|
I would be a perfect candidate but I don't know asterisk, sounds like your tryings to get a voip system going or something.... I hope to see success!
|
|
|
|
I'm selling adspace that is 1000 px by 400 px in size(blue box in image below) and the image size is at 300px by 300px(approximate. shown in red box image below). You get a long product description to fill out(around 550 characters) and a nice huge heading(green box below). The image and the header are linkable to any url of your choosing. Here is a screenshot of google analytics - Stats from Aug 16th to Sep 15 Only 0.3 BTC/per day. Contact me by PM, We'll get to business. Website link: Cheaper In Bitcoins . com
|
|
|
|
+1 well said sir. YTMND of the week! Just my humor opinion, reading from your posts, both are experts technically and also in entrepreneurship. Look at the popularity of Solidcoin when it was first launched. Why not join forces and give us a tamper proof new generation Solidcoin instead at being at odds which each other?  Because I want a true open source system run by the community and he wants a coin he controls, scams and is the central authority of. You are not "the community". You are a Troll, willing to destroy what other people created with their hard work. Also you are trying to take Control over SolidCoin - its not yours and you will Fail. The Heart of the Solidcoin community is #solidcoin at freenode - you are not welcome there, everybody hates you. Oh come on - where is this hard work? Seriously where is it? And ... here's something new for you too look up: "Open Source" There really isn't much effort involved in bug fixing the bitcoin software especially when you know exactly what the bug is. Come on, this place is full of programmers, if you aren't one yourself you really need to stop making a fool of yourself by praising something false. Also, it's hard to be against BCX in this argument when he is the one advocating what Bitcoin is all about and CoinHunter is totally against the Bitcoin community. ... and that is a statement of fact, no fallacy at all - he is against the Bitcoin community. At least understand what Bitcoin is about - coz it IS about open source and decentralisation and CoinHunter is CLEARLY against that. Which is also why I think you SolidCoin votaries (yes I chose that word specifically) should just leave and go praise your God in your own forum. |
|
|
|
Thanks for that link ill be sure to use it!  |
|
|
|
|
Exactly, one difference is that it wouldnt make things realistic if high amounts of volume start showing up so im wondering i should just run a joke exchange but witb low amounts of BTC. Like a maximum of 1btc to go in per day just so people know its not "too serious" as far as trading goes.
Bitcoins will be stored in an offline wallet to prevent theft and can be widthdrawn in a day at most.(thats if everyone likes the idea of playing with a couple btc for laughs.
I practically already have secure software already built, I was going to use it for a joint project but I decided to call it off so I'm trying to recycle some of my hard security work to at least some good use then to just delete it all.
|
|
|
|
|
Been working on something on the side that a coin 2 coin exchange simulation. I figure it would give traders and non traders a fun game to entertain them selves with.
My goal is to make it as accurate as possible, and scince it will be a joke exchange i can play with features and possibly inspire exchanges to adapt the features.
I dot know how adding fake funds will work dosent really make sense yet.
I could give new traders to start off with 100fakecoins but then the market can be controlled by those who sign up with multiple accounts and then just cross trade with potentially unlimited funds.
So idk may what i could do is make 1 btc = 100btc in the exchange then everyome can pretend their rich.
Of course if i went this route i would have l btc get sent to an offline address to prevent theft.
Any thoughts? Concerns? Suggestions?
|
|
|
|
damn that turtle one looked painstakingly long to make
it looks far less complicated when you click quote and view it in plain text LOL i should have thought that but your right its soo simple! |
|
|
|
|
I like this idea. No ideas come to mind yet
I'll think of somethin....
or ad a couple gigahashes maybe....
|
|
|
|
So to start off I'm selling this mother board which is on location and can be sent within 3 days(This three day limitation is because the banks takes forever to accept wire transfers). After I get the funds, I will query supplier to ship out and is always shipped out same day and directly to the customer. GA-990FXA-UD3 By Gigabyte Branded By Gigabyte Quantity: 64 Weight: 3.4 LB Sku #: GA990FXAUD3 Current price is: 33.29 BTC @ $4.98/Bitcoins. PM me for any more questions about this product or any other product you see or contact us through the Customer Support or through the toll free number located at the bottom of the website. For all sales go through our SSL encrypted connection over here: https://cheaperinbitcoins.com/product.php?productId=2574For international shipping, put your shipping address in the customer comments when you are checking out. Pay the amount of the purchase, and when the system alerts me that a payment has been made I will see the customer comments and see that you want international shipping, I will then take the specs provided to me from my supplier and calculate shipping cost, which i will then update the total amount owed on the invoice. Note: during this phase the customer BTC funds are not moved and is still eligible for a refund if they think the shipping is too much. If the customer agrees with the new amount they can pay it and i will ship off to address or they can cancel. International shipping will take much longer and can expect the over all international shipping process to take up to 2 weeks. Domestic USA shipping however should only take 2-3 days after BTC has been confirmed, this estimated time isn't accounting for the 2-3 day wait for funds to be wire transferred. In the future I will have a business line of credit so i don't have to solely rely on wire transfers and am pushing to get approved, when this happens the 2-3 day wait time will be ill-relevant but until I have something realsolid to show them(pun in tended!) we will all just have to wait.
Note: I no longer will be selling items which are required to be sent to my business address then resent to the customer(mostly the currently advertised video cards and some in the videocard section) for now on I will only sell things where I am allow me to directly send to the customer. All this will be transparent to you the customer, except you will how ever notice your packages coming sooner. I will be adding more video cards to replace the ones I'm removing. |
|
|
|
Honestly i like how things are in the off-topic sections... not too serious... not too funny.... keeps me entertained and its hard to troll in this section Am i rite? |
|
|
|
|
I just had some weird things happen to my account, and now I am awaiting for their side of the story to figure this out. Apparently their US banker made a mistake, uhh well i wont go into details but its kind of sucks for them.....
|
|
|
|
|
This is a great idea... i wonder why no body has done this before? maybe its too expensive to do? maybe nobody wants to take on the embarrassment of failing in front of the whole community? any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate! Can't wait to for them to arrive so I can post them all over town!
|
|
|
|
Apparently my posted images were not showing up about a page back so I'm reposting to see if it works here is what mine looked like the day i got'em (all minted in individual baggies, at least their were no finger prints until i touched one is what i mean by minted) I hope this image works this time:  |
|
|
|
You have been praised.
+1 Everyone head on over to https://cheaperinbitcoins.com to purchase things that are near competing prices of amazon and other popular websites like newegg. You can see some already successfully shipped and purchased items over at the https://cheaperinbitcoins.com/daemon page which will show some interesting stats of the site as well. We are also listed as a fallback node. As a fall back node as we are an always on node which will always choose the longest valid block chain. Be wherry of the cancer nodes! Solution to cancer nodes connect to more safe nodes! https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses#Cancer_nodes |
|
|
|
|
damn that turtle one looked painstakingly long to make
|
|
|
|
You can only hash one user at a time if you operate under the constraints you've outlined.
Right. Because there's a salt, so rainbow table attacks are prevented. You said: Gat3way detailed it fairly well, which explains why salts (when properly implemented) offer some protection against bruteforcing and, as you correctly stated, rainbow tables. However, a properly implemented salt system increases the compute requirement for bruceforcing dramatically, slowing own the bruteforce by a factor inversely proportional to the complexity of the salt. So you're saying that salts are helpful against attacks that do not use rainbow-table-like attacks. That is, you're saying that an attacker trying to reverse a single hash without looking at other hashes (a brute-force attack as opposed to a rainbow table attack) is worse off when there is a known salt present. This is false. In almost all password systems, salts are less than 32 characters, which does not make brute-forcing of a single hash any slower. If you're trying to slow down brute-forcing, you typically increase the number of hash iterations, which doesn't require you to store more data. To everyone that thought i didn't know anything about salts.... Didn't I just say something this earlier about a page back? But "noooo!!!" everyone was just thinking I was just putting sea-salt on meh hardware encryption function. LOL Theymos YTMND |
|
|
|
Funny i was just thinking about this the other day... about making a poster to post up all over town on every store bulletin. I realised I couldn't explain well but the one we have made by "The Joint" (I believe) was excellent. Can't wait till the pdf comes out to print out and post up all over town! |
|
|
|
Came back to say: Now that I have a pretty good feel for how things will operate and the flow of it all, It seems after any order it will take 2-3 days for money to transfer to bank account, after that it takes 1 more day for bank to approve. Then I send money to my supplier(s) and they will ship it same day or the day after. My personal credit limit is lower then orders I'm getting so that was an issue but I have raised it to get orders out faster. Getting a Business line of credit so me and my customers wont have to wait the 2-3 day period for bank transfers. Once the bank clears my line of credit all orders will be next-day(if not same day) shipped. Thanks everyone for helping me get my service into gear by being supportive! I will be sure to keep pushing my business further! Selling X68 XL-ATX Assasin  Total PCI-E slots: 6 SKU #:GAG1ASSASSIN For only 72.26 BTC! If your weary of purchasing from me, Might I recommend purchasing something small to "test the waters?" Lots of people already are purchasing keyboards/mouse combos to test out my service! Call my toll free number if you need help with anything or If I'm messing up you can call and bitch me out: +1 (877)563-0721 I don't care what you do just tell everyone about bitcoins! and how they can prevent identity theft! |
|
|
|
My theory was that if someone were to set a static salt in a file and the attacker only downloaded the database it would render useless(this only works if the salt length is of a long length such as 64characters long mininum).
Thats just my thoery, any great ideas on protecting your self bruteforcing for this particular situatiom?
Not that good idea. This all lies on the assumption that the attacker would not be able to access the filesystem which is not necessarily the case. Depending on configuration, the user might be able to read arbitrary files using e.g mysql's LOAD_FILE(). The forum software might have other attack vectors like LFI that would allow reading the file. The salt file should be outside the document root but that would break some (already inefficient) security mechanisms like open_basedir. Short enough salts would fall victim to simple attacks (like registering an user with a single-character password then bruteforcing to obtain the salt). But what's worst - you'd have a single salt for all the passwords that way. This is enough to thwart rainbow table attacks if salt is long enough (even 10 bytes of salt is enough to render readily available tables useless). But there is also another huge advantage of using salts which you are losing by using a single common salt. You turn the complexity of a hash crack attack from (nearly) O(1) to O(N) where N is the number of passwords. That's because if all passwords have the same salt, you do: 1) hash = H(salt,password) 2) compare hash to all the hashes in the list. overall that's one compute-intensive operation per candidate if you have many salts, you need to do the following: for each hash K in the list do: 1) hash = H(salt, password) 2) compare hash to K overall that's N compute-intensive operations per candidate where N=number of users. So yes, it might be a good idea if you can guarantee that the attacker would never get the salt. Once it gets it though, you lose a great deal of the time that password hashing buys you prior to your hacker obtains your password. For a forum of 1000 users, cracking the passwords using a single common salt would be up to 1000 times faster than cracking 1000 passwords with different salts. Finally someone with an intelligent answer to salts. This makes perfect sense. I do however don't think that using the username as a salt helps scince the attacker would already know that the forum is salted with usernames..so wouldn't they just point their brutforcing problem to query for the username first before the bruteforce attempt? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
