My new CLAM trading tool Swap is starting to get a decent bankroll. This allows users to buy and sell CLAMS for Bitcoin and other altcoins. We've completed over 420 trades today! I think our "checkout" process is the best in the game... it's even better than Dominos Pizza's checkout. (here is a 1.5 minute video if you want to watch before trying: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AJ2wNgfkR0)
|
|
|
I'll talk to X about possible investor graphs!
Thanks for the feedback <3
We are at 8.61% profit right now on the Bitcoin Rockets, but our wagered is still pretty low (1.52 BTC wagered). Math says that someone is due to win some coinage, but who knows!!!!! It's kind of exciting.
The nice thing is that you can withdraw whenever you want and you didn't lose money with a dilution fee just from playing with us!
Yeah, that's what I could gather from the manually posted stats (and what's visible topline of the site) - a historical graph (or even just a simple monthly table) would probably do a lot more to attract investors. Nothing like a 2-second visual representation. Low wager and quite a high return, though I suppose the 1/32 bust chance has a hand in it. It's quite decently low house edge for bets below 2x, given that the crypto dice "industry" standard's about 1%. 1:36 bust
|
|
|
iam not getting the faucet claim to just-dice
i go to just dice , then click on account: Your user ID is 2540452.
then i enter the user id "2540452" on your faucet and press submit. But my balance is still zero on just-dice
regards
Are you sure you don't have auto-invest turned on your account? I just tested it myself and it worked fine. Balance 0.00365972 CLAM turned into 0.00415972 CLAM.
|
|
|
I can buy anything you want with cash.
Fast and easy. Purchased with cash by myself and receipts proved for all purchases!
Hold it, spend it, whatever!
I can mail the physical cards as well for a $7 fee.
Load costs deducted from the amount of BTC sent. (Example: You send $500 worth of BTC, you'd get a $496.05 card because of the $3.95)
Post or PM
|
|
|
Can't hurt having another one of you to add to the band of merry little open source games. Looks like you've been around for a while too, so welcome back to "the space"!
Might suggest you add a sort of automated graph that updates every Sunday. Tried to look at the manual updates on commissions, but can't immediately tell which months have been profitable (I think they all have been). The site itself seems to show almost 10% profits (since November?).
I'll talk to X about possible investor graphs! Thanks for the feedback <3 We are at 8.61% profit right now on the Bitcoin Rockets, but our wagered is still pretty low (1.52 BTC wagered). Math says that someone is due to win some coinage, but who knows!!!!! It's kind of exciting. The nice thing is that you can withdraw whenever you want and you didn't lose money with a dilution fee just from playing with us!
|
|
|
Only thing I would say, my investment hasn't moved a single satoshi, neither profit or loss. Maybe I don't understand how it works?
It's 100% based on how players play. Watch the wagered amount too. That's the key really. Right now we are doing $0 in marketing... besides what we give away on our faucet. Hopefully, in the future, we can afford to do a bit of advertising and such. One way you can help your investment is by using your signature here on Bitcointalk. Slowly but surely.
|
|
|
but you need to behave a bit more decently if you wish to attract more investors in my opinion.
I'm not running for President or trying to be the next Pope. Everything I said was true from my point of view/experience. I probably could have sugarcoated it a bit, but I did say "no offense" though! I'll go to the moon and back for our people. Plus I'll work my fingers to the bone to be #1. That's why you should invest... not because I don't sugarcoat my opinion on things I've been watching for years / personally have dealt with. Devan didn't list us on their free marketing page while we completed open sourcing our site. Which we appreciate (I guess). It seems like they pick and choose what plebs have to follow their licenses... The vibe I got from it was like a patent trolls vs looking for actual people to contribute to the code and I personally really don't care for that (this falls in that "everything in between" range I spoke of).
|
|
|
The game is like on bustabit, but with original design of a rocket flying up. Kind of reminds me of altcoins mooning It's sad that the faucet only provides money for one bet, it doesn't give much of the taste... But it's a good thing that the faucet is at least there. I agree with others that it would be a lot easier to type the username to claim the wallet, rather then enter the chat discussion only to see the ID. Apart from that, I think that the website could be more user-friendly. To start playing, you first go to the faucet, then learn that you need to learn your user id, afterwards you go to the game and even if you know you should be looking for the chat, you have to guess that you should attempt to play the game by pushing the relevant button to even see it. Good luck! Do you even need to test the site again since the base code refer to bustabit?i do not think their v1 code really that bad to let people use it for fraud or anything. So I think they only put it there because of the standard procedure. For bustabit code, I think what they really change is about the design because I saw many similar site never have anything wrong system with them so this kind of site will not do anything bad either but again marketing problem to get new players is a core to team The bustabit open source we used was trash. I think most of Bustabit is trash tbh (no offense)... everything from their name to their dilution fee and almost everything in between. We are a much better site for investors IMO, most players don't care about house edge vs "getting lucky" (1:36 is damn decent IMO) and that is why I created this website because I thought "if bustabit can make money being managed so poorly and their shady site "sales"... this should be a cakewalk." (Which it has been a cakewalk thus far, we spend $0 dollars on marketing and we are seeing steady growth with players/investors) We need more investments in order to attract more players... we are slowly and steadily growing. We have over 2 BTC and 1,800 CLAMS invested. Our bankroll is growing daily... slowly, but surely!
|
|
|
All statements about the breach are coming from the CEO i guess. I dont know who is manage the Twitter , but guess someone of the Support / Staff Team ! Dosnt matter from who it comes , if the post is on the Cryptopia Twitter its an offical post.
You should probably stfu if you don't actually know.
|
|
|
We missed commission this weekend due to me being busy IRL.
This doesn't hurt nor help anyone and we will continue with the commission on Sunday this week.
Other news: Our Bitcoin bankroll is over 2 BTC now!
|
|
|
Any update on the new client, specifically the syncing issue? Mine was 18 days behind and after 8 hours it's still struggling to sync: ORPHAN BLOCK 751 For those who run the client 24/7 this is never a problem, but for everyone else..... The new wallet syncing MUCH faster. It's still being worked on day by day. We need more people contributing and helping. The github link is somewhere above and for people that are serious about helping... dooglus has a discord for developers and contributors we can invite folks into.
|
|
|
Awesome news! I was just going to try and go in today to look at the bankroll and invest something small, I remember the balance is not big but already in profit. No harm to spread some spare money around to try and diversify right?
That's right! Also, you don't need to deposit in order to try out the invest features... the faucet hits invest too. BTW the link you gave, if you are not logged in, it asks you to login. But if you click on the login link, then there is "404 not found" error. The URL of login: https://freebitcoins.com/login - needs to be updated Also, I keep getting popup error of "game in progress". Even though I click when game is starting countdown. Ahhh good eye on the 404! We'll check out that Game in progress and see if we can recreate it. Are you running a bot as well or anything funky?
|
|
|
please don't set high limits like other gambling sites.
That's the goal for sure. I think it's important to be functional for the little stuff because that builds user confidence in the website. We want people to have a good free option for having fun and killing time.
|
|
|
Bump!
Offers/trades are always considered!
Don't be shy <3
|
|
|
My suggestion will be about adding more coins(ETH) for swap,there are only 3 listed altcoin DGB,DOGE,XMR.
ETH is next on the chopping block for sure. Hopefully by next week I'd guess.
|
|
|
My user ID: 5176. When can we start investing? You already can https://freebitcoins.com/games/rockets/investWe even allow you to test the investing with faucet amounts as well, so no deposits required! I hope this will bring additional entertainment to us.
We will have more games moving forward! I'm thinking Blackjack, then Monopoly that is PvP / fair by math (I really miss sharking around on that one site that had monopoly, but they never did it "right"), and possibly Bitcoin dice somewhere in the middle... just cause. Slowly but surely.
|
|
|
Easy signup, but should make username also valid for claims (instead of only UID) because that's far easier to remember. A little confused though, is this all the same as luckygames and just-dice? I see them at the faucet page but have only claimed BTC so far.
This is on the to-do list. Right now our game + just-dice require a User ID #. Our game will eventually allow usernames, but Just-Dice will always be a User ID #. LuckyGames.co faucet uses usernames though. Also, Monero is spelt wrong So it was... it's fixed now! Thank you very much! If you let me know your user ID on the Rocket game, I'll send you a tip. Thank you SO much for the feedback. We need all the help we can get at this point.
|
|
|
Bitcoin withdraw fees lowered to 0.0001!
Good luck <3
|
|
|
"Creators of Dicing"? Primedice did not create dicing... not even remotely(?) Compared to:
|
|
|
|