|
i wanna give my money away ASAP
can u extend the ico to at least 5K btc so ill be able to throw 200K usd on it
|
|
|
|
Bobsurplus in? Scam 100%  Could someone explain me why everyone thinks BobSurplus is a scammer ? The only thing I know is that he is a whale. Im a scammer because I pumped a coin or two in my day and these guys just got in at the end and are rekt buthurt trolls. say it aloud wankey, i dont get wut u're attempting. u gonna pretend to be a clean-handed man? go better hang urself on a wooden bar, overgrown malasian coot, u r spammin this sickass viral scam toooooo damn hard to be forgiven in this lifetime by ur boyfriend for lack of attention. u r homo |
|
|
|
Viral "Twitter Nodes" technically a botnet. Twitter will shut it down. Just a heads up.
Twitter will close this fuck soon or late, and all the fucked herd followed by so much exited 10 yo trollbox blindos will be biting elbows and blaming on lies that make them realize truth. |
|
|
|
Dev understood that if he procrastinate more, the price will drop below 75%, so he launched the mining urgently . Don't think this will help though. Sad to tell that, but this Dev does not listen to community, better to say - he just ignores it, being driven only by greed  The price was almost 2000 sat (at the border of the C-Cex trigger for the second buy wall). lol u smartass doe sucker pull ur fuckin eyes out ur chocolate ass and look at the last candle : ATL is being at 2002 mark which shows respectively the drop in value 74.975%according to the ico rules the remaining funds must be used to support the concerted exit price ~~ 8K : if sell orders price fall more than 75% of the original ICO price, during the initial 5 day ICO fund holding period, a full buy wall will be set for 2 more days at the initial ICO price the ICO funds will continue to be frozen during this two day extension whats the issue with dat support wall? they havent yet placed the 8btc wall so whats the business in here? It would have to go to 2000 sats, it never did. 74.xx is not 75. Good lord you are a dumb fuck. Can't use language or math. ur mouth needs to hardly nailed right now homie, watch ur language until i put my dick inside. I bet u r the smartest student evah who achieved fuckin grade A in all disciplines and about to be awarded an academic qualification! look, fag what i'm saying is: ATL is being at 2002 mark which shows respectively the drop in value 74.975%
u commenting like so: 74.xx is not 75
fuck ur mouth, u really came up with a brilliant post which is example of ur exceptional intellectual power! so 74.975 is not 75 really i do really believe that 0.025% spread is indeed the only reason that makes my post worth replyingTo make you stop talking about it, i have put a buywall of 1.30BTC, so please dump on me before tomorrow so that i can remove my buywall dump a few below 2000sats and make 300% profit, so please dump. Nope. What u've put up ur hole is not a buy wall. It is an asscork. I don't really care what you say or don't see... if people dump enough then i can make it drop below 2000sats and then i will profit out when C-CEX put the other 50% in buywall  If u going to drop it below 2000 sats, pm me, we'll together work out a deal. |
|
|
|
bought some more of this coin. I just dumped my Viral in worries that the "Twitter Nodes" will be considered a botnet and get shut down.
good boy. go get a chunk of KTK now. |
|
|
|
Dev understood that if he procrastinate more, the price will drop below 75%, so he launched the mining urgently . Don't think this will help though. Sad to tell that, but this Dev does not listen to community, better to say - he just ignores it, being driven only by greed The price was almost 2000 sat (at the border of the C-Cex trigger for the second buy wall). lol u smartass doe sucker pull ur fuckin eyes out ur chocolate ass and look at the last candle : ATL is being at 2002 mark which shows respectively the drop in value 74.975%according to the ico rules the remaining funds must be used to support the concerted exit price ~~ 8K : if sell orders price fall more than 75% of the original ICO price, during the initial 5 day ICO fund holding period, a full buy wall will be set for 2 more days at the initial ICO price the ICO funds will continue to be frozen during this two day extension whats the issue with dat support wall? they havent yet placed the 8btc wall so whats the business in here? It would have to go to 2000 sats, it never did. 74.xx is not 75. Good lord you are a dumb fuck. Can't use language or math. ur mouth needs to hardly nailed right now homie, watch ur language until i put my dick inside. I bet u r the smartest student evah who achieved fuckin grade A in all disciplines and about to be awarded an academic qualification! look, fag what i'm saying is: ATL is being at 2002 mark which shows respectively the drop in value 74.975%
u commenting like so: 74.xx is not 75
fuck ur mouth, u really came up with a brilliant post which is example of ur exceptional intellectual power! so 74.975 is not 75 really i do really believe that 0.025% spread is indeed the only reason that makes my post worth replyingTo make you stop talking about it, i have put a buywall of 1.30BTC, so please dump on me before tomorrow so that i can remove my buywall dump a few below 2000sats and make 300% profit, so please dump. Nope. What u've put up ur hole is not a buy wall. It is an asscork. |
|
|
|
|
buying KTK off the market pm me with ur offers
|
|
|
|
im a slut dildoeater and im unable to spell
hey motherfucker whats up with ur calculations huh |
|
|
|
Dev understood that if he procrastinate more, the price will drop below 75%, so he launched the mining urgently . Don't think this will help though. Sad to tell that, but this Dev does not listen to community, better to say - he just ignores it, being driven only by greed The price was almost 2000 sat (at the border of the C-Cex trigger for the second buy wall). lol u smartass doe sucker pull ur fuckin eyes out ur chocolate ass and look at the last candle : ATL is being at 2002 mark which shows respectively the drop in value 74.975%according to the ico rules the remaining funds must be used to support the concerted exit price ~~ 8K : if sell orders price fall more than 75% of the original ICO price, during the initial 5 day ICO fund holding period, a full buy wall will be set for 2 more days at the initial ICO price the ICO funds will continue to be frozen during this two day extension whats the issue with dat support wall? they havent yet placed the 8btc wall so whats the business in here? It would have to go to 2000 sats, it never did. 74.xx is not 75. Good lord you are a dumb fuck. Can't use language or math. ur mouth needs to hardly nailed right now homie, watch ur language until i put my dick inside. I bet u r the smartest student evah who achieved fuckin grade A in all disciplines and about to be awarded an academic qualification! look, fag what i'm saying is: ATL is being at 2002 mark which shows respectively the drop in value 74.975%
u commenting like so: 74.xx is not 75
fuck ur mouth, u really came up with a brilliant post which is example of ur exceptional intellectual power! so 74.975 is not 75 really i do really believe that 0.025% spread is indeed the only reason that makes my post worth replying |
|
|
|
Dev understood that if he procrastinate more, the price will drop below 75%, so he launched the mining urgently . Don't think this will help though. Sad to tell that, but this Dev does not listen to community, better to say - he just ignores it, being driven only by greed The price was almost 2000 sat (at the border of the C-Cex trigger for the second buy wall). lol u smartass doe sucker pull ur fuckin eyes out ur chocolate ass and look at the last candle : ATL is being at 2002 mark which shows respectively the drop in value 74.975%according to the ico rules the remaining funds must be used to support the concerted exit price ~~ 8K : if sell orders price fall more than 75% of the original ICO price, during the initial 5 day ICO fund holding period, a full buy wall will be set for 2 more days at the initial ICO price the ICO funds will continue to be frozen during this two day extension whats the issue with dat support wall? they havent yet placed the 8btc wall so whats the business in here? |
|
|
|
Ok. If the coins were purchased on the market with ICO funds i can give about 0 fucks on how it is dealt with. Ya so they bought up a bunch of coins. This means the developer is interested in the coin and has invested their earnings into it. I dont really see what the fucking problem is.
Dont listen to the sheeple.
well the tipping point is its all build up on 'trust' in one anon idiot who controls a centralized site i don' much care that but wut gonna happen if he turns it off? wut happens then? theres no fucking infrastructure of any sort over this shitcoin which it can be related to, and theres no benefits unless add & sell offer hosting on a centralized site he turns it down, wut next? |
|
|
|
I am really sorry that my suggestion was faced so much misunderstanding, and the only one who supported that, is a dirty talking moron, such as logictense I would sincerely suggest not to listen placebo, as he is a person who participated in and promoted so much scam, like no-one else. I can respect him as a clever person, but he is the one who will dump the shitload of coins on you, then tell "I had a nice profit, why didn't you  ". Anyway, folks, lets understand one simple thing. This Dev has now 50% of the supply. He doesn't want to part with those coins, and and even worse, he wants to sell it now at price much lower than first ICO. This way he solves his own problems, and screws all his investors. I would never trust a person who starts his project that way - by screwing up his first and true supporters. That's is immoral at least. All we now understand that burning all the coins is not the best option, as in that case the Devs will be left without anything, and will just easily abandon the project, leaving everybody with worthless coins. But leave 50% of the supply to Dev (irresponsible Dev who publicly wants to dump them at 5000/8000 = 62.5% of the ICO cost, will be stupid and the investors are doomed. I would suggest either to burn at least 90% of the dumped coins, or hire an escrow and give the coins to him. I do not trust this Dev anymore. he should prove he is legit. lol u r getting pretty hilarious in here u dumb cunt motherfucker fat chick, now listen to me: cryptofocus don't care ur suggestions at all wut he minds is to blast the current prices with 130K inflow placed at 5K satoshi which would dead sure tarnish this fucking shit right to the inner core a POLL would do the job : if the voting ends up with keeping the dumped coins unbreakable then the wall must be placed at the ATL price level |
|
|
|
I'll try to explain what I suggested above.
To summarize what we have here: there are two facts we need to make note of:
Fact 1. This ICO was not what everyone was stating ("Real honest ICO with no whales and only real investors putting money in"). A big manipulator was in, not sure was it Dev or some unrelated third party. In any case at least the half of the coins were sold to not real investor.
Fact 2. Now DEv has too many coins in his hands. It is at least half of the ICO coins, and if 50% of the whole supply. Even after mining phase it will go down to 29.4% - a huge "pre-mine", allowing a nice dump.
So thats some more reasons why I suggest to burn those coins (dumped 50% of ICO). Apart from other benefits, in my eyes this will 100% ensure the malicious one is not the Dev.
You want them to burn the coins they bought with the money they raised from the ICO? They only raise like 20 BTC from the ICO and now you want them to throw away half of it? Get real man. Also your "Fact 1" is not at all a fact, it is just what you suspect. So how about you call it what it is. Look at viral, see how people dumped below the ICO price right off the bat? It's pretty normal. People get impatient and realize they need BTC now, or see something where they think they can invest their BTC in for a quick profit and then come right back with more BTC (having made much more than they lost in fees). If you want the devs to continue development of the coin, they will need funds or incentive to do so. They didn't raise all that much in the ICO, but if they have a lot of the coin itself then they have a lot of incentive to keep working on the coin. If they could set up an address viewable and audit-able to the public for the coins they bought back and use it as a development fund, I think that would be best for all parties involved. It looks like our opinions are 180 degree opposite in every topic. I don't get your point of view, the same way you don't get mine. I hope you are not actually the one who bought those coins, then dumped them, trying to manipulate. I suspect you are, though. Yes I want them to burn the coins they bought back, because 1. They did not spend any money on those coins. Did not want those coins. These coins are same if they were not sold at all. Why those coins should not be burned the same way as all other unsold coins? REAL ICO was 50% less, than it seemed, let's just face it. 2. It is dangerous for Dev to have so many coin. What do we tell, when we see "no ICO" normal coin with 30% pre-mine? Don't everybody tell "WTF!!!???" and stay away? Such big premine offers a great dump. I would be interested on what other community members think (except you and maybe placebo, as his opinion is predictable). What dev thinks? Why everybody is so silent. All this is too suspicious. You are the one who is trying to make the devs change their plans to please yourself and your agenda (although I honestly don't think what you are saying is the best for you or me, as I imagine we are in similar positions), and it's not the first time. I'm not going to reply to those two points because they are just restatements of your previous message which I already responded to, you just repeated your previous points... and I don't feel like going in a circle with you. And no, I am not the person who is trying to manipulate the coin, and the fact that you think I am proves (to me personally, at least) that what you think is going on here is wrong. So, yes. Let's see what the community thinks and, most importantly, the devs. absolutely agree with that, dumped coins MUST be burned otherwise that would be nearly impossible to trust this coin having such a fucked distribution WTF, so much BULLSHIT talk here.... the only way to get FCS in the picture is to let DEVs us those coins to promote the coin, burning the coins will be the most ridicules move that they can do. How will they continue supporting the project? With burned coins? I have saw some ridicules posts in the past but this one is the biggest one that i have ever read. u have the IQ of mustard crust, and thats me being generous, to prevent severe retardation in the future ur account deserves to be wiped out of the forum, u are the epitome of a Dumb Fuck if there has been immense dump movements these coins should be treated as utilized as ultimately they haven't been ever bought do u understand this? I'll try to explain what I suggested above.
To summarize what we have here: there are two facts we need to make note of:
Fact 1. This ICO was not what everyone was stating ("Real honest ICO with no whales and only real investors putting money in"). A big manipulator was in, not sure was it Dev or some unrelated third party. In any case at least the half of the coins were sold to not real investor.
Fact 2. Now DEv has too many coins in his hands. It is at least half of the ICO coins, and if 50% of the whole supply. Even after mining phase it will go down to 29.4% - a huge "pre-mine", allowing a nice dump.
So thats some more reasons why I suggest to burn those coins (dumped 50% of ICO). Apart from other benefits, in my eyes this will 100% ensure the malicious one is not the Dev.
You want them to burn the coins they bought with the money they raised from the ICO? They only raise like 20 BTC from the ICO and now you want them to throw away half of it? Get real man. Also your "Fact 1" is not at all a fact, it is just what you suspect. So how about you call it what it is. Look at viral, see how people dumped below the ICO price right off the bat? It's pretty normal. People get impatient and realize they need BTC now, or see something where they think they can invest their BTC in for a quick profit and then come right back with more BTC (having made much more than they lost in fees). If you want the devs to continue development of the coin, they will need funds or incentive to do so. They didn't raise all that much in the ICO, but if they have a lot of the coin itself then they have a lot of incentive to keep working on the coin. If they could set up an address viewable and audit-able to the public for the coins they bought back and use it as a development fund, I think that would be best for all parties involved. It looks like our opinions are 180 degree opposite in every topic. I don't get your point of view, the same way you don't get mine. I hope you are not actually the one who bought those coins, then dumped them, trying to manipulate. I suspect you are, though. Yes I want them to burn the coins they bought back, because 1. They did not spend any money on those coins. Did not want those coins. These coins are same if they were not sold at all. Why those coins should not be burned the same way as all other unsold coins? REAL ICO was 50% less, than it seemed, let's just face it. 2. It is dangerous for Dev to have so many coin. What do we tell, when we see "no ICO" normal coin with 30% pre-mine? Don't everybody tell "WTF!!!???" and stay away? Such big premine offers a great dump. I would be interested on what other community members think (except you and maybe placebo, as his opinion is predictable). What dev thinks? Why everybody is so silent. All this is too suspicious. You are the one who is trying to make the devs change their plans to please yourself and your agenda (although I honestly don't think what you are saying is the best for you or me, as I imagine we are in similar positions), and it's not the first time. I'm not going to reply to those two points because they are just restatements of your previous message which I already responded to, you just repeated your previous points... and I don't feel like going in a circle with you. And no, I am not the person who is trying to manipulate the coin, and the fact that you think I am proves (to me personally, at least) that what you think is going on here is wrong. So, yes. Let's see what the community thinks and, most importantly, the devs. absolutely agree with that, dumped coins MUST be burned otherwise that would be nearly impossible to trust this coin having such a fucked distribution Dumped coins will NOT BE BURNED. It is not part of C-CEX rules and it is also not good for the future of the coin. What will be the result of destroying those coins? Yes, a nice wonderful pump and dumped and then coin dead as there is no budget to continue working on the coin, so burning coins will be NO!!! Option 1 : The dumped coins will be put on sale on the exchange again with a lower price target (most likely 5000 sats). This will give the team the possibility to increase our BTC stake to continue paying our Indian resources. Option 2: The dumped coins will be put on sale on the exchange again with a lower price target (most likely 5000 sats), but 10% will be used for promoting the coin. If one of those options is not interesting for you, then you have a third option by crashing the price 75% lower then ICO price, and then C-CEX has to put the remaining BTCs at 8000 sats and people will be able to get their money back at 8000sats and this will result in a net lose of -12 BTC for FCS and most likely some lose of people that bought the ICO in at 8000 sats @ CryptoFocus think well whats going to happen when u open the next ico session, 130K at 5K sats will undoubtedly hasten downfall of this coin which is being the biggest bullshit in the cryptospace over the past few icos and if u push the dumped coins at sale this is gonna be much more serious issue for those of the higher price purchasers whose investments u're leading into fucking skid and im fucking have to respectively decline ur reputation then coz that is patently absrd what u gonna do when the new wall gets eaten and then half of it held up at 5K crashes again? fuck would u place the dumped remains at 2500 then? |
|
|
|
I'll try to explain what I suggested above.
To summarize what we have here: there are two facts we need to make note of:
Fact 1. This ICO was not what everyone was stating ("Real honest ICO with no whales and only real investors putting money in"). A big manipulator was in, not sure was it Dev or some unrelated third party. In any case at least the half of the coins were sold to not real investor.
Fact 2. Now DEv has too many coins in his hands. It is at least half of the ICO coins, and if 50% of the whole supply. Even after mining phase it will go down to 29.4% - a huge "pre-mine", allowing a nice dump.
So thats some more reasons why I suggest to burn those coins (dumped 50% of ICO). Apart from other benefits, in my eyes this will 100% ensure the malicious one is not the Dev.
You want them to burn the coins they bought with the money they raised from the ICO? They only raise like 20 BTC from the ICO and now you want them to throw away half of it? Get real man. Also your "Fact 1" is not at all a fact, it is just what you suspect. So how about you call it what it is. Look at viral, see how people dumped below the ICO price right off the bat? It's pretty normal. People get impatient and realize they need BTC now, or see something where they think they can invest their BTC in for a quick profit and then come right back with more BTC (having made much more than they lost in fees). If you want the devs to continue development of the coin, they will need funds or incentive to do so. They didn't raise all that much in the ICO, but if they have a lot of the coin itself then they have a lot of incentive to keep working on the coin. If they could set up an address viewable and audit-able to the public for the coins they bought back and use it as a development fund, I think that would be best for all parties involved. It looks like our opinions are 180 degree opposite in every topic. I don't get your point of view, the same way you don't get mine. I hope you are not actually the one who bought those coins, then dumped them, trying to manipulate. I suspect you are, though. Yes I want them to burn the coins they bought back, because 1. They did not spend any money on those coins. Did not want those coins. These coins are same if they were not sold at all. Why those coins should not be burned the same way as all other unsold coins? REAL ICO was 50% less, than it seemed, let's just face it. 2. It is dangerous for Dev to have so many coin. What do we tell, when we see "no ICO" normal coin with 30% pre-mine? Don't everybody tell "WTF!!!???" and stay away? Such big premine offers a great dump. I would be interested on what other community members think (except you and maybe placebo, as his opinion is predictable). What dev thinks? Why everybody is so silent. All this is too suspicious. You are the one who is trying to make the devs change their plans to please yourself and your agenda (although I honestly don't think what you are saying is the best for you or me, as I imagine we are in similar positions), and it's not the first time. I'm not going to reply to those two points because they are just restatements of your previous message which I already responded to, you just repeated your previous points... and I don't feel like going in a circle with you. And no, I am not the person who is trying to manipulate the coin, and the fact that you think I am proves (to me personally, at least) that what you think is going on here is wrong. So, yes. Let's see what the community thinks and, most importantly, the devs. absolutely agree with that, dumped coins MUST be burned otherwise that would be nearly impossible to trust this coin having such a fucked distribution |
|
|
|
I still don't think you understand what you are really asking though. You want the devs to burn all those coins, leaving them with less than 3000 USD from the ICO to continue long-term development of the coin while simultaneously taking away their long-term monetary incentive or vested interest in the coin- and you expect that will be best for the longevity of this coin. Lol. Best for short-term spike in price aka pump and dump? Yes. Anything past that? No.
u fucking idiot wtf r u even chatting in here? drays made a valid point saying the portion of dumped coins should be burned given its fucking everyone's vested interest as to expect 40% total supply rebate and assure a pretty safe increment on the investment when thing turns out to be a nice rare coin. if the selloff continues to run there would be a good chance to cut off the supply with the remaining 8 btc provided the price shrinks to 2000K which would effect in a 75% value drop as stated in the ico rules: If sell orders price fall more than 75% of the original ICO price, during the initial 5 day ICO fund holding period, a full buy wall will be set for 2 more days at the initial ICO price meaning all the ico monies will be used to support the certain sustainable floor. Now u fucking come and insinuate such a thing that the current buyers must be loyal with 50% of the coins which is 131250 fcs sitting in the hands of one dude. wtf? its un-fucking-believable and i'm going shortly to open the fucking scam accusation thread against this exchange if they refuse to burn the dumped coins. everyone have to be protected against the fucking 50% holder dump-machine whos likely going to cause the dumps on the news rollouts and shut the fucking website when hes out of coins. ICO result : 21 BTC
C-CEX payment : 3 BTC
Website development payment : $2500 = 10 BTC
Net ICO result : 8 BTC
Dump FCS : -10 BTC
Profit of ICO including all our cost : -2 BTC
As you can see FCS is running with a loss now, so no coins will be destroyed that were dumped. Yes, that means that our team owns 50% of all coins and we will use those coins to pay services with FCS and run some promotions.
Edit: In fact we are hoping that some private investor contact us and buy up those dumped coins so that we can have some BTCs to pay for services that we cannot make ourself because of time constraints.
u either newbie or don't fucking realize what the crypto is and if the latter then u should move away. Right fucking now. No one cares. NO ONE ON EARTH CARES HOW MUCH do u put online on advancement of ur fucking priming interests, don't assign a responsibilty for ur fault to those who dumped thousands of ur shit and stop bullshitting all over the thread with meaningless expressions like 'its not ethical to dump or wtv' the important rule u should stick to is keeping up with the ico rules |
|
|
|
Time for the next ICO... FCS will be launched tonight.
oh c'mon enough said shut the fuck up already lol, just stop this bullshit |
|
|
|
|
here comes the time to dump the fuck to 300 satoshi, hoping it will see 1K until this evening and 300 tomorrow night
|
|
|
|
|
its either pure absurd or a badly orchestrated joke
what the fucking point?
if u wanna money post ur addy in the op and type: "i want anyone to send me 10K usd"
that would look much truthful and honest
what reaction besides laughs r u trying to achieve with all dat fuck?>
|
|
|
|
No trolling or FUD post allowed, thanks.
We are solving the Bittrex issue in this moment. Speaking with Bill seems that things are turning fine back again.
Thanks for your patience.
I am glad that you solved the problem, I would like to know what was the reason for the lock bittrex, please answer is very important for investors. Why no response from the Dev to this simple question? cause this fag doublespent the coins and is now slowly dumping on c-cex markets won't resume in the foreseeable future |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
