Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 06:17:29 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ... 192 »
2041  Other / Meta / Posting/reporting limits on: December 28, 2020, 05:49:45 AM
While reporting some spammers today, I ran into some limits as to my activity. Specifically, I was unable to report posts more frequently than once every 4 seconds.

Is there anything I can do to have these limits increased?
2042  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: Donating Bitcoin and IRS form 8283 on: December 28, 2020, 05:28:57 AM
*not tax advice*

I understand that the appraised fair market value would be the price of bitcoin times the number of bitcoin you are donating.

My advice would be to contract with a tax professional who is familiar with your individual tax situation to help you fill out this form.
2043  Other / Meta / Re: Please block the user @taatacycsa. on: December 28, 2020, 04:43:56 AM
There are many like this person. Report his posts, and he should get nuked.
2044  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Please be careful reaching out for trades on forum on: December 28, 2020, 04:13:01 AM
For the love of whatever you believe in though, do not take your communication off forum. I get it this can be annoying to try and PM here if your account is fresh with the time limits in between PM's. The work around is hammering out all the details in the thread by posting back and forth, and saving any personal information you don't want to share for PM.
This is often not possible for many new users wanting to conduct trades.

IMO, much better advice is to confirm off-forum contact details with the person you want to communicate with personally before trusting anything someone says in an off-forum communication channel. Make the person tell you their contact information. Don't accept someone on an off-forum channel telling you they are xx member without verification.
2045  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: NiceHash stops paying back -- scam or not? on: December 28, 2020, 04:03:54 AM
I think it's obvious they collected the funds from customers' profits (and they did it in the past as well). So practically every customer paid himself back, it's not like NH really cut their profits to pay back.
Nicehash is providing a service to their customers, and are earning income from providing said services (connecting buyers with sellers of mining equipment temporarily -- those who are wanting to rent mining equipment with those who want to rent their mining equipment). Their customers are paying for said services.

Noone is forcing anyone into continuing to do business with NH. No one will do business with NH unless they provide substantial value to their customers. If NH provides less value to their customers than other competitors, then few people will do business with them.

NH will forward a portion of their income to the people they owe coin to. This is similar to a loan that someone takes out. If you borrow money, you will generally use money that you earn to repay that loan.
2046  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Offline signing your paper wallet using air gapped phone via Electrum on: December 28, 2020, 03:53:02 AM
   
      Wipe out all data on cellphone and have it reboot with factory reset, thus cleaning it of any malware of viruses.
I am not sure this is a valid assumption. In theory, malware could modify what your phone does when you initiate a factory reset. I would rather buy a new phone from a random store in person. There is still the possibility your phone will have malware, but it should remove the possibility you will be specifically targeted.
     Install Electrum and then will place it in Airplane mode, disable wifi, disable bluetooth, remove sim card and also remove the antenna thus making it air gapped.
How are you getting electrum onto your phone? Are you downloading it?

   Yes downloading it before antenna is removed
Downloading something from the internet on a cold storage device is not the best of ideas. It is most ideal for a cold storage device to have never touched the internet.

I am also not a fan of using paper wallets as a means of cold storage. If you were to generate a wallet on your cold storage phone, there is a subset of possible vulnerabilities in which your phone could leak your private keys. If you use a paper wallet to store your private keys, you will be subject to the same vulnerabilities as if you were storing the private keys on your phone, and in addition will be subject to additional vulnerabilities when you print your paper wallet, and when you move the private keys from your paper wallet to your cold storage phone.
2047  Other / Meta / Re: Suggestion to add support for 2FA/MFA on: December 28, 2020, 03:47:02 AM

Hmm, I don't see how email notifications provide any benefits of 2FA. But good to know that 2FA is in plans for vNext of the forum.
Email notifications alert users when certain actions are taken (such as a password change), and allow them to lock their account. This limits the damage that can be done when an account is hacked. It is not quite as good as 2FA, but is a step in the right direction.

Even adding a PIN in addition to the password would be somewhat helpful in my opinion,
I don't think there would be much benefit to this. Anyone who could gain access to a person's password, should also be able to learn their PIN...assuming the PIN is static.
2048  Other / Meta / Re: Bitcointalk is being used as a backlink source on: December 28, 2020, 03:18:24 AM
Doesn't google catch on to this sort of thing and take action? It's obviously pretty out in the open and easy to see when a company is utilising these spam services.
Google does ~everything via automation, and while this may be obvious to a human, it may be less obvious to google's automation.

Google will only access a webpage every so often, and as long as google's crawlers see the page as of when the links are present on a thread, google will recognize the link as being on the thread.
2049  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Strange Nashville bombing on: December 27, 2020, 11:04:44 PM

1. Initial reporting is that there may have been human remains found near the blast. This has not been confirmed. Maybe this was just a really flamboyant suicide?


The police are saying the human remains are those of the owner of the RV. They are also saying that he is a suspect in the bombing.

It is unclear if there is security tape of the RV itself where it was parked. It looks like this was made to look like a suicide, but who knows. If there is no video of the RV, it could be a fake suicide in order to cover up whatever the true purpose of the explosion was. I have read a report that the RV owner had recently transferred the deed of his house to someone else, which would be consistent with a suicide (giving away his possessions).


It looks like there was a fake copycat with someone in an RV blasting a song that the RV was playing prior to the explosion.
2050  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Offline signing your paper wallet using air gapped phone via Electrum on: December 26, 2020, 11:42:12 PM
   
      Wipe out all data on cellphone and have it reboot with factory reset, thus cleaning it of any malware of viruses.
I am not sure this is a valid assumption. In theory, malware could modify what your phone does when you initiate a factory reset. I would rather buy a new phone from a random store in person. There is still the possibility your phone will have malware, but it should remove the possibility you will be specifically targeted.
     Install Electrum and then will place it in Airplane mode, disable wifi, disable bluetooth, remove sim card and also remove the antenna thus making it air gapped.
How are you getting electrum onto your phone? Are you downloading it?
2051  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Strange Nashville bombing on: December 26, 2020, 03:57:42 AM
I'm gonna go with Occam Bruce Willis on this one. Somebody was robbing a bank or some other valuable target.
If this is true, why actually make it explode? The explosion will result in security cameras being more scrutinized, and the penalty is much harsher if they get caught.

If this was part of a robbery plot, I think more time would have been given and the bomb wouldn’t have exploded (or even maybe wouldn’t have been a bomb).
2052  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Trump Pardons on: December 26, 2020, 03:39:42 AM

Don't you have to accept responsibility for the actions that they're pardoning for to actually be pardoned? Which is pretty much accepting guilt for the crime that you're accused of, even if it's completely wiped off your record anyway.
Not quite.

If you are pardoned for a crime, you can no longer be convicted for said crime. This means you are no longer protected by the 5th amendment against being forced to testify against yourself. It is possible for someone to not recognize a pardon in order to not have to testify about their own involvement in illegal activity.

Accepting a pardon often implies the person is guilty. There are times in which this is not the case, for example, if additional evidence is made public that shows a person is innocent, but they cannot use this evidence because of a legal technicality.
2053  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Strange Nashville bombing on: December 26, 2020, 03:34:20 AM

2. This could could an attempt by a US enemy
This is possible. It could be an attempt to sow discord, or it could be a test run to see how effectively communication systems can be knocked offline.

The RV was parked in front of the AT&T building. As you noted, the RV warned people in the area well in advance of the pending explosion, and the explosion occurred at a time and place that would likely result in few casualties. If there are no casualties, there would not be as much public support for military action against whoever was responsible versus if there were many deaths.


3. This could be the opening salvos of some terrorist group. By doing it this way, you can multiply the efficiency of all of your future attacks, since you can put loudspeakers on a vehicle very cheaply, and if only 1% of them actually explode, this is enough to cause widespread terror and disruption in potentially hundreds of cities.
This is possible, and is along the lines of what I thought when I heard about the explosion earlier today before I learned the RV was parked in front of the AT&T building. This particular attack caused fairly little disruption prior to the explosion, and plenty of time was given for people to evacuate to safety. The facts indicate care was taken to minimize the cost to citizens of the area.


5. You never know, but:
    b) A bunch of big, terrifying attacks could conceivably be used by Trump as part of a coup to stay in power.
You never know, but I guess this is possible. I think there are too many institutions that have spent 4 years "resisting" Trump for him to be able to realistically stay in office. The Trump administration has had way too many leaks for anyone to even consider trying this, IMO. I also don't see the benefit to Trump in staying in power illegitimately. Trump is already a multibillionaire, has considerable influence over the country, and is unlikely to be at risk of jail when he leaves office.

   c) While there have been a few true false flag attacks by the US government in the past, they're incredibly rare,
If this was the case, maybe there is a group within the 'deep state' that wants to go to war with Iran. A false flag attack to start a war with China or Russia sounds too crazy to me.


More info will presumably come up as time goes on; right now, everything is very preliminary. I'd find it pretty unbelievable if there is no surveillance camera footage of the RV being put into position, for example. Surveillance cameras are so ubiquitous nowadays that it should probably be possible to trace the path of the RV at least to the edge of the city, though it will take a lot of time to collect all of the footage.
Today, it is very common (and sometimes even required) for people to be wearing facemasks in public. Whoever was driving the RV could have had a facemask on while driving, got out of the RV with a facemask on, and walked to a residential area without security cameras, where he was picked up by an Uber some number of hours later.


Edit to add:
I don't think this is an anti-5g group. 5g towers only reach about 1500 feet, so the impact to 5g specifically would have been low.
2054  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What's a 51% attack? on: December 25, 2020, 05:10:54 AM
I was referring to something along the lines of the attacker would occasionally orphan a block they don't like or refuse to confirm transactions that don't meet certain criteria. 
I think that's quite a stretch to say that miners will support deliberate censorship and undermine the foundation that Bitcoin is built on. The last time Ghash exceeded 51% threshold, the price dipped briefly and there was a huge discussion about the whole fiasco. If that's was the consequence of them having 51% of the network without doing anything malicious, I would think that miners that care about their own returns would take more proactive steps to prevent this from becoming a threat.
It may not be a single pool that is controlled by the same entity. It could be 5 pools that are controlled by a single entity (secretly), that always end up on the correct chain when a block gets orphaned. If the pools are paying out actual earnings, those that have a higher block orphan rate will end up paying out less.
2055  Other / Meta / Re: My investigation on satoshi on: December 25, 2020, 04:57:08 AM

This has been studied extensively.

The UK is not the only country that uses the dialect you describe. Australia is another country that uses a similar English dialect.

I would argue that this gives credence to CSW being satoshi. With that being said, there is also plenty of other evidence that suggests that CSW is not satoshi. Although it is difficult to prove a negative, I would say it is all but certain that CSW is in fact not satoshi, at least in my eyes (the evidence is overwhelming IMO).

As others have mentioned, it is possible this is all misdirection. IIRC, satoshi's posts were consistent with him living in the US, on the east coast, or having a similar sleep schedule as someone who lives there.
2056  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: How to get multiple addresses belonging to the same person on: December 25, 2020, 04:45:38 AM
I have seen many blockchain browsers automatically recognize that the wallet address belongs to the same person. How is this done?
They make assumptions, and disprove null-hypothesis for certain sets of addresses. They may run their analysis multiple times before coming to a final conclusion.

These 'blockchain browsers' will not always be accurate.
2057  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What's a 51% attack? on: December 25, 2020, 04:39:28 AM
Depending on how severe the 51% attack is, an attacker could direct their own equipment towards a pool they control and get miners to mine on their pool via higher actual mining earnings. The pool would have higher mining earnings because it wouldn't have its blocks orphaned.
At the end of the day, miners probably won't support the attacker. After all, the miners would be losing money after any 51% attack. The rational thing miners would do is to try to mitigate the 51% attack or to switch off their equipment. Helping the attacker would just be burning through your cash. 
I was referring to something along the lines of the attacker would occasionally orphan a block they don't like or refuse to confirm transactions that don't meet certain criteria.

I could see the miners revolting against a 51% attack that double spends transactions on any large scale, or orphans a chain of many blocks.
2058  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Breaking: $600 Stimulus checks deal in the US on: December 25, 2020, 04:34:18 AM
I have mixed feelings about the PPP loans. They were intended to keep employees on the payroll who otherwise would have been laid off. This meant that employers would not have to layoff, and subsequently rehire many of the same workers once the economy opened back up. It was intended to be a form of unemployment payments to workers via their employers. Unfortunately, many PPP loans were abused, and many businesses got them that didn't need them. It also gave political cover to local officials to impose lockdowns when they were really not necessary that early in the pandemic.

PPP, direct bailouts, etc. just prop up businesses that should fail. Theaters and airlines are probably going to be less popular going forward: they should have fewer employees, and they should probably cut their operations overall, at least temporarily. If they think that continuing to operate will be useful, then:
 - They should've been saving for these sorts of emergencies. If they haven't, then they're bad businessmen and they should be replaced in the economy by more competent businessmen.
 - They should be able to get private loans from someone who agrees that the business can survive. If there is no one willing to lend, then the company is too risky, and that means something.
 - Public companies should be able to issue more stock, to be bought up by people who think that the industry and company will recover. If there is nobody willing to invest, then the company is clearly unlikely to be profitable anytime in the next ~5 years at least, and it would be better for it to be liquidated and for its resources to go elsewhere.
I would find it more likely that there is pent up demand for airline travel that will come once populations are vaccinated in larger numbers. Airlines have cut their schedules by over 50%, sometimes more.

It is not typical for businesses to save 'for a rainy day' as people should. Money that a business makes is generally either reinvested into the business, returned to shareholders, or in some cases stockpiled to be used for acquisitions. For the airlines, they did raise money via the debt markets at the start of the pandemic, but they could not keep their employees on their payroll and still meet their obligations to shareholders.

The airline bailout basically guarantees that their employees will stay employed by the airline, even if there is no available work. This means the airline can immediately call their employees back to work once there is sufficient demand. My guess is the airline employees are working enough such that they will not need to be retrained once airline demand goes back to where it was. If the employees were furloughed, some would not be willing to come back once demand picks returns to normal, and those that do come back would need to go through training again, which would delay their availability to perform actual work. The world is not experiencing a worker shortage currently, so one airline employee doing something productive would mean that one non-airline employee is not doing something productive.

I would note that the airline industry is getting a (second) bailout, but the hotel industry is not. The airline industry is very important to our national security. The airlines give us the ability to move both people and goods throughout the country. There is also a lot of economic activity that is possible because of airline travel. Without airlines, our economy suffers.



If there was no government support whatsoever, then businesses run by idiots would go bankrupt, which is good. Businesses that have no long-term potential for actually contributing to the economy and therefore making a profit wouldn't be able to get loans or investment, and they'd go bankrupt, which is good. People who worked for these businesses would either go work for a more competent company which could use their labor more effectively, or they'd go do something else that is more useful in the current environment. For example, maybe airline employees could get training in administering vaccines, or providing childcare, or working at a shipping company, or doing some sort of virtual work: all in high demand now.
You make a fair point with regards to repurposing some of the airline employees to something that is in demand currently. I don't think the skills for airline employees are transferrable to the healthcare industry, and I believe the airlines have repurposed some of their planes to help with shipping medical supplies, PPE, and vaccines.

You are correct, without government support, businesses that are run poorly would go out of business, and this is good. Also, without government support, businesses also might take certain risks that is likely to spread the Coronavirus to both employees and the public, including the vulnerable, and this may result in hospitals being overwhelmed/overcapacity. I think the lockdowns were unnecessary and handled poorly, but I also don't think it would have been good public policy to encourage people to be congregating. People should have been able to make their own personal decisions regarding if they will stay home, but they should not have been forced to make the decision between risking spreading the virus, and making ends meet, especially in the spring when much about the virus was unknown.


This reorientation of the economy in the face of changing conditions is how you ensure long-term economic growth.
My assumption is the changed conditions are temporary and will change back once the coronavirus is under control. If too many people go into industries that are temporarily in demand today due to the virus, there will be shortages once things get back to normal. I don't know when things will be back to normal, but I would anticipate that airline demand will be something closer to 2019 demand by this summer, depending on the speed of the vaccine rollout. Same with other businesses that are receiving PPP loans.

If you're a Republican who voted for the past relief bills, then it would've made more sense from your ideological perspective to instead do something like a very large one-time check for people making under <some amount>, plus a very large increase in the earned income tax credit (for everyone, not just people with kids) which would last at least 3 years, and no business bailouts. The actual past relief bills were results of economic ignorance combined with various political realities such as the need to appease tons of special interests.
I believe we are in a 1 in 100-year pandemic/event, or possibly even rarer. I am willing to make exceptions to my normal beliefs in order to handle such an unusual event. My belief is that in 6 months or so, there will be economic demand similar to the economic demand in 2019. If too many workers are doing things that do not reflect 2019 demand, there will be shortages (and higher inflation) of goods and services.

The PPP loans, were given to businesses, but the ultimate beneficiary was the businesses' employees (if the loans were taken as the spirit of the program intended). The benefit to the businesses was that they would not need to have the expense of hiring and training new employees once economic demand gets back to normal.

2059  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: What's a 51% attack? on: December 24, 2020, 11:38:23 PM
they have their own miners that is powerful and make it centralized in a way to steal coins from people, in a 51% attack like ethereum classic attack (the same way it happens on other coins blockchain too), you can have ethereum classic on you wallet but all gone because of the attack.
51% attacks cannot steal other people's coins. The most they could do is to prevent their transactions from confirming. Other than that, double spending requires the attacker to have the ability to create an alternative transaction which would require the private keys to create the transaction.

An attacker could send coin to someone, receive something of value in return, wait n confirmations, and double-spend the transaction via an alternate blockchain. I would consider this to be stealing.

I keep reading in this thread that you need >50% of a network’s hashrate to perform a 51% attack. This is not true. Having >50% of the network’s hashrate only increases your odds of being successful. A bit of good luck could reduce the needed hashrate greatly.

Yeah, you could deem having less than 50% of the networks hashrate a success if you simply wanted to disrupt the network, its probably fairly achievable for a lot of people out there, but as discussed several times over by now, its simply not worth it, especially on a prolonged basis.
Depending on how severe the 51% attack is, an attacker could direct their own equipment towards a pool they control and get miners to mine on their pool via higher actual mining earnings. The pool would have higher mining earnings because it wouldn't have its blocks orphaned.
2060  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Cyber Criminals dumped Ledger's hack database on: December 24, 2020, 11:27:05 PM
<…>
I’d also consider severely changing the mobile phone number, in order to reduce the sim-swapping vector of attack. It’s not pretty to do, specially the more tied your phone is to services and verification processes, but it’s something to ponder heavily. In the process, I’d make sure the substitute phone number is completely new (and not some recycled number provided by the telephone network operator). You are probably going to need both numbers operative for a while to complete the process (verification sms do get sent to both numbers with some entities).

Pain in the ass though, but a clean contact start every now and then is probably healthy.

It is really best to not have your phone number be a method to verify your identity or authenticate your access. Last year, Jack Dorsey (the founder of Twitter), had tweets sent on his behalf because someone was able to impersonate his phone number. Changing your number would potentially allow an attacker to have legitimate access to your old phone number, and might be able to impersonate you. I am also not sure how easy it is to get a previously unused phone number.

I would rather use google authenticator or some other time based code as a means of authentication.
Pages: « 1 ... 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 [103] 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 ... 192 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!