BAD for you scam copy coin with Polo sorry to say  14 comments and 0 english. Legit opinion. |
|
|
|
Everything is awesome! Let's fill up with positive kryptonic energy. Vote for super every hours Cmon guys vote, even if we get on polo, the coin deserves better ^^ |
|
|
|
I would like to point out that I did not personally review the code, as many people seem to think. The person who did has very high standards and was not thrilled with what he saw, and he was overzealous in his criticisms. When I made this post, I firmly believed that the maximum supply was inflated. My intention with going public before contacting the devs was to make sure they did not have a chance to cover up the mistake or take advantage of the issue.
It is my responsibility to ensure that these issues are addressed correctly, so no fingers should be pointed anywhere but at me. I see now that I should have had another reviewer confirm the findings, and investigated sufficiently to make sure I understood all of the code myself before proceeding. I apologize for this misstep. There are still some parts of the code we're concerned about, so our investigations will continue, and I will talk to the devs privately about the anon feature.
This whole raising the standards for coins thing is in an early stage, and we are constantly improving our process. We believe strongly in integrity and transparency, and it has always been my intention to use Poloniex's position to improve the quality of crypto.
Busoni - This is great that you are going to speak with the Developer and that you have issued the above statement. You really should put a link on the front page of the Polo website directly to your comment ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=652351.msg7319548#msg7319548) so that anyone clicking on the link can see directly to that post about the coin. I, like most of the people with half a brain trading Crypto, appriciate your / Polo's efforts to ensure security and transparency within the AltCoin world. With regards to most of the people bitching and moaning on the forums here, they can mostly be ignored, I had quite a bit of BTC invested in SUPER and I still do, the price has bounced back to where it was previously so really don't think its going to be much of an issue in terms of price, only the people who panic sold or panic bought will be affected, and those are people looking for a quick buck anyway. The ONLY thing to take away from this whole fiasco is that perhaps you should have been less-zaelous when posting the REASONS why - A simple "We are not listing SUPER as we are unhappy with some of the code and need to speak with the DEVS" would have sufficed, would have save a lot of people time / money and most of all would have looked far better for POLO overall. Keep up the good work with the exchange, you know I'm a supporter as are many others, just less "jumping the gun" in the future I think  Dave/Tuto i agree, its all these punk ass pumpers that are trying to cover their asses, busoni and polo are top notch, dont fall for all these douchebags trying to make polo look bad wanna be pumpers, with 20 accounts on here and on the trollboxes, lol Sad that you could manage to learn writing before reading. |
|
|
|
|
Working anon wallet is a good feature at this price, lets home MP notices the potential
|
|
|
|
It gets really tiring to read all those negative comments.
None of you who criticize haven't actually come up with any proof that the supercoin code is ok.
I dont know much about codein' coins, i do code other things. But all i can see is 'nak nak nak nak nak nak' from people who properly are involved in supercoin somehow or lost some btc on it.
Its not the end of the world that poloniex aint submitting supercoin. You can go on other cryptocoin exchanges and trade them there.
I hope poloniex will get the time to go through all coins they have listed.
Keep up the good work Poloniex.
> be a tard > imply no dev joined the discussion stating that the code is ok Fresh account, enough said. |
|
|
|
Supercoin in mid 2ks, will be in teens within a couple days then to hundreds. Sorry bagholders, should have sold in the 7ks. Next time put a little thought into what the developer is offering - hell he even admitted his system doesn't stop cheats, can't get more clear than that.
Reply to my last comment made on you. Sad stuff that you have your account with the only purpose of spreading fud on coins. Your life is pathetic. |
|
|
|
Good decision, I strongly support you!
Legit account with good reasoning. /s |
|
|
|
You idiot Supercoin bagholders.
This has nothing to do with the 150m max coins. Since there are way too many people too stupid to understand the dangers of a centralized trust based anon system, Busoni feels the need to step in and do something about it. Holy shit, this community holds some of the dumbest bastards on earth.
fucktard. can you tell us which saint coin you are holding? So original, wonder where you got that name from? A centralized trust based anon system contradicts the whole point of bitcoin and cryptos. It is the blockchain and not people that ensure transactions. It is this that makes it what it is, safe from human greed. I'm just blown away by how blind, deaf and dumb people here are. To miss that just tells me what I already knew, just a bunch of assholes trying to profit fiat off others. They could care less about what's happening here, all they see is fiat in their eyes. Just go to a casino or play poker since you see nothing else here. This thread is about discrimination of coins due to max coin code as stated in first post. Go make another thread, you're talking about other bullshit wtf... Who's dumb again ? Either you are too fucking stupid to see what's really going on or you are a Supercoin bagholder trying to keep the coins value up. Either way, you are a waste of space. Watching your comment history, all you do is spread fud on every coin you deem a "shitcoin". Even if 99% of the coins are trash, you seriously waste your time and life to spread negativity on an online forum? How pathetic. |
|
|
|
yeh, maybe we should really to update our sig. Busoni needs us much more than how we need his exchange. Bittrex works perfectly, for example. If within this evening busoni doesn't give the apologies to the supercoin community, I'll update my sig. Not because I'm directly involved in that coin - yeh I have 10K, very little fish - but because this shame could happen to every coin of this world. He is looking very unfair
Agree. They just burned hundreds of people with spreading fud. Polo should expect waves of fud in their direction if not compensated with adding it / public apology. |
|
|
|
|
Love how every account that is agreeing with polo in the form of a single sentence (no argument for pro or con) is under 50 activities or is a newb account. That makes it fully legit.
|
|
|
|
|
Stop feeding Spoetnik, he is already a fat troll. Ignore him and don't reply.
|
|
|
|
I think this is where lines must be drawn and standards set.
There has been much hype and excitement about the next best thing to hit crypto but, looking at the code, it's obvious that basics are being forgotten about.
Whether this is deliberate acts such as Lytecoin which was launched shortly after LiteCoin and its sole purpose was to search, copy and forward all "wallet.dat" files to a dead email drop to just getting bad code into the source by cloning code from another clone, which was also cloned from another clone, ad infinitum. Each time, the dev of that particular coin not removing coin specific code from what they are working with.
We've seen coins that includes code to generate and send coins to a "foundation" donation address but the developer of the next coin either ignores it, doesn't know it's there or hasn't got the required skills to attach importance to it.
We are also seeing more and more "developers" portraying themselves as the coders, when this is not true and they pay some freelancer to provide the code. Yet the dev stands behind the code 150% even though they don't even know the basics.
(So it's not tl;dr) we even have developers working on their own clone coin but don't even know how to generate their own genesis blocks (or can't be bothered to spend time doing so).
So, we have people shouting at exchanges to list code that is either just simply bugged out due to a mass of code which only applies to a previous coin, would severely put the exchange at risk of being investigated for money laundering due to them having to be the party to make transactions anonymous or to list code which contains trojans (DaFuq). I was watching the Poloniex trollbox when some users were saying that the malicious code didn't affect them because they don't run the daemon as root... so list it and "think of the profit".
For SuperCoin. The Devs state repeatedly that the coin can and will be exploited. The nodes can cheat. By stating this, they are saying they are aware of this threat and it is real, yet they use copy honorcoin and make some strange changes. At the very least they did not review their own code correctly, nor did they try to increase checking and security of the code. They even left in the code for IRC peer discovery for a coin they claim to be anonymous.
If I were running an exchange today, I would draw the line immediately.
Check code for a complete disregard of standards.
Check the devs for claims that are just illegal and fraudulent (such as claims to be a Charity but are not. Seriously? Once upon a time a lynch-mob would have been rounded up for that alone).
Make sure the development "TEAM" is a team and not just some "ideas man" paying 0.5BTC for some code. How can you expect fixes to happen soon when the dev has to track down the freelancer?).
Crypto may be lots of fun but it isn't a game. If this kind of behaviour is allowed to continue, there will be very serious consequences for those crypto service providers that do not fully comply with the law.
As much as the law is an ass, it can not be ignored and cast aside with comments like "Hey, man. It's virtual so it doesn't need to comply with the law."
That mind-set is just going to continue to slam doors in everyone's faces, it's been happening for some time now but not many realise it. I guess they thought all that banging was the balloons popping after the last major hype campaign.
So, supercoin. created by devs that repeatedly state they are working on a new system for crypto that can and will be exploited but don't take extra care over their code.
If it were me, there is no way I would list or even mine it.
A personal request to Poloniex: Please continue to raise the expected standards. Re-review all the coins listed on the exchange now and see which developers are willing to work with you to attain greater reliability and security. We must start to be seen to keep our own backyards in order. It's about time we did.
Except its not "raising the standards" when a poloniex employee spreads fud openly and thinks he has a clue about the code he reads. Did it look professional to you? Your standards are probably really low. |
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Trust: 0: -0 / +1(1)
Unignore
Today at 10:50:48 PM
Show/Hide
This user is currently ignored.
Is this guy trolling again?
|
|
|
|
Frequent voter here also  |
|
|
|
Here we have a first coin with working anon?  No you're wrong, all the CryptoNote coins already has privacy and anonymity working since inception. Except bitcoin clones are superior atm in everything vs CN coins except anonimity. If that is solved there is no reason for CN-s to exist. |
|
|
|
|
You guys should really get a life. OK, you don't see the future of cloak. So why waste your life here?
Our time is limited, go outside and do something special or spend your time where you get something positive.
I just can't understand what positive you guys get from spreading negativity. Karma will strike back for sure.
|
|
|
|
And when Cloak prevails on implementing anon, there's only one thing to do: Bow Down Haha. You believers are so funny. Nice to see you again. Abinito is only FUDer. Look at VRC thread. Only manipulator. VRC dev is not a man of his word, thats for sure (check the thread). This coin, maybe not a scam, but its a high risk game. Perhaps you can better put your money on black/red in the casino. At least they have some liquidity... Stop being childish. Every coin started low and had to build up trust, services and features are not yet delivered. No reason for you to spread fud and weaken the people. |
|
|
|
|
Every coin has to start somewhere, obviously the volume isn't high and the coin is only on bittrex.
If the coin can deliver the anon it promises than it will be added and it will push upwards, obviously it's a risk, but everything is risk except bitcoin currently.
No reason to spread FUD before you even saw what the dev delivers.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
