|
@owlgames, at this point after reading the response from my last reply to the topic, looking at the email screenshot from you giving ultimatum to the OP, trying to create diversion by accusing OP not having an old forum account, why he not playing with others and many more irrelevant statement; I think you are fishy and you do not want to honer the OP his wins but trying everything to make him guilty to keep the money that he won. You even did not response to my question of showing the win ratio that you claimed was 97%. All you are doing is avoiding legit equerries which was supposed to be an easy path to chose if you were transparent in your words.
All these concludes me that you do not have enough bankroll to protect your business. Playing in your casino for high rollers are risky. Thus I will leave you a negative feedback. The feedback will be reconsidered only when you will show following and the results are satisfactory:
1. Current Bankroll with blockchain evidence
2. Show data of you claiming OP's winning rate was 97%
|
|
|
|
The new Bitcointalk Community Award made me realise how much time has passed since the start of this adventure, that abruptly ended way before the due time.
Maybe we will see a new video after the new winners are released?
I already decided it for Fail of the year. Credit to shahzadafzal. |
|
|
|
So, theymos might not go for it. However, it'd be nice if it was a regular thing, and could benefit this event too.
Theymos, my man! do me a favor. Three reporters in your mind? Please PM me if you don't want it influence others.@Welsh PM sent to Cyrus too, let's see what he has in mind. A report stat at least before the event could really help everyone. Or The category should be for the mods only since they handle the reports. A regular user does not have any idea at all to judge the quality of reports and the numbers. |
|
|
|
Only theymos, and possibility Cyrus has access to that information. There's been suggestions that this sort of thing gets implemented publicly, but I don't know what theymos' opinion is of that. I'd be in support of it, maybe having a opt out for privacy sake, but considering theymos has had no issue publishing the list of reporters in the past, I wouldn't of thought it be too much of a problem.
Asking theymos for information is a gamble, I am not taking the risk 😉 I sent you a PM, just in case you miss it, please check. Thanks brother. |
|
|
|
Period Sep 22 - Oct 22. In this period, 8877 reports handled as good, 291 handled as bad, 1215 unhandled.
Is it possible to know top three reporters from the last year December to till date please? |
|
|
|
Absolute Hero of Good: Satoshi, theymos are done. I need someone new.
Golden Feather: JJG is boring LOL
Bitcointalk Ninja: TryNinaja, Mr. Bot and Ddmr are done. I need someone new again
Bitcoin Geek: No achow101, I need to think of a fresh blood.
Event of the Year: Bitcointalk pumpkin craving (I was squeezing my orange 😉)
Fail of the Year: FTX, BTC price drop from $69 to under $16k
Discovery of the Year: There is a user who have good bitcoin technical knowledge and in chipmixer campaign. He is relatively new forum member.
SpamBuster: No fucking idea. I would like to fine who have sent most report for this year
ScamBuster: This group of people are tricky. Most of the time they use it to build their reputation and sometimes they scam others when get their chance. I don't trust users falls in the group. No vote
Craft Master: Homer from WO
Antihero: Thinking
Miss Bitcointalk: I highly doubt Foxpup is she.
Step ahead of my brain storming. I still have a lot of time to put in though. Absolute Hero of Good: Team Cryptios and Cyrus. They are doing fantastic job recovering accounts and no one talks about them.Golden Feather: [working on it] Bitcointalk Ninja: PowerGlove. He knows coding to improve experience of the forum.Bitcoin Geek: [working on it] Event of the Year: ChiBitCTy for Bitcointalk pumpkin craving (I was squeezing my orange 😉)Fail of the Year: BTC price, TheBitcoinTalkShow, Centralized exchanges (Because of CZ and FTX fall, People are now realizing danger of centralize exchanges.)Discovery of the Year: n0nceSpamBuster: [Going to need help from forum moderators for top three reporter of the year] ScamBuster: No vote. This group of people are tricky. Most of the time they use it to build their reputation and sometimes they scam others when get their chance. I don't trust users fall in the group. Craft Master: xhomerx10 and all 65 nominated users from 🎃 Pumpkin Craving Contest.Antihero: [working on it] Miss Bitcointalk: lovesmayfamilis this is must be a woman with lots of kids 😉May be tonight I will give more thoughts and will do my own findings before making my final list. Fail of the Year: FTX, BTC price drop from $69 to under $16k
Why no one is talking about TheBitcoinTalkShow? Am I rushing? Or is it too early call it a fail? Good catch and updated. |
|
|
|
My take from the match today. Ecuador's captain Valencia is a fantastic player. He could have a hat-trick but unfortunately first one was an off-side. The semi referee system played a good role to the match. Ecuador's defense is cooperatively strong. They have not conceded goals for the last 11 plus playing hours now. Qatar does not have a good defense and their forwards have no ability to score too. An average team in my opinion. You are right, at least the match-fixing allegations have not been confirmed.
After losing by 2 - 0, isn't it confirmed now? There will always be a group who try to create hype. It's was their idea. I don't think there were any fixing at all. It's a big event and we are at 2022. |
|
|
|
You can't send merit to the second post and only, so this doesn't apply to the OP. Finally it's live means I will need to spend few hours to think of my votes LOL I will do some draft here 🤣 Absolute Hero of Good: Satoshi, theymos are done. I need someone new. Golden Feather: JJG is boring LOL Bitcointalk Ninja: TryNinaja, Mr. Bot and Ddmr are done. I need someone new again Bitcoin Geek: No achow101, I need to think of a fresh blood. Event of the Year: Bitcointalk pumpkin craving (I was squeezing my orange 😉) Fail of the Year: FTX, BTC price drop from $69 to under $16k Discovery of the Year: There is a user who have good bitcoin technical knowledge and in chipmixer campaign. He is relatively new forum member. SpamBuster: No fucking idea. I would like to fine who have sent most report for this year ScamBuster: This group of people are tricky. Most of the time they use it to build their reputation and sometimes they scam others when get their chance. I don't trust users falls in the group. No vote Craft Master: Homer from WO Antihero: Thinking Miss Bitcointalk: I highly doubt Foxpup is she. |
|
|
|
Usually when it comes to decisive games we have Europe vs South America. Does anyone expect that teams from other continents can get involved into it? Personally, I expect same stuff again, maybe 1-2 teams outside Europe/S. America reaching 1/8 final and getting eliminated there.
It's always Europe vs South America. Even if we have Dutch and Danish final it's still between Europe and South America, well precisely Europe. Australia is under Asia and there are some African teams. I don't think any of them have the ability to win the world cup yet. Still a few decades to wait for them. |
|
|
|
First I ask two questions, because I saw someone discussing it in the forum 1.telegram dice stickers Is it possible to control it, or know its outcome in advance 2.If it is impossible to control it and its result cannot be known in advance, is it possible to roughly calculate the probability of 80% of its next time through big data I know it seems hard, but after all it's just a random function control https://core.telegram.org/api/diceWith a lot of money in the pocket, why don't you contact Telegram developers and offer them the job 🤣 P.S: It took me few minutes to understand what it is all about. Then I took my wife's phone and checked her telegram app to see how the dice thing works. It's a cool emoji feature. May be telegram users can start playing Ludo LOL |
|
|
|
Luckily they have never been mixed.
You can also consider the KYC coin to mix using a mixer and send them to a totally new wallet. The none KYC coin can be mixed using a mixer too and send to the same wallet. In both cases, the mixer is going to break the connection for you and you can have all your coins in one wallet. Depending on how exchanges track mixer usage, they might be able to know if you've used a mixer with funds bought from them. There are risk in mixing but the best course of action is to avoid centralized exchanges. The true benefit we all will enjoy when we will value the decentralized exchanges and limit us from using the centralized system. They will then send offers to user to use their exchange and will become more flexible. Do we know which exchanges allow mixed coins and who does not? |
|
|
|
if the original owner took out a loan, nothing prevents him from creating a new account and presenting his story with possibilities of repaying the debt (judging by his previous positive ratings).
If he had the wish to repay then he would not sell (assuming the account is sold) the account to someone else. Creating a new account (which probably he already did and watching) is fine but why would he expose the new account, risk to get red tag and repay $3k? The amount seems a lot of money to him. Behind the face of reputation, some people are scammer in their heart. I sometimes doubt those scam busters. What is their incentive? Build an account as they are some authority figure of the community, take loan, do projects, do charity and when they think it's time to disappear, they disappear. There are many high rank users who are loan defaulter. They were active and seemed very caring to the forum members. Always active busting alt accounts, always active to aware users against scam projects. They spend their entire life busting scammers, tagging them and even leaving unnecessary neutral tag. All to achieve some sort of attention and build up reputation. But eventually the same person scam another member when they find a good opportunity. Not long ago a charity where most of the members were from Philippine scammed around 1 BTC (I can not remember the amount but it was around this amount). The name was bitcointalk charity I guess. Sorry for your loss zazarb. It's gone and hope for nothing. |
|
|
|
You need to follow proper formatting for the topic. Gather evidence to support your accusation. Does anyone know if sportbet.one have a forum account? PMing them to response here will be a good moving forward. This is the topic to follow the formatting. |
|
|
|
I landed on this website and saw the other list they've made for the gambling APIs and what the article listed is 140 APIs about gambling. Those were some random search and quick result from the search. I did not even looked at the contents and have not done any research. But anyone who wants to have a sportbook of their own they will obviously do their own homework. Live betting is cool as long as it is fairly operated.
Anyone remember onehash? I don't know what you mean by live betting (guessing it's not in play betting), onehash allow pool better between their users. |
|
|
|
Portugal look to have the easiest route to the final assuming they finish top of their group but they will probably have to get past France who were obviously the previous winners.
I read somewhere in history, the former champion team can not qualify for the round 16 most of the time. If France caught on the history then with Denmark, Australia will be the other qualified team. Portugal may not need to face France but England. Both are tough opponent. Maybe, maybe England really is the underestimated top favorite then. We will see. Their group doesn't look to difficult at least: Iran, United States & Wales - not really the who's who of football.  England may have the real test in the quarter finals. I personally know for sure that Argentina will be in the final,I just don't know against who as I have not a clear idea but they are without a doubt the best selection of the World Cup if we count the players individually.
The four team I would like to list for the final are: England, Belgium, Argentina and Brazil. Out of these four teams we my find a world champion. |
|
|
|
Bet365 is using their own API if im not mistaken.
They are huge in the industry and can afford to build their own system. But for a new sportsbook there are no way they can afford it. The amount of human resources the data providers needs, is unimaginable. For new sportsbooks starting with third party API is the best solution. Stake is big but I doubt they still have their own API. |
|
|
|
I have a new set of finalist in mind. How about we find a completely new nation who never won the world cup before?
Or maybe England will win the World Cup for the first time since 1966? Naaah, I doubt that. May be final between Dutch and Danish?
I would actually love to see such a final and it's ofc way more likely than England winning something. You seem praying for England not to win the world cup 🤣 We are not a bad team, in fact English team has some experienced world class players who can win any match against any team. Few days ago we won World Cup T20 cricket, before then we won World cup ODI. Currently we are holding both trophy. In recent times World cup means England to take the trophy at home. Why would we have different this time 😉 |
|
|
|
Since 50 Merit is the minimum, the voting power doesn't change much. Having to earning 9000 more Merits to go from 3 to 4 sharply reduces the power of more Merits.
I don't understand the decimal counts so I am going to put xxx. When I am voting for Mr. A, he receives 3.xxxx When you are voting for Mr. A, he receives 4.xxx Mr. A will always prefer you over me on his campaign 😉 Anyway jokes aside, I don't have better idea in mind and I don't see it's a bad idea too. The only problem last two years we had were the merit sent by users and accounts (those were voting) were taking advantages from it. This year if we can prevent it, then that will be a huge improvement. |
|
|
|
Oh my! I am sorry that the new generation is unsteady. A little information that sounds against your will, you get upset too easily. The only one triggered here seems to be you. Especially when you use that infantile stuff like "new generations" while having no idea how old person that you are addressing to is and trying to discredit it that way. When I said to annoy others I meant to annoy the person who received the feedback. Of course you are labeling him/her with an unpleasant comment (neutral) which possibly is not even him. I honestly don't care whether person I left feedback will be annoyed with it as its up to him to be annoyed or not. Image in your neighborhood, you saw someone who seemed to live here a long ago. Some stranger come and tell you this guy is a rapist. You go to the guy and tell him you are a rapist and stick a poster to his door saying this guy is a rapist. What will you expect? Do you even have any right to talk to him that way? Very bad analogy and its not what has happened here. The very first reply in this topic was me telling OP to come back with evidence as change of email/pass is not enough, and I only left neutral when I had time to check post history. Btw, have you even bothered to check his post history back in 2014/2015 and compared it to posts written during 2017? Either account changed owner, or more people are using this account as I don't see the other explanation for such a sudden change. New generation is merit generation. Anyway, credit-discredit, does he really need to response you with evidence or not need to, all are irrelevant. My point is some of you are too triggered to leave bad label to others and make this place annoying for the victims as you want to claim the forum to be your own territory. Anyway, there are no point to exchange words with you. Your mindset and my mindset are totally different. It's clear from the few post we exchanged with each others. It's fine to agree in disagreement. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
