Also, as you guys said, this is not a scam site but they need some time due to the KYC...well, for me when someone keep my money, ignore my emails and have no communication at all, thats pretty much a scam

The use of our imagery is neither fair nor fair use, we have our logos trademarked. This is a conflict between you and jeremypwr and as you're not part of the signature campaign anymore your permission to use our logo and signature has been revoked.

Karl
Bitcasino.io

I personally put 1.5 BTC into the Betking ICO and got a bonus for being an early investor too. I'm disappointed when I see the BKB buyout price you're giving us for 10% of our tokens. For me it's 0.08110188 BTC. So you're saying that my total BKB investment is only worth 0.8110188 BTC? That's almost HALF of what I invested in the ICO yet you claim your investors are "happy with the roi so far" when in reality that couldn't be further from the truth. Please explain yourself. If the business is going well then why is the investment only valued at 54% of the initial investment? It would be slightly understandable if you actually converted the Bitcoin investments from the ICO into fiat right away, but you didn't. I'm interested in hearing what on earth is going on.

I told him that if he didn't remove his posts claiming he was getting scammed, then he wouldn't get paid.

How is that in the wrong?

What; I'm supposed to pay him, then have him lie and claim he didn't get paid?  

game-protect, you are officially blocked.

I admitted an error, said he would be paid, then he starts with his FUD.

He was removed because not only was he a difficult individual to communicate with, but a more qualified participant (Legendary member) was selected in his place.

It has never been about money; he was paid for his work and then I decided to drop him and add a better quality poster.

If your posts aren't gone in the next 5 minutes, you won't be getting any payment.

And you can file as many "scam reports" as you'd like.

Thank you very much! I just received my first payment

You know this is a false accusations?

Do you think if you are an anonymous forum troll you can say anything you want without bearing any responsibility?

File a legal complaint, dude, cause this shit-storm of yours is getting boring.

You're right about the extortion, but I wasn't in the campaign for 2 months just one week before this guy failed miserably and dragged all the companies he's associated with through the mud, permanently damaging their reputation.

Doubt all the campaign progress in the world can undo what was done in just an hour by this guy

He is saying I "scammed" him because I kicked him out of my Campaign, therefore preventing him from earning $960.

That's not what "scamming" someone is, and I have every right to kick you out and ZERO obligation to pay you for 2 months.

If your posts aren't gone in the next 5 minutes, you won't be getting any payment.

And you can file as many "scam reports" as you'd like.

I cannot put the blame on the investors because they were fooled in to funding this pathetic shambles of a betting website called Betking

Dean Nolan made millions from the ICO while investors lost everything. The Betking tokens are as good as a chocolate teapot (as BitcoinCasinoFinder.com mentioned earlier)

Shame on you Dean Nolan

This user in question was linked by fingerprint to a user who defrauded PD out of a significant sum of money. Given that, their account had a flag on it before they even made a deposit. We asked for ID and the user provided an identity we believed wasn’t theirs. We wanted to have a phone call with them to try and clear this up and after many delays they agreed. It was clear they had found a non-involved girl talk to us who didn’t seem to know anything about primedice or bitcoin. That violated our terms but obviously that isn't why we held the withdrawal, we held it for the reason originally stated.

I'd like to stop this right here and make clear that this is not a matter of money but rather a matter of principle. I'm happy to donate at minimum the funds involved in this claim to a charity of the community's choosing. The trust of this community is not something we take for granted and is why we elected to post here to further explain this unusual situation.

This user in question was linked by fingerprint to a user who defrauded PD out of a significant sum of money. Given that, their account had a flag on it before they even made a deposit. We asked for ID and the user provided an identity we believed wasn’t theirs. We wanted to have a phone call with them to try and clear this up and after many delays they agreed. It was clear they had found a non-involved girl talk to us who didn’t seem to know anything about primedice or bitcoin. That violated our terms but obviously that isn't why we held the withdrawal, we held it for the reason originally stated.

I'd like to stop this right here and make clear that this is not a matter of money but rather a matter of principle. I'm happy to donate at minimum the funds involved in this claim to a charity of the community's choosing. The trust of this community is not something we take for granted and is why we elected to post here to further explain this unusual situation.

With him having kept 30 million Betking tokens on which the holder can claim a share of the 'profits' as well as the millions that he has in crypto from the ICO he can afford to pay to have an exchange coded for him.

Deal Nolan is still asking for investors to buy his Betking Tokens: https://betking.io/invest

Has he no shame? The following is from his Betking website:

The token value is calculated as:

I + (P /100,000,000)

Where I is the initial token price after the IC0, $0.09286 and P is the total site profit from all games and currencies at the current exchange rate in $.

For example, if the site profit was 100 Bitcoin and the current price of Bitcoin was $8000 then the BKB price would be:

$0.09286 + ((100*8000) / 100,000,000) = $0.10086

What a load of rubbish. Of the 100 million Betking tokens created how many did Dean Nolan keep for himself?

Of the 100 million Betking tokens, 70 million were supposed to be distributed for ICO investors and Dean Nolan has kept 30 million yet is selling more?

https://betking.io/ico:
"70 million will be available for sale to crowdsale participants.
30 million will be retained by BetKing for ICO bounties, testing bounties, advisors, hiring, future marketing and development."

Let us look at the example Dean Nolan has provided on his website and change the figures a little bit:

For example, as of today 31st July 2018 Betking Tokens are unsold and unwanted on HitBTC at 0.000007 BTC but let us continue with the example. If the site profit was 85 Bitcoin (which is correct as of today: https://betking.io/stats) and the current price of Bitcoin was $7577 (which is correct of today) then the BKB price would be:

$0.09286 + ((85*7577) / 70,000,000)  = $0.1021 -  not including the 30 million Betking Tokens that Dean Nolan did not release to the public
$0.09286 + ((85*7577) / 100,000,000) = $0.0993 - including the 30 million Betking Tokens that Dean Nolan did not release to the public

Why is Dean Nolan making a profit for himself on the 30 million Betking Tokens that were not released to the public? $0.0028 profit per token as per todays rates are going towards the 30 million tokens Dean Nolan has not released to the public. That shows $84,000 at the moment for the exact calculation is 30 million Betking Tokens x $0.0993 = $2,979,000 for his own pocket.

For investors it means 70 million Betking Tokens x $0.0993 = $6,951,000 for investors who can only sell back 10% of their holdings in the buy-back meaning anybody wanting to sell MUST keep hold of 90% their tokens at any given time because they cannot sell them on HitBTC because they are virtually useless and worthless. they have to wait for Dean Nolan to implement his buy-back. this ties investors in for many, many years.

Why did the ICO go ahead and why did he propose it going ahead with Betking Tokens as the currency in US$?

Payout in Bitcoin, Ethereum or Litecoin (the 3 crypto used in the ICO) would have been appropriate. At least if investors received in profit instead of US$ they might have a better chance to get some funds back.

The ICO investors got duped. I feel so sorry for them. Dean Nolan is the only winner in this pathetic charade called Betking

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2150057.msg25690641#msg25690641

The token value is calculated as:

I + (P /100,000,000)

Where I is the initial token price after the IC0, $0.09286 and P is the total site profit from all games and currencies at the current exchange rate in $.

Although this looks like somewhat scammy, Mr. game-protect continues to prove how unprofessional he is.

As of today 31st July 2018, the value of the ICO crypto:

BTC - 1,046  @ $7,804 each =  $8,162,984  
ETH - 4619   @ $434   each =   $2,004,646  
LTC - 856     @ $78     each =   $66,768

Dean Nolan seems to have hit the jackpot himself at Betking.io by getting investors to "invest crypto for betking tokens" when the tokens are virtually worthless and useless.

A user called ETTKS posted this in the now locked Betking thread:

At the time of the ICO, the amount of crypto raised is priced in USD and the token is valued in USD.

However by Dean's own admission he holds the crypto and never sold for USD. This means if the value of the crypto goes up (like it has) Dean personally gets free money.

But if the value of the crypto went down, Dean can just fold betking up or even just say it can't afford to do buy backs. Which is true.

Our old thread was getting a little noisy.

I think I have to state some thoughts at this point:

I've contacted Bitcasino a while ago with the request of sending me over the licensing contracts which they claim to be in possession of.

The answers were clear enough to know that Bitcasino isn't licensed anywhere except with a nonsense "seal status".

They said that they won't hand out any licenses because it's an "unusual practice".
And around three or four times they reminded me of looking up the seals status (with link) at Curaçao eGaming which guided me to an INVALID seals status.

After mentioning that and once again requesting the license the answer was something like "we won't reply to you anymore because if you are worried about our licensing you can ask Curaçao eGaming.


My interpretation: No governal licensed casino would treat their customers in such an obscure manner.


The only answer I got was that they're operated by Luckbox Ent and owned by mBetSolutions which is just another way to sound professional.
First of all I need to highlight the fact that this information has nothing to do with the licensing issue.
Secondly we've got no information about Luckbox Ent.

If this useless information should answer the claimed licensing by the government of Curaçao:

What Ent. stands for?

Where is this company located and where is the license for this operator of Bitcasino.io?


I think that's enough to know that the license seal status is representing (if valid)  a business license and in no way a legal license to run this casino.

We were frequently being asked for a fresh start,

so that those waiting to receive promos, news and updates could do so easily

It just reflects of what company Sportsbet.io has.