I haven’t seen this thread until now It was nice to see how people are looking for different games. I wish I could build a casino and bring all these to you guys lol. Personally, I haven’t seen any casino to have a board game (LUDO). Ludo is somewhat a popular board games here and if any online casino is planning to target sib continent area as potential customer, I believe this board game will help them very much. I have tried to build a dedicated board game on Ludo but failed as I'm not a developer and I need a huge investment for this.
|
|
|
{...} What do you think?
Yep, it seems a waste to send merit to banned users. One of the main purposes of introducing merit system is to identify the high quality posts so that readers can avoid wasting their time by reading all the posts. Merited posts are sign of high quality post. So, there's nothing wrong if a banned user gets a merit if the post is high quality. - Highlighting good posts with the "Merited by" line.
The only problem with meriting a banned user's post is the circulation of merits. It's going to be decreased if shared with banned user but the ratio is too small as shared above.
|
|
|
Depends on which board you are actively distributing merits. If you are active in global board, I don't think it's needed anymore (at least theymos would consider if needed more) but if it's for any local board which doesn’t have enough merit sources, I think you should go for it. We don't have a local board (only a thread) and it hurts there's no merit source and most of the times, quality post don't get enough merit.
|
|
|
It's same as CPNpr who was official representative of CompuCoin. There's no other way to prove the account's legitimacy other than asking a signed message from the above bitcoin address. But this is certainly a case of account trading. It’s very much likely that it's hacked account. I'm tagging the account for now. Will remove if he can provide a signed message.
|
|
|
I. The offer is open to any member below Legendary rank and only those who don't already have enough merits to reach Legendary.
Why not above Legendary? Don't you think they deserve merits? Kidding. There's no more rank above Legendary but I have no problem now if theymos adds one lol. However, there are some club like 10k merit club, 5k merit club and I really hope that you will help all that guys too and consider their post history review offer I'm not actually looking for merit here. I'm not requesting a review either but it would be great if you would accept such request too because it would help to distribute the merit perfectly. For example, most of the times, I'm out of smerits (only last few days, I have few) and I wasn’t able to merit some of the local post which I thougt deserve merit. I know I can report them to LoyceV's thread in reputation but I only report post there which is somewhat a great contribution only. If a post deserve 1 or 2 merits, I don’t feel reporting them on that thread. Just my 2 cent but I appreciate your effort. Not everyone spends such huge time behind reviewing the post.
|
|
|
Furthermore they’re planning to sell Casemiro to Manchester United, and I don’t think that they’ll replace him which is another risky transfer from my point of view. Casemiro's departure will be irreplaceable for now. And his departure is almost confirmed according to the latest update from Fabrizio Romano. It's sad to see Case leaving Madrid. But there's a rumour ongoing that Madrid is considering Bruno Guimares though I don’t think that's going to happen. But I would really love him to see in Madrid. Case will be missing badly in the current season and of course in the UCL.
|
|
|
Account changing hand obviously deserves a neg tag to notify other people that the account doesn’t belong to the original owner. Original owner and new owner may not have the same standard, trustworthiness and that's why it warrants a negative tag. I would prefer a neg tag over a neutral as neutral isn’t notified all the times. And if the account seems trustworthy later on, delete the feedback and turn it into a neutral.
|
|
|
but what about the chips, will they be coins or just something like shares simply tied to specific addresses of IBCO participants, on which dividends are accrued as a percentage of the participant's amount?
Chips are the BTC someone is going to invest. For example, 1 chip = 1 mBTC. In return, investors will get 10% of the monthly revenue from the site. If total revenue is $1000/month, then investors will receive $100 and this will be distributed among all the investors in term of their investment percentage. And they will be paid in form of BTC in the same address they will send the chip (BTC) from.
|
|
|
With more digging, tracked the host down to ilovewww.com, a Malaysian company accused of being a front for phishing. It is impressive how little paper trail these exit scams leave.
Betja going down or going offline or exit scam, whatever you say, is still a mystery as we got no update or anything regarding this unless I'm missing something. I used to contact him most of the time through telegram chat but that's gone too. I was in talk with him about a signature campaign and he was all set to run a signature campaign as the FIFA world cup is coming. I don't know what happened suddenly and all went offline. I tried to contact through the support email but no luck there too. Seems like an exit scam but got no documented scam accusation here too.
|
|
|
I really don't get why would bitdice stake their reputation for as small as 8 mBTC. Can you please add some screenshots of your conversation if you don't have a problem sharing? I can see only two images that don't have any discussion between you and their representative. Did they share any reason/potential reason for not sending the withdrawal? They are here for a quite long time and I doubt they have paused the withdrawal without any issue. It would be great if we could hear bitdice side of the story too. You have stated your issue but haven't said if you have done anything wrong which would break their terms and conditions. Let's see what say bitdice has though they aren't active here for quite a long time now.
|
|
|
Ugh... I am going to quit crypto forever. This wasn't even MY money, it was for a friend who was just wanting to buy a miner.
Very sad to hear that but that's something childish. Crypto has nothing to do with this case. It's your fault of course. It was being released to the prior agreed upon address.
If the amount was released to the agreed address and there was a confirmation from your account, I don't think you can blame on OgNasty for this though OgNasty could have done some more investigation as an experienced escrow service provider, you can't blame him at all. It's your responsibility to secure your account.
|
|
|
For such a big deal, I wouldn't trust a simple message from an account. Rather, I would look for a signed message from a bitcoin address. That's how we should use the forum. Will 2FA guarantee that the account won't compromise? Of course not. Someone may have the access to the device and misuse it. Problem isn't with 2FA or anything else. We are the problem for ourselves. We must be more aware of the possible scenerio. PS. 2FA is overrated. People tend to keep 2FA tool on the same devices as the browser or exchange/social media apps they use with 2FA.
Almost everyone does so. I can't remember if I have seen someone with a second device for the 2FA.
|
|
|
My question for Casino Critique is what will happen if you don't manage to collect 2.5 BTC or if you collect more than that amount?
The hard cap is 2.5 BTC. If there is more amount than 2.5 BTC, it will be sent to the owner's address. This is a first come first serve basis IBCO with a capped maximum of 1000 chips. If the total amount of chips received is less than 2.5 BTC, still Casino Critique will be there. No issue with the investment as far as I know. Hard cap is required for moving fast and achieving the goal while without the hard cap, it will be a lengthy process to reach the top position. How is this rewards given and do we have to pass any kyc identification or not?
The reward will be given in form of BTC at the sender's address or any other address if the original sender signs a message from the investment address. Why do we need KYC here? As stated, you will only receive the reward at the address from which you have sent the chips. Otherwise, a signed message from the same address is necessary to change the payout address. Note- Don't send chip/s from an exchange or any other address which you don't have control.
|
|
|
Changed everything accordingly.
|
|
|
2. Based on my research, those accounts already got banned. Why does moderators ban those accounts? it's temporary or permanent? AFAIK most accounts got banned due to plagiarism or evading ban, not spamming.
You are not most likely going to get banned for spamming a single time. If you spam a lot, you will get banned of course. The above mentioned users have no contribution on the forum, most of their post are spam. It can be safely assumed that they will only bring spam to the forum, nothing else. Having them banned makes sense I think.
|
|
|
I noticed Wasabi have a small partnership with LFC which is kinda cool. (Phone signal awful in these seats. Sorry for poor quality image) I thought Wasabi Wallet lol. It partnered long ago.
|
|
|
Might keep an eye on this, is it possible I know some of you veterans?
You can check out them here- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5409868.0I still didn't understand why you need crowdfunding.
most reviews aren't very helpful to a new user and it's not something easy to fix True indeed but we are working on that as well. We have focused on putting information that will be very much friendly/helpful for the noobs gamblers to pick the best casino and of course by knowing everything they need to before they start.
|
|
|
I would normally disregard such a bearish post by LFCB but taking into account the guy almost caught the previous ATH and cashed out near the top this makes me feel concerned. Selling now and buying back at $17k-$15k-$13k seems too easy to be true. Easy money. What if there will be no last bottom as there was no blowoff top? Play safe and hodl or gamble? Well, let me share what I have done. I was buying BTC for a quite long time after the crash in 2018. In the last bull, I couldn’t make a good forecast (I'm a bad trader) and sold all around $31k-$35k and invested some in some alts. I was in good profit. I was almost no-coiner for a long time after the bull run. Recently, when it got down to around $17k, I started buying back just because I don't want to miss the chance as there could be no more bottom. Waiting for a drastic dump and I will go all in.
|
|
|
The current failure to capture & subsequently hodl $25,000 doesn’t fill me with confidence that the bottom is in. I would advise you all to have dry powder loaded on exchanges for potential lower lows. I’ve seen this movie too many times before.
Honeybadger will wake up & start going on a tear but maybe not for a year or more.
Would love to see around $12k-$13k though I have started buying ever since it got down to $17k.
|
|
|
|