My real question regarding this subject is, what is up with all the hat avatars  I asked the same question not so long ago, start reading here  |
|
|
|
Short version (but read the whole post!)- Facebook (get paid 250 bits):
- Playing (get paid 250 bits):
- Play at least 1000 rounds on Drownhim.com. You can choose any room, starting from 0.1 bit per round. You can use a bot or play manual. Playing 1000 rounds at 0.1 bit per round for a 100-250 bits bonus means you can't lose money. Or you can risk to play in rooms with a higher buy in.
- Both (Facebook and Playing) (get paid 350 bits):
- See above, do both
- Claiming prizes:
- Post your Drownhim username, number of rounds played since this topic was opened, and link(s) to your Facebook post(s).
- Or, if you don't have nor want a Bitcointalk account:
- Post your entry in Drownhim.com's chatbox, or send your entry by email to drownhim@gmail.com. This will give you 150 bits (for joining either Facebook or Playing) or 200 bits (for joining both Facebook and Playing).
Two weeks ago, I made this thread [Drownhim.com] Promotion campaign: earn DROWNS and convert them to Bitcoin on the Bounties (Altcoins) board. Unfortunately, a spam free campaign can't compete with the massive spam on that board, hence this new topic here.A few months ago, I discovered Drownhim.com:Official thread: Drownhim! Brand new multiplayer game.
I like Drownhim because it's different than other gambling sites: it's a social multiplayer game. You can win by cooperating and fighting at the right moment.
Manual or Unibot
Drownhim offers manual playing, and several Bots. The most versatile bot is called Unibot:
Know what you advertise
Test Drownhim.com before joining. You'll need to have an account before you can apply to this campaign. Feel free to deposit, but there's a faucet (on the deposit page) too.
Rewards
This campaign pays in Bitcoin (250 bits = 0.00025BTC = 0.25 mBTC), all payments will be send to your Drownhim account. The minimum amount ot withdraw is 150 bits, minus 50 bits fee.
You'll receive 250 bits (if you joined one part of this giveaway) or 350 bits (if you joined both) and post here.
Jackpot rounds
Users who make a decent (at our discretion) post/review on Facebook, will be granted Rank=2 on Drownhim. When there are 10 users with Rank=2, Drownhim will run jackpot rounds. 20,000 bits per week will be allocated to these jackpots.
Requirements
500+ Facebook friends or 100+ real (at my discretion!) Facebook friends. To qualify for "100+ real friends", your Facebook friends should not be "bounty hunters", but real people you know IRL (I want to see friends with baby pictures and vacation videos, but no ICOs!).
Note: your Facebook privacy settings should allow me to see your friends to count them.
Payments will be rewarded for qualifying entries at least once per week, but we try to be much faster. There's currently a limit of 60 users per week on this giveaway, to see how this campaign develops. If this campaign is a success, we'll have more campaigns later, for instance on Twitter and a signature campaign on Bitcointalk.
Rules
1. This campaign is self-moderated to stop (signature) spam. I will remove all non-qualifying posts. If you quote the entire OP, your entry will be deleted. Feel free to ask questions here, I want real users, not spam bots 
2. Only one account per person. It is allowed to join through Facebook first, and join for another 100 bits after playing 1000 rounds later (create a new post, editing might be overlooked).
3. If you cheat, spam or plagiarize, I will get you banned. Just be fair.
4. If you don't follow the correct format to join this campaign, you'll be rejected. Think of this as a reading test 
5. Anyone who has been blacklisted for any of the campaigns I've managed in the past will be rejected here.
6. Users with Red Trust on DT2 are not allowed to join. Those entries will be deleted.
Disclaimer
We reserve the right to change or end this campaign at any moment, and to exclude people from the giveaway if we feel we need to do so.
I (LoyceV) am not affiliated with Drownhim.com, but I've been in contact with MrDrowner, and run this campaign on their behalf. I am not in charge of any payments. There is no escrow.
|
|
|
|
What's this sorcery?  Despite the fact that I additionally however about combining the sources of info nowadays, I was not sufficiently brilliant to make a legitimate string and increment mindfulness. I some way or another needed to hold up additional, until the point when the charges drop much more. You made this string, great done It's almost poetic, as if Google Translate married a text spinner and has been spinning the same text all night long. It's in my self-moderated thread, so I'll delete it when he's banned ( archived!). |
|
|
|
Please ban Newbie Togacity for plagiarism by using a text spinner to create jibberish in my thread. Copy: Despite the fact that I additionally however about combining the sources of info nowadays, I was not sufficiently brilliant to make a legitimate string and increment mindfulness. I some way or another needed to hold up additional, until the point when the charges drop much more. You made this string, great done Original: Although I also though about consolidating the inputs these days, I was not smart enough to make a proper thread and increase awareness. I somehow wanted to wait more, until the fees drop even more. You made this thread, well done! |
|
|
|
If you are a source of merit what makes you unable to feed your alt-accounts? My conscience Merit transactions are public, abuse is heavily frowned upon. |
|
|
|
Absolutely not rigged for people with multi I guess  they would never send merit to each other It's the other way around: they'd never get 100 Merit on all their spamming alt-accounts. |
|
|
|
Please ban Newbie chaabane2018 Banned! for plagiarism: Copy: Galaxy Digital CEO Michael Novogratz delivered a fresh bullish price prediction for Bitcoin (BTC) Nov. 5. Novogratz told U.K. business publication Financial News that the leading cryptocurrency could hit highs of “$20,000 or more” in 2019. Speaking to the publication, Novogratz, who is well known for his optimistic outlook for Bitcoin prices, forecast BTC/USD to end this year at around $8,900.
“Bitcoin has to take out $6,800, and after that we could end the year at $8,800-9,000,” he said. (quote shortened by me) Original: https://cointelegraph.com/news/after-taking-out-6-800-bitcoin-will-hit-new-highs-in-2019-says-galaxy-digitals-novogratz |
|
|
|
this will avoid sending a notification while mentioning your own username or alias, now it's off by default for everybody
Thanks, much better this way, I get enough notifications already I've used your bot for the first time to send myself a notification from my mobile. I posted this: LoyceV, you have been mentioned in the following messages: - Bitcoin - Bitcoin Discussion - Re: After ‘Taking out’ $6,800, Bitcoin Will Hit ‘New Highs’ In 2019, Says Galaxy Dig
LoyceV check this thread
I deleted this post a few seconds after posting it (note: not all boards allow this). This is easier than sending a PM with the link to myself. Reporting plagiarism is much easier from my desk than from my mobile. |
|
|
|
And you posting in the marketplce--auctions,would simply be you doing business,no strings attached whatsoever,you could self moderate the thread to keep it clean and free from those you're trying to avoid in the first place.. You can't create a self-moderated topic in Auctions (to prevent manipulation of auctions). Just like you can't edit or remove posts on that board. |
|
|
|
Bad manangement of money Make sure it doesn't happen again, paying 25% interest plus exchange rates on a loan is terrible money management too. I received but I don't know from who. In 10-12 hours I have btc to refund, but to what address? He sent from exchange or personal address, what do you think? My guess would be it's not an exchange, but it's not possible to be absolutely sure: -the fee was very low, exchanges usually use higher fees -the wallet used different types of SegWit addresses (starting with 3~ and bc1~) as inputs Just don't burn the money yet until someone asks for it, and don't believe just anyone who says it's his. |
|
|
|
You have insulted dozens of people (like LoyceV, JollyGood and other respected forum users). You must explain it all. I was hoping some of those ‘respected forum users’ would comment on this. I’d like to hear their comments. There is more to be revealed. Blockchain doesn’t lie about it's past, they can check it themselves and it is there forever. Sure, I'll bite Your posts are off-topic in this thread. Create your own topic, with a proper title, and use this Scam Report Format. If you provide clear evidence in your own thread, you can expect serious responses. Until then, I'm just curious who's alt you are. I don't believe that a random bystander would create his first account on Bitcointalk only to target one specific user on this forum. Especially since several other accounts are doing the exact same thing, and nothing else than that. It's much more likely selective scammer ChangeNOW ( -8: -3 / +0; Last Active October 13) abandoned his now useless main account and tries to discredit the person who exposed their scamming and damaged their "business". |
|
|
|
Disclaimer
If we get less than 100 participants within 2 weeks, there will be no special DROWNS rounds. In that case, DROWNS will be exchanged at the rate of 1 DROWN = 1 Bit (100 Satoshi, 0.001mBTC or 0.000001BTC).[/size] Due to the lack of participants, all DROWNS will be exchanged for Bits. A new campaign has started: Drownhim.com P⃢R⃢O⃢M⃢O⃢T⃢E⃢ A⃢N⃢D⃢ P⃢L⃢A⃢Y⃢ Giveaway. Note that this campaign is still open. |
|
|
|
I will start with the US and will ask my Canadian lawyer to find the adress of Martin Lawrence from Edmonton and send him a letter with the question if he is Vod from bitcointalk.org. I found one on Google already, no need to use a lawyer for that I don't want to dox a (possibly random) random person, so I won't post it. Vod, do you have a red front door? Since you deny to proof your identity i guess i will have to go a detour which will just take a bit longer. Maybe I missed it, but why would Vod have to prove his identity to you? |
|
|
|
Seeing one of these reminded me of this thread today. What is their name? I'm going to find out anyway, so might as well tell me.
I'm guessing Saul Goodman. I really must have posted in this thread, it's good entertainment so far. --- PING bpip.org(2001:56a:f860:9700:401:51de:6f91:4900) 56 data bytes ---
64 bytes from 2001:56a:f860:9700:401:51de:6f91:4900: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 2001:56a:f860:9700:401:51de:6f91:4900: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 2001:56a:f860:9700:401:51de:6f91:4900: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=156 ms
64 bytes from 2001:56a:f860:9700:401:51de:6f91:4900: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=151 ms
Isn't 156 ms a bit slow for a home network? |
|
|
|
Many users now try to impersonate higher rank accounts just to get acknowledge from other high rank users. As far as I know, this doesn't happen that often, but there have been scammers who impersonate others. Usually, they quickly get tagged. If you find an impersonator that isn't tagged yet, just report it somewhere and DT will get them. |
|
|
|
I've always seen the recognition list to be something that moves or changes in time with the forum (dynamic). If you add weight to historical inactive accounts moving forward, don't you eventually over time end up with a static Hall of FameRecognition/Greatest recognition of all time sort of list as people move on? Not that this wouldn't be a nice thing to have, but I'd assume the current way recognition is calculated would be more valuable to an active member of the forum because it's more or less based off of their current point in time on the forum. This got me thinking: an "average Recognition score" could be developed over time. Imagine all recognition scores for all users are stored once a week. At any given moment, the "average Recognition score" can be calculated by adding up all weekly scores per user, and dividing this by the number of weeks stored. The result will be a value that includes past recognition instead of only current recognition. This will help recognize users with long-term involvement. A large shortcoming will be that it can't be done retroactively, but long term (in the far future) that effect will subside. |
|
|
|
It is also worth noting though that the original design of Bitcoin doesn't seem to have accounted for the division of mining and non-mining full nodes we see today (ie. the first versions of the Bitcoin reference client included the mining logic as well). However there's a lot of speculation in terms of what satoshi did and did not intend so I'll leave it at that. Exactly! Satoshi's whitepaper didn't make a distinction between miners and nodes. The whitepaper mentioned "CPU power", thereby assuming all nodes are searching for new blocks, and all nodes can earn the block reward when they find a block. Unfortunately, this financial incentive disappeared when ASICs made CPU (and GPU) mining impossible. One could argue all miners should run a full node, but most of them use mining pools, which means only the mining pool itself needs to run a full node. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply so does that mean it has arrived and I am now waiting on the receiver to do something at their end? Yes. It has arrived, and it's now up to the receiver to hold up their end up the deal. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
