Bitcoin Forum
June 01, 2024, 08:56:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 »
2161  Local / Новички / Re: Мошенники BitCoin on: February 14, 2011, 07:12:16 PM
Создавайте голосовалку, впишите туда самых видных представителей и вперед. Smiley
2162  Local / Разное / Re: rospil.info и Bitcoin on: February 14, 2011, 06:56:38 PM
Ну, называется это QR Code. Раскодируется телефоном или вот этим: http://zxing.org/w/decode.jspx.
Создать можно этими сервисами: http://qr.ma.eatgold.com/, http://tcatm.github.com/bitcoin-js-remote/.

По теме. Я думаю, желательно бы добавить в письмо адреса https://btcex.com/ и https://mybitcoin.com/.
2163  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Pooled/Remote Mining - Open Source - Updated 2010-12-24 on: February 14, 2011, 12:48:21 PM
Will be an update here? It will be great if gethashespersec will show total hashps for all connected miners. Smiley
2164  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Using GPU to *verify* blocks? on: February 14, 2011, 12:44:32 PM
Downloading and verification are actually quite fast. It's creating the index file that's slow.
Can it somehow work without creating the index file? It is really slow.
2165  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Issues building bitcoin on Windows 7 on: February 14, 2011, 12:24:54 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berkeley_DB
2166  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 3.20 avaiable on Sourceforge while 3.19 on the main site ? on: February 14, 2011, 12:23:34 PM
because it's power pc cpu mac
Afaik we just need to rewrite assembler parts and it will work on ppc.
2167  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Send bitcoins to an unknown recipient on: February 14, 2011, 12:17:22 PM
As far as I understood it is just extension to the keypair export idea. Right?
2168  Other / Off-topic / Re: mybitcoin receiving address question on: February 14, 2011, 12:09:10 PM
Yes, it is so. And you can easily check it. But you have no guarantees.
2169  Local / Разное / Re: rospil.info и Bitcoin on: February 14, 2011, 12:05:05 PM
Начните кто-нибудь, а там добавим, поправим, допишем.
2170  Local / Новички / Re: Мошенники BitCoin on: February 14, 2011, 10:24:36 AM
Удалите уже тему. Я ручаюсь, что btcex.com не мошенничество.
2171  Local / Разное / Re: Как бороться с черным пиаром? on: February 14, 2011, 10:19:32 AM
Ну, я своей репутацией ручаюсь, что btcex.com не мошенники.
В качестве ссылки можно это: http://juick.com/lzsaver/1126355
2172  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: bubble imminent on: February 13, 2011, 11:06:32 AM
I just think that we do not really need that functions.
And we do not need any fork. Why should we split?lol
Nothing will help if someone can easy break SHA-256.
It is senselessly to use a set of locks on an one door.
2173  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: GPU mining slower than CPU mining? on: February 13, 2011, 10:55:35 AM
No, it is not a typo. He had in mind that having a low mhps for some high end ATI card is a problem.
2174  Other / Off-topic / Re: How cyber-rich are you? on: February 13, 2011, 10:44:51 AM
grondilu, I know that you are a good person. I have no doubt.
I would send you bitcoins, but you have more of them than me.
2175  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 3.20 avaiable on Sourceforge while 3.19 on the main site ? on: February 13, 2011, 10:13:19 AM
Yeah, it is difficult to go without a leader.

I think that it is an experiment to see if we can manage on our own or not yet. >_<
2176  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: 3.20 avaiable on Sourceforge while 3.19 on the main site ? on: February 13, 2011, 10:03:26 AM
And it is for Linux only. Undecided
2177  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: More divisibility required - move the decimal point on: February 13, 2011, 05:52:40 AM
I think that we can do anything, but it should be compatible with the first Bitcoin release. Test on testnet first.

That would be not for the URI scheme, but just for general use.
But I do not think that it is good idea. I do not want to say something like "1 BTCX1" or "1 BTCX2". It is terrible.
2178  Economy / Economics / Re: Could BitCoin ever be backed by Gold? on: February 13, 2011, 05:22:36 AM
Total 21 million bitcoins amount is the value of Earth and Moon, including everything that is on them.

Gold will be backed by bitcoins someday.
Exactly! Let's think about a golden meteorite. What will happen? Smiley
2179  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: what miners are trying to resolve? on: February 13, 2011, 03:22:24 AM
The block example (it is №107764):
Code:
{
  "hash":"00000000000271de9d8b94afff543366e290e995f3e3e337bb86a0b7bf02e8d1",
  "ver":1,
  "prev_block":"00000000000148c04e58dca8e1a2df251339c81e2dfe1ff0e9d655b7b4ca428d",
  "mrkl_root":"72febc107470c4f83e224f9683a5c7fb24c4dece8412b9d95db277c8dd75451d",
  "time":1297566305,
  "bits":453150034,
  "nonce":329961997,
  "n_tx":2,
  "size":473,
  "tx":[
    {
      "hash":"d74f0f8e979dc08d028f0fd97e06b97b81b3f42f41c80ce5e4a900003c202abe",
      "ver":1,
      "vin_sz":1,
      "vout_sz":1,
      "lock_time":0,
      "size":134,
      "in":[
        {
          "prev_out":{
            "hash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000",
            "n":4294967295
          },
          "coinbase":"045285021b0135"
        }
      ],
      "out":[
        {
          "value":"50.00000000",
          "scriptPubKey":"045ac21e53fc77ea47b72ae306840bd7eb16709b04488a0daf177df6a2476bbd6fabf76731e1cbfa75ec55c575454fe89e41ce58993f1cbd3dcf497b85bbebab80 OP_CHECKSIG"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "hash":"8ddf80cb3f3286922752da908f3b3f96c4bd8114cd67f3e00ae6a130e7d37b6e",
      "ver":1,
      "vin_sz":1,
      "vout_sz":2,
      "lock_time":0,
      "size":258,
      "in":[
        {
          "prev_out":{
            "hash":"4f41d46faa2e34b718e7edf051e27fbfe2e77055e5a4519eda67068cc060141b",
            "n":0
          },
          "scriptSig":"3045022013402505fee0e884206e6ae22b8057227ce2de970fae57ad4ab95c616fc60418022100aa52d63f3cd6c9e17c2ba4a7410d68e8f4c25e77f7f08f161c2f1af116cc065401 045216f2b5745cf08681a1409aa83e1554c788a7365600c7378665895a5377960eb49a86e3a2128d2ffe5f52e6a6e5ed453a1b87ebf08e5fdbe0b98352be2719cf"
        }
      ],
      "out":[
        {
          "value":"0.05000000",
          "scriptPubKey":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 8707482c01949460fad582ef14558cbf1a2baf28 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG"
        },
        {
          "value":"47.98000000",
          "scriptPubKey":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 5b83f29112290e0baf004db04a85c1e32a7f4242 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "mrkl_tree":[
    "d74f0f8e979dc08d028f0fd97e06b97b81b3f42f41c80ce5e4a900003c202abe",
    "8ddf80cb3f3286922752da908f3b3f96c4bd8114cd67f3e00ae6a130e7d37b6e",
    "72febc107470c4f83e224f9683a5c7fb24c4dece8412b9d95db277c8dd75451d"
  ]
}

The hash of that block header:
Code:
00000000000271de9d8b94afff543366e290e995f3e3e337bb86a0b7bf02e8d1

The current target:
Code:
0000000000028552000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

The cryptoproblem is that the block header SHA-256 hash should be below the current target.
2180  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: GPU mining slower than CPU mining? on: February 13, 2011, 02:34:08 AM
I just read an information about your GPU. It has a very low config core. So that speed is normal for it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Nvidia_graphics_processing_units#GeForce_300_Series T_T
Pages: « 1 ... 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 [109] 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!