Создавайте голосовалку, впишите туда самых видных представителей и вперед.
|
|
|
Will be an update here? It will be great if gethashespersec will show total hashps for all connected miners.
|
|
|
Downloading and verification are actually quite fast. It's creating the index file that's slow. Can it somehow work without creating the index file? It is really slow.
|
|
|
because it's power pc cpu mac Afaik we just need to rewrite assembler parts and it will work on ppc.
|
|
|
As far as I understood it is just extension to the keypair export idea. Right?
|
|
|
Yes, it is so. And you can easily check it. But you have no guarantees.
|
|
|
Начните кто-нибудь, а там добавим, поправим, допишем.
|
|
|
Удалите уже тему. Я ручаюсь, что btcex.com не мошенничество.
|
|
|
I just think that we do not really need that functions. And we do not need any fork. Why should we split?lol Nothing will help if someone can easy break SHA-256. It is senselessly to use a set of locks on an one door.
|
|
|
No, it is not a typo. He had in mind that having a low mhps for some high end ATI card is a problem.
|
|
|
grondilu, I know that you are a good person. I have no doubt. I would send you bitcoins, but you have more of them than me.
|
|
|
Yeah, it is difficult to go without a leader.
I think that it is an experiment to see if we can manage on our own or not yet. >_<
|
|
|
And it is for Linux only.
|
|
|
I think that we can do anything, but it should be compatible with the first Bitcoin release. Test on testnet first. That would be not for the URI scheme, but just for general use. But I do not think that it is good idea. I do not want to say something like "1 BTCX1" or "1 BTCX2". It is terrible.
|
|
|
Total 21 million bitcoins amount is the value of Earth and Moon, including everything that is on them. Gold will be backed by bitcoins someday. Exactly! Let's think about a golden meteorite. What will happen?
|
|
|
The block example (it is №107764): { "hash":"00000000000271de9d8b94afff543366e290e995f3e3e337bb86a0b7bf02e8d1", "ver":1, "prev_block":"00000000000148c04e58dca8e1a2df251339c81e2dfe1ff0e9d655b7b4ca428d", "mrkl_root":"72febc107470c4f83e224f9683a5c7fb24c4dece8412b9d95db277c8dd75451d", "time":1297566305, "bits":453150034, "nonce":329961997, "n_tx":2, "size":473, "tx":[ { "hash":"d74f0f8e979dc08d028f0fd97e06b97b81b3f42f41c80ce5e4a900003c202abe", "ver":1, "vin_sz":1, "vout_sz":1, "lock_time":0, "size":134, "in":[ { "prev_out":{ "hash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000", "n":4294967295 }, "coinbase":"045285021b0135" } ], "out":[ { "value":"50.00000000", "scriptPubKey":"045ac21e53fc77ea47b72ae306840bd7eb16709b04488a0daf177df6a2476bbd6fabf76731e1cbfa75ec55c575454fe89e41ce58993f1cbd3dcf497b85bbebab80 OP_CHECKSIG" } ] }, { "hash":"8ddf80cb3f3286922752da908f3b3f96c4bd8114cd67f3e00ae6a130e7d37b6e", "ver":1, "vin_sz":1, "vout_sz":2, "lock_time":0, "size":258, "in":[ { "prev_out":{ "hash":"4f41d46faa2e34b718e7edf051e27fbfe2e77055e5a4519eda67068cc060141b", "n":0 }, "scriptSig":"3045022013402505fee0e884206e6ae22b8057227ce2de970fae57ad4ab95c616fc60418022100aa52d63f3cd6c9e17c2ba4a7410d68e8f4c25e77f7f08f161c2f1af116cc065401 045216f2b5745cf08681a1409aa83e1554c788a7365600c7378665895a5377960eb49a86e3a2128d2ffe5f52e6a6e5ed453a1b87ebf08e5fdbe0b98352be2719cf" } ], "out":[ { "value":"0.05000000", "scriptPubKey":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 8707482c01949460fad582ef14558cbf1a2baf28 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG" }, { "value":"47.98000000", "scriptPubKey":"OP_DUP OP_HASH160 5b83f29112290e0baf004db04a85c1e32a7f4242 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG" } ] } ], "mrkl_tree":[ "d74f0f8e979dc08d028f0fd97e06b97b81b3f42f41c80ce5e4a900003c202abe", "8ddf80cb3f3286922752da908f3b3f96c4bd8114cd67f3e00ae6a130e7d37b6e", "72febc107470c4f83e224f9683a5c7fb24c4dece8412b9d95db277c8dd75451d" ] } The hash of that block header: 00000000000271de9d8b94afff543366e290e995f3e3e337bb86a0b7bf02e8d1 The current target: 0000000000028552000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 The cryptoproblem is that the block header SHA-256 hash should be below the current target.
|
|
|
|