|
Возможно, что зарубежные партнеры разуверились в надежности BTCex.
|
|
|
|
Да, скорее всего, это левые h@x0rZ, которые решили, что могут подзаработать.  |
|
|
|
Нет, GUI всегда спрашивает. Просто там 0.01 BTC можно считать обязательной комиссией.  |
|
|
|
Да, никто не сговаривался. Вот это и есть настоящая паранойя. Думаю, что только теперь BTC обретают свою истинную цену Именно. Происходит движение к реальному курсу. |
|
|
|
|
Для биткоинов сойдут самые разные рынки. Реальному рынку нужен реальный курс биткоина.
То есть больше $100 за BTC.
|
|
|
|
|
Нет, там явно DDoS, а не повышенная нагрузка. Кроме того, у хозяина Mt.Gox вымогают 5000 USD.
|
|
|
|
Let's live amicably! And without DDoS! |
|
|
|
Okay. As for me I can not be sure was it his DDoS attack or not. Read this. |
|
|
|
As of now, I view btcex.com as a FRAUD site. But it is not the fraud site. There are fewer users than on Mt.Gox but no one was deceived. |
|
|
|
Если вдруг потребуется помощь с bitcoind или скриптами к нему, обращайтесь.  |
|
|
|
He should start his own thread in the Russian forum and have someone with a good command of English translate for him. Because we can debate about his vague English posts as long as we want. I hope that I have not lost the original meaning. I added that link to the first message. It is clear that bitcoinex wanted greater decentralization. However, he should not threaten the DDoS attack. It is at least unfair competition. I did not threaten. Enough interpret me wrong. It was just bad joke on support the DDoS attack because I liked that idea. There is nothing wrong here. Moreover, it would have happened in the future. It simply couldn't not happen as bitcoins couldn't not appear. And I was attacked verbally by those who bought bitcoins and are now afraid not for the idea, but because of their money invested in currency, which is dependent on a single rickety site. And it just means that the exchange rate depends only on what was told by a few people on the forum and which buttons does few merchants click on Mt.Gox. |
|
|
|
I like this idea. But I want to understand what is what here.  |
|
|
|
|
I do not think that it could drop too low.
|
|
|
|
Yes exactly, they would generate identical wallets and the client would behave the same way as if you copied one wallet to two computers now. They could spend/steal each other's coins. It seems that you do not understand how Bitcoin works. The wallet encryption may be useful in 0.4 but no more. Your idea is possible as the third party service. But I really do not want something like that in the standard Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
|
Okay, I hope that we will overcome DDoS!
|
|
|
|
Отличная новость!  |
|
|
|
Пришла мысль, что это может быть кто-то из Европы.
Просто они не хотят, чтоб рынок двигался, пока они
сладенько спят, по этому вешают Mt.Gox на ночь.  UPD: сейчас я думаю, что кто-то начал DDoS, потом другой подхватил, потом еще и еще... |
|
|
|
|
S3052, what you think about the current situation? It seems that DDoS affects the market.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
