Bitcoin Forum
July 14, 2024, 01:09:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 [1085] 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 ... 1373 »
21681  Other / Meta / Re: Report plagiarism (copy/pasting) here. Calling for Mod action: please permban on: September 23, 2018, 08:57:16 PM
Please ban Newbie Lucy.luies Banned! for plagiarism.

Copy (Archived):
Transactions with around 5 Satoshis/byte are getting confirmed again, and the number of unconfirmed transactions is still quite low.

Original:
Transactions with around 5 Satoshis/byte are getting confirmed again, and the number of unconfirmed transactions is still quite low.



I'm in doubt if I should start leaving red trust on users who plagiarize my text.
21682  Other / Meta / Re: sMerit participants – a worrying descending trend (!/?) on: September 23, 2018, 08:39:54 PM
Anyway, I decided against doing that. Sorry LoyceV, you're gonna have to make do with only 50 merits from me...
"only" Cheesy
Just a thought: if you were to send 40 Merit to userX, and then send 12 Merit to his known alt, you're exceeding 50 without getting an error warning.

People send you plenty, more than enough, don't they?
Not only are they halved, they are sitting in surplus..
I can't complain about a shortage of Merit indeed Cheesy I must admit hI've always had a hard time sending out more than I receive, but I'm working on tipping the scale.

I've sent merits to perhaps 500+ different users
Make that 698 as of last Friday:
Code:
     1. 5412 Merit sent by suchmoon (#234771) to 698 unique users in 1609 transactions
See suchmoon's full Merit history.

Quote
Merits are not scarce
This is indeed a common misconception. I think (but I'm not sure) this is what eddie13 means too.
21683  Other / Meta / Re: sMerit participants – a worrying descending trend (!/?) on: September 23, 2018, 08:04:13 PM
<Serves no purpose other than to halve (1/2) the amount of smerits that could possibly be sent to new/periodic participants..  
I'm pretty sure I can get my source sMerits increased if I manage to spend them all, so I see no reason not to send them to higher ranks. In the past days, I've emptied my source sMerits for the first time ever, I now have 345 sMerits "of my own" to distribute, and if I ever manage to do that, I'll PM theymos and ask to increase my source amount.
21684  Other / Meta / Re: Announcing the 🦊 Vulpine Order of Merit 🦊 on: September 23, 2018, 08:01:08 PM
I am going to take a wild guess here and predict that the next member will be a legendary one that does not actually need your merit...
It's not about needing merit, it's about deserving it! If we'd give merit to anybody who "needs" it, the merit system would become useless.
21685  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Embroiderymate scamming. on: September 23, 2018, 06:52:28 PM
What exactly did you expect, when you send money to a user with -32 red trust, who advertises with a locked thread?
This thread only adds to the pile of evidence, more red trust isn't going to change anything, and you won't get your money back either.
21686  Economy / Reputation / Re: Selling Bitcointalk account with 1 merit on: September 23, 2018, 06:48:54 PM
Newbie with 1 merit worth of $10, and jr.member worth of $30? That was insane holy crap!
It's more or less what theymos predicted:
Merit sales, transfers to aliases, back-and-forth trading, etc. are not much of an issue. All illegitimate merit will decay, and will account for a tiny and very expensive fraction of the total merit economy. It's basically a rounding error; fight it where convenient, but waste no sleep over it.

Add the fact that it's very likely the accounts don't even exist after "buying" them, and I don't expect account sales to cause that much spam anymore.
21687  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Transaction from Summer 2010 on: September 23, 2018, 06:12:07 PM
Is there a list of the first two hundred users of this forum. I've seen lists of 30 some but no higher. Any help?
Here you go:
1. admin
2. does not exist
3. satoshi
4. sirius
5. does not exist
6. nandnor
7. does not exist
8. does not exist
9. does not exist
10. Xunie
11. madhatter
12. nanaimogold
13. SmokeTooMuch
14. The Madhatter
15. does not exist
16. xuO4k04c6Ng
17. The Doctor
18. does not exist
19. does not exist
20. does not exist
21. AgoraMutual
22. RogerRabbit
23. 1 currency now
24. dwdollar
25. does not exist
26. NewLibertyStandard
27. riX
28. Sabunir
29. giik
30. BitcoinFX
31. Suggester
32. livingsoulnation
33. m0mchil
34. BlueSky
35. theymos
36. nphyx
37. soultcer
38. garrett
39. fergalish
40. xc
41. I-am-not-anonymous
42. ec
43. foobar
44. does not exist
45. ihrhase
46. Ensayia
47. bit-numismatist
48. Legion
49. Cdecker
50. does not exist
51. DannyM
52. sniff
53. seq2010
54. does not exist
55. SheriffWoody
56. does not exist
57. does not exist
58. does not exist
59. FreedomFirst
60. does not exist
61. does not exist
62. does not exist
63. does not exist
64. does not exist
65. does not exist
66. bdimych
67. does not exist
68. does not exist
69. does not exist
70. does not exist
71. does not exist
72. does not exist
73. does not exist
74. does not exist
75. does not exist
76. does not exist
77. does not exist
78. fluffy
79. does not exist
80. does not exist
81. does not exist
82. does not exist
83. does not exist
84. does not exist
85. does not exist
86. does not exist
87. does not exist
88. bitcoin2paysafe
89. does not exist
90. does not exist
91. does not exist
92. does not exist
93. does not exist
94. does not exist
95. bidcoin
96. summy
97. dsg
98. does not exist
99. does not exist
100. does not exist
101. Goldstein
102. does not exist
103. does not exist
104. does not exist
105. does not exist
106. does not exist
107. does not exist
108. does not exist
109. does not exist
110. does not exist
111. does not exist
112. does not exist
113. does not exist
114. does not exist
115. does not exist
116. does not exist
117. does not exist
118. does not exist
119. does not exist
120. does not exist
121. does not exist
122. does not exist
123. does not exist
124. does not exist
125. does not exist
126. does not exist
127. does not exist
128. does not exist
129. does not exist
130. does not exist
131. gkelly
132. Link2VoIP
133. byronbb
134. bitcoinuser
135. thufir
136. does not exist
137. does not exist
138. does not exist
139. ender_x
140. pnnac
141. does not exist
142. does not exist
143. laszlo
144. greg
145. ducki2p
146. Brandon
147. Minsc
148. does not exist
149. does not exist
150. does not exist
151. does not exist
152. does not exist
153. does not exist
154. generica
155. D&#1161;ataWraith
156. does not exist
157. does not exist
158. kosovito
159. gue5tgue5t
160. does not exist
161. does not exist
162. does not exist
163. Karmicads
164. does not exist
165. komoto
166. does not exist
167. does not exist
168. does not exist
169. does not exist
170. does not exist
171. dmp1ce
172. does not exist
173. does not exist
174. does not exist
175. does not exist
176. does not exist
177. does not exist
178. does not exist
179. does not exist
180. does not exist
181. does not exist
182. Derrick
183. hugolp
184. does not exist
185. does not exist
186. does not exist
187. does not exist
188. does not exist
189. does not exist
190. does not exist
191. does not exist
192. dkaparis
193. does not exist
194. does not exist
195. does not exist
196. does not exist
197. Dynotor
198. allinvain
199. does not exist
200. does not exist
21688  Other / Meta / Re: Is there a rule for not cleaning meta? on: September 23, 2018, 05:54:26 PM
I had some recent reports marked as bad and I am a bit unsure when reporting.
Don't worry about it, it literally says this on the report page:
Quote
Do not worry about your accuracy too much
21689  Other / Meta / Re: Is there a rule for not cleaning meta? on: September 23, 2018, 05:48:24 PM
Have you reported it? I just did, saying: "Insubstantial thread", and I expect it to be gone as soon as a Mod sees the report.

Quote
Or are moderators waiting for people to report?
Of course! Mods can't possibly read all posts/topics.
Meta doesn't have it's own dedicated Mod(s), that means only a few Global Moderators have to take care of this and many other boards.
21690  Other / Meta / Re: Discover new title(rank) introduced by Jet Cash- "spambies" on: September 23, 2018, 05:41:36 PM
LoyceV is so close to becoming the 2nd member of it's kind after theymos. He is actually 13 Merits away for reached the 2000 Merits with 1000 earned Merits.
That means I'm 12 Merits away from campaigning to remove all airdropped Merit, after which theymos and I will have our own private Legendary club Cheesy
More seriously: I never expected to earn this much Merit in 8 months, it's very good for my ego and a great token of appreciation on this forum. I'd have to admit though that I've earned many of my Merit in Meta, and an easy topic started in Meta* easily earns much more Merit than a topic that's much more work started in Bitcoin Technical Support.

As for the word "spambie": it sound much better than pajeet, but the latter can be of any rank.

* I recently moved this topic to the Beginners board, but the majority of the Merits were earned in Meta.
21691  Other / Meta / Re: sMerit participants – a worrying descending trend (!/?) on: September 23, 2018, 05:27:48 PM
Damn, LoyceV broke my nice streak of 4s...

Sorry Tongue
I only saw this now. Since you've hit the limit, you should/could make your own version of the Vulpine Order of Merit. But wait until I no longer qualify, I don't want to suggest this so that I'm the first to reach it.

Quote
Which brings up an interesting dilemma - is it ok to send merits to LoyceMobile after this?
I think the limitation was meant to limit abuse, so you can't instantly bump a Newbie to Full Member. Assuming that's the reason, meriting an alt account shouldn't be a problem.
But LoyceMobile doesn't make many high quality posts. Mainly because I really dislike typing on a phone, editing quotes is terrible, and it keeps writing stuff I didn't intent to write.

Which brings up an interesting dilemma - is it ok to send merits to LoyceMobile after this?
I don't think so.
You might forget that you already merited him for a specific post and thereby give him double the credit he deserves Shocked
If you put it this way, it sounds bad. My interpretation was that suchmoon would merit a post that deserves it. An alt-account's post shouldn't be merited on behalf of a post made by the main account, that would be bad.
21692  Other / Meta / Re: You have been banned by a forum moderator on: September 23, 2018, 02:30:27 PM
If this is the first and last mistake why the ban is not lifted
What part of "permanent" isn't clear to you?
Luckily, rule breakers don't get a vote.
21693  Other / Meta / Re: [CLUB]The SpamBuster!4 Cases open,over 3000 accounts, Reviewed:5000+ [11.09] on: September 23, 2018, 02:21:05 PM
Hompgraphs are back again
It's not much, there are only a few that replaced just the "a", this is different than the ones that replaced many characters in many words.
21694  Economy / Reputation / Re: A red trust for absolutely nothing on: September 23, 2018, 11:54:47 AM
So anyone can just give out a red trust arbitrarily or at his or her own discretion...wow
Correct. But only a few people are on DT. And you won't find many people who disagree with Vod's ratings in general.
From what I've seen, he's very willing to remove some ratings again after a while.

I'll love to see him come into this thread and state his biased reason for giving me a red trust..
Didn't he do that already? See your trust summary.

A funny fact is these days higher ranked members throw merit about to other higher ranked members for any sarcastic comment against the so called 'merit beggars'.
Sarcasm is a great way to show that you understand what you're talking about. And after many times friendly responses, people do become sarcastic if users keep making dumb posts.
21695  Other / Meta / Re: An advice to the newly demoted accounts, learn before you earn. on: September 22, 2018, 08:14:37 PM
The quote is the wrong way around now.
Please review the post again. I did a correction after he gave me the correct format.
It's still incorrect.
21696  Other / Meta / Re: @Admins: Images not loading on Bitcointalk. on: September 22, 2018, 07:22:23 PM
Maybe it's began - LoyceV's deMerit deActivity source application  Grin
Lol Cheesy
Your Activity was the same as your Post count on BPIP: 1014. Since 72 * 14 = 1008, my guess is one of your old posts got deleted, and that post was the only post you had within a 2 week Activity period. Therefore, 1008 is now your maximum Activity.
21697  Other / Meta / Re: [RUPL] Ranking-Up Pipe Line of Forum Members on: September 22, 2018, 05:57:51 PM
Can you guess the rank?? It's my own creation and I called it Elite Legendary
How about self-made Legendary?

Quote
I'm more than happy to ranked up you with my sMerit.
Don't "waste" your sMerit on me, finding a few quality Newbies does the forum more good.

Quote
I may think sometimes you will catch the theymos with Merits If others will stop giving away Thanksgiving Merits to theymos Cheesy
I'd be proud if I overtake satoshi Cheesy Even though satoshi did it without posting for 8 years.
I'll never reach theymos-levels, he earned 1391 Merit just by announcing the Merit system Cheesy
21698  Other / Meta / Re: @Admins: Images not loading on Bitcointalk. on: September 22, 2018, 05:51:19 PM
Try Shift-F5, see if it loads again.
I think you mean CTRL + F5 Smiley
No, not on my browser.
21699  Other / Meta / Re: @Admins: Images not loading on Bitcointalk. on: September 22, 2018, 05:31:06 PM
I also went back to a post[1] I made with a picture and It's showing fine, so I'm not sure If this is everywhere or not.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=122438.msg45096642#msg45096642
Could this be your browser cache? I don't see the image.
Try Shift-F5, see if it loads again.
21700  Other / Meta / Re: Most annoying word of forum on: September 22, 2018, 05:26:57 PM
For me its "please" (for some reasons)
I use it all the time when I report posts:
  • Spambot/bumpbot doing a homograph attack. Please nuke.
  • Account farmer using at least 3 accounts (~names~) to post useless crap, sometimes in the same thread, to gain activity. Please consider nuking all 3.
  • Spambot, please nuke
  • Shitposter/bumpbot, please nuke.
  • Spambot. It has just 1 post, but 18 different accounts post the same spam. Please nuke.
  • A whole army of insubstantial shitposts from bump bots, please consider banning them all Cheesy
  • Spambot spamming Bot.exe. Please nuke.
  • Spammer, spambot and/or shill account. Please nuke.
  • Low-effort posting from many different accounts, posting the exact same crap. Please check the thread.
  • This guy opens many useless threads, please check his post history a bit.
  • Insubstantial post. All his posts look like a Synonyms-replacement-bot. Please consider nuking him.
  • And many, many more Cheesy
I'm very polite to the Mods Cheesy

KYC
For a moment there I thought: "What's wrong with chicken?"
Pages: « 1 ... 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 [1085] 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 ... 1373 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!