It's disappointing to see an online casino fail to provide their customers with satisfactory customer support. Not only does this undermine the initial trust players have in a casino, but it is also likely to cause even more problems in the future. It's just a matter of time before these disgruntled customers spread the word about their experience and it will likely have a negative impact on the casino's reputation.

Gianluca95 is the campaign manager for YAS.BET casino. He is also their support representative in the bitcointalk community. You can try contacting him for more detailed information.

OWL.GAMES kampanja ima slobodno mjesto za jednog Hero/Legendary člana.
Minimalno 20 postova tjedno (od toga barem 5 u Gambilng-u). Postovi u Local sekcijama se NE broje u tjednu kvotu.

Hero/Legendary Members - $80 in BTC/Week

---

Fairspin.io kampanja ima slobodno mjesto za jednog Sr. Member člana.
Minimalno 20 postova tjedno (od toga barem 10 u Gambilng-u). Postovi u Local sekcijama se broje u tjednu kvotu (do 5 postova tjedno).

Sr. Members - $55 in BTC/Week

Online casino games are typically dominated by pure luck games. There are some card games, such as blackjack or poker, where skill can have a certain impact on your chances of winning, but these are exceptions to the rule and even then it is not the decisive factor. The reason for this, I think, is in part because they're easier to implement, and because the casino wants to make sure that they have a better chance of winning than you do (casino rule no.1: the house always wins).

Another problem is that people who gamble want instant gratification, so it's much easier just to put out a game that everyone can play immediately and doesn't require any practice or skill.

It is good to see how the online gambling industry is growing and how every day new casinos emerge with amazing new features, superior gaming experience and mind blowing graphics. If a casino takes inspiration or copies some ideas from another casino, then they are certainly not doing anything wrong. However, if a casino takes too much from other casinos and doesn't add anything new or unique to their own, or worse, copies the whole website design and features of another casino, then it's not a good idea.

Most of the online casinos want to make sure they have a customer that sticks around for a long time and doesn't change their preferences or habits. As a result, most online casinos spend a lot of time researching and creating game systems, features and prizes that they can offer to keep those customers happy. So, when a casino clones another casino, it's definitely bad for business and could easily turn customers away. It may even be considered as a breach of intellectual property rights.

These scammers will prey on people who have recently lost money to scams, and will often claim to be law enforcement officials, government officials or lawyers that can help recover lost funds. They will try to get your personal information by claiming that you're entitled to a refund.

Thus, be suspicious of anyone who says they can get your money back, especially if they ask for a fee up front. Avoid sharing personal information online (for example, banking information) with any third party. Make sure you practice good judgment and stay away from anyone that contacts you out of the blue promising to recover money you lost in a scam.

I haven't gone through the entire chip allocation structure, but maybe he was referring to this:

https://ibco.casinocritique.com/terms-and-conditions/

There is also a "chips sold" indicator on their website that goes up to 9,499.



It's still not 10 BTC, though. 

You might hold the keys? Why such a vague statement? Either you hold the keys or you don't.
To clear things up, you need to prove your words, and the only way to do this is by providing evidence. Otherwise this is just a empty story and no one will believe you.


If it were me, I'd probably ignore this thread too, until someone posted something worth responding to. Partiality has nothing to do with this discussion. Until you can prove your case, I don't see any reason to discuss it further.

OP, that's a nice initiative. Unfortunately, something like that cannot be applied to the current version of the forum because it would require changing all the SMF template files from the backend. Your modifications could be implemented locally in the user's browser using Tampermonkey or similar userscript manager extensions if you could add JS functions that would replace the current HTML code with the new one.

You can host your code for free on GitHub Pages: https://pages.github.com/

Totally agree with you GamblingBro. If we look at the Stake.com Terms of Service, there is a section on Intellectual Property where it is clearly stated that the use of any part of the material from their website is prohibited. Regardless of what the Punt casino representative said, unless they show they have written permission from Stake.com casino, this should be considered plagiarism and intellectual property theft. That is not what a serious business would do, at least not one that I could trust.

Yes. It is actually preferred that you move the BTC to the new address first, then claim any forks from the old addresses.


There is a topic at the top of this board: [General] Bitcoin Wallets - Which, what, why? I suggest you take a look at it. There is also a list of recommended wallets at: https://bitcoin.org/en/choose-your-wallet

I suppose each of these wallets are safe if downloaded from an official source. ^{(I suggest you learn how to verify GPG signatures.)} In terms of convenience and simplicity, that is a matter of personal taste. I personally prefer the Electrum wallet or one of the open source hardware wallets.

Having an alt account is fine, but ban evading is not. He is appealing for this account, but his alt accounts are also banned, so there's no point.

Nice find, @acroman08! Added another negative tag to BitcoinMoses account.

I'm afraid that idea will be a little more difficult to implement (I hope I'm wrong). Unlike your first idea, this would require serious coding to add a patch like this to SMF. Maybe in BitcoinTalk 2.0?

Based on Blockchain transactions^[1][2], there's a strong evidence that the accounts are connected in some way, however, blockchain transactions alone may not be sufficient to prove that the accounts are owned by the same person. But, if we add to that the other evidence^[3] presented by coolcoinz …


...the chances of all this being mere coincidence are pretty slim. There were thousands of active members on the forum. Of course, it is possible that some of them have a similar activity (joined the same campaign, on the same day, after a long period of inactivity) and make an identical mistake when joining, but the chance that these same members share blockchain transactions that connect their addresses, and that they are not related to each other, are almost non-existent.

Now you can try to explain it, or provide your evidence to refute those claims, if you want, but you can't say there is no strong evidence. Well, you can, but that wouldn't be true.

[1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5068434.msg48325655#msg48325655
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125884.msg54145770#msg54145770
[3] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5068434.0

Good lord, he made his first two forum posts and is already being accused of ban evasion on his alt account. This has to be a record! 

Indeed, he seems to have exposed himself already in his first post:



I'm no expert, is that perhaps the Pakistani way of writing "Assalam alaikum"?

I don't know what you're talking about. As far as I'm concerned, your posts are perfectly fine, and your level of proficiency in English is more than adequate. Since many of us are not native English speakers, we may not be able to write perfect posts, but it doesn't matter that much as long as they are relevant and not spammy. Just keep your sentences brief, use proper grammar, and don't post where you don't know what you're talking about, and you'll be fine!

It might be harder to buy bitcoin if any government regulations limit bitcoin trading and exchanges. Meanwhile, since Bitcoin has been around for some time, people will become quite used to the system, and new customers will find it easier to buy it. Ultimately, as someone already said, there will always be someone ready to sell, so it is all a matter of whether you have enough money to buy it. Bitcoin knows no borders, and the world is a pretty big place.

Option #3:
- Spend approx. 50k on BTC now (which will buy you approx. 1.7 BTC according to the current price)
- Use the rest of the money for DCA or buy in batches when the price is good

Using this strategy, you should be able to accumulate more than 3.41 BTC in two years, and, on the other hand, you'll be somewhat protected from price swings or if the price slumps further.

Yes, it does.
Here is an interesting topic that you might find useful: Why KYC is extremely dangerous – and useless


Not necessarily. Many people still avoid registering their details on gambling platforms, and some platforms will only require identification after winning a large amount, or to prevent fraudulent and criminal activity.

In order to prevent unnecessary spam, I think it's best for the moderators to lock this thread since the OP hasn't updated it in over nine months (even though he is active on the forum even today). Since this is the Gambling section of the forum, it's best to give more space for gambling platforms with active representatives and active user base. OP can always unlock and bump this thread if needed in the future, he doesn't have to create a new topic.



Yes, this thread was moved from Project Development, but the second post (after a nine month gap) was from a member BTTlobverss, but was later deleted by a moderator for being irrelevant or low quality.


nakamura12 saw this thread bumped up in the Gambling board but probably didn't notice that the original post was over nine months old.