Royse777 is Casino Critique

[Royse777isCasinoCritique]

Royse777 has been caught, no matter how hard his buddies try to hide him.

After Bitlucy777 fiasco, he is now back with Casino Critique trying to raise 10 BTC, in collusion with his DT friends.

Let's hope no one is foolish enough to throw their money away.

[1714535486]

1714535486

[1714535486]

1714535486

[1714535486]

1714535486

[yahoo62278]

You may be right and you may be wrong, either way you need to present proof instead of throwing something at the wall and hoping it sticks. You also probably need to be a man and use your real account instead of hiding like a chickenshit. Don't be a pussy and claim you're scared you'll be targeted.

[dkbit98]

One more coward with no balls using his alt account and speaking about some nonsense dt secret conspiracy theory that nobody really cares about, and all this without any proof,
I don't care about anything you say until you use your real account.
Go get a life.

You may be right and you may be wrong, either way you need to present proof instead of throwing something at the wall and hoping it sticks. You also probably need to be a man and use your real account instead of hiding like a chickenshit. Don't be a pussy and claim you're scared you'll be targeted.

I think he is a pussy now.

[_BlackStar]

The OP is fine with his alt when he doesn't want to do it with the main account. Even though you both think he's a coward for not using the main account, but that's allowed and not against the rules.

I'll just focus on what he wants to talk about, those are accusations. But I'd really like to see some evidence so the OP doesn't talk about baseless, false accusations. So, I hope the OP can complete some proof before making a new drama in reputation board.

[Bitcoin_Arena]

After Bitlucy777 fiasco, he is now back with Casino Critique trying to raise 10 BTC, in collusion with his DT friends.

Which DT friends are colluding with him? if you are going to bring up an allegation about connected accounts, then make it count. Where is the proof for example?
Using an alt account to throw around allegations with no proof makes you look more like a troll

[stfu yahoo]

You may be right and you may be wrong, either way you need to present proof instead of throwing something at the wall and hoping it sticks. You also probably need to be a man and use your real account instead of hiding like a chickenshit. Don't be a pussy and claim you're scared you'll be targeted.

seriously, who the fuck died and made you the king of the forum?   if Theymos says its ok to use a alt account, then you need to shut the fuck up with your threatening curse words. you little pussy

[yahoo62278]

You may be right and you may be wrong, either way you need to present proof instead of throwing something at the wall and hoping it sticks. You also probably need to be a man and use your real account instead of hiding like a chickenshit. Don't be a pussy and claim you're scared you'll be targeted.

seriously, who the fuck died and made you the king of the forum?   if Theymos says its ok to use a alt account, then you need to shut the fuck up with your threatening curse words. you little pussy

Nothing threatening in my message. You don't like being called a chickenshit or a coward, then quit acting like 1. We are supposedly adults here but most of you act like children. No wonder the place is dying.

[GxSTxV]

Unless you got some proof for your accusations you can moan and bark forever, you didn’t like what yahoo said because he was 100% right you have no balls to talk with your own account, and just like a little girl started cursing everyone who’s against you instead of defending yourself and prove what you said about royse. You knew that talking shit and spreading lies won’t get you anywhere that’s why you choosed to use a newbie account, if you had a small evidence you would use your original account because everyone will help you. I smell jealousy and hate. You’re disgusting

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

WTF is going on in reputation board LOL?
Two brand new accounts against two managers in this thread. In another thread another troll against another manger.
Shall we all call it a war between managers and bounty cheaters? The cheaters are in guerilla mood and managers are trying to hold their grounds.

Or we shall call it a football match. Managers are the Messi, Ronaldo, Neymar. On the other hand those trolls are some unknown third league players constantly foul playing so that they do not concede many goals. Where is the fucking referee to show cards?🤣

[Awaklara]

now more people are creating new accounts to make accusations like this. attack the bounty manager and DT members.

I have no problem with using alt accounts to make accusations. but please make more sense and provide sufficient evidence. instead of just attacking with stupid accusations to build wild opinions.
if the allegations with evidence and indeed proven. I don't think there will be any DT members to protect and support. give evidence, don't just scream like a girl who just menstruated.

[PaperWallet]

This forum, as far as far putting your money in (whether investing or using the scam platforms advertised) is either the place for dumb money or for when somebody makes mistakes. Since dumb money has short memory, do not expect it to get better. It's a learning place though for cases when somebody admits to a mistake using anything advertised here.

[NeuroticFish]

Where is the fucking referee to show cards?🤣

Although trolling is not allowed, trolls are treated rather mildly (in many cases the referee pretends all is OK, knowing the spectators are too nice and won't assault the field).
Even more, such "reports", whether they're for real or not, are allowed here.

Imho one big problem is that we tend to take too serious everything and everybody, whether it's new account made for a specific purpose, to trolls, to various (useless) dudes on Twitter or the news.

Royse777 has been caught, no matter how hard his buddies try to hide him.

Unless you have (and show) any proof I have no idea why some tend to take you serious.

[Z-tight]

Or we shall call it a football match. Managers are the Messi, Ronaldo, Neymar. On the other hand those trolls are some unknown third league players constantly foul playing so that they do not concede many goals. Where is the fucking referee to show cards?🤣

The 'referee' always lets the match go on though, telling the players to wear a tougher skin, it helps so the match goes on without too much stoppages, though we have var for any dangerous foul play.

Members here should know by now that nobody is going to waste their time with reports or accusations without without solid proof, and nobody is going to help you check deeper for that proof, if you feel someone has faulted the rules, then you bring the proof, even if you do so with your 10th account, at least do so with meaningful evidence. I notice many reports these days are out of vendetta against another member, that stinks.

[Rikafip]

The OP is fine with his alt when he doesn't want to do it with the main account. Even though you both think he's a coward for not using the main account, but that's allowed and not against the rules.

True, there is nothing wrong with using an alt account, but its one thing to create an alt account and then provide some solid evidence for the claims (in that case I don't think that people would complain about using an alt) and completely different to do what OP did - zero proof, just some baseless accusations.

So, I hope the OP can complete some proof before making a new drama in reputation board.

He doesn't have squat. If he had, he would already provide it.

[examplens]

WTF is going on in reputation board LOL?
Two brand new accounts against two managers in this thread. In another thread another troll against another manger.
Shall we all call it a war between managers and bounty cheaters? The cheaters are in guerilla mood and managers are trying to hold their grounds.

maybe they are just angry (although I think it is the same person) because they were not accepted in some of their campaigns. However, they prefer to perform with newly created accounts because they do not want to compromise the possibility of participating in some of their future campaigns.

Royse777 has been caught, no matter how hard his buddies try to hide him.

Unless you have (and show) any proof I have no idea why some tend to take you serious.

User CasinoCritique is not the only one in that business, as far as I know, several old members of the forum are involved in it. I believe that it is not difficult to determine if the need arises.

[Poker Player]

WTF is going on in reputation board LOL?
Two brand new accounts against two managers in this thread. In another thread another troll against another manger.

Yeah, I was thinking the same, like WTF?

I think there are a lot of people here who resent the managers for not having accepted them or maybe for having been part of the 1xCrap campaign and having been negative trusted.

On the other hand we have to take into account the example of Solosanz, who started making threads in this section and nowadays is in DT2 and in a signature campaign. So let's not be surprised if imitators come out.

[notwhatyouthink]

(although I think it is the same person)

I don't know if you are referring to me, although I understand you don't, as I think BitcoinGirl.Club refers to other accounts. In my case, yes, I am an alt. I created this account because I already have an account on the forum and I thought about making a second one, as many people have. In the future I might say which is my main account, or maybe not, or maybe I won't get very far because I'm not sure I have time to manage two accounts, combining them with my daily activities. In any case, I am not obliged to say so.

Yesterday I was looking for a thread of interest to comment on and I saw the other one about Bitlucy.

I have nothing against Royse777, but after what has been said, I think the following:

1. I think it is more likely to be Royse777 who is behind the Casino Critique account than Darkstar_, as explained in the other thread.

2. Without more data, we cannot be sure. I think the OP is probably a shitposter who was tagged by Royse777 and that's why he talks like that.

3. The two escrows know who is behind this account.

4. If it's Royse777, dkbit98 knows it too and in this case what he has written in this thread would be completely dishonest. The fact that he talks about balls, pussy and conspiracy theories, without clearly stating that it is not Royse777 who is behind the account makes me think even more strongly that it is him.

5. If it's Royse777 and some people on the forum know about it, I don't think it's honest for them to hide it. I understand that after what happened, they want to give him a second chance, but we are talking about a lot of money here. The reason for not saying who is behind it is clear, many people will think twice if someone who was involved with Bitlucy is behind the project, no matter how much the community has forgiven him.

This last point applies, even if the person behind the account is not Royse777. Most likely it is someone who has had reputation problems on the forum, and therefore does not use his main account or does not make it clear, either with a neutral tag or by explicitly saying so, that it is that person who is behind it. Hiding this is not honest with potential investors.

[NotATether]

Here we go, cryptohunter v2.0 is booting at full speed, please stand by while we get to the login screen

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Here we go, cryptohunter v2.0 is booting at full speed, please stand by while we get to the login screen

I don't know who cryptohunter is, although I heard of him on the forum I think.

On the one hand I'm not very clear about the OP's accusation either, but on the other hand, what's Royse777's problem in coming to this thread and saying whether or not he's the one running the account?

[GeorgeJohn]

I think that it will be barely for someone to understand exactly what you are saying because their is no backups in the exact statement or what you agitating. Any accusation been present do cover with a prove some that when discussing you will no exactly your a point to portray. Only thing i will advice op is to put link to back it's accusation up.