The comparison infographic is biased or skewed in that it conveniently omitted facts or points that do not favor Sumokoin. For example:
Sumokoin Monero
10% of the total token supply (about 9 million Sumo) No premined tokens
are being held hostage (premined)
only a couple of developers 100+ developers who are driven by ideology
who have control over the premined tokens and mostly work for free
FYI
1. HitBTC, when Monero was listed, costed a couple of BTC (on about 1000 usd at the time) for life long listing now it costs 50 BTC (on about 1,000,000 usd, i can send you their email) there is no way anyone can come up with such amounts to enlist in major exchanges without a premine. May I remind you that ETH had a 17% premine, a premine does not equal to fishy intentions
2. Four devs (not a couple please dont distort the numbers) all academics and researchers in their countries not a community gathered "idealists"
3. We have a dev community of about 10 devs working for free (out of ideology as you call it), you can check their git repos cause many very interesting projects of theirs are under development under supervision of the official devs
4. Our community developers doesnot need to consent to updates and roadmap, try persuading 100+ developers to consent to a single decision (recent BTC example)
EDIT: I am very happy that you agree with the rest of the facts displayed on the chart (obviously not commenting them means that you agree with them) even though I know I cannot remove the negative impact the premine has on your view ofSumokoin