I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.
I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this. Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos? Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team. There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps Maybe we will see one or the other some youtuber with their review when they are finished with reading the whitepaper  That would be a long video I guess but there are different kind of people out there. Some prefer reading and some listening to a podcast or video. Watching videos is the best way to understand something for most people including me. But if the video duration is too long, we can get bored sooner. It will be better to cut the video into parts hence it'll be more comfortable to watch. |
|
|
|
When I used to use Facebook (in Facebook's early days) it wasn't polished either they only improved it overtime and took several years to become what it is now
Of course, you always have to improve and put in new features otherwise your social media network will day as user will just move to the next one with better features. A good platform will do regular update/upgrade to meet the need of the users and to make the platform more secure. No perfection comes suddenly. |
|
|
|
I look at icobench just to know which ICOs are around, I just completely ignore ratings because in my opinion are useless as hell
Totally agree with you. A quick look at the bitcointalk thread and a skim though the whitepaper will tell you much more than all those rating sites combined. Not to mention that you can't trust those sources, they might just be paid to give a high score. That's why i like that the CEO did an interview on Youtube, where he passionately talks about the project. That is something you can trust. Actually i always think they are getting paid for good scores but nevertheless, i like to check their scores. I don't know why but it is something to look at. It's a big claim and i think that's wrong to think like this. Anyway I also check the ico ratings before investing, it has minor effect on my decisions but 1>0, so I think its something to look at before investments. There are a lot of resources we can use to get better confidence including ICO's rating sites. We can combine it with other stuffs before we decided to invest our money. |
|
|
|
I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.
I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this. I also believe that there should be a document summarizing the most important points of the project. Having such a long wp is fine but it does not facilitate reading. Have you guys tried the brochure? It's a 28 pages summary. I have read it and I can say it's quite informative but it doesn't inform you about how they plan to do it. It's really just some basic stuff about the project. The brochure is better for the general audience and the whitepaper is better for those who want to delve deeper in the project. If I were a big investor I surely would read the whitepaper and if the brochure is not detailed on some points you can look it up in the whitepaper. There will be translations of the whitepaper IIRC. It might be easier to read it in your native language considering the medical and technical terms. The big points will be on the brochure and for detailed information we can find it in the whitepapper. About the translation, I don't think we will always get a better understanding since not all translator will translate the whitepaper correctly. I found some translations from other projects even harder to understand although it is in my own language. |
|
|
|
Is sphere planning to have their own blockchain, or will they be dependent on etherium network?
They mention token so probably ethereum. SAT is an ERC20 token and yes, it will depend on ethereum network. |
|
|
|
Im wondering whats the current state of this project except preparing for the tokensale?
Are they really will only start the development in August 2018 according to the roadmap? it means only after the token sale?
I think they are currently preparing different stuff. Probably trying to find big investors to achieve their goals (like for example getting near the hard cap). But I assume their development will just start like it is written in their roadmap. I think so too. The next months on the roadmap are reserved for the ICO but I think they'll continue to grow the community through videos and other marketing efforts. Advertising the project through as many media as they can will increase the number of people to join. Building a big community is the best way to help the project to achieve the main goal. |
|
|
|
ICO ends on 26th February or this is ends of 1st round only?
1st round only, its written on their site. And Period of Sale: 12 February 2018 UTC 21:00 to 9 April 2018 UTC 21:00 it's gonna take a long time for this sale to end. I'm really curious about how the price of this token will do after the ICO. There will be four rounds for the token sale. The first one will end in around two days while the token sale will end at April, 9th. Each round has different bonuses as I know. |
|
|
|
It is nice when I read that cryptoflix will offer free educational contents. I wish the content will have a good quality and not just the ordinary one.
Many wrote that the content of the educational plan will be distributed free of charge. I wonder what it will be for the content? Who knows?? Please tell me. I think you can already make a lot of deals with providers that already offer free educational content. I hope there will be a focus on blockchain education, since i think this is a yet untapped market, one big database of videos about blockchain. While blockchain education would be cool as free content I hope it will not be the only one. Actually I would love to see school education too, to help children here, which maybe can't pay for good education or after class teachers to get better grades. That would really be amazing. There are already many educational projects/platform, I think it will be better to make a partnership with 1 of them and then cryptoflix can focus on movies. Yeah, there are many educational projects but as I understand, most of them doesn't give the full learning system. I mean, they give for free only the small part of the learning system. I hope, cryptoflix will be different from others. |
|
|
|
Yes, thats right and i think eHealth First has more potential than other healths projects here on bitcointalk.
This is why I fully support this project. I think that this could be very profitable investment As fas as I know there are not too many health projects in crypto and anything like this with such an experienced team and so well organized. I guess all crypto holders either big or small must pay attention to this project because wealth will be useless if we are not healthy enough to enjoy it. This is a good point . In other words anyway nobody is immune from health problems, so this project should interest everybody. Tbh, we can access health services almost at everywhere but if ehealth can give us different approaches and we can benefit from it at the same time, I think more and more people will be interested to join in. Well they have some unique approach they are planning to use, like the system will allow to store and search in a library information that will help diagnosing diseases. With ehealth I wish we will able to recognize potential disease that maybe we will face, earlier. Hence we can try to cure it before it's too late. |
|
|
|
Health on the blockchain is always wonderful. We need more projects to care about people health rather than wealth
The sad thing is that most of the people in the crypto market are just here for the money. That's why projects like eHealth don't get that much attention. But that is not a problem just blockchain and crypto is facing. A lot of projects outside of blockchain also just get money if there is potential to make a lot of money with. Just thing about technology in general or the pharma industry. They don't do research to just help people. Big pharma concerns are just doing research for new medicine etc if they can sell it. A working eHealth platform is something that will change people's life. Investing now is smarter but also harder for most people due to the long roadmap. It's a bit sad. I think that big and institutional invests have more capacity to invest in something long-term rather than individuals, they can see the perks of a 5-year investment, they also have more disposable income. Maybe that's why eHealth has such a long privale placement round. Yes, I also think that there are some big players needed and I am quite sure they will find them. If they get some big partnerships I am also sure that this will build enough trust for smaller investors to invest at least a bit for a long hold. Big partnership for sure will boost the popularity of a project. The hardest part is to find or to make such partnership. |
|
|
|
I think nobody read the whole whitepaper...except the guys who participated in the bounty campaign to translate it If i were a big investor and would put some 100k's or even millions i would probably read it but for 1-2 eth (my investment budget) brochure is enough  i think so, for a small investors is probably not necessary to read all the detail about the project, in particular the very technical ones. The brochure is giving all the general information to make a decision. We are complaining about the Whitepaper being too long but we should be happy that they made it very detailed and not just like any other project's whitepaper. Actually, i'm not complaining, i am happy that they made a great effort for whitepaper and made a very detailed one. I am just not reading it I skim through whitepaper, long ones I may never open. Will just speculate on how the public reacts the public will probably react positively considering how large it is. it gives credibility to the team. Thick whitepaper can give benefit and shortage too. At one side, thicker wp can give confidence that the project will be handled in earnest ways. But at the other hand, thicker wp will make people bored. |
|
|
|
Will you enable for my aunt to easily invest in some movies,independent documentaries,any tv product and to earn eventual profits if the project succeed? Decentralization goes on,revolution is happening!
People can invest in every projects no matter how old he or she is. If they can't invest during the ICO stage due to KYC, they can buy the tokens on exchangers as soon as the token tradeable. |
|
|
|
Ah, the important issue of censorship in a decentralised environment. Without any rules/culling/censoring, social media can turn ugly very quickly. Will Sphere have staff members that will remove offensive content? One thing is certain - if people see pictures/video posted on Sphere that disgust them, they will not want to use it.
It is horns of a dilemma. I hate censorship but there are some very fragile areas. I don't know how will they solve this problem. Cencorship is a must, otherwise the platform will run wildly and for sure will make the project get a very bad image/name. |
|
|
|
Thanks for the link I didn't know that there was a document like this. It's much easier to read. But this one lacks some information. I really don't know why they wrote a whitepaper with 288 pages. I think that frightens many investors who will not invest because of this. I’ll just go ahead and say that any investor who is ‘frightened’ by a 288 page document (which is pitched at an average level of english and technical knowledge) shouldn’t be investing in the first place. They should just go to the casino. Reading 288 pages of whitepapper should be a boring thing to do. It will be better to read just the important points only. I think nobody read the whole whitepaper...except the guys who participated in the bounty campaign to translate it Oh I think there are people who are reading the whole whitepaper, it is up to what kind of investor you are. But in general I think people will read just parts of it, which is in my opinion definitely ok. But yes, I would appreciate to get a smaller version, like 15-20 pages maybe? Like other proejcts have a one pager. I've read it completely. Took me some time but I read it on trains and during breaks. If you like a much shorter version just read the brochure. I think it was just about 10-15 pages long and sums it pretty much up. If you want to know explicit details you can search the wp or the index and just look it up. Yeah, that's the best way to know what ehealth offer is. Reading the general points and if wanted to know explicitly, we can find it from the whitepaper by following the index page. |
|
|
|
no need to be paranoid.
Simply check several characters at the beginning of the address and in the end. This is quite enough.
We are in crypto, here are not stupid email collectors and Viagra spammers. People here are intelligent and often have good programming skills. If they make a fake, you will not see it at the first glance. So my advise is, be paranoic every day and doublecheck every times, before you hit enter. Use two computers, one for crypto, one for surfing and so on. Being paranoid in cryptoland is wise, not a psychological disease. Agreed! The bad guys out there always update their ways to fool people. Extra high precautions are a must. |
|
|
|
Too much need to be changed on the Internet to make it work. Thanks to piracy, movies can be watched free of charge.
I don't mind paying but I don't want any restrictions while I'm paying like Netflix impose. The main issue is country. I would strongly suggest that the contents should not be country specific, people from everywhere have access to Internet now and everyone has the right to watch contents. The main differenceis that you pay a subscription on Netflix , Cryptoflix is based on videos on demands, so you'll not care if there are some movies that you don't like, you'll pay only movies that you like What we like is what we got! That's cool so we won't waste our money for unnecessary stuffs. |
|
|
|
Like I said on every ICO discussion I joined, those websites are useless, icobench for example, there's usually one guy and a bot voting lol
But we can not ignore their existence. Some people use icobench and similar sites as a reference too. |
|
|
|
Sometimes we need to accept that there are short term investor (maybe trader) and long term investor.
We cant hope that all people are same and using the same strategy.
If youre quite active in the market, you can sell at high and buyback at low.
Take profits from the volatility not just watch it.
In my opinion ehealth is a good long term project, i will watch the progress closely, maybe i can take some profits if i can do the right thing at the right time.
I think you are forgetting the other investor type which combines short&long. My strategy is to make a basket with short term and long term investments. Mostly short terms are riskier but offering more profit and long terms are less risky but offering less profit. Making a balance with them is my investment strategy. And planning to put ehealth there for a long time. Since it is understood that this project is likely to become a long term investment, will it be able to generate big ROI to compensate investors? Of course we must not forget short term investors, who only invest in an ICO to make a quick flip with profit, right after the ICO. But as you said, since eHealth is the prime example for a long term project/investment, I hope they can find enough people who will go the long way with the project and have the patience. Well in the end someone will buy the dumped tokens, and they will be the new holder. So even after the tokensale, there will always be new investors come up. that's the way the market works. dump at first and then hold for the long run There are some people who wait for tokens to hit exchanger for the first time in the hope there will be some people who will sell the tokens cheaply especially from bounty hunters. Then they buy it and hold the token as long as possible. |
|
|
|
I agree that the more money they can get, the development of the project will able to obtain their goal and most probably, if all tokens got sold, still they can consider private investors to invest in the project because the more investors means success of the project and " what can they offer to the investors in return?" that is the question. Any idea? I didn't get this. If there is not token left and they are not getting anything back, why are they putting their money into this? Yeah, if all tokens being sold that means the money to run the project is already enough and there is no need to take another investors. That will make the whole concept becomes crumbly imo. |
|
|
|
At what stage is the project now?
There will be Pre ICO from February, 18th - March, 18th 2018. Bonuses up to 40% and price per token will be started from 0.006 ETH. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
