erf tamereenslip@rie:~/riecoin/src# riecoind: main.cpp:2895: bool InitBlockIndex(): Assertion `block.hashMerkleRoot == uint256("0xb8fcc5eedac458fe02b8797ceff6c7ba4c05f749ff464b6ebf775e0eab0afa6c")' failed.
There is an updated file that contains the real implementation. Just sync & rebuild. |
|
|
|
Topic starter is not even online. Another one fail launch.
He's too busy mining. But this was supposed to be fair launch.. right? All men are created equal. Some are just more equal than others. |
|
|
|
Topic starter is not even online. Another one fail launch.
He's too busy mining. |
|
|
|
Topic starter not even online. Another one fail launch.
The source code is up on github. Just download it and compile, and you can start mining. |
|
|
|
Windows binary?
Sure. Just compile one yourself. Haven't you learned anything from the MAX launch? |
|
|
|
|
Did riecoin.org just get DDOS'd?
This looks eerily familiar.
|
|
|
|
|
Which exchanges will it be listed on?
(Please say MCXNOW).
|
|
|
|
Annoucing our MaxCoin pool!! Features- Help Desk
- 150Gbps DDoS protection
... Uhh. Did you just get DDOS'd? |
|
|
|
good for you, i just feel bad for the ones that traded you the btc to get your coins.
It's Max Keiser's punishment for those who slept through math class in school. |
|
|
|
This Coin will survive even community DONT WANT IT.
I want this coin. It's valuable. Easy to mine. More ASIC resistant than the scrypt coins. And actively tracking DDOS attacks and trying to respond quicker than other people out there is fun. I wish there were more coins like this. But go ahead, speak for all of us. |
|
|
|
This is NOT a 1% fee pool by a long shot.
It's:
* 1% fee
* 1% required donation
* 1% on auto-withdrawal of minimum of 10 MAX (if you think it's a good idea to use a pool as your wallet you can drop this %).
i.e. It's a 3% pool.
Lol - No it's not. It's a 1% fee. 0% donation (but if you DO donate it has to be in 1% increments) -< THIS IS OPTIONALand a .1 Max fee on transfers (max of 100) so 0.1% <- the network charges TX fee on new coins. The average amount is still being calculated. So we are in effect 1.1% fee pool if you REALLY want to be picky. Ok, I'll give you that the donation can be 0. For some reason I tried setting it to 0 earlier, and it complained saying the minimum is 1%. On the web site it also shows the allowed range as 1% to 100%. However, in order to get a 0.1% fee you need to accumulate 100 MAX in the pool. EVERY other pool out there tell users not to use a pool as a wallet. You guys seem to be ok with being a wallet service, but I'm not sure if you will convince users to trust you with that. So if users pay out at the minimum of 10 MAX, 0.1 MAX constitutes a 1% fee. So realistically this pool is still a 2% fee pool. |
|
|
|
I really wonder how much money Max Keiser did earn over these stupid miners/traders.
Please don't mine this coin, let it die.
Yes, everybody - stop mining the most profitable AltCoin out there now! Make it even more profitable for everybody else that are still mining it. Uhh. No. |
|
|
|
Annoucing our MaxCoin pool!! UPDATED: Now with 5 MAX BONUS to the block finders of the next 10 blocks!!!! Bonus is paid from my personal wallet NOT the block rewards - it will be credited automagically at the time of the block find Features- Help Desk
- 150Gbps DDoS protection
- SSL across the entire site
- VarDiff
- Dedicated Servers (not a VPS)
- Proportional payment system - Helps part time miners as there in no PPLNS ramp up period
- Fully redundant servers
- 1% fee
- Anonymous account option - Recommend you enable this to prevent account lockouts by brute force attacks
- Idle worker notifications
- FAST servers hosted in a secure, datacenters
- Invitation system
- Auto payout alerts
Feel free to post any questions. Happy mining Nutnut It's: * 1% fee * 1% required donation * 1% on auto-withdrawal of minimum of 10 MAX (if you think it's a good idea to use a pool as your wallet you can drop this %). i.e. It's a 3% pool. |
|
|
|
Anybody have payout issues with Dwarfpool? My balance is increasing, but its not paying out..
Same. Dwarfpool hasn't made any payouts in about 4.5 hours. About 25% of the pool users have jumped ship as a result. |
|
|
|
|
The pool seems to have stopped making any payouts about 4 hours ago (even though 9 blocks were founds since - 7 of them confirmed already).
Is something wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Don't create a scrypt coin - it's not going to be ASIC proof for much longer.
At least MAX is a non-scrypt GPU coin. I think STACY should be as well.
|
|
|
|
I actually see transaction with lots of confirmations (221), but also that don't make it to my wallet. E.g. 56aae6d0832c029f66bd5e61047fba0373e37c527ff90c95527bb3b7d866d687 Did the coin perhaps fork? Not sure why a TX with so many confirmations don't show up - never encountered that before. Never mind. For some reason my Wallet fell behind even though it said it was connected. I restarted it and all good now. For anybody else wanting to verify whether this is a problem, go to the debug window of the miner and type in 'getinfo'. Then compare the number of blocks your wallet thinks there are to the latest block on: http://max.cryptoexplore.com/ |
|
|
|
I actually see transaction with lots of confirmations (221), but also that don't make it to my wallet. E.g. 56aae6d0832c029f66bd5e61047fde0373e37c527ff90c95527bb3b7d866d687 Did the coin perhaps fork? Not sure why a TX with so many confirmations don't show up - never encountered that before. |
|
|
|
|
I have a riser question.
I'm using a Asus P8P67 WS REVOLUTION motherboard which has 4 PCIx16 and 3 PCIx1 slots.
I have GPU's directly on the MB in the x16 slots, and I'm using risers to get additional GPU's into the x1 slots. This all works, but is a big mess. I'd like to use risers even from the x16 slots so I can build a separate case.
So I just tried the x16 to x1 risers (+molex) that I'm currently using from the x1 slots. HOWEVER, those risers don't work from the x16 slots - ONLY from the x1. The cards just vanish from the O/S.
Do I need to use x16 - x16 risers (or an otherwise special type of riser) to rise a card from a x16 slot?
Preferably I'd just like to USB 3 risers for all the cards, if possible?
|
|
|
|
Christian I got this with settings -R 2 --algo=keccak -d gtx780 -L 512 -l K1024x32 -C 2 -m 1 -i 1 -o stratum+tcp://max.netcodepool.org:5555 -u ManIkWeet.nvidia -p gpu: [2014-02-09 00:38:07] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 159006 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:07] accepted: 111/208 (53.37%), 159006 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:08] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 157707 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:09] accepted: 112/209 (53.59%), 157707 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:19] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 158071 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:19] accepted: 113/210 (53.81%), 158071 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:21] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:21] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 156465 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:31] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:31] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 157016 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:36] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:36] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 155436 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:39] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 155511 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:38:39] accepted: 114/211 (54.03%), 155511 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:38:47] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:38:47] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 156940 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:06] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780 result for nonce $b87707f3 does no
t validate on CPU!
[2014-02-09 00:39:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 0.00 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:13] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 95321 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:35] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 163385 khash/s
[2014-02-09 00:39:35] accepted: 115/212 (54.25%), 163385 khash/s (yay!!!)
[2014-02-09 00:39:41] Stratum detected new block
[2014-02-09 00:39:42] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 780, 162740 khash/s Edit: It's all good spinkick  Wow. Are you seriously only getting 160khash on a GTX 780? I can get that on a 7850, and that's a $150 card. Or are the Cudaminer and Cgminer displays not directly comparable? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
