you can only have one MN per wallet as far as I know.
Mmm...likely true. But I have two wallets running. Question then is can you have two wallets running on two distinct masternode keys but on the same machine (hence same IP address)? |
|
|
|
Hello, anyone so kind to me as you can tell I can spend my coins the wallet again, to put the wallet, coins appear to me in conflict and the balance to 0 btx
See if anyone knows how to solve this problem
Thank You
I recommend you PM me your email address so I can invite you to our slack. We have a support channel that will help you  Please check your PMs AltTrader; Have sent Slack invite request. I'm also stumped with my wallet telling me I need to set masternode=1 in the configuration file even though that's exactly what I already have. If anyone can explain why it's doing this and how to get around it I'd appreciate it. Righto. I've progressed things along a bit. Here's what I did to get things working: 1. I assumed that given the directory that the new wallet creates for the data and wallet.dat to be stored is \users\(username)\AppData\Roaming\BTX the configuration file would need to be BTX.conf. WRONG!! It still needs to be called BitcoinTX.conf as upon changing it to that I was able to start my masternode without getting the 'set masternode=1 in the config file' error message. 2. I also assumed (dangerous business this "assuming" but when you're using a guide from another unrelated coin and trying to cross reference there are many "guesses" one needs to make) that the IP address to put into the .conf would need to be the external address of my DSL router as (surely) this is what the masternode network would need to be seeing? Wrong again! One needs to put their internal NATed address into the config file. So in my case 192.168.1.3. Maybe this is incorrect but it's allowed my masternode to start. So having achieved one wallet running as a masternode I thought I'd try to get a second one running. To do that I made a completely new data directory for BTX (so in addition to \users\(username)\AppData\Roaming\BTX I created a directory C:\BTX and copied everything from the AppData\Roaming directory to it). Then used the command bitcointx-qt.exe -datadir=C:\btx to run a second wallet instance, but referencing C:\btx. I was then able to go through the same process of doing a masternode genkey, getaccountaddress 0 and sending another 250K BTX to the new wallet's address from my existing wallet.dat and (after waiting for 15 confirmations) was able to start a second masternode! Whether the network is properly seeing my two nodes though I don't know. Here is the masternode network tab on the first one  And here is the masternode network tab on the second one:  I'd be interested in comments on whether what I've done means I have two masternodes or is the network just seeing one because they're on the same IP address? Furthermore can someone explain what happens now? Should I be seeing staking/masternode payments coming through soon? |
|
|
|
Hello, anyone so kind to me as you can tell I can spend my coins the wallet again, to put the wallet, coins appear to me in conflict and the balance to 0 btx
See if anyone knows how to solve this problem
Thank You
I recommend you PM me your email address so I can invite you to our slack. We have a support channel that will help you Please check your PMs AltTrader; Have sent Slack invite request. I'm also stumped with my wallet telling me I need to set masternode=1 in the configuration file even though that's exactly what I already have. If anyone can explain why it's doing this and how to get around it I'd appreciate it. |
|
|
|
One more thing, can I get a step by step guide on setting up a masternode. I have enough funds , I created the masternode, but I dont know how to collateralize it. When I click on Masternode , then start, it says "could not allocate vin". Do I just need to send the 275k to the new address of the masternode and then start it? Anyone?
Prometheus will make a guide Sry my health dont allow me to sit longer then 5min at my PC For the first ppls, use the guide from icash masternodes (page 16/17) until i can create it for us The only change is that u have to send 250000 BTX to the MN address, all other stuff is the same And dont forget to set "staking=0" in ur conf file. Hey PrometheusX can you please provide a link to this icash masternode guide? I've just read the OP at the icash ANN thread and, while I can see that someone claimed a bounty for creating a masternode guide, I cannot find a link to it anywhere in the OP. I've also searched through that entire thread and again no link specifically, but there are a few posts giving instructions. It's all very piecemeal though. I'd like to be able to actually see this guide, read it through and go to page 16/17 like you're suggesting. |
|
|
|
Dear community, Rest assured that the BTX team is working every day on this project. We are just facing a quite complex situation, but it is about to be resolved. We sincerley apologise for the delays, we do not control the turn of events that hit us. It is too soon for us to explain you what has happened since the situation is not entirely resolved. All is fine for BTX nonetheless because the team is as motivated as ever to reach its goals  Do not look at the price atm. It is clearly not a good representation of the quality of what we are doing here. As for exchanges, we first get MN working ! Your project leader, as dedicated as ever, TheAltTrader AltTrader any idea what's going on at C-Cex? There hasn't been a BTX sale transaction since (depending were in the world one is) late 29-June/early 30-June. Their wallet status is indicating BTX is okay but it's reporting latest BTX block as 19819 whereas http://blox.btx.rocks/ is reporting 19839 and my wallet's just gone 19841. Is it broken? Did they ever get back to you? I know you guys are doing stuff and I appreciate that but the one exchange we're on appears to have a stuck wallet, there's no trade and (apart from what you've written above) no indication of what's going on to tackle the situation. It not looking too good. Just tested; A buy on CCex A sell on CCex A withdraw from CCex All were successful At the time, both Abe.BTX.Rocks and Blox.BTX.Rocks and my wallet were all showing 19867. Not sure what is up with them showing 19847.\ Possibly they are using a separate wallet/daemon for the web page and separate wallets/daemons for accounting which would make it much more secure and the daemon for the web site is behind. One thing I noticed on Blox.BTX.Rocks is that you have to really look at the block number to make sure you're looking at the max block. When I looked at it they were ordered 19865, 19866, then 19867 because all 3 blocks were solved at the exact same time... WOW Okay thanks for checking. I can see your 499 BTX buy on there now. But interestingly their wallet is showing it's at 19936 whereas at this moment my wallet (and blox.btx.rocks) is showing 19949. It's like their wallet status interface reports the block the wallet last did a transaction, not the current block the network is at. |
|
|
|
Dear community, Rest assured that the BTX team is working every day on this project. We are just facing a quite complex situation, but it is about to be resolved. We sincerley apologise for the delays, we do not control the turn of events that hit us. It is too soon for us to explain you what has happened since the situation is not entirely resolved. All is fine for BTX nonetheless because the team is as motivated as ever to reach its goals Do not look at the price atm. It is clearly not a good representation of the quality of what we are doing here. As for exchanges, we first get MN working ! Your project leader, as dedicated as ever, TheAltTrader AltTrader any idea what's going on at C-Cex? There hasn't been a BTX sale transaction since (depending were in the world one is) late 29-June/early 30-June. Their wallet status is indicating BTX is okay but it's reporting latest BTX block as 19819 whereas http://blox.btx.rocks/ is reporting 19839 and my wallet's just gone 19841. Is it broken? Did they ever get back to you? I know you guys are doing stuff and I appreciate that but the one exchange we're on appears to have a stuck wallet, there's no trade and (apart from what you've written above) no indication of what's going on to tackle the situation. It not looking too good. |
|
|
|
I hate to sound like a parrot but to me this time is kind of tipping point so allow me to share some more thoughts. I write this out of respect for Mangled Blue, Coins101, Tungfa, Tao, Tante, Renegade Man, qwizzie, Artoodeetoo, toknormal, oaxaca, Minotaur26, Alex-Ru... and several other members whose contributions I admire. Emphasis is on "several" others. I'll get back to it.
It only goes to show how much we are hated in crypto
DASH actually "does work"
We have over-come HUGE obstacles
I'm sure others could explain many things better but - simple fact - we are hated
A red-headed step-child
Our open-source code will continue to be molested....
...
Face it - CRYPTO HATE US!!!
LONG LIVE DASH!!!!!!!!!!!
I do not care if "crypto hate us" I wonder who LOVES us? There are only 3,045 members on Dash Talk (from 1,850 on November 5th 2014) and here we have only these several people talking among themselves here. And I see this little motley gang of enthusiasts being increasingly delusional. Forgive me this harsh word, I do not use it as negative as it may sound and count me in, regarding that "delusion," because had I had a grain of salt left in my brains I'd leave this dash thingy the very moment it lost its character and became what it is today. Look at this example, Tao's passionate argument against "some negativity creeping through our normally positive thread," and focus on this bit:
We are in this project's infancy. Darksend has its bugs, InstantX does not work every time, and the UI of the wallet could use some work to be more user friendly. What are we in a rush to promote? People download the wallet, say this doesn't do what it's supposed to do and then discard and never come back.
ALL Tao has been doing since commencement of this Twitter et al. activities was to PROMOTE Darkcoin / DASH. But now he asks "what are we in a rush to promote?" If there was ever a negative statement, that would spook me away this instant, is that sentence. (not to mention that famous Ben Hur, promotional video that takes forever) Alas, " WHAT" in it is much worse to me, it frightens me. 18 months into development but the project does not know what it is. Of course no one is buying it. We can all mull over LTC and find gazillion issues with it (I, for one, never got why that thing even existed) but it is CLEAR what LTC is, a "lite" version of BTC. Discussion, over at Dash Talk about its mission and vision has these two interesting bits: " Dash’s mission is to deliver safe and reliable financial solutions to consumers and merchants in a decentralized manner - providing greater economic freedom to its users." & " Vision statement: People and businesses use Dash as digital money for everyday financial transactions." To which Alex-Ru replied with: " Dash is about creation of payment system of the future, created by decentralized community to replace current financial system for whole humanity to prosper." I was screaming from the top of my lungs (as GreyGhost over there at DT) how losing its IDENTITY (as Darkcoin) might kill this technologically great project. Thus far I can't say for sure I was right (after all I still cling on my MN) but every passing day I see that bland, tasteless, wanting to be loved by all but ignored by (almost) everyone DASH as the ONLY one in that crypto space ("that hates us") without its character. Damn it, even that Dogecoin that I do not get at all, or that ripped for pillage Ripple have their IDENTITY but we don't. I would rather be a laughing stock for a day or a month or even several months and yes, admit a horrible mistake, ditch the DASH name, go back to Darkcoin if I wanted it to be a real, revolutionary financial instrument that focuses on other lunatic fringes all over the world, that need privacy, be it freedom fighters in Tibet struggling against communist destruction of their ancient land, be it supporting Occupy, Snowden or Assange in that other totalitarian system (the U.S.) or to focus on immigrants and displaced all over the world that do not have bank account but have mobile phones (hint) etc., and build it from the scratch or find some other name that would DEFINE IDENTITY of Evan tech vision in two, three, succinct terms, one simple sentence max. Than we'll have a platform to really push Self-sustainable Decentralized Governance by Blockchain as yet another brilliant idea that can change the world. But hoping to "change the world" from the top (mass adoption delusion) is as deranged as sending a petition to Obama asking him to do "X" or "Y" while you are his (his masters) victim. And on a personal, gut level, of how I feel about all of this, I sense a paradox of a crypto century. Whomever was pushing re-branding of the name Darkcoin under the false pretense that its name will kill it (coupled with that other wishful thinking of "big retailers" "adopting DASH but not Darkcoin" and "big exchanges" "listing DASH but not Darkcoin," neither of which had happened and is not likely to happen) had created a new name, a lukewarm detergent sounding bland nonsense that might end up killing it instead. Nomen est omen, do not forget this ancient truth, you children of today, Nomen est omen.  You've raised some very salient points Wozzek. As I've stated before, I don't agree with some of your assessments about the name change (as I've previously mentioned, 'Darkcoin' was just never going to be workable for anything other than a very tiny sliver of humanity that would identify with such a brand) but I do appreciate your articulation of (what's becoming clear to me) a somewhat mixed up approach on what it is we have here, and how we're getting the message out. Tao, while I really appreciate your extraordinary energy and focus on tweeting Dash news, stating "some negativity creeping through our normally positive thread," like it's "bad" I think is poorly characterising an attempt to discuss the reality of the situation. We HAVE TO have open discussions about what's working and what's potentially not. As a contributor to this thread, I don't appreciate being told "quit your belly-aching and put your efforts into supporting the project" when I'm trying to stimulate genuine conversation about what the likely challenge is we're experiencing. There is clearly a marketing/positioning issue with Dash and it's not going to go away by ignoring it. Some of Wozzek's (effectively) "all things to all people" complaint has validity. The worst thing would be to just ignore him because his view doesn't meet with our group-think view on how we're going to make Dash successful. Perhaps this isn't the most appropriate forum to discuss this but there's clearly the need to sort through some stuff as I'm of the view there's now some level of confusion as to what Dash is and who it's for. |
|
|
|
Good podcast Bill. Sounds like those Node40 people have built a good masternode hosting service. |
|
|
|
|
Just scored a 5247.01150684 BTX staking payment!
|
|
|
|
Great post - very diplomatically and balanced"ly" put ! (Though laced with some well seasoned frustration ). Yep 'seasoned' frustration as, on a purely personal level, I've not yet made a dime from DASH and am considerably underwater with it. Frustrating when I think of people who've probably taken part in the pumps in a far more ruthless fashion and have done okay whilst the rest of us 'here for the long haul' wonder what we're doing when cryptos as banal and lacking in substance as LTC take off again and leave DASH wilting. I'd have to agree with a lot of that while at the same time having to admit to not doing a damn thing to address it myself and I'm aware that others are doing major amounts of work and paddling underwater.
That's not true Tok! You add enormous value to this thread and therefore the DASH community. It's one of the many benefits (even if not directly monetarily related) of being involved in this project. Keep posting man; we all love it! (even the trolls who secretly admire you....they just can't bring themselves to acknowledge it. Poor sods) All the same, we're still a good 50% to 100% up on January's valuation so I don't really see it as a crisis.
True, but if you entered during the first pump in May 2014 it's harder to look at it this way. Finally, I'd love to understand more about the background to the litecoin pumps. It has a trend like no other coin - only 2 major pumps in its entire history. 1 in November 2013 and the other in the last 2 weeks. So if you're worried about holding Dash when it drifted down for a month or 2, imagine holding litecoin while it lost 82% of its value over a continuous decline lasting a full 18 months.
Me too. It's such a hard to explain phenomenon and if, back earlier this year when DASH roared past LTC, someone on a troll box had've said "No...I tell you man, LTC's gonna come good mid year..." I would have just laughed at them; but they would've been right. To keep it in perspective though, LTC has reached low $4 territory; still a way to go to its $48 ATH. However, it may continue to rally given the dynamics of Grexit and everything else spooking traditional markets. |
|
|
|
Ha! His tweet is (for us not living there in terrible distress or with relatives we're worried about) quite funny: "Decided to solve the Greek Debt Crisis via crowdfund. All I need is for everyone in EU to buy a Feta and Olive salad" |
|
|
|
As much as I'd like to believe "all is well/it's all going great" the fact is DASH has been losing its value and all of us have to take that into account against our own personal criteria on investing, our understanding of what's happening and where things are at. The ongoing rise of BTC and the dramatic recovery/re-rally of LTC just HAVE TO be taken into account to protect one's position so considering DASH against the BTC price isn't just valid I think it's fundamental.
How do you propose we take these into account ? (i.e. what significance should we draw from these trends). Well (at risk of having my DASH loyalty questioned; but I'm trying to stop 'confirmation bias' in its tracks) I think we're a very technical project. By that I mean I think we focus on the technology and how the technology at a deep architectural level is being formulated, designed and implemented as the primary activity we're all here for. Now, that's to be admired in many ways because if you're going to build a new currency and revolutionary financial system, you'd want to get the fundamentals right. We've all seen too many examples of poorly thought through platforms/systems where fundamental flaws that weren't addressed at the beginning end up causing major difficulties down the track. However it's also very apparent (and you would articulate this concept more powerfully than I can Tok) getting a tech into the market and getting it accepted is often even more important than getting everything about its development and architectural substance perfect or close to perfect. There's this fine line to be followed between 'getting it right' and 'getting it out there'. I think we're suffering from perhaps too heavy focus on 'getting it right' and not enough 'getting it out there' and we've become a little insular in our discussion and activities. That we're now coming up to 18 months of DRK/DASH and we still don't have a proper marketing video out there is testament to what I'm talking about. I don't want to take away from the good work that many are doing (and I've hardly had anything much to do with it, so I'm conscious of how easily my comments could be characterised as hypocritical) but the reality is that DASH means something to people within crypto (and they're either lovers or haters) but is virtually completely invisible outside of that and has no hooks/links into other realms. The trading of DASH that's going on is limited to a small community for the most part, until something major is released, then the crypto speculators jump in too....but none of that is external money from people that have bought into the DASH story, can see what's being built here and want to be involved for the longer term. (Well this is my perception, rightly or wrongly, and I'd hazard to guess it's many other people's perception too). To summarise, I think we're a project with a stunningly sound architectural development that's as close to crypto nirvana in terms of its fundamental properties around the 2-tiered network, fungibility, and (the potential for) liquidibility, but I think we've put nowhere near enough effort into getting the message out and the price going down slowly like a leaking balloon is indicative of that. The stunning resurgence of LTC (which has not a single advanced property like DASH does) is simply because of the network effect of so many major exchanges (especially Chinese) being so enamoured with it as an alternative to BTC. With the upcoming halving (and with BTC block size change controversy) I think people are seeing LTC as a genuine alternative. That's almost incomprehensible to us here....but it's what's happening and our story just isn't out there even remotely enough to pull some of that activity away from LTC to DASH. |
|
|
|
Not good news!!!
"There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about."-- Oscar Wilde This is very old news, but daesh is what resistance members call ISIS as a derogatory term. ISIS hates it and promised to cut the tongue of anyone who calls them that. It is really not an issue for us in any way, we also checked with middle east community members back in the day and reality is they feel is completely unrelated. Our Prime Minister down here in Australia, Tony Abbott, often refers to the "Daesh death cult" and how "they're coming after us" (I think he's decided to incite fear and loathing about something across the other side of the world as a mechanism to cover up the fact the local economy's tanking and he'd promised us all his side of politics were the ONLY ones that could manage the economy properly). The first time I heard it I thought "Geez, I know we get our share of trolls in this thread but I didn't expect my PM to characterise us as a death cult!" |
|
|
|
lowest price since March any predictions?
That's not true. Please refer to the USD price and not the BTC ratio. We are still around $2.83. BTC ratio goes down when BTC rises faster than DASH but in many cases when the ratio goes down, the DASH USD price still creeps higher. Well, since most of us bought DASH with BTC, we measure price in BTC... That's silly. How do you buy the BTC? You shouldn't measure it with BTC but if you do, you'll probably feel quite a bit of hurt if you haven't already. Good luck with that. It's not silly. For example, I measure my funds only in BTC with no relation to USD, that's why I don't care DASH/USD rate, but only DASH/BTC. I'd have to agree with CODERsp. Whether we like it or not, all of crypto is tethered to BTC and a particular crypto's performance, perceived or otherwise, is its price against BTC. The DASH/USD market is tiny by comparison to the DASH/BTC market (which, of course is still tiny too). As much as I'd like to believe "all is well/it's all going great" the fact is DASH has been losing its value and all of us have to take that into account against our own personal criteria on investing, our understanding of what's happening and where things are at. The ongoing rise of BTC and the dramatic recovery/re-rally of LTC just HAVE TO be taken into account to protect one's position so considering DASH against the BTC price isn't just valid I think it's fundamental. |
|
|
|
Hello, Following a review of your Coinbase account, it appears that you are likely violating the Coinbase User Agreement by reselling your bitcoin through services such as LocalBitcoins, Craigslist, Ebay, etc. Please see: https://support.coinbase.com/customer/portal/articles/1905681-localbitcoins-and-coinbaseFinCEN guidance states that “a person is an exchanger and a money transmitter if the person accepts such de-centralized convertible virtual currency from one person and transmits it to another person as part of the acceptance and transfer of currency, funds, or other value that substitutes for currency.” As such, accepting bitcoin from Coinbase and then re-selling to another person is considered money transmission per FinCEN. Money transmission is an inherently high-risk business and is heavily regulated. Coinbase has elected to not facilitate money transmission activities via these services.In order to continue using Coinbase, you will need to deactivate your account with these services within 10 days. Additionally, your purchase and sell limits will be lowered to $200/day. However, if you can sufficiently demonstrate that your daily limit needs for transactions unrelated to money transmission exceed this amount, then we can raise your limits accordingly. You may also request a limit increase after 90 days by emailing support@coinbase.com if you have not engaged in any further money transmission activities via these services.Thank you for understanding. Regards, Coinbase Compliance I don't even use LocalBitcoins, Craigslist, Ebay, etc. for crypto, most of the coins that I've bought the last two weeks have yet to clear, topped $10k is I guess what triggered this BS. I'm not normally someone that makes a sweeping judgemental statement about someone's looks, but I can't help thinking Brian Armstrong has a smugness about him that makes him the poster-child of sheer stupidity and bloody mindedness determined to ruin what crypto represents and drag it down into guv-stoog banality. I have about as much desire to use Coinbase as I do to buy Ripple.  |
|
|
|
Dash will get pumped soon enough... Its starting to look very tempting I would think now...
I'd like to think so but I'm not feeling that hopeful to be honest. LTC's been as high as 0.01645 (on Bitfinex) in the past little while (a more than 100% increase over 30 days). And NMC & PPC have had big pumps in the past few minutes too. We seem to be missing the action these older alts are now reaping as capital starts flowing back into crypto with traditional markets everywhere so jittery about the likely default. It's frustrating that Dash isn't (currently) in that uptake. |
|
|
|
hello
are we there yet???
Where's "there"? |
|
|
|
For the Bitcoin price i'm hoping these ATH's will be broken at some point in time (purely looking at the Bitfinex exchange right now) :
259.10
303.96
315.00
475.00
Hey qwizzie, how can you have multiple all-time-high's? I mean isn't that an oxymoron? The concept of an all-time-high is the highest price an asset reached. So that can only ever be one price and one time (or am I'm being pedantic?) i guess i could call them STTH's (Short Term Time High)  or you could see them as resistance points... Ha! Yes, how about we call them the Short Term Intercorrelated Cyclical Break-Out Spikes (STICBOS).... Well the first one might be just minutes away; Finex went through $256 and Stamp almost through $257 just a short while ago. |
|
|
|
For the Bitcoin price i'm hoping these ATH's will be broken at some point in time (purely looking at the Bitfinex exchange right now) :
259.10
303.96
315.00
475.00
Hey qwizzie, how can you have multiple all-time-high's? I mean isn't that an oxymoron? The concept of an all-time-high is the highest price an asset reached. So that can only ever be one price and one time (or am I'm being pedantic?) |
|
|
|
And, by the looks of it, here goes LTC too! (who would have thought the chikun would revive so.....I certainly got it wrong!)  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
