*ping* Nah, it's not dead - "stasis", like someone wrote above, is a very good description. I have not given up on TRI, it's not abandoned! I know I repeatedly said I am going to finish the wallet (and I still mean it), but I simply lack the time - and with lack of time comes a temporary loss of motivation caused by exhaustion which is fueled by lack of time. It's a diabolical circle! oO Anyways, the wallet is coming, sooner or later. I don't think it's that urgent because - correct me if I am wrong - there are no technical issues, at least not that I know of. I have one wallet running perfectly fine for over 2 months straight, happily staking. =) But if someone feels like doing a little more - whatever that may be - for or with TRI, simply msg me. I won't stop you (and even support you!) - this has been a community project ever since it was taken over.  |
|
|
|
No more new coin launch coins for me.... No money in it anymore. 1 outta 10 may yield a profit. Sure would help if the dev was active. Stick with older reliable coins  He posted ~ 3.5 hours ago - what do you expect? Bi-hourly status updates? ..... |
|
|
|
Only I have problem with connection to yobit? - "Website is offline"
Yobit has been working fine for me.. From around 8 hours can't connect, what should I do? (DNS restarted) I wrote to them on twitter but I didin't get any answer. :/ Does your DNS resolve the yobit IP address? In case it doesn't: Try other DNS server(s), for example Google DNS 8.8.8.8 (and 8.8.4.4 iirc). In case it does: Can you access yobit via the resoved IP address? |
|
|
|
2 hours and still waiting for the wallet to start staking  Found 100 block MRB and 50 later.  Same here, found a couple of 100s and 50s. And I just created a masternode for fun. |
|
|
|
cd src/leveldb
make libleveldb.a libmemenv.a Then try again. |
|
|
|
Newsletter will be released this weekend.
Aaaaaannnnddd the fixed wallets? ETA? |
|
|
|
We've already removed a few of posts from this thread. Not because we are seeking to silence the voice or opinions of members simply because we disagree with their point of view. Rather, we want the HALO Project, and our community, to not include the rampant skepticism and negativity which plagues so many threads on many forums.
Now listen up, asswipe. I've lost 1.3BTC due to your coin and ocminer's decision to not launch a pool yet + his mistake to put up a pool for a PoS coin (Grav). So it's only normal that i'm a bit negative, don't you think? Launch the coin this instant, goddamnit! How can you already lose money on a coin that hasent even launched yet? Well, maybe because I rented a couple of big rigs in advance, before someone else could take them? Captain obvious speaking ^ what kind of rigs did you rent and who gave you any info about algo? Huh He is either a semi-funny troll or a moron. Simple as that. |
|
|
|
Different topic: Speaking of updates, I know it's annoying when community members ask for updates so I won't ask. I'll just say I'm VERY anxiously awaiting the next newsletter lol That. And don't worry about delisting....won't happen. |
|
|
|
If you guys really wanna invest in a social marketing coin Viral is the only one. SMAC tried but failed and lets be honest... its not like they have an Adam of their own to slingshot this coin to the moon.
just saying..
Where and how failed SMAC? And if SMAC had an Adam, I wouldn't be writing this. Ummmm Id say close to no support or volume is a big indicator that SMAC has failed hard. You're wrong. SMAC is different, general rules don't apply here. Unlike other coins, you don't need someone to dump on to make profits with your investments since there is a monthly buyback. And no sell volume isn't bad at all. Good luck man.. in the 12 months of buybacks i'll have made 12x that on Viral and all the other coins in the mean time. Why wait a year to see real returns and not play all the money makers. LMAO... Great! Go playing with Viral then, I stay here. That way we both have what we want and can part ways happily! |
|
|
|
If you guys really wanna invest in a social marketing coin Viral is the only one. SMAC tried but failed and lets be honest... its not like they have an Adam of their own to slingshot this coin to the moon.
just saying..
Where and how failed SMAC? And if SMAC had an Adam, I wouldn't be writing this. Ummmm Id say close to no support or volume is a big indicator that SMAC has failed hard. You're wrong. SMAC is different, general rules don't apply here. Unlike other coins, you don't need someone to dump on to make profits with your investments since there is a monthly buyback. And no sell volume isn't bad at all. |
|
|
|
If you guys really wanna invest in a social marketing coin Viral is the only one. SMAC tried but failed and lets be honest... its not like they have an Adam of their own to slingshot this coin to the moon.
just saying..
Where and how failed SMAC? And if SMAC had an Adam, I wouldn't be writing this. |
|
|
|
net hash going over 1ph every time the 1000 coin cycle starts. whats funny is with 3th i am doing better when they leave and blocks r at 50
Unless someone buys all the hashes @ nicehash. Then it goes severely down. Dunno what he or she is mining though, it's not marbles. |
|
|
|
Fix confirmed as working. CheckStakeKernelHash() : using modifier 0xc3f7e4cbb3e9d895 at height=88976 timestamp=2015-05-07 04:52:03 UTC for block from height=88622 timestamp=2015-05-06 22:53:55 UTC
CheckStakeKernelHash() : pass modifier=0xc3f7e4cbb3e9d895 nTimeBlockFrom=1430952835 nTxPrevOffset=158 nTimeTxPrev=1430952835 nPrevout=1 nTimeTx=1431461624 hashProof=00009050cb1a39c31ed4d4a20e11be760d9d214ac0c3d0ebf6b0b2e912480482
DEBUG nSubsidy=11860146275, nCoinAge/365=474405851, nRewardCoinYear=25
GetProofOfStakeReward() : create=1.18601462 nSubsidy=118601462
CheckStakeKernelHash() : using modifier 0xc3f7e4cbb3e9d895 at height=88976 timestamp=2015-05-07 04:52:03 UTC for block from height=88622 timestamp=2015-05-06 22:53:55 UTC
CheckStakeKernelHash() : check modifier=0xc3f7e4cbb3e9d895 nTimeBlockFrom=1430952835 nTxPrevOffset=158 nTimeTxPrev=1430952835 nPrevout=1 nTimeTx=1431461624 hashProof=00009050cb1a39c31ed4d4a20e11be760d9d214ac0c3d0ebf6b0b2e912480482
CheckStake() : new proof-of-stake block found
hash: ae423f782f32ea1e4473c8c64ea98f6ffdf67ebd2ccd19d560ebf6a9cff98393
proofhash: 00009050cb1a39c31ed4d4a20e11be760d9d214ac0c3d0ebf6b0b2e912480482
target: 0009fa867e000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
CBlock(hash=ae423f782f32ea1e4473c8c64ea98f6ffdf67ebd2ccd19d560ebf6a9cff98393, ver=6, hashPrevBlock=1a0648dbb16c3e98b2e87e00181ff1dc3a505dbddae494a686ab03404c1aed44, hashMerkleRoot=50877f016ff94f57c8f4100ba3c82fee337e505f4231d238c22c18b7596bc517, nTime=1431461624, nBits=1e01c716, nNonce=0, vtx=2, vchBlockSig=3044022035aeae9912e464b0eea3cbfe9db5eef1dd95f5a3962e37683184e422b943d78802200faf60da05e85d92914a2de2ff81db97bcb47b794b931451c6a67f652339a369)
Coinbase(hash=d1dc176f9f, nTime=1431461624, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=2, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 03417301)
CTxOut(empty)
CTxOut(empty)
Coinstake(hash=e40b8de047, nTime=1431461624, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=2, nLockTime=0)
CTxIn(COutPoint(cabfeaf821, 1), scriptSig=30440220364e48ff94cec543)
CTxOut(empty)
CTxOut(nValue=295.23448939, scriptPubKey=0385bd0fec486ca5dfcb42f47c3143a9ecc963b909a23c60e2ce4a64c4202d80f7 OP_CHECKSIG)
vMerkleTree: d1dc176f9f e40b8de047 50877f016f
out 295.23448939 |
|
|
|
|
Thanks. Checked via 3G, works.
Damn you, corporate firewall! oO
|
|
|
|
Does the block explorer in the ANN work for anyone?
*bump* |
|
|
|
That MAX_MONEY value is the maximum transaction size (set too high for the given coin supply I would say, but who cares?). Supply after PoW will be 32.8k coins. PoS is varying from 1% to 10% per year. Let's assume it will be 5% average: Supply after 1 year: ~34.4k Supply after 2 years: ~36.2k Supply after 3 years: ~38k and so on... Didn't check if there is some maximum total supply. *Anything I wrote above may be wrong. Only invested a few seconds to check. |
|
|
|
My coins have been in my wallet for almost 24 hours, M1 coins minimum stake age is 2 hours, I have no weight wtf ?
As discussed two pages back: PoS starts @ block 2000 - not earlier. Edit: We'd better hope there is enough staking pressure exactly at block 2000 or this blockchain is gonna stop suddenly! Very unlikely. Even if there is no weight @ block 2000 (again - very unlikely), the chain would start moving again as soon as there is (enough) weight. PS: Block 2000 might also be a PoW block (the only block which can be either PoW or PoS). |
|
|
|
|
Does the block explorer in the ANN work for anyone?
|
|
|
|
Looks like this coin's developer is Mammix.. who already created coins like BOOST, MAIA and abandoned them. Do not give your BTC's to him
We are not affiliated with those projects. I'd love to hear your reasoning behind that accusation. Edit as you have decided to lengthen your fud: There are many members of the community that can verify the fact that there was no instamine and the block reward rates are a standard incremental reduction. Could you please adjust the total coins after PoW and the block "halving" (well...it's no halving) rate in the OP to the correct values? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
