SLUSH is reporting they won 322930 & 322947, but BLOCKCHAIN is reporting that 322930 went to BTC Guild and 322947 went to AntPool. What's going on? Both are showing being reported from US near New York as well ***fingers Crossed**** we need the luck 322930 should go to us BTC guild showing reporting it like 30 secs later slush shows 14:36:49 BTC guild shows after 14:37 and 322947 appears to go to Ant beating us by 30 secs or so
|
|
|
SLUSH is reporting they won 322930 & 322947, but BLOCKCHAIN is reporting that 322930 went to BTC Guild and 322947 went to AntPool. What's going on? Both are showing being reported from US near New York as well ***fingers Crossed**** we need the luck 322930 should go to us BTC guild showing reporting it like 30 secs later slush shows 14:36:49 BTC guild shows after 14:37
|
|
|
SLUSH is reporting they won 322930 & 322947, but BLOCKCHAIN is reporting that 322930 went to BTC Guild and 322947 went to AntPool. What's going on? Both are showing being reported from US near New York as well ***fingers Crossed**** we need the luck
|
|
|
10.5 min avg blocks since new diff so might not go up much next round except even at that ridiculous price batch 1 s4 sold out in 12 hours
Batch 1 wasn't that large to begin with, this is from their post in S4 thread: S4'B1 is limited in quantity, as it is the first mass production after the development stage. understood still dont see how anyone would buy that 3.4 btc for .01 w gh/s improvement over s3+ .069 vs .070 when 2 s3+ is 1.16 and prob cheaper you can get 4 for over 1 btc cheaper and have same hash rate and I know it has an integrated psu so they wont have to buy 2 140 dollar psu's but they have to find a 16 amp power cord that fits hmmmmm... gonna be tuff 15 amp is what 12 gauge and thats already thicker then standard computer power cord bet it costs a bit and as standard outlets in the us are 15 amp rated I'm sure warranties will be void Agree, I wonder if they noticed that server psu and those 4 large fans? It is going to be very loud. S4 was obviously geared for their hosting option or a data center not the home. Either way you will never see ROI with it but sheep will be sheep. yup i was looking online and it appears only 250 volt solutions for above 15 amp power cords Wouldn't surprise me if the S5 when it comes out is a 220v only, just hope they don't drop the S3 line. Don't let this come across as "attacking" anyone: You fail to realize the S4 COMES WITH A POWER SUPPLY BUILT IN. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO BUY A PSU TO POWER THE THING. We have to buy PSU's to power the 3 or 4 Antminer S3's to get about the same hashing power. I prefer the S3+ at this point in time. However, the S4 will probably have a greater resale value down the road if you choose to get out of mining at some point in time. So, you save money not having to buy PSU. Their PSU is GOLD rated and not PLATINUM rated like my Corsair AX860's powering my S3's. Also, someone made a good point about the "watts consumed at the wall." Approximately 1400 watts OR 1380 watts to be exact when you multiply the .69 watts x 2,000 GH/s. TRY putting two of these on a 20 AMP circuit; EVEN WHEN YOU REPLACE THE STANDARD 15 AMP RECEPTACLE (OUTLET) WITH A 20 AMP OUTLET. You would only be able to put ONE of these bad boys on that ONE 20 AMP OUTLET. 20 AMPS will drive 2400 WATTS. Do the math: 1400 watts x 2 Bitmain Antminer S4's is 2800 WATTS. The 12/2 wire will get too hot. IF you have 14/2, YOUR HOUSE WILL BURN DOWN if the breaker doesn't trip! SOLUTION: RUN 10/3 wire [Rated at 30 AMPS] to a 30 AMP OUTLET [NEMA L-14-30-R (circular/4 prong)]. IT MUST BE NEMA L-14-30-R/CIRCULAR. OTHERWISE, IT WILL NOT ALLOW THE NEXT THING I MENTION TO PLUG INTO IT. http://www.homedepot.com/p/Pass-Seymour-30-Amp-Self-Grounding-Locking-Single-Outlet-Receptacle-Black-L1430RCCV3/100155901?N=5yc1vZc33aZ1z11vjb#specificationsTHEN GET THE FOLLOWING EXTENSION CORD [3 ft. Generator 30 Amp 4-prong to 15-20 Amp (x2) Y-Adapter] TO PLUG INTO THE NEMA L-14-30-R OUTLET: This extension cord splits INTO TWO 20 AMP PLUGS to plug in two Bitmain Antminer S4's. It's only 3 feet but it gets the job done. http://www.homedepot.com/p/Rodale-3-ft-Generator-30-Amp-4-prong-to-15-20-Amp-x2-Y-Adapter-G30AM420AY/202669114?N=5yc1vZc4neZ1z11vjbDON'T FORGET THE DOUBLE POLE 30 AMP BREAKER. http://www.homedepot.com/s/double%2520pole%252030%2520amp%2520breaker?NCNI-5Problem solved; IF YOU HAVE THE S4's in mind. Now you have 30 AMP circuit [3600 watts] for the 2800 watts required for two S4's David Exactly and now you have spent more money then buying your 2 1000w gold psu's for powering your s3+ and still spent 1 btc more fore same hash rate to get a .001 better efficency anyone who buys s4 is doing it wrong unless you already have the infrastructure it is not home miner friendly at all and with 5% diff jumps will mine 2.45 btc before un profitable so upside down it will always be i was really hoping for a 2 btc price point and a home friendly setup but they are pushing there hosting thru hashnest supa hard atm
|
|
|
Just came back to the pool. Now getting negative numbers? ? the negative is just percentage of shares vs whats expected at current diff
|
|
|
I just switched back to Slush and on the Statistics page, #22867 is the first block I received and it shows my reward there as expected, approx .004. When I go to My Account page, it is showing no unconfirmed reward (0.0000)!
Is anyone else seeing this?
no it is fine for me ....my account shows estimated reward of block we are currently mining stats page shows actual calculated reward for found blocks so im not sure but if no reward in stats page thats why my account unconfirmed not showing
|
|
|
10.5 min avg blocks since new diff so might not go up much next round except even at that ridiculous price batch 1 s4 sold out in 12 hours
Batch 1 wasn't that large to begin with, this is from their post in S4 thread: S4'B1 is limited in quantity, as it is the first mass production after the development stage. understood still dont see how anyone would buy that 3.4 btc for .01 w gh/s improvement over s3+ .069 vs .070 when 2 s3+ is 1.16 and prob cheaper you can get 4 for over 1 btc cheaper and have same hash rate and I know it has an integrated psu so they wont have to buy 2 140 dollar psu's but they have to find a 16 amp power cord that fits hmmmmm... gonna be tuff 15 amp is what 12 gauge and thats already thicker then standard computer power cord bet it costs a bit and as standard outlets in the us are 15 amp rated I'm sure warranties will be void Agree, I wonder if they noticed that server psu and those 4 large fans? It is going to be very loud. S4 was obviously geared for their hosting option or a data center not the home. Either way you will never see ROI with it but sheep will be sheep. yup i was looking online and it appears only 250 volt solutions for above 15 amp power cords
|
|
|
10.5 min avg blocks since new diff so might not go up much next round except even at that ridiculous price batch 1 s4 sold out in 12 hours
Batch 1 wasn't that large to begin with, this is from their post in S4 thread: S4'B1 is limited in quantity, as it is the first mass production after the development stage. understood still dont see how anyone would buy that 3.4 btc for .01 w gh/s improvement over s3+ .069 vs .070 when 2 s3+ is 1.16 and prob cheaper you can get 4 for over 1 btc cheaper and have same hash rate and I know it has an integrated psu so they wont have to buy 2 140 dollar psu's but they have to find a 16 amp power cord that fits hmmmmm... gonna be tuff 15 amp is what 12 gauge and thats already thicker then standard computer power cord bet it costs a bit and as standard outlets in the us are 15 amp rated I'm sure warranties will be void
|
|
|
10.5 min avg blocks since new diff so might not go up much next round except even at that ridiculous price batch 1 s4 sold out in 12 hours
|
|
|
I dont know if anyone can help, but i have put my 3x Antminer S2 machines pointed at the pool, and they seem to be showing 0 best share, all my Antminer S3 machines are showing fine, but not the S2.
Just wondering if this is normal for the S2, or if its the older firmware thats causing the issue.
Im not familiar with the S2 so I cant be of much help to you could try a brief run on the testnet to verify functionality i believe
|
|
|
It appears a few changes have been made to web interface such as new block found there is no processing appearing to show that blocks potential reward in statistics? ? While the new block has begun this is a little disconcerting as it doesn't show up it makes it appear we lost the work for the previous 10 hour block I'm sure it will show up but the 5-20 minutes of processing without it showing will be a visual ugg.....and as this is the first block completed since web changes we wont know what will show until 15 minutes or so have passed I hope they did not make changes to the way the statistics page works So they just removed the processing part block appears after calculations are made!!...not sure why they did this but once again with no updates as to when things are scheduled to roll out it is a little off putting to see changes aka. passwords no processing etc. when you are used to a certain format.
|
|
|
It appears a few changes have been made to web interface such as new block found there is no processing appearing to show that blocks potential reward in statistics? ? While the new block has begun this is a little disconcerting as it doesn't show up it makes it appear we lost the work for the previous 10 hour block I'm sure it will show up but the 5-20 minutes of processing without it showing will be a visual ugg.....and as this is the first block completed since web changes we wont know what will show until 15 minutes or so have passed I hope they did not make changes to the way the statistics page works
|
|
|
It appears a few changes have been made to web interface such as new block found there is no processing appearing to show that blocks potential reward in statistics? ? While the new block has begun
|
|
|
I went to Coinbase and generated more btc addresses. Have them in their now per your advice!
Thanks again for looking out for me!!!
you're welcome
|
|
|
You pretty much have it all good. You can set each one as: Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH Pool 1 password x or seperately as (if i read ck's info correctly) Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH.1 Pool 1 password any Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH.2 Pool 1 password any Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH.3 Pool 1 password any Personally, I have a BFGMiner instance as a proxy that my S1, X1, and U1 are connected to, which then points them to CKPool And yes the Found Block column will tell you if you found one, also CK will know if you find one and will usually post it up here. Also, if you have a few S1's, head on over to the Mining > Software thread and grab something like Spiceminers Antviewer, will come in handy for multiple S1's. THANK YOU!!! do not use the .1 .2 .3 etc the only thing you can use is a btc address thats valid period.....if you have multiple machines and want to track simply go to wallet and generate additional addresses to use for different workers In Addition Found Block will work as well as best share if your best share is a higher number then current difficulty you have found a block
|
|
|
You pretty much have it all good. You can set each one as: Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH Pool 1 password x or seperately as (if i read ck's info correctly) Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH.1 Pool 1 password any Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH.2 Pool 1 password any Pool 1 stratum+tcp://solo.ckpool.org:3333 Pool 1 worker 1FAqPBCr19f3tJybRoaeNxih1hsmK9bMEH.3 Pool 1 password any Personally, I have a BFGMiner instance as a proxy that my S1, X1, and U1 are connected to, which then points them to CKPool And yes the Found Block column will tell you if you found one, also CK will know if you find one and will usually post it up here. Also, if you have a few S1's, head on over to the Mining > Software thread and grab something like Spiceminers Antviewer, will come in handy for multiple S1's. THANK YOU!!! do not use the .1 .2 .3 etc the only thing you can use is a btc address thats valid period.....if you have multiple machines and want to track simply go to wallet and generate additional addresses to use for different workers
|
|
|
it appears a lot of th/s is pool hopping slush pool consistently going from 6-7 ph during blocks affecting rewards by a significant amount 10-20%
|
|
|
@wasikidding, everything you said I appreciate. I may have mis-worded something though.
Slush has not paid me out 3 times, but there have been 3 completed sessions for the 24th, the most recent completion actually happened on the 25th based on Slush time zone. The first took 4h 24min, second took 1h 6min, third took 4h 19min all time stamped for the 24th. I have not been paid out so to speak because my payout is higher then they total. But the balance for each session is sitting in my balance on Slush. So what I was under the impression is that each completed session was a block that was completed or solved. I initially commented on it because the original poster to my post said "So far I don't even think we have had single block all day", but don't the completed sessions = 3 blocks solved or finalized? I appreciate your patience with me. Thanks
Yes in that regard unlike other pools we mine in a session until a block is solved, slush's number stays the same as network block number we are solving climbs so yes sorry i thought you meant you received three payouts so that is why i explained that way unlike ghash which I believe has like a set time per session etc we run until a block is solved and then score is calculated based on total shares and last share etc to calculate our btc value for that solved block
|
|
|
will these be assembled?
|
|
|
|