prevent 1 hunter being dominated by multiple hunters? as in the past - e.g. dominators blocking an area and being unable to get past as they have too many hunters and no to little risk for doing so..
An alternative fee structure to keep dominators down would be a slow ticking upkeep (0.005 coins per block or so, payable after despawning on a bank tile), while refunding harvested coins after disaster. And players would need more control on where they spawn, as groups of hunters will be stronger than a single one. |
|
|
|
The amount of actually distributed coins (total - gameFund) is still going up, but slightly slower than gamefund itself. "height" : 795564,
"num_utxo" : 392623,
"moneysupply" : {
"utxo" : 7612505.48086544,
"inNames" : 12835.00000000,
"map" : 19114.10188000,
"gameFund" : 421863.74725456,
"total" : 8040648.33000000
total - gameFund = 7618785 "height" : 795830,
"num_utxo" : 392919,
"moneysupply" : {
"utxo" : 7616501.47186544,
"inNames" : 7750.00000000,
"map" : 11085.85088000,
"gameFund" : 423470.99725456,
"total" : 8043308.32000000
total - gameFund = 7619838 I guess the 20 HUC cost for sending destruct was about right, and it alone would prevent the map from getting too crowded. |
|
|
|
|
It looks like the crown is now an interesting item, taking it is dangerous (suicide if hunters of other colors are nearby). With enemies nearby you even have to be careful not to pick it up accidentally when killing the current bearer.
|
|
|
|
|
Margin Call Orders had prices of 212 and 215, and BitUSD price is now 226 BTS (and was higher)
The mouse-over help for Margin Call Orders says that a short entered at BTS 30 has an call prize of 45, and at this point 75% of the collateral are required to buy it back...
I'm not sure how much margin is used when the short is initially entered, perhaps it was save (still collateral left) up to 212*100/75, or 282.
|
|
|
|
Over the last 8 months BitShares BitUSD price has been fairly stable at $1 but also had some spikes from $0.85 to $1.15.
Almost all of the traded volume was between 0.92 and 1.00, you wouldn't have been able to buy 1k or so at 0.85, no way. Only the last few days were really interesting because of margin calls for >200k bitUSD shorts, if Bitshares price would have dropped another 10% then this http://bytemaster.bitshares.org/article/2015/01/27/BitAssets-and-Black-Swan-Events/would have been the result. But now it looks like the situation has fixed itself and everything is back to normal and stable. |
|
|
|
If they are to open CNY/USD trading, why not allow trading other currencies as well? usd trading was stoped before steled btc, since january for Trouble with egopay I never registered for USD withdrawals, but I checked if it's possible, and the only withdrawal method I can see is by egopay. There is a drop down list with only one option saying "egopay (fee 0%)". Isn't egopay closed since they were hacked? egopay not closed I still can't make up my mind of whether it's reasonable to withdraw USD from Bter to egopay in the current situation. Both can disappear at any time (or they could be forced into formal bankruptcy) and perhaps Bter will eventually reopen one of the USD markets or offer a second withdrawal option. |
|
|
|
Back in the day it was not unheard of for people to run full peer node (bitcoind or BitcoinQT.) In fact it was probably more common than not. I don't recall if MultiBit and other SPV stuff was out or not. Electrum was around as another option.
Yes, more hardware requirement==more centralisation. But if the devs don't forget to implement the optimizations part of the plans (i.e. "The Future Looks Bright" in https://blog.bitcoinfoundation.org/a-scalability-roadmap/) then everyone can run a full peer node in the future just as easy as now. |
|
|
|
we conducted a security audit of peatio. The report will be public in a week. In general: it's much more secure than the rest of exchangers and code quality is higher.
This would mean Peatio is the most important project since Bitcoin itself. Very exciting.  |
|
|
|
not really its not as easy as it sounds its really pain in the ass ... like its not a gear u can turn on and leave it .... those virtual machines needs to be cheacked like every 30-45 min/each for VPN drops and at this prices its not really worth that work at all ... if it goes like 120-140 that maybe profitable then..but by the time that happen the reward may be droped again.. so yeah its a closed loop ..best choice now would be putting some buys and wait for them to hit ....i just got more 100k coins  But each wallet would still need a globally unique IP address to get coins? |
|
|
|
You can get a 10% discount on the #Blocknet ITO if you pay with #NHZ
Just sayin'...
If at least one of the exchanges allows to sell the Blocknet token for BTC (while ITO is still open) this would create an arbitrage opportunity... |
|
|
|
Still a little bit wobbly until now. Bitcoin is not yet stabilizing.
Would be a pretty 6-month double bottom at 375 (if stabilizing). Last time it was catastrophic news, this time nothing. Just someone selling, which is kinda scarier than gox. |
|
|
|
|
What is the status of the 4 official gateways,
are NXT<->NHZ, NHZ<->LTS and NHZ<->PTS currently online and working,
and when will NHZ<->BTSX come back up?
|
|
|
|
This is great, providing an overview over the assets traded on NHZ AE. Just bought some Bitshares X  I would put in a ask but http://dacx.nhzcrypto.org only gives deposit addresses for LTS and PTS but not for bitshares  |
|
|
|
|
Would it be a good idea to add "reward liquidity in selected markets of the Asset Exchange" to the list of available bounties?
For example, you want tight bid-ask spreads in the NHZ/Bitshares market. This could be checked in semi random intervals, and
the NHZ address or the 2 addresses who posted the best bid and ask (of all orders currently in the order book, and bid or ask size
must be higher than some threshold) receive a bounty.
(Perhaps about the same amount of coins for all markets as for all hallmarked nodes?)
|
|
|
|
Some people are diversifying as much as they can. Always afraid they could miss 'the next big thing'. The next 30x Litecoin bubble or something alike. I sometimes wonder whether it is all those altcoins that actually drain BTC's power nowadays!
I think people diversify when bitcoin is up, right now it's still flight to safety. Altcoin market cap (all altcoins compared with bitcoin) is constant or still shrinking, at about 5%. This was >10% at the end of 2013, and like 1% in the old times when bitcoin was at 10$. Could be a good sentiment indicator... |
|
|
|
Awesome. domob-s4ox (the red one) was not only ahead of the competition, it was 2 squares ahead of everyone else. (those who clicked "New..." the moment the alarm went off) So the Python source files is mandatory reading Well, it was two squares ahead of most. I think for other colours (yellow / blue?) there were a few hunters that were only one square behind. Players in reserve are already name_new'ed and can be launched
(activated) immediately. Yep, that's the trick. The player is name_new'ed and kept in this state for up to 12 days until disaster strikes. |
|
|
|
Awesome. domob-s4ox (the red one) was not only ahead of the competition, it was 2 squares ahead of everyone else. (those who clicked "New..." the moment the alarm went off) So the Python source files is mandatory reading |
|
|
|
I completely refactored the code, the storage server doesn't have any more outside contact except being part of the nhz and the coin's network. A hacker doesn't get anything by breaching the web server, as the wallets with the funds are hidden at another unknown server.
Next step is finishing the multisig part.
The code won't be published until a few gateways are up and running.
This would be to NHZ what Dividendrippler is to Ripple, only open source and decentralized. Very interesting |
|
|
|
Maybe there can be some kind of teleport power up. It can cost 100 huc or something.
We should make a gameplay related wish list. A long one To build consensus about each possible feature (i.e. will it be in if someone comes up with code and assets). |
|
|
|
Regarding my numerous times saying Huntercoin is not a game... I haven't.
I said it shoud be considered more of a crypto currency than a game
As per how, Chronokings will be more of a game, than a crypto currency.
You mean Chronokings will be a crypto currency plus a rather good game. And everyone is afraid of what grisly fate will befall the crypto currency with the rather basic game. p.s. aim is to make Huntercon more fun -
Currently fun in Huntercoin: 1. the post-disaster races (surprisingly) 2. PvP action in the outer ring, playing bandit Not fun: 1. to carry coins through the chokepoints 2. generally the time it takes to walk around on the map |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
