2 We will make XDN be a real financial instrument this year, implementing SWIFT messages types In fact, XDN onchain messages is the very powerful tool for secure and private information transfer. As you may know, there is a worldwide system called SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication). It provides a network to allow financial and non-financial institutions (e.g. corporates) to transfer financial transactions through a 'financial message'. The majority of international interbank messages use the SWIFT network. DigitalNote will implement the SWIFT messages types on blockchain to be compatible with the existing SWIFT software. We will make XDN be a leading social decentralized encrypted messages platform, implementing desktop, web and mobile messages apps with the instant, free out-of-chain messages protected by proof-of-work and empowering the XDN blockchain.Private, instant and decentralized information transfer is a global issue. The last US President election exposed that problem. We are going to try to change the things and to solve that issue. We will introduce an absolutely new instant, free, out-of-chain messages that will empower XDN security. You will need to perform some proof-of-work to send a message for free (with no XDN fee). This message proof-of-work will be "added" to the global XDN proof-of-work securing the network. XDN will empower its financial instruments by social communication and will try to implement the real "people's money" "It provides a network to allow financial and non-financial institutions (e.g. corporates) to transfer financial transactions through a 'financial message'." Can you clarify? How "basically" do this "financial messages" work? Does this mean banks can "see" DigitalNote on the "same" level as them? ( banks) Will XDN have their own SWIFT ID?
|
|
|
Grab a rock, exhale, and try again! Funny as.. The way kids spell these days, who knows what the problem is Could add plug in your computer, or any number of other things. Zero details given, zero help returned. Might as well have a grin. Explorer, don't let me down, the hardfork went smoothly.
|
|
|
AUCTION MODE
let it start...
|
|
|
Sorry, what does "Kamma" mean? Price is undefined, I will check offers... ok I offer $2 Whats your counter. That makes no sense to me and you know why. Serious offers only.
|
|
|
Sorry, what does "Kamma" mean? Price is undefined, I will check offers...
|
|
|
Darkmonero.com for sale
let me know if anyone is interested.
|
|
|
ATTENTION
Coinmarketcap.com shows an exchange which BIPCOIN is not listed on. Buy carefully. ( Cryptopia)
Following this coin since day 1.
Subscribed.
|
|
|
231
|
Local / Beni / --
|
on: December 20, 2016, 07:52:02 PM
|
|
http://185.106.122.31/bitcedi/#The pool stats are a bit messed up. At time of writing this, the stats show the pool has a higher hashrate than the entire network. The block found stat is also confused, with the pool finding a block a minute ago, the network found a block 3 minutes ago Everything is working just fine, the network is adjusting to the real "network hashrate" also blocks can be found by solo miners or private pools. "with the pool finding a block a minute ago, the network found a block 3 minutes ago" this is also a common issue with most pools however everything is working properly.
|
|
|
Seems like Craig Wright liked the joke EDIT - "Ok, nevermind...we gonna have a problem here "
|
|
|
Bitcoin the individual transactions, the name or the data?
I don't know each one, if you could clarify i would appreciate.
|
|
|
& vs && means that the commands are running in parallel in his script, instead of sequentially. This creates a race condition where the input is decoded to a file after the next step has already read it. The misspelling of signature in the script also makes his script read from the wrong file (whatever file is referenced by the misspelled environment variable). Most remarkable is that these scripts were not Wright's creation: https://gist.github.com/ezimuel/3cb601853db6ebc4ee49 They were plagiarized from the web but modified to insert these bugs. The net effect of these modified scripts is that the modifications would allow you to use them to fake a signature. Can Bitcoin be copyrighted? Dude, it's like open source. You may read my question again...
|
|
|
& vs && means that the commands are running in parallel in his script, instead of sequentially. This creates a race condition where the input is decoded to a file after the next step has already read it. The misspelling of signature in the script also makes his script read from the wrong file (whatever file is referenced by the misspelled environment variable). Most remarkable is that these scripts were not Wright's creation: https://gist.github.com/ezimuel/3cb601853db6ebc4ee49 They were plagiarized from the web but modified to insert these bugs. The net effect of these modified scripts is that the modifications would allow you to use them to fake a signature. Can Bitcoin be copyrighted?
|
|
|
What if the real Satoshi was "erased" and been stolen all is personal files?
ALERT, THIS IS NOT THE REAL SATOSHI! I CAN FEEL IT...
|
|
|
Whatever they are hiding still the price of bitcoin is uncertain this coming halving. I would like to think this is just to test its effect in an attempt to see which way the market goes if Satoshi is known to everyone. The last time he was in the news it somehow move the price up, didn't it?
This time seems different to me. Latest news: " achow101 Is gavin's commit access still revoked? 12:40 am gmaxwell Yes. I think it's unlikely to be restored. It hasn't been used in a year, and the situation with CSW is still very screwy. "
|
|
|
So what would be the alerting difference between these other licenses and an MIT issued one?
In a general way, they might want to copyright bitcoin. Which makes me think this could be at a HIGHER level that people are taking it.
|
|
|
|