But one thing need to be sure. If the clients send the btc from an exchange or service then the input address for you may not be their own address. If you refund to that input address then that exchange or service will receive the coin, not the client. So in your website, have this term that one has to own their private key of the wallet they will use to send you payment (their wallet has to be a noncustodial wallet). Make it noticeable for all the clients and have clear FAQ for it.

The site is not accessible for me too so can't see anything that you shared. I am on TOR. I did some google. Coinsource is an ATM machine which means the BTC were purchased in a store or any physical place.

I only heard about two teams from the list. Dinamo Zagreb and Lokomotiva 😂

Yes, I think the same. The team Croatia was unbelievable in 1998 or 2002 world cup. They were one of the Semi finalist in one of the world cup, if I remember correctly. Your player Davor Suker was amazing to watch.

City were able to give rest to some of their key players in the last UCL match so they are going to have a start with rest legs. It's not like even if they were not taken rest Fulham was going to be a great challenge for them. However, it will be interesting if anyhow Fulham can steal some points from City 😂

What's interesting in Everton vs Leicester? May be for Leicester, it will be a chance for them to create some distance from the bottom part of the table.

Also an email address which is associated with paypal.

Paypal will see delivery tracking number. In this case there are no tracking number. It's gone out from Murat.

Sorry to hear the lose brother. I am going to leave a negative feedback and the flag will be supported.

You are asking to pick one which is a torture for me LOL. Fourth time I wanted to vote for one. But I could not.
But this time I was able to make a shortlist.


I will try next time to shorter it again.

I like my boy LFC_Bitcoin and many others such as lovesmayfamilis, GigaBit, Ryu_Ar1, ajiz138, smartaction, KrispyKrypto, xSlyy, Shaha98, xsyren, Dubaian including so many more.

No promotion for individual users are allowed LOL

P.S: I am so confused that even after my third try I was not able to pick one 🤣
Choosing one is unfair for others because there are so many good works there.

Time to report .xyz. The resister service is nicenic.net.
Here is the the explains for them https://nicenic.net/customer/reportabuse.php

However, it's really hard to check every time who is coming with a new idea and report them. Hopefully Chipmixer team have some people to protect their brand.

We have a new range now LOL
$20,100 to $20,800 🤣

Observing @ 20,580

So instead of taking the Chips in the cash counter you take the Chips to an exchange? Is that how it's done? It will be very complected for gamblers. I would not care much to walk in another place to cash my chips LOL

It might be well-known to you and some others who are always interacting with him but it's still unknown for many members on the forum. Meta, Reputation, Economics, Speculation, Bitcoin Discussion, Scam Accusations, Altcoin Discussion are used to be his all time favour boards. So anyone who are regular in some of these boards especially I will say in Meta, Economics, Reputation and Scam Accusations; they will know the name. But when you are going to local boards, gambling sections including many other part of the forum, I can tell that many users do not even have any idea of the name.

There are still a lot of members who don't even know who the admins are. How many users know who was MicGoosens?
Very little but the place we get together we know him very well.

I think it's the subscription period they can only control. Once the period is over then they obviously release it for others. It will be interesting to see if the same account owner can buy that domain later. Sure there will be some system in place to avoid the old owner from buying it again.

It must be GazetaBitcoin 😉
Something is not right. The merit suckers will not going to have a good time in the season 🤣

I think it's difficult to know what criteria members who are in your trust list consider to add or remove someone in their trust list. Discussions like these are helpful. When we are adding or removing anyone in our trust list we should consider who they have in their list too. Ultimately it's a chain.

To clearly understand please read response from me and LoyceV. Adding someone (which igehhh said he added) in the trust list because they are not trade risk is a wrong use of DefautTrust system. Trade risk reflects on feedback page.

I have cases to report a domain to their service provider. If the domain is bought from namecheap or godaddy then anyone can report the abuse of the domain to them and they will take it down.
Some instructions will be found https://www.namecheap.com/support/knowledgebase/article.aspx/9196/5/how-and-where-can-i-file-abuse-complaints/

Looking up at domain details this is what I found: tucows.com and my guess is the tucows are their domain register service.

It's Japanese, no idea about the language. It could own by them or someone else. But I see Dice, money, game tables. Maybe it's their site since in the topic they have similar discussion for the game.

Quoted.

In fiat system for example paypal; when a customer asks for a refund they refund it to the same account it came from. Why don't you do the same. Return the coins that came from the address. It's less risky and troublesome for your team.

Poker Player and BitcoinGirl.Club be like



So, how it's different than the EPL pool and UCL pool we have in Gambling discussion? Isn't it a kind of game where we are rewarded for scoring?

You have exploded like a volcano and it's better not to talk about it with you since you are denying to understand the system.
It's frustrating to see there are still many out there who still do not understand the system. Perhaps as a community we failed completely and the work from theymos gone down in vain. I don't know if I have you in my TrustList or not but since you really do not understand how it works then you deserve to have the negative vote. I will recheck after few months to see if you have improved but right now your understanding of DefaultTrust system is wrong. It's not about own the system it's about right use of the system.

It's better to quote you what my main man suggested everyone when he had the idea of redoing the DefaultTrust system.

The part with mental illness has changed yesterday. Sad to see you even missed to quote it from the topic post itself.

The reason for your explosion does not make any sense though. Sorry, if there were any hurt feeling.