there is no place sodomy in civilised society
There's no place for people caring for what others do or don't in a modern society. So we just become apathetic cyborgs on our overpriced smartphones? |
|
|
|
Given this was originally an open forum invite, please help me to understand your viewpoints by answering the following;
1. Why is it acceptable for Muslims to demand freedom of religion, that being to practice Islam, in any country they want without fear of repercussions yet those same tolerances are not extended into Islamic countries?
2. Why are Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, etc either imprisoned or killed in Islamic countries for practising their religion in Islamic countries?
3. Why do Muslims not defend themselves against radical Muslims?
4. Why do Muslims not defend the rights of practice of other religions as they expect for their own?
I ask these questions in an open nature with no intent to slur anyone and I will openly admit to being a practising Christian.
Regards,
Cranky
Bump - my questions have been overlooked...perhaps because they ask to hard a question? 1) No religious group should ever have to "demand" freedom of religion. The freedom to practice your religion is a constitutional right. Also, your logic is pretty fallacious. You imply that it is unacceptable for Muslims to demand freedom of religion when other countries don't have it. That's like saying Korean-American US citizens shouldn't be allowed to use the internet because the internet is banned in Korea. 3) They do, it's just that our media does not like to portray them doing it because they make an earning out of negativity. http://rt.com/news/186460-french-muslims-christians-isis/4) I've never heard of a Muslim here in America violating the rights of other religions Oh, you openly admit to being a practicing Christian? Ever heard of Uganda? They're not exactly your idea of "tolerance" or "acceptability", and they claim to being a Christian nation, with a "Kill the Gays" bill. Does this have anything to do with you? Nope, just like it has absolutely nothing to do with Christians in America. Asinine tangents, bitchy attitude, and a lot of mouth. Leave it to an asian to miss the fucking point and think spouting nonsense is a valid counter argument. You missed almost every single point he was making. He was calling out muslim hypocrisy, none of which you addressed, and instead tried to deflect and shift blame in the most pathetic slimmest of tangents. Answer the actual question, slanty eyes. You're assuming I'm an Asian for no valid reason whatsoever. Your fallacious reasoning tends to have an unfortunately humorous nature. Also, your grammar is just terrible. I am unable to comprehend your incoherent babbling, I'm sorry. |
|
|
|
Not only is barring Muslims from entering America unconstitutional, but the assumption that doing so would stop terrorism is absurd. There is nothing on the National ID that states anyone's religion. Do you really believe, that any Muslim who wishes to go to America with the intention of terrorism would actually state his religion to the authorities, if such a fascist law were ever to be passed in our nation? Furthermore, the organizations you mentioned, Al-Qaeda and ISIS, were both funded for fully by the US government, once upon a time. Much like other foreign immigrants from the Middle East, Muslims are already subject to harassment, discrimination, and illegal searches by the authorities. You are nine times more likely to be killed by a police officer than a terrorist, according to data from The U.S. Department of State. And...  Data obtained from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control above further proves that you are 35,079 times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack According to this source, Obesity accounts for 100,000–400,000 deaths in the United States annually, which means: You are more 23,528 likely to die by being a fatass than get killed by a terrorist. The 911 card is always used by politicians to try and impede our rights and take away our constitutional freedoms. |
|
|
|
Given this was originally an open forum invite, please help me to understand your viewpoints by answering the following;
1. Why is it acceptable for Muslims to demand freedom of religion, that being to practice Islam, in any country they want without fear of repercussions yet those same tolerances are not extended into Islamic countries?
2. Why are Christians, Jews, Buddhists, Hindus, etc either imprisoned or killed in Islamic countries for practising their religion in Islamic countries?
3. Why do Muslims not defend themselves against radical Muslims?
4. Why do Muslims not defend the rights of practice of other religions as they expect for their own?
I ask these questions in an open nature with no intent to slur anyone and I will openly admit to being a practising Christian.
Regards,
Cranky
Bump - my questions have been overlooked...perhaps because they ask to hard a question? 1) No religious group should ever have to "demand" freedom of religion. The freedom to practice your religion is a constitutional right. Also, your logic is pretty fallacious. You imply that it is unacceptable for Muslims to demand freedom of religion when other countries don't have it. That's like saying Korean-American US citizens shouldn't be allowed to use the internet because the internet is banned in Korea. 3) They do, it's just that our media does not like to portray them doing it because they make an earning out of negativity. http://rt.com/news/186460-french-muslims-christians-isis/4) I've never heard of a Muslim here in America violating the rights of other religions Oh, you openly admit to being a practicing Christian? Ever heard of Uganda? They're not exactly your idea of "tolerance" or "acceptability", and they claim to being a Christian nation, with a "Kill the Gays" bill. Does this have anything to do with you? Nope, just like it has absolutely nothing to do with Christians in America. |
|
|
|
Got paid 5.73 mBTC I now have a total of 11.46 mBTC |
|
|
|
If both parties engaging in a civil discourse simply posted Youtube links to each other, then there really would be no discussion now would there.
Wrong. Discussion is stating the facts and arguments. If facts are stated via text or via videos, the result is the same. Get it? It is more civil to state facts using words. If I were to link a video to Bob Dylan's "Hurricane", you would fail to comprehend my thesis. A lot of assumptions can be made from a single video. Additionally, Youtube videos are hardly backed by sources, and their credibility is nearly always questionable. |
|
|
|
That must have taken a lot of valuable time. Which sucks because nobody else would bother to read it. That is not the issue, the issue is that illegal information could be conveyed that way Top secret stuff, terrorism ... would that turn the entire blockchain illegal? It wouldn't turn the entire blockchain illegal.. but it would certainly put you on a watch list. And I doubt terrorists would reveal their latest plans somewhere where anybody can read it. An excellent point... to play devil's advocate though, they could send out a notice saying "go now" or something, signalling other jihadis to start an operation they planned earlier. Which again would make no sense, because there are more convenient methods that don't involve leaving a gargantuan trace visible to all users of the internet. |
|
|
|
Still getting daily withdraws and getting paid promptly daily. They also set up a twitter account.
A twitter account is by no means an indicator to the legitimacy of the company |
|
|
|
I don't suppose you will want to come to Cape Town South Africa?  It's always been in my list of places to visit, soon, so yes I would. Especially if bitcoin makes me rich It's always so touching to see people dream of what they would do when they obtain Bitcoin with hopes of making it big |
|
|
|
|
Don't let anybody impede your rights to free speech. This includes threats for removing/altering your signatures.
Additionally, report any users that threaten to ruin your reputation if you do not comply to their demands, which consist of removing your signature.
|
|
|
|
If both parties engaging in a civil discourse simply posted Youtube links to each other, then there really would be no discussion now would there. |
|
|
|
Withdraw very long time..)) 40 min wait...  Took 34 minutes for me |
|
|
|
Just got paid as a Member, a dollar which is 2 mBTC  |
|
|
|
|
if you shut down the internet only offline wallets would continue to exist
and nope, radio waves just won't cut it
|
|
|
|
I have free electricity too.
But it's a bit risky to entrust your miners at my place, eh?
its risky yes, but now i don't need to place my miners anywhere else but my mining house, but i get your point Is your mining house verified? What is the address (if it's a business address, not a residential one) its a residential adress. i'd be happy to tell people where to find me if they are intressted. That's very dangerous. Additionally, like adaseb said, there is hardly any money in mining, and there is risk for both parties (You and whoever is lending the rig) What would the dangerous part be? Hiring thugs to fly over to your address and smash up your rigs, then loot the remains. Have you any idea what that costs? Its not cheap, specially not in Sweden hehe Stalking is free ^_^ |
|
|
|
I have free electricity too.
But it's a bit risky to entrust your miners at my place, eh?
its risky yes, but now i don't need to place my miners anywhere else but my mining house, but i get your point Is your mining house verified? What is the address (if it's a business address, not a residential one) its a residential adress. i'd be happy to tell people where to find me if they are intressted. That's very dangerous. Additionally, like adaseb said, there is hardly any money in mining, and there is risk for both parties (You and whoever is lending the rig) What would the dangerous part be? Hiring thugs to fly over to your address and smash up your rigs, then loot the remains. |
|
|
|
NO! I will not do that if it was me.. The thing is, its your own child. Youre going to kill him/her?
Pain receptors are formed in a baby within seven weeks. Abortions beyond that point better be worth it. |
|
|
|
This $100, how can this be used on the site? Or is just a token gesture?
A percentage of your investment will be given to you daily until either the campaign ends or you choose to cash out and refrain from doing business with the company any longer. |
|
|
|
they patrol black areas more frequently because they are more likely to find criminals there. And that is a direct violation of the Fourth. Race is not reasonable suspicion to get a warrant to get into someone's car, or pull them over and ask for papers if they look like they're Mexican. Let's fix this, as Americans, it is our moral duty to restore the constitution. |
|
|
|
dont like grammar
Did you mean that blacks take up more welfare than other races? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
