Nitrogensports.eu signature campaign launched just now.
And all of a sudden, notaek is back.
First payments for BetKing have been made recently, the campaign can be moved to active (we still got some free spots for users willing to join with sufficient post quality). |
|
|
|
Edit: Nevermind, he contacted me from a newbie account he just created. I now have the address to return the loan to.
 |
|
|
|
oops, sorry I deleted that wallet.
Comedy Gold, right there. I vouch that he is really the real BPB...maybe. I will go as far as to cover that loan if he did not pay it back - Bob with that info maybe take another loan or 2 and run up the long con more
How far would you go? 1 time? 2 times? 3 times, where we are right now? |
|
|
|
Lutpin, I thought you are looking for 10 Full Members to enroll in this campaign but I've seen the spreadsheet and there are no more slots for Full Members and only 7 Full Members are enrolled.
I am and there are. I wondered. Is it against membership in Article 4?
Zombie007 has negative trust but is included in the campaign.
Yes it is. They will be dealt with during the payround (or no-pay round in this case) later today. I got no intentions to pay for posts done with a hacked account.
@everyone who applied: Please have a little more patience, I'll review accounts and do enrollments in a bit. |
|
|
|
It's past Sunday and no payments sent. I havent heard a response about how probation works.
The reason you didn't hear about how probation works is because it's a mark for me, not for you. The only difference is that I take a closer look at you and that you're more likely to be kicked again. (For further questions, a PM always is a quicker way to get my attention) Lutpin tends to make payments on a Monday night these days, he never ever lets his signature campaign participants down, you can trust him. I've been in this campaign for a long time.
That's right, as noted in my first reply, we've moved payments to monday evenings/nights (EST).
Payments for the week have been sent ( 99ca472466a908313c05e3d3669d8655933b77085a4195b1d9faed69a2179b1d).
Name : FlightyPouch
Enrolled. |
|
|
|
What?
My reaction exactly.  Pretty sure this just refers to the maximum win on a single dice bet, not any jackpot or anything.
That's what it says. Maximum winning amount on single bet at dice is now 5 BTC!
Due to a rising bankroll size (and hence investors security), the maximum possible amount to be won in a single dice bet has been increased to 5 BTC. What you need to do for that? Place a bet at the according size/payout and win. What was required to deposit in advance
Doubt you're gonna reach 5 BTC from faucet, but hey, feel free to try. And if there is a particular bonus to get the prize / bonus 5 BTC
Nobody said anything about a bonus. what only one round on all bets in this Dice game, or many times will get a prize of this ..
After 220 winning bets at that size our bankroll is emptied up, so I guess that would be the limit  |
|
|
|
BTW, isn't everyone (staff) a patroller? Do some staff here not have the "Patrol" link at the top? Show unread posts since last visit.
Show new replies to your posts.
Patrol
Watchlist That's not what makes you a patroller, else I would be one aswell. That one is a setting, you can trigger it under the following site: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;sa=forumProfileShow patrol link: Shows a link to the patrol page under "watchlist"
(While we're at it, theymos, it's actually over watchlist, not under.) |
|
|
|
Ya oh well. I just saw the 0.025 come in and thought I did something wrong. Could you PM me the posts that were denied so I have an idea of what to avoid? Or were there just posts on sections that weren't counted
You had some meta posts (this posts right here won't be counted next week either). whether the signature is still receiving member
According to OP, thread title and spreadsheed, we're closed for new users. |
|
|
|
Seems like this election is going to divide us all if we are going to make a local moderator a candidate to be a global moderator, why not just promote it according to hierarchy? I suggest that if we are going to elect a global moderator it should be from the staff excluding the local moderators, and promote one local moderator to fill up the position of the promoted staff and have a local election to replace the position of the local mod promoted?
If I understood the moderation levels correctly, there is no difference between topic section moderators like achow101 and "local" section moderators like HostFat. Some moderators even fill both positions at a time, like Lauda, who acts as topic section moderator for the Speculation section and as "local" section moderator for the Croatian local section. (Same goes for Mitchell btw, who moderates Beginners&Help/Project Dev on one hand, and the Dutch local board on the other.) Hence saying to do promotions according to "hierachy" doesn't really change anything about the current situation, all are on the same level here. |
|
|
|
Damn. I wasn't expecting 3 of my posts to be intelligible (and thus my payout being lower).
Very sorry for that, but at these rates, I gotta be firm with the rules. Is there any way for me to make that up? I know I had lots of extra posts in the past.
Not really doing rollovers, and certainly not for 1 or 2 extra posts from each round. They come in handy in rounds like these though, getting 3 denied at 30 still leaves you with a full payment, getting 3 denied at 26 is where the things get more complicated. |
|
|
|
Love to see it - though I've noticed downtime has been a lot lower late I feel like Most downtime is caused by either database mainentance or major updates that can't be performed on the live, running environment. We didn't have any of the latter recently, so the uptime has been pretty good. |
|
|
|
Now that it has come to light that a candidate was overlooked for this election, you should really lock this thread (or delete it), begin a proper nomination thread for potential candidates with a cut-off date a few weeks into the future so that everyone has an equitable opportunity to be acknowledged.
So we should wait a few weeks for a potential next (active) global moderator to respond to a PM? Sure. I don't believe the situation is so dire that we can't take the time to do it properly. The point is, when searching someone who can in the best case be active on a daily basis handling reports on global level, candidates that aren't abled to respond to a PM in a weeks time kinda already fall out of the pool by that.
Would this[1] count as electioneering or is it still considered an "informative" post? [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1687427.0 |
|
|
|
what about maximum amount available in post/weekly | post/monthly campaign column ??
What do you mean exactly? He means maximum amount of posts that the campaign is going to pay for. It could be a good idea but I'm not sure how the table you made is going to fit for more columns at this point. Take a look at the tabel. Take a close look. Notice something? There's literally a column with exactly that name and information. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
