I expect LoyceV and other user who make statistic thread would be happy to make extrapolated assumption. Anyway, here's my guess.
I know a name which has really high amount of reports submitted and with good mark and he is none other then @Ratimov who has also previously dedicated a thread for it here in which he has submitted 100,000 reports as good so this is old record so he might have gone above it not checked now so one of top in this matter. I just felt we are going to hijack the thread. To avoid it I reposted this game to the Games and rounds sub board. Submit your answer on that post please: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5418636.0 |
|
|
|
Submission already posted on the meta board thread are copied in this post. 510
bc1q4w024sesxqwusxf3g8nwm3jp29umpcxx2fhwse
P.S. I expect it's ranged between 9 to 2541. |
|
|
|
The whole idea started from a topic created on meta. I feel continuing it on that thread is off topic so here I am moving it. Original idea is below quoted message: Why are some of you too serious about reporting and it's stats? LOL
My reporting accuracy is 89%.
Who can tell after all these years how many reports I made?
I have some BTC to spare, 0.00098414 BTC.
Closest one will receive 0.0003 BTC
Rest will be sent to two more members.
You will post the number of total reports you made so far.
The top two will get the reward.
Highest number will receive 0.0004 BTC
The 2nd highest will receive the rest excluding the fees the transaction need
Don't cheat LOL
Shall we go?
Post your btc address with answer. Deadline is 31 October midnight forum time 😂
Staff, moderator and admin are excluded 😉
Additional information: Staff, moderator and admin are excluded 😉
I expect LoyceV and other user who make statistic thread would be happy to make extrapolated assumption.
Additionally LoyceV can not join. Human only. 🤣 I sent a self message with the number of reports I made so far. In case it requires to prove then the PM will be reported to the staff. Join and enjoy the reward. Most importantly have fun! 🥳 |
|
|
|
Staff, moderator and admin are excluded 😉
I expect LoyceV and other user who make statistic thread would be happy to make extrapolated assumption.
Additionally LoyceV can not join. Human only. 🤣 I sent a self message with the number of reports I made so far. In case it requires to prove then the PM will be reported to the staff. |
|
|
|
Even so, the non-recipient participants/users will have to trust the recipient of the message to show the correct message, since they wont be able to decrypt it by themselves.
Sounds reasonable enough if used together with the forum's trust system but involving trust is kind of a drawback.
That's the reason I suggested to use more than two members. So authenticity of the revealed message can be validated without error from one member. It's just information and I don't think anyone who are on the forum for long time will even try to alter the message. |
|
|
|
A few minutes later  @ $20,110 The price won't stay above $20k for more than 5 consecutive days. That's going to be true for the foreseeable future. Strong bullish signal! Buy! All in!  I need a graphic design to create gif's for me LOL Like now I need a snail is crash landing 🤣 |
|
|
|
|
Observing @ $20,150
We are going below $19k again?
|
|
|
|
|
Why are some of you too serious about reporting and it's stats? LOL
My reporting accuracy is 89%.
Who can tell after all these years how many reports I made?
I have some BTC to spare, 0.00098414 BTC.
Closest one will receive 0.0003 BTC
Rest will be sent to two more members.
You will post the number of total reports you made so far.
The top two will get the reward.
Highest number will receive 0.0004 BTC
The 2nd highest will receive the rest excluding the fees the transaction need
Don't cheat LOL
Shall we go?
Post your btc address with answer. Deadline is 31 October midnight forum time 😂
Staff, moderator and admin are excluded 😉
|
|
|
|
You can't post the encrypted messages before the "reveal date" because the recipients will be able to decrypt it right away.
The idea is not to let the recipients to know about using their public key until OP wants to call them to check it was signed for them. But what's the difference in terms of security?
Both signing a bitcoin address and signing using pgp key are secure enough. PGP actually used in military system. The regular email system also use PGP in the back to encrypt the message. From the font we can not see it though. |
|
|
|
|
Stop it. The merit fishing is not going to work anymore LOL
|
|
|
|
[...]
Are you and PlayBetr same business? I am totally confused to see the response 😂 In any case, it's obvious that you are following by trolls or I do not understand the catch for member LEVSKI7 LOL [...]Betting is just one of my hobbies, trust me [...]
It's hard to understand who is right but betting is not hobby for you. If it was then you would never bother to find this place and create an account to complain against any sportsbook. |
|
|
|
[....]
Look at the amounts he kept depositing back. It's even probably the same coins from the casino. How is that really mixing coins? Maybe his account was flagged for something else.
None of us know the real reason. It will be better to see Duelbits is making a statement. Has anyone notified their official account yet or we are just continuing the guess what game LOL? Update: Fuck me, they are not online since the 9th last month 😂 Anyway, I left them a PM in case they can see it from the email linked with the account. |
|
|
|
 Just look at the date the feedback left. February this year. If it was a feedback left before 2018 then it was fine, we could say that JollyGood was not aware of valid practice of the feedback system. Isn't he making a joke of the idea of the feedback system suggested by theymos? Feedback left for BitcoinTurk is a joke as well.  JollyGood is knowingly abusing the feedback system but unfortunately so many members are still trusting him in their trust list and giving him a pass. Buddy, eight months? I can understand that this is a long time, but referring to JollyGood about removing the negative tag, I can predict that eight months is not enough time for him. Have you read BitcoinTurk's request and also JollyGood's response? Somehow, it seems to me that you will have to wait a few more months, if not years. You are saying it's okay to leave feedback for such things and it's also okay to tell the users to wait some number of months to have their feedback removed? JollyGood actually told the same to BitcoinTurk with some usual hate speech against those who are not supporting his abuse. a couple of low-level attention seekers with grudges against me will continue to use this thread as a platform to spout their useless comments and it will only distract and divert from the issue.
JollyGood should be removed from the DT system for his abusive use of the system. On reputation board there are enough complains against his trust abuse. How many more we need? Maybe it's time to notify the users who have him in their trust list before we see even more abusive cases against JollyGood. JollyGood's judgement is Trusted by:Vod, DiamondCardz, peloso, Coinfan, Lauda, digit, Timelord2067, jeremypwr, allyouracid, stompix, Avirunes, dopey, Gianluca95, SiNeReiNZzz, DaveF, owlcatz, examplens, nutildah, thandie, LFC_Bitcoin, s0nix, TwitchySeal, vlom, JaredKaragen, Jemzx00, Slow death, IconFirm, johnsmithx, blurryeyed, kurian, igehhh, CryptopreneurBrainboss, mosprognoz, KTChampions, icopress, indah rezqi, invincible49, logfiles, tvplus006, witcher_sense, darcon_pr, The Cryptovator, lovesmayfamilis, cryptobenn, TalkStar, Trade Runner, bitbottrader, zasad@, Rikafip, protrader786, FatFork, decodx, CryptoYar, villain_Mr.Burns, PaperWallet, wagmi. List collected from Loyce.club |
|
|
|
|
Fuck you all 😘
Maybe you thinks it's complicated hearing those complicated words encrypt/decrypt 😂
It's meant to be easy but not sure why you think it's complected LOL
Load precipitants public key and sign the message. You need only recipients public key. It's as simple as sending an email.
|
|
|
|
We are glad to hear that you love Playbetr so much that you want your account reopened, but we have already confirmed that you violated our TOS, and therefore, your account will remain permanently closed. If the mediator says to return your balance, then your balance will be returned.
That's a good decision. OP chose a 3rd party mediator where both of you will agree with their decision and let the case to close. PlayBetr, why do you think making the fonts bold and coloring it blue will get you more attention? It hurts the eyes 😂 |
|
|
|
If am were to bet a multi then I will (I feel like to gamble lately LOL) go with the following:
Napoli to score over 3.5 goals,
Barca vs Bayern both team to score
Ajax vs Liverpool both team to score
Lost only if I would gamble. That's the reason I gave up from gambling 🤣 Yesterday, I felt very unfortunate. Kane scored and when it was showing 2 - 1 for Tottenham I was happy for the full three points on the pool. Atl. Madrid got penalty and I was having another hope to get 1.5 points. Both were in the last last seconds. I could really use the extra 4.5 points to have a better position on the pool but luck did not favour. You won't fill unlucky if you are not close. I was close in both occasions. Fu*k both Atl, Fu*k VAR LOL. |
|
|
|
It is important in your case. You created the thread because you are butthurt and you want the manager to lose his reputation. You are butthurt maybe the manager found you cheating and left you a negative feedback. On the other hand you don't want to lose your chances to join their campaigns too if the cheating was not the reason. So you are hiding your main account.
It's not a matter of getting a chance to join his campaign. I think there are many other managers here who are more honest. Many bounty managers do not pay participants, but they are not as fraudulent as he is by erasing tracks.Speak it loud from your main account, otherwise you are not having any attention. I already told you that you do not have balls. Once again, joining the company of Murat, the hunters do not work for themselves, so you should not look for justice.
I am pretty sure that OP won't hesitate to join his next campaign. After all, that's why he used an alt account. It's a complete hypocrisy. He is butthurt at the moment. |
|
|
|
An update:
The player's account has been opened and he can withdrawal all funds that were both deposited and won in Moonbet.io To be clear, the player did NOT win thousands of dollars betting in Moonbet as originally claimed. He did however have a balance which he was wrongfully unable to withdraw over the past several days.
As mentioned in our previous message, we do NOT agree with the actions taken by the trading team and have advised them to consult us in the future before any players have actions taken against their accounts.
Unfortunately, limiting or refusing players can occassionally occur in the world of sports betting. While we never enjoy taking such actions, in cases where players engage in syndicate betting, arbitrage, and other tactics which are frowned upon by operators, we must do so to protect our business.
Everyone at Moonbet hopes that this has resolved the issue of the player and shows our commitment to player experience. As with any platform, we do make mistakes but aim to make it right as quickly and easily as possible.
I like this part we do NOT agree with the actions taken by the trading team and have advised them to consult us in the future before any players have actions taken against their accounts. I know many established sportsbook excuse their providers and decides to go with their decision without even asking for a valid reason. Most of the times sportsbooks do not have any control over the trades but they take the heat. Good luck Moonbet. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
