They wouldn't be able to control them

And control here means being able to print new money as they find necessary. For example, how can they create new bitcoins other than through regular mining and receiving standard reward? Right, there is no such way. So if a government were to create their own variety of cryptocurrency or anything however remotely similar to a cryptocurrency, they would undoubtedly keep a "controlling interest " in their hands. Basically, that means they would be creating yet another fiat

I think I can help you with an elaborate review of your swap mixer:

My BTC address: bc1qgvpwtkgefh6tjhvtptwt87e64ccdt63gwvtgm6 (with zero balance)

That's probably a valid point in and by itself

But it is still very counterproductive (if not outright destructive) to think like that. The key problem with people is that the vast majority of them can be safely called irresponsible. That's just how life in general is, and if we proceed from this assumption, then casinos can in fact have bad influence on such people (let's call them would-be addicts)

It is not much of an issue with online casinos (simply because there are fewer such people in crypto than in "real life"), but with the Las Vegas variety it is, as well as the primary reason why many governments across the world establish special gambling zones or areas, and make casinos legal only there

Сейчас трудно сказать, сколько в том росте чего было

Хотя из всех топовых альтов (эфир, недобиток, кто там еще у нас числится), лайт вырос больше всех остальных (в процентном выражении). А если учесть, что сейчас награду уполовинили (а это объективное сокращение притока новых монет на рынок, кто бы чего не говорил), то в случае очередного пампа альтов (альтсезона), Лайткоин побьет свои собственные рекорды полугодовой давности. Даже вчерашний рост это наглядно продемонстрировал, пусть даже и в миниатюре


Keep us posted

I think they not are going to tell us

At least, not until the imminent release, and it is still not going to be anything specific even if they are. This is understandable for a couple of reasons. First, such things rarely arrive on time. As you may remember, PD 3.0 had been postponed for almost a year or so, and eventually it became an object of numerous jokes all over the forum (like <put something highly unlikely here> was going to occur sooner than PD 3.0 released)

And then, an early announcement will take away the element of surprise and interest toward the site. Vague and non-specific hints work better in this regard. A viral campaign would get you even further in stirring up interest and agitation (like many in the film and game industries are doing nowadays)

It seems appropriate to explain why the inflation tax can be quite profitable for some

As the term itself suggests, inflation can be considered as a form of tax, and tax means someone pays it and someone else receives it. In this case, the inflation tax (otherwise known as seigniorage) is paid by the common people while it is received by those who print the money (read, the government). You may rightfully ask here how it is possible as the government doesn't seem to receive anything

But that's not so. Inflation (as in price Inflation) implies the loss of the purchasing power of a currency, and this loss is what the government receives as a gain in its own purchasing power since it can buy anything what can be bought with that new money at old prices not yet adjusted for the inevitable inflation. The point is, inflation doesn't instantly propagate through the economy, so those who have early access to money can take advantage of this

I'd rather say no

I don't know how the seeds guarantee the fairness of the bets exactly (being the implementation of the so-called "provably fair" solution), but from what I grasped while translating that part, the seeds, both client and server, are like two pairs of one key. If you have your part of the key (i.e. the client seed which is not known to a casino), the casino cannot arbitrarily change the server seed after the roll as both these seeds determine the outcome of that roll and should be known to you before you make a bet (there is also the nonce number involved but we can skip it for simplicity's sake). In other words, when you know the outcome, the server and client seeds as they were before the bet, you can then check whether these three variables of the equation (plus nonce) make the equality true. Otherwise, the bet result has been rigged
 

It doesn't change your chances but allows you to check the bets (as I got it)

Cryptogames is out of the question then

With 1 doge being the minimum bet amount you can't build effective martingale strategies as you won't be able to cope with variance unless you are going to deposit insane amounts of doges (likely well beyond the maximum bet amount allowed there anyway). Therefore, the high speed, whether it be for VIP players or otherwise, becomes utterly irrelevant with all things considered, and what I wrote in this post still holds true


And what's the bottom line?

With this you are going to create a hidden paradox (pardon the pun)

If you added some meaningful mnemonic title or moniker to a player which was to stay with him between races (read, forever), that would undermine the whole idea behind hiding usernames, basically making it useless and futile. In that case you could just reveal to the public the "real" names of the players as the effect in the context of a casino would be the same. It would be as if those players had chosen their attributed names on their own right at the registration

It's not surprising at all

I've seen that same situation repeat itself countless times in different places. Small stores and shops can only survive if they can offer some unique product or service. In my place many such stores had been closed a few years ago after big retailers showed up in the area

And it is not just about groceries as almost every industry gets severely affected in this manner. It is the same not only on the local level, but on the regional and national levels as well as previously successful companies are now unable to compete with multinational corporations going to smaller regional markets


I wouldn't call that competition as to me it looks more the "slaughter of the innocents" and weeding out all possible competition (what monopolies habitually do all the time)

With this setup you should never lose perspective

And perspective here refers to the fact that your earnings come through variance, not the amount of bets you make. It is somewhat counterintuitive or even paradoxical as the idea of martingale assumes making quite a few bets, and consists in earning by accumulating dust. It is not the amounts of bets that matter here, but the variance that counts. Indeed, at a given level of risk, you can expect that variance come about only after making enough bets (that's statistics), but you should forget about dust as it will only make you impatient and greedy

Let's just admit that it is a very complex and hard to tackle problem. To keep things more specific, let's consider a real-life example which repeats itself in many countries with astonishing regularity. A big multinational retail corporation operating a chain of hypermarkets (think Walmart here) comes to town one day. Since it is huge, has a lot of suppliers in different parts of the world and highly efficient logistics, it can make prices very cheap and still book profits for itself (not even speaking of deliberate dumping)

Obviously, the local stores are quickly forced out of business, and people living in this town who were somehow involved in these small businesses, that is almost every adult there, are now jobless. So whose fault is this? People want to buy better and cheaper goods, which is understandable. But by doing that they are effectively destroying their local economy since the money that the Walmart-like retailer receives goes elsewhere and doesn't get reinvested locally simply because it makes no economic sense

And it works in essentially the same way on a country as well as international level

Poker is not dice

I mean, some people are trying to make a living out of it since the results of a particular game are not entirely random as they are in dice (well, let's assume that for a moment) but also involve skills and expertise. You are not typically playing dice to earn money, but if, nevertheless, you are, it is in your best interests to make sure that the outcome of each bet you make is truly random. And as I also said in one of my previous posts here, you can play at casinos where the bets are made on the blockchain and their outcomes cannot be rigged (think EOS or TRON here)


If you are cheating with bet outcomes, you will get caught in due course as it happened many times before. Reputation is everything in this field, and once ruined it cannot be restored

Here we go again

Well, if you ask me, I think it is totally fine. And not because I'm wearing their signature but rather because it can't be any other way as long as we consider ourselves a community which highly values and praises anonymity as well as privacy. You are just like the other guy over here who claims that casinos are cheating for the simple reason they can be cheating (despite all that "provably fair" stuff)

Regardless, if we were to follow your logic through, the casino could just create a dozen dummy accounts with their names in the leaderboard (and do that again and again for every daily race). Would that remove your doubts and suspicions? Unlikely, as I'm inclined to think (and technically, there are 4 names in the list)

That's the thing with such logic

When someone questions something but doesn't come up with any concrete evidence making it look like the other party should disprove his point. Yes, some sites are not likely as "provably fair" as they claim to be, or probably not "fair" at all times. But you can't prove that by just making a contention they are not

And even if they are not, they are going to get caught eventually, and specifically because big stakes attract more attention as no one wants to lose big. But it won't be because you come to think some of these casinos should be cheating. Simply put, it is just idle talk on your part

Or you may get addicted in the process

I don't know how it stands in respect to "going over your limits" (probably, in this case your limits are such that you should never gamble in the first place). However, addiction means having an insane amount of fun (since otherwise you will not get addicted), but we all know the detrimental and oftentimes outright dangerous consequences of an addiction (not necessarily in gambling). So it looks like your "definition" of fun needs redefining

It is the strength of the economy that determines the strength of its currency

So if an economy is weak and failing, its currency cannot be strong by definition. In this frame of reference, it becomes glass clear why the dollar is still dominating the world. In simple terms, it is because the US, as a nation and country, massively dominates the world in almost any area of relevance and importance

Regarding why Euro is more expensive than the dollar, it is simply an accounting identity of sorts - there are more dollars in circulation that euros. So even if the purchasing power of one dollar can be lower than that of one euro, it doesn't mean that euro is a better currency than the US dollar

Well, I'm not sure you correctly understand the approach described here

But that's not the point of this post. You see, if someone doesn't want to get into how something is supposed to work, you can't force this knowledge onto them - and I'm not a school teacher, either (no offense intended). As they say, you can lead the horse to water but you can't make him drink. Hint, it is not about the amount of losses I can sustain in a roll - it is about the number of losing rolls in a streak that I can survive


We all know that, but the devil is in paying precious attention to detail, as always

Well, technically, they don't do anything illegal

At least, not until they get caught and found guilty in the court of law. These corporations (for example, so-called Big Pharma) can hire the best tax lawyers (or just best lawyers in general), and since it is assumed (and rightfully, I must add) that governments are not very efficient and effective overall (apart from being hostile to each other, which severely complicates things for them), we can plausibly expect the corporations to be a few steps ahead of any effort to bring them to justice, so to speak. If they can change whole governments in some countries, the question of money laundering becomes kinda irrelevant since who is to define what is money laundering and what is not?

See, that's the crux of the matter!

If your minimum bet amount is 1 doge, you are set to lose your balance in less than no time, and with higher speeds you will just bust sooner. At wolf.bet, you can start as small as 0.00000001, and cope with pretty long losing streaks, which this thread and my stats unreservedly prove. As I said on a couple occasions already, enjoy this ride while it lasts. No other casino is likely going to give you the opportunity to unleash the unbridled power of martingale done right