Lastly, I do not see a reason for another Global mod. AFAIK the last promotion happened as other Glob. mods were not as active and Cyrus already had some experience in moderating multiple boards.
Wanna show me the rock you've been living under the last half year? The name is close to the feminine "Laura", which is why people confuse it.
Lauda is a female name itself in many European countries, mostly in Italy, if I'm not mistaken. And believe me, her posts give her away instantly. My choice was mostly based on personal interactions with you two and how you are solving problems as mods.
That's how most people who are voting decide how to vote. That's probably why most of the Phillipines people voted for Dabs; he is the one that they have interacted with before. I've voted for Mitchell over Lauda, even though I got more moderation-related interaction with Lauda and should thus by this reasoning select Lauda. I don't think I came in contact with you about moderation any more than you handling some of my newbie reports, yet you can find you on my list aswell. |
|
|
|
So this is what the results would be after doing the elimination process? What is "Exhausted"?
I would guess those are valid votes that have neither Lauda nor Mitchell in their 3 picks. So far, there's only 1 of them. |
|
|
|
Yes theymos (or Cyrus) -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0and please give that account negative feedback for now until I get it back again (I wish)
Done. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I am real owner of issho and today is 20 november 2016 -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1GsVhzhADTws6Vojb6eKDYpmZ5m539tzk2 IEIZTSyEImIQvkBUhPm83Ow/uBd85mP42GyvJ+2tumrWYd5Sq4SfPzA1BujRic5kN5/FhqOLjxTI7Zrvb3/oQOY= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- I posted that address in here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.msg15085857#msg15085857The message verifies.
Can't find any recent changes of password/email on the account, that's odd. Got it. "September 18, 2016, 10:17:02 AM - issho - password changed" |
|
|
|
Considering that the manager is a "Newbie" I would advise all users to wait until deposit will be escrowed.
I'm not a newbie 
Username: FLoving
Current Post Count: 364
Username: BestWebCreator
Post count: 262
Enrolled. will change signature avatar and personal text
Do so, PM me. |
|
|
|
I never seen Lutpin offering an escrow service. But maybe he offer this on other thread that i didn't or in private. He is very busy on campaign management and doing some stuff on forum.
I don't. At least not officially. Although I'm handling some decent funds for my campaigns and am escrowing for a few other campaigns I don't manage aswell. Personally, I prefer escrowing signature campaigns over trades and hence there's no designated escrow topic (yet). However, there have been requests in the past. If you need somebody quick for a one off trade, pick someone else. If you need somebody reliable for a longer esrow, I might be your guy. |
|
|
|
Can i get a spot for full member? Thank you Lutpin
Sorry, but you're denied. That's good man, long live and tell me if you accept me in this campaign.
Your posts are good, but you seem to be a little on edge. I can enroll you on probation, if you promise to take a chill pill. |
|
|
|
Luptin wish that you are alive and if yes, than give us your answer.
Luptin is dead. Long live Lutpin.
Enrolled on probation. Username/UID: harizen / 458393
Enrolled. Username/UID: alani123/121796
Enrolled on probation, as discussed via PM.
All applications after this post will be considered for and eventually enrolled into the next round (starting on Tuesday). |
|
|
|
3. Michelle.
Vote Laura & Michelle for Miss Bitcointalk 2016! |
|
|
|
Seeing as an admin of CG.net has joined in, along with Lutpin being the camp. manager, I guess the campaign is trustable. But for the sake of clarification, could you confirm if this camp. is going to be escrowed or not?
Because we needed an escrow in our other campaign that runs for how long now? 17 months? User Lutpin is campaign manager. Campaign spreadsheet coming soon Spreadsheet is up: http://newssheet.lutp.in |
|
|
|
|
Happy to see some movement with the current global situation. It's much needed.
|
|
|
|
|
1. Mitchell
2. achow101
3. Lauda
|
|
|
|
You're right, he's wearing one of my signatures. I can see he applied last week. I can also see I didn't enroll him, neither will I, in any case. He's got close to a page full of loan requests... |
|
|
|
I have a feeling we have quite a few fans in the Haters Club.
I've never been widely popular. Wasn't my goal either. Well he is just a kid still imature at age of 20 just got banned after I reported his copy/paste posts. Don't know he was also following Lutpin and yahoo though
You should try these insults: "teenager", "piece of nothing", "assole in this forum". They worked wonders with me. I will no longer give reasons as to why youre being denied folks. You are either on blacklist already, shit poster, spammer, an obvious alt account, or whatever. Point is oure denied and you need to deal with it and improve your accounts.
I never understood why people feel like I need to give them a reason for being denied, or further, I need to back my decision up with "proof". The management of my campaigns is up to me, and hence it's my decision to enroll who I pick and to deny who I don't. If you don't like that, don't apply. 99% of the times I give a reason ends with them trying to argue and build a case for them, only very little guys actually want my opinion and then try to improve. |
|
|
|
House edge has been stated as 5%. No fee needed in order to check the seed. withdrawal is 1%.
This is kinda broken. There are 4998 possible outcomes for a tail win and only 4649 for a head. Playing on head hence increases your house edge. |
|
|
|
Bitcoinflips is a Provably Fair coin flip game that allows gamblers to win 200% on their bets.
If you say "win 200%", I expect to get my bet back, plus 200% profit. This is not the case, it's a simple double or nothing game (I win exactly what I have wagered, hence 100%). You should adjust your advertising there to avoid misunderstandings, because I can guarantee those will happen. |
|
|
|
You have reported 10332 posts with 97% accuracy
You have reported 2157 posts with 87% accuracy You have reported 9124 posts with 99% accuracy
 |
|
|
|
Kindly change my address into 3NWpoKU2vz5PEtJybb2KwMJYYt6PDS76CG. I lost my phone last Tuesday and I forgot to create a backup so I wasn't able to recover the whole wallet.
Done. Could have sworn that previous one was a coinbase address, well, guess I was wrong |
|
|
|
As far as not taking accounts for collateral, there is nothing wrong with that because they have a value. If they did not have value, there would be no price estimator for the accounts.
So creating a price estimator for my sh*t will give it value? Why accounts have value was explained by Vod above, doesn't mean I support or like the trafficking of those (I use this word on purpose). Take that away and have it against the rules to do this and I will stop. Just because you are not making nothing from it does not mean nothing.
Saying Lauda does this because they are jealous is taken out of thin air, you know that. As for the first part, a user can't change the forum policies, but they can leave feedbacks. Gotta work with what you have. I have counted another 25 accounts currently up for auction from newbies, did you tag them? No you did not.
So I understand correctly, you want more feedbacks left, not less? Look at all the feedback you left lately, you are abusing the system.
Being active and fighting for something isn't abusing. There aren't much cases in which the trust system is clearly abused. This is none of them. If you were not and you were concerned with this forum, like you say, you would have been tagging for the past years, not just this month.
What kind of arguing is that? Just because someone hasn't been doing something a year ago doesn't mean they can't do it now. I wasn't even registered 2 years ago, does that mean I don't care about this forum today? If so, why exactly can't I care about it? I CALL YOUR BS buddy.
You clearly did. |
|
|
|
It's not the same thing when you replace mod-wannabes with actual mods and admins. Are you saying that mods can't read 2 or 3 lines of text which a red paint usually consists of and decide for themselves what to do with the account in question?
You're right, you're replacing people who want to do this and actually are doing it already with people who don't want to get involved with it in the first place. The forum doesn't want to moderate scams, and hence moderators don't get involved with this (at least not in their role as moderators, what they do as users is something different). Or do you prefer to have random people giving feedbacks just because they think someone sneezed at the wrong moment?
I have random negative feedbacks for the best reasons you can imagine. I tend to ignore those, as every other sane user does. |
|
|
|
Remove the feedback system and disband all the default trust members. Create a ticket system where fellow forumers send in their accusations against suspects and let the mods and admins read the reports at the end of the day and deal with the cases objectively and according to the forum rules. There are too many vigilantes stirring the pot already and making the forum experience not fun for everyone else.
So you replace DT users with Staff and get the same thing (or at least a very similar one) at the end, only that you will get way less activity from it, since you reduce the amount of people involved and further, mods are busy anway with moderating the forum/posts (their main purpose). |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
