If you already announce it's your second account, why not just create the account using your own IP address? As far as I understand you can use it through TOR after you have created it from your own IP.
Your privacy is gone already when you started this topic, so why not just create another account.
BTW, I didn't know about the evil points. Learn something new every day!
Well, nope, I want everyone to know that I am MaryJane-Watson but nothing else. I just want to keep anonymous and I don't want anyone to know where I am or something else. Well, hiding my IP is no crime I guess. Another point: When I first signed up, I did so with Tor (no real IP) Hence the suggestion to try again. Not all exit nodes are this expensive. |
|
|
|
Its confirmed.
1 input had ~1600 confirmations.
1 input had ~99,000 confirmations.
the other 4 inputs had > 100,000 confirmations.
Thus the TX had a very high priority and did not need to pay fee.
ah, just saw this was confirmed. strange, how this all happened. I just wanted it back (or to resolve this) so i could pay the guy again. Using 2 year old inputs certainly helped. |
|
|
|
@shorena: I would allow you to verify the PM he sent me but is there a way to verify it without giving you my account(Teamviewer screen sharing or something similar)?
Giving someone short access should be the fastest way of verifying the PM. I'd say (IMO) shorena is more than trusted to do that. Or you choose someone else who is a) trusted on the forum and b) yau personally trust. Its not that I don't trust shorena to hold my account I just don't want to change my password and have it appear on my trust page. TeamViewer is fine with me. I might have time later tonight (CET), I will write you a PM when I do. |
|
|
|
@Next BillGatesI never asked for compensation , what I only asked was that " sorry " because he insulted me over many place. I never threat him and bribe for money, never !
the PM quote posted by atomicat here says otherwise. I have no personal problem with you, but what you done was bad. Let me know how you will compensate for the reputation you decreased of mine .. and I promise I wont reveal your accounts.
^^ doesn't sound like you only wanted an apologize... or is that a fake quote? He quoted 1 message , ask him that I asked him to just apology, say Atomi didnt I ? compensation itself means apology ( because he dented my reputation ) Compensation may refer to:
Financial compensation
Compensation (chess), various advantages a player has in exchange for a disadvantage
Compensation (engineering)
Compensation (essay), by Ralph Waldo Emerson
Compensation (film), a 2000 film
Compensation (psychology)
Biological compensation, the characteristic pattern of bending of the plant or mushroom stem after turning from the normal vertical position
Lets go through this one by one... #1 Financial compensation: Financial compensation refers to the act of providing a person with money or other things of economic value in exchange for their goods, labor, or to provide for the costs of injuries that they have incurred.
#2-#7 Dont apply here. I dont see where this means apology. I dont see why you would use a more complex term (compensation) instead of apology if you meant apology either. Feel free to explain this to me, because to me it looks like blackmail.
@Atomicat Would you allow someone to verify the PM?
|
|
|
|
Never mind. Figured it out. I'm an idiot and had front end set wrong.
Wana share the solution? Others might have a similar problem in the future. I suspect you had to wait 120 confirmations for the block to mature, but Im not sure if thats what you mean with "front end set wrong". |
|
|
|
What will it cost me to get an address with 111111 or 122222 or 133333 and 4,5,6,7,8,9 ??
111111 - 0.0090 btc 122222 - donation 133333 - donation 144444 - donation 155555 - donation 166666 - donation 177777 - donation 188888 - donation 199999 - donation You can have an extra [2-9] (e.g. 1666666) for 0.0002 btc or two extra [2-9] (e.g. 17777777) for 0.0079 btc
Guys I don't know which is better for me  Let me know when you made a decision. |
|
|
|
that's a 1.3kb transaction with zero fees. your tx will most likely never get confirmed and will be dropped from the mempool as long there's no one rebroadcasting it frequently. Its confirmed. 1 input had ~1600 confirmations. 1 input had ~99,000 confirmations. the other 4 inputs had > 100,000 confirmations. Thus the TX had a very high priority and did not need to pay fee. |
|
|
|
-snip-
But, i think pruned node isn't real full node. Bitcoin network can't store past transaction if every nodes use pruned node.
A pruned node still fully verifies all data (blocks and transactions) and is thus a full(y verifying) node. We might need a new word for "non-pruned" nodes. Some users from the german section suggested "archive node". Which would be a full node that keeps a full archive of the blockchain as well. The core devs have some nice plans for the pruned mode though. One of the goals is that you only keep a part of the blockchain (as you do now), but that the sum of the parts of several users result in a single full copy. This would remove the requirement for archive nodes, as long as enough nodes are running. |
|
|
|
I did use bitcoin core 0.11.2. the unedited post is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=996318.3440Page 173 as KiwiParty Now it did fail to verfy even on my own wallet. Here is the new on with Bitcoin core 0.11.2 -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is KiwiParty from bitcoin.org and today is 2016.03.15. It is 01:11 pm.
My account has been locked due the use of the secret question.
Please send me a new password or recovery link to the email linked to the account.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Q1TcbLoNEC5S1CY5dTKtTingW6ydSsMJp
IMqseqNraaYkhmRiPjsZnoUghQ9rrTn6z4X1B5qj12MOUovF3LmQyHcU0iE+Jh6h8yf7+7+Xxeu/+6m9XkLh3bI=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I double checked it. Says Message verified in green letters. PS: At the end of the message you'll have to do a 'return', so the cursor will be in the next line.Here is the one without the lf/cr. -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is KiwiParty from bitcoin.org and today is 2016.03.15. It is 01:11 pm.
My account has been locked due the use of the secret question.
Please send me a new password or recovery link to the email linked to the account.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Q1TcbLoNEC5S1CY5dTKtTingW6ydSsMJp
IMZlQ922AtCpXr9riH9TzhtRsMn488MD/1KPQZoxTPsqTJlDPaN1tSu0nQ0/8s7Tm4TJNTb+2quNhQicCziR/1o=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
If a return is part of the message you need to post it as part of the message, every symbol is important. 1st verifies with a trailing linebreak, 2nd verifies. The address is 4 days old, but as your account was locked and not hacked, send theymos a PM and/or mail. |
|
|
|
Sent you a PM with a Link, Wana Your Permission if its Right?
Regards
Yes, you can use it. The format looks wrong though and I think you should show the pictures directly. As I mentioned in the PM that I just yet Copy pasted the content, Will do some work on it after your approval. Now I will work on the content to make it better looking. Thanks again Regards Let me know when you are finished with polishing, I will link it in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
You can make a TX entirely offline and have the network confirm it at the same time. You can however create an unsigned TX, sign it on your offline machine, transfer it to any online computer and broadcast to the network. That way the private key was never online. Bitcoin core allows you to create raw unsigned TX via the console with createrawtransaction. Enter help createrawtransaction for an example. All you need is the TX ID of the TX that send the 10 BTC to an address and the 5 (or 10 or 20 or...) new addresses. Read the safety advice by Danny below!
Keep in mind that you dont manually set the fee when creating a raw transaction. The fee is what is left. E.g. if you send 10 BTC to 10 addresses let them receive 0.9999 each for a (10-(10+0.9999)=) 0.001 BTC fee.
|
|
|
|
I did pm this. and hope this is going to help & solve this. thanks for your time & support.
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is KiwiParty from bitcoin.org and today is 2016.03.15.
My account has been locked due the use of the secret question.
Please send me a new password or recovery link to the email linked to the account.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Q1TcbLoNEC5S1CY5dTKtTingW6ydSsMJp
H4TX55XHnAii2X3AqXGTehZ/iVKBsMVCknprZhaPChS/IOstMp3+erK48pELsoh7kdS9wj4c2fAW7BmqB38fcLU=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Failed to verify with electrum 2.6.2 You also need to provide an unedited post for the address, preferably old. |
|
|
|
-snip-
That is how secure Trezor is.
Still not the topic at hand. |
|
|
|
...it would give users a false sense of security about non-RBF transactions.
ThomasV, thanks for providing comment. If I read you correctly - you are of the school of "if you don't have a confirmation, don't even trust any input"? Still - identification of a RBF would be even more obvious and useful - because it is Opt-in, it would show the intent (read: pre-meditation). We could play the probability game here - but wouldn't someone that decides to Opt-in be more likely to RBF a transaction? The crucial point is this -snip-
a non-RBF tx can spend outputs from an unconfirmed RBF parent...
A TX that does not advertise itself as RBF can depend on a RBF TX. These chains can (and have been without RBF) very long. A single RBF in the chain is enough to possibly revert all following TX. |
|
|
|
These hardware wallets also run software, I dont really see your point here.
Yes - agree. But this "hardware" is in a unique controlled environment: 1. Impossible to rewrite the bootloader - other than changing the unit. 2. Loading a firmware that is not signed by the HW manufacturer creates error messages every time it is booted There is more, you can read about it at: https://doc.satoshilabs.com/trezor-user/advanced_features.htmlStill an attacker needs physical access to the device (be that an old laptop or the hardware wallet), which IMHO is more likely with a hardware wallet as its easier to carry around. Its also unhelpful to go into a thread about problems with a bike and suggest to use a car instead. |
|
|
|
You dont have to update with every release, but you should keep up to date with the changes (e.g. by keep the online part updated). Some updates require you to update the offline wallet as well. i want to use Electrum on my offline pc as my cold storage so this means i will not update it
so if (for example) i install Electrum v 2.6 and after a while versions 2.6.1, 2.7, so on are released do i have to update my cold storage every time or can i leave it as it is?
how can i know when it is mandatory to upgrade to a newer version.
- also for upgrading my cold storage i just have to move the installation to that pc and install again right?
If you have a decent amount of BTC - don't rely on Electrum (software) Cold Storage. A software file is a software file. The best Cold Storage is with Trezor or Keep Key - which are Wallet independent. These hardware wallets also run software, I dont really see your point here. |
|
|
|
OP updated with Shorena's pastebin.
messed up the order of Rollin.io and SpectroCoin. I will recheck all campaigns and post an update afterwards. fixed -> http://pastebin.com/5Vb022Jy |
|
|
|
The second week of the Free Tipster Competition campaign is over, and the entry can now safely be removed from the OP.  Thanks for the help, shorena, Mitchełł. removed -> http://pastebin.com/7XnyVAFk (based on Lutpins last pastebin + some corrections) |
|
|
|
I thought so, too ... but after all my wallet.dat was rewritten with no keys inside. I don't know why I assume I made some mistake, but just want to ask if someone knew more.
Can you post a debug.log or upload it on pastebin if its too large? AFAIK the only part of the code that removes a wallet file is the one that is activated when a corrupted wallet is found. This would show in the log file. |
|
|
|
Proof Of Works Rewards Saving System
Pulsarcoin value is base on Bitcoin price
Every block will be reward 0.005 in Bitcoin
You will need to input your Btc address in the wallet to get the Btc
reward or on the pool you will choose you will have to do this too
Pulsarcoin mining will reward 0.005 Btc for each block + the normal reward block in Psc
Sounds like you are talking about an alt coin and not a wallet. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
