It is now apparent that Tesla and Elon are here for the preservation of values due to inflation and it is obvious they don't care or give a damn thing about bitcoin adoption or the technology.
First, they announce that they will accept bitcoin for their product and played everyone believing that they are here for the long-term adoption and later denounced that they no longer accept due to energy concerns after selling a few of their sats and he came back and tell the public that they were tasting bitcoin liquidity, Nice try Elon! He is a twister and a fraudster and I'm more than that Bitcoin Maxis now knows his true colour.

As if that was not enough, they have now sold about 75% of their bitcoin with some crap headline, well it is their bitcoin and they are free to sell, the more they sell, the more buyers keep accumulating, and they will come back by the time we hit 100k and buy another one and who knows there will be another richest man that might have to replace him.

When people say they predicted about bitcoin and it goes as they said doesn't really mean your analysis actually works as you plan but you did actually speculate about it and due to fomo, it went up as planned. If you are so sure about predictions you will have seen it coming that the Bitcoin under LFG reserve would have caused a lot of damage to the market, and you would have seen the CPI increase coming.
There are going to be a lot of people making some noise about the market as we have had little pump after many weeks of higher low but it is a normal thing that market always bottom to the top after many dips of the candle stick, keep holding and buying at every opportunity. Don't forget to keep the goal long-term.

In addition, self-confident as a loyal and hardcore fan who believes in his team(I'm talking about sports gambling). I had an argument about a match that I was so sure that my team will win that match, I wanted us to bet some amount against each other but for the fear of losing, he was afraid and didn't bet with me. To prove that I was super confident about that game, I took the odds and stake some amount, and my team made me believe in them more when the result came out good.

There is no theory that makes it absolute to describe other coins on blockchain as native tokens, though bitcoin is unique and exclusive, it is a coin and doesn't support smart contracts like other chains. However, the Native token describes the chains that are EVM compatible, not really the coin of a blockchain. Example: KCS token is supported on Ethereum as ERC and Kucoin chain(Kuchain) as a native token because it is EVM compatible, this helps to tell users when making transactions and knows the type of token and the chain they are interacting with, the same with other layers one blockchain like Matic (now polygon), Fantom etc.

Where were they during the ICO scams and frauds that were done through fake projects, were they not reading annual Chain Analysis report? If I can remember very well from their last report, scams carried out through cryptocurrency have reduced drastically and according to the data presented in their report, North Korea is the number one country who do these things.
Most of the crowdfunding and Investment today usually avoid US investors, they don't want to be associated with them, we have seen how they have been dragging Ripple for years,  so they should worry about how to take their country out of the recession

You should know they are called exchanges for a reason and that fixed withdrawal fee is one of them, they are also centralized to some extent otherwise this thing can be done in a way that as soon as you insert your wallet address, their app should be able to detect the wallet address you are using and since most of the time they don't use junks of input to pay withdrawals, the withdrawals fee should be less than what they charge as a flat rate.
The exchange companies are milking users with this fee, most of their transactions are done in the range of 2-5 sats/vbytes and they are mostly done by batch transactions helping them reduce the fee instead of paying fees every time on a single transaction.

These solutions can easily be adapted by an introvert but an extrovert must have an alternative to forget about gambling, you can't eliminate gambling addiction completely if you don't have an alternative, I think you should have added ''a gambler should indulge in a job that will give them a source of income'' and not stay idle. If you don't have anything serious that you do to kill time, you will always go back to gambling because you will always have excess time in your hands but the moment you are so busy with your job, you hardly have time to think of gambling in the first place especially if it is the one they can fire you ASAP for any slight mistakes.

A match is supposed to be unpredictable and no credible player will fumble like this, this nonsense wasn't supposed to happen in the first but who knows if they are not paid weekly and bonuses. But there is something bothering me about this event, who are the people capable of making this happens if not for Sportsbet or the organizers themselves. Here are my reasons:
1. A team wouldn't pull this nonsense, they wouldn't give up their league cup for some bets, they would rather try their best to win the league than risk amounts.
2. If the team cannot do this set up, then a single person can't either except the organizers or sports bets but what will they stand to gain when this thing is obvious to the public, they would lose their reputation, and names for nothing.

Did you say fun with the word MOST people NO! I beg to differ, perhaps you can enlighten me more about that because the way I see people gamble from my place, I don't think passion is what motivates most people to play but an avenue to do some big cash out due to their financial position.
Gambling has dip eaten some students, especially the university students who don't have any other means to source money, their passion for sports is what always triggers them in the first place but the main objective is to win big, when you see them with a long slip of tickets, just know that they have stake/wager money in some games and expecting results in some days.

I like the concept but I'm not too clear about the review part. What is the potency of your reviews and how reliable are they to depend on? You said a lot of things about what it takes to review a casino but what if your platform becomes big, wouldn't this becomes too centralized with favouritism to some established Casino over the small ones.
On your Home page, I can see top casino slots with different descriptions but they are kind of misleading, they all have a Play button that redirects to another page but what it shows are just reviews and a little description about the game, one will think a slot play page will open when you open a page, may be you should change it from play to another thing.

It is a product that can give value to a token, if a casino and the team can do more than the platform itself, investors wouldn't worry about short-term growth like the way you fear now, one of the problems with these casinos is that you can never predict their longevity and be sound to the demands of players. As long as players keep using the medium to bets, there will always be a utility for the token and employing a burning mechanism will improve the value over time.

Actaully, in terms of damage control, MMA and Boxing didn't come to Football, Basketall and other sports that require more than two player, I know that it require just a single person to start a turnament in boxing but if you compare it to other sporting activities, it is very easy to handle when a single player becomes corona positive and quickly evacuate and quarantine than when a single player that is in the mix of 11 players, football requires you to attack an opponent which brings you too expose to other players.

GiftedMAN wasn't wrong either but wasn't supposed to be generalized as he put it, in some situation some gamblers are always known to disguised under that umbrella so that people don't view them as gambler especially when they see them as a responsible and public model, you know that some society view gambling as a wayward thing to indulge in, they always find a way to hide under this circumstances.
People are different and our financial status have different tastes, there are some gamblers that truly play to have fun and have a nice time, doing it in the first place is not because of money but when it goes as predicted, that doesn't mean they wouldn't take the money, after all, we all do like money.

I think you missed the point of KTC, he is talking about whale, especially one that may be so influential that his words alone will satisfy their T&C and allow him to play without undergoing any Secondary identification, just the way Drake became a special VVIP player on Stake Casino and even with that, he has lost a couple of bets and still later partner with them, he officially announced it on his IG and that also brings in lots of more players to stake bet casino.

Just hope the company in charge of your KYC doesn't have a data bridge as often they use to say, if that happens eventually, there is nothing you can do when your ID gets leaked to the wrong hands. Personally, I dislike KYC not because they want it but because anything could happen to it if it falls in the wrong hands. An email and a password are enough for me to roll some dice.

What did I just watch? 
Those players are plain clowns and paid to come to play nonsense for the league else no credible player will want to play with his career, the way they did it looks even too stupid and I'm surprised that the fans didn't invade that pitch in crowd.
This is just one of the reasons why I don't watch local leagues, so much corruption and manipulation of matches and this is clearly one of them, I hope FIFA is watching these and should take action against those who organised this event because this is a taint on them.

I wouldn't compare them with rest of the tokens out there since they have a good use case and such will help grow the value of their tokens. However, looking at the three of the tokens you made mentioned, TFS is the only one with too much total supply, it wouldn't go far when you compare it with others and also, buying these tokens for the sake of APY reward in USDT and BNB is not too convincing. I know they are trying to avoid dumpers but they should build and increase the utility of the Casinos, they would worry less about those that will dump their rewards.

Did you call Bitcoin the most hyped coin? You must be really good at making comparisons about altcoins with king BTC. You were fair in your first statement and then change your tone in the last paragraph. I hope you make a deposit next time on a Casino that supports Luna and other shit-related tokens.
If you play on a Casino that keeps a balance on bitcoin, buying bunch of bitcoin right now is the best as you will get more value when the price appreciates and have more dollars to wedge and less satoshi to pay the casino on games to play.

Allow me to use this analogy: Just because alcohol is abused and intoxicated by some people, I haven't seen the call for its ban, why should gambling be banned? Besides, it is a financial instrument for some people, they have made a lot of fortune from it.
I'm not too familiar with casino games but I can wage my last card for my club when they have matches against their opponent and when they are playing against a weak opponent, I may even stake a bigger amount I can afford to lose, this why they called it "play for the entertainment of sport and for the fun." Anything you see on earth has a pro and cons and because people abuse it doesn't mean it should be totally stopped, after all, there use to be warning in most bet mediums and the risk associated with them, I don't see any valid reason why gambling should be ban.

It is not as if they cannot support the swap of native Bitcoin into other coins and tokens, it doesn't just align with their view of bitcoin. As you can see from the https://www.github.com/thorswap, they can fork their idea but I don't think there is a need to swap real Bitcoin to wrapped bitcoin, holders don't need it except the lenders and some decentralized finance who used it to bridge between blockchains and another reason I think Trust wallet wouldn't copy that idea is that native and wrapped bitcoin is already available in Binance, doing that on trust wallet is will be pushing some users from Binance especially those who don't want KYC.

An accusation has one thing which is been wrong and when that happens, it must be treated with fair judgement. It doesn't matter if the casino has been known for a good reputation for a long time, after all, good guys have turned bad in many situations, if the evidence found against them is valid, they must come out plain and pay out what they own except otherwise where the players must have invalidated their terms and policy, they have that right to penalise a player, especially the cheaters.