aggiornamenti sullo staking di ethereum... sembra che abbiano finalmente fornito una data per questo aggiornamento. https://academy.binance.com/en/articles/what-is-the-ethereum-shanghai-upgrade-and-how-will-it-affect-meQui potete leggere l'update proposto EIP-4895 che verrà implementato come hard fork! On January 5, 2023, Ethereum developers agreed to a March 2023 launch date for implementing the upgrade as a network hard fork. Users will be able to test the update with a Shanghai-implemented public test network towards the end of February 2023.
Notizia interessante anche dal punto di vista "trading" perchè rientreranno "potenzialmente" in circolo circa il 13.81% della supply totale di ETH in un colpo solo... il fatto che sarà possibile sbloccare queste reward del POS potrebbe comunque influenzare altri utenti a effettuare staking.... |
|
|
|
|
Personally, I would prefer option B because there is more chance to win and these kind of games are based on strategy / skill / experience and not just "lucky based".
But games of group B requires people to be online (enough people with different skills, wagering option...) it's not easy to have such setup...
|
|
|
|
Vado un pochino fuori tema, sarebbe una idea quella di fare una illustrazione o un quadro o qualcosa che ha gli oggetti di una seed di 12 parole?
Il problema sarebbe l'ordine forse e altro problema sarebbe il nome della parola, se io disegno una bottiglia magari qualcuno pensa la parola "acqua" piuttosto che "vino" e non "bottiglia".
No questo sistema non mi convince molto.
L'idea è carina, ma all'atto pratico praticamente un metodo per ottenere un ottimo malditesta   Immagina anche fosse un quadro astratto o contenesse ulteriori elementi :O Una cosa simile è stata fatta, qui di seguito un esempio di crypto puzzle che nasconde dentro un seed. Ovviamente è stato realizzato come gioco e non come reale sistema per conservare il seed https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5404156.0 |
|
|
|
congrats for you win and thanks for sharing here ! Most of people coming of forum just for complaining, read some nice win it's always a pleasure. I think it's also a wise decision stop to bet/gamble for a while. These kind of games are just lucky based, you can't have a real strategy on long term  |
|
|
|
|
If you want betting in a professional style you need, you must use a desktop (maybe also a backup system).
With a desktop system you can set up an automated betting system, scripting, access to statistics and so on...
Phone is suitable for quick bet (maybe you are doing other stuffs and you have already planned a bet) nothing more.
|
|
|
|
|
what happens if a seller provide a description and upload a wrong file/damaged or just make a scam? how it can be trusted the contents? did you plan to make escrow on transactions?
what if there are virus/trojan/malware added to these files? did you plan to scan contents uploaded?
|
|
|
|
|
A random proposal made by a newbie sound always a bit strange even if there is not intention to scam... However why only USA gamblers?
If you are advertising a casino you should write clearly what is the site, explain the requirements for withdrawal etc etc (it's better for everyone people know why you're giving these 10 USD for free).
|
|
|
|
I don't think they need to scam around some random trivial amount $ but let's see how its evolve... Coming back on topic I don't think that a casino is more or less lucky than others... OP has been just lucky to win this amount nothing more nothing less of what is really expected by such kinds of games. |
|
|
|
|
I would suggest to have a look here
glacierprotocol.org
because you will find the best guide/instructions/detailed info about the top cold wallet.
you can take also details on how you can adapt this guide for your personal purpose, adding some variants, etc etc...
It's considered the "state of the art" on this argument it deserve a read!
|
|
|
|
|
Prediction 2: $19,771.20
bech32 address: bc1q33tc9q86ham6qrwg8pev4t2jrnu0j4dayz7nkn
|
|
|
|
50 bitbollo thank you  |
|
|
|
|
thanks all for your comments...
I think just that such amount if invested correctly can yield a good sum... for example you can buy a well-established business (at least here in my country - Italy).
playing "big" money in gambling I don't think it's ever a stroke of genius regardless of how "big" the wallet is.
people should gamble for passion, fun, spending nice time... even if someone who has so much money to make such a bet winning 8000 USD, what would he have done with it?
|
|
|
|
...
If you have accounts with a small book that has a website and are looking to get regular sharp/edge bets to make a profit over time PM me. For examples of the sites I am talking about PM.
Thanks!
....
First: I guess that many gamblers potentially interested in something like this would request the same question: "what is an account in a site with a small book" ? Why not post directly here? Secondly: For what I can understand this is something called "radar betting", considered a scam by all bookmakers... one of the leading reason a lot of gamblers didn't receive their payout/cashout... |
|
|
|
|
@OP
nice idea, it sounds good did you have a demo about your games?
what kind of games did you are planning to launch? house edge?
as reported by @aioc this is the wrong section since here we are talking about bitcoin gambling.
did you plan to release something related to bitcoin?
|
|
|
|
https://nypost.com/2023/01/15/gambler-loses-massive-1-4-million-bet-on-chargers-jaguars-game/One bettor wasted a massive $1.4 million wager after betting on Los Angeles before the Jaguars mounted an epic comeback to beat the Chargers 31-30, according to Action Network’s Darren Rovell. It seems that a gambler has loss this massive amount (1.4 million USD) playing a bet with an odds lower than 1.01! (exactly 1.008) I think there are several lessons here: - there is not easy bet! even lower odds there is always a risk. - it's really risky playing an huge amount. This not helps gambler because the risk is much much higher then rewards! - gambling is not easy at all! it's really hard achieve a profit even for easy games! what your opinion about this gambling issue? did you had experience similar experience? how a good gambler should avoid such mistakes?
|
|
|
|
...
Sinner continues with impressive performances - Etcheverry is not a great player but he's tall and a decent server - and yet he managed to win less than 60% of games on his serve.
He's got all the stars aligned for his first GS title.
let's hope that Sinner is able to "hold up" even on a physical level! he has suffered from many injuries during this year, some even trivial such as vesicles on his feet which however forced him to retire  |
|
|
|
l'ideatore con la sua chiave privata non può spendere quei btc visto che servono due chiavi.
il design di gbianchi da un vantaggio chiaro. devi distruggere un oggetto per accedere alla chiave privata. insieme al sistema multisignature l'acquirente è protetto da un produttore fraudolento. Mi sfugge un punto però: come si può essere certi al 100% che la chiave dell'oggetto funzioni effettivamente e che all'indirizzo X ci siano veramente i BTC che l'ideatore dice di aver depositato prima di rompere per davvero l'oggetto, recuperare la chiave e fare una prova? Probabilmente mi manca un pezzo perché altrimenti mi sembra una situazione da "bitcoin di Schrödinger" in un certo senso. questo avviene con tutti gli oggetti attualmente. in più la chiave privata è coperta da un ologramma che non permette di verificare nemmeno la sua presenza. qui almeno puoi verificare che "qualcosa c'è"... ma in generale come visto con gbianchi, è possibile migliorare ulteriormente questo passaggio... ed implementare anche altre varianti... Quindi diciamo che è tutto basato sulla buona fede di chi produce e vende questo tipo di gadget alla fine. ed è per questo che stiamo cercando delle alternative "don't trust, verify" applicato a qualsiasi aspetto della vita |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
