Okay - I just want to know who moved my topic - surely you can just tell me that - can't you?

(let's try and keep the emotional language out of it please - I am calm but not interested in being "dicked around")

Sure - I will wait - I have already spent over a year on development of a technology that provides a "Turing complete" transaction system which can work on basically "any blockchain".

I just find it a pity that some mod can just move my topic (without even bothering to research what AT is) and then go on a weekend holiday when I work 7 days per week and nearly 365 days per year to develop it (did they do anything like that - I doubt it).

In future mods - don't go and move topics then take a holiday (that is pretty low IMO).

Do you mods really have *no standards at all* that you just move topics and take holidays and "that is fine"?

(so any controversial decision you make will be followed by a short holiday then?)

Okay Mohammed Zahir - you make a good point.

I got a bit upset as after nearly a year of effort in creating a technology that has been designed to work with all blockchains I get treated like some snake-oil salesman selling some new alt-coin.

I just wish those with *some brains* would actually read the material and work out what is what.

I think the mods do watch the Meta topics (if nothing else) so let's see if one of them steps forward to say they moved my topic (actually I thought you could actually tell that before - has that changed?).

Well at least @shorena had the guts to admit it was he/she that reported my posts to the mods.

Now would the mod who moved the topic please also have the balls to actually step up and say who they are?

The mods don't care (that is clear enough already).

If you guys think that a technology created to do Turing complete txs across any blockchain is just some alt-coin then fine - you lose (this very forum represents the "old world" that we are going to replace anyway).

It was put in a part where other projects that "might be in the future of Bitcoin are allowed" so if I am not allowed then please remove every other topic that also isn't part of Bitcoin today.


That was actually Danny Hamilton's idea - but whatever (you clearly don't read very carefully do you).

Enjoy wasting all of our time to earn your ad sig posts (we all can see what kind of a person you really are).

Oh and look - he has an "ad sig" - what a surprise!

(a guy who has no shame to sell his posts to the highest bidder)

Maybe I'll just report your crap posts to the ad sig campaign owner (but who knows they are probably as morally bankrupt as yourself).

Also - you admit you are unable to differentiate between an "alt coin" and a "technology"?

(dumb - and proud of it?)

Well I hope that you are happy with your result - it won't stop the development of the project nor the failure of your own agenda!

So thanks for showing up - and have you read this: http://ciyam.org/at/at_script.html

(I am not going to degrade myself to talking to you like a 5yo as I assume you are not a child)

After you have read that can you please defend your position?

BTW - have you reported TierNolan for ACCT being altcoin also (as that is not possible on Bitcoin either)?

My guess is that you have an agenda against either my projects or myself (perhaps you are a Nxt fan?).

Check the OP of the topic and then tell me why the mods would think it is "alt related".

(the bit with *** telling the mods is not entirely obvious?)

Am sure they have seen this topic.

I'd at least hope that the mod who moved it would actually "show their face" and explain themselves - sheesh.

@gmaxwell should know what AT is about as I have sent him a PM about it before, so as I stated if it was him then that is very disappointing (and I am not going to send another PM to him).

If it was @gmaxwell then that is rather disappointing indeed.

Perhaps he should take a look at my PMs to see that even Gavin has asked me about AT (I don't think Gavin tends to send PMs to forum members about their alt coins).

Mods - please stop moving topics about AT (Automated Transactions) into the alts section.

AT is not an alt nor has it been designed to only work with alts (even if it is only currently implemented in an alt so far) - it is a technology which can be implemented in any blockchain platform (even Bitcoin if they ever decided to do that).

Perhaps whoever is moving my topics could take the time to read this: http://ciyam.org/at/at_script.html

My guess it was thanks to the ad sig posters that this topic got moved into alts *even though AT is not an alt*.

Will lock this topic now - thanks a lot *mods* for being unable to even understand a technology from an alt and thanks for nothing ad sig posters.

I don't really care about whether people invest in BURST or not (I own *zero* BURST) and I will quote valid points if made but if the content is not adding anything of use (and especially if the poster has an ad sig) then I will delete it.

Hope this is clear (my topic so my rules).

So if you have an "ad sig" then please create a new account without it (for forum is happy for everyone to have multiple accounts) and please post with that account instead (if you are truly interested in this topic rather than just trying to meet your ad sig quota then I don't think it is too much to ask).

If there are any valid points made from ad sig posters then I'll quote them (but will still delete their ad sig post).

Certainly ATs could be used as an automatic funds dispersing agent (if that is your concept).

One idea that we have thought of that could be useful is an AT that acts as a "pocket money" sender so that you could send it some large amount of funds which it would send a small portion to another account regularly.

It could also be handy for scheduled payments with an option to send it a message to redirect the funds back to its creator (i.e. "cancel subscription").

An AT account has no public or private key - each peer knows that an AT account is not a normal account and that its funds can only be "spent" via executing the AT code.