But the reason I thought at first it was incomplete remains, the parameter "mintxfee" is mentioned here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_fees#Sendingbut not on the list page. Thus I wonder if the parameter is valid or if there are also other existing ones not mentioned in the list. that was left out intentionally.
|
|
|
why is everything on your site in ALL CAPS?
|
|
|
Placebo has increased the overall stability and throughput when mining.
ftfy there's no logical reason why running on a ramdisk would increase stability or speed. mining is not disk access intensive, therefore you should not experience gains when using ramdisk.
|
|
|
Just to be clear: I put this in my signature for 30 days: And make at least 60 posts in the next 30 days and I get 0.25 bitcoins?
|
|
|
Why would you download from some shady .tk site? I linked you to the official topic for pywallet.
|
|
|
because people are irrational. but shush, we need irrational people so rational people can make more profit
|
|
|
Tks for your replys, this issue its on my laptop, ATI M 5730. I know its not good as desktops but at the moment its what i got... I'm guessing your graphics driver switches to low power mode the instant the screen turns off.
|
|
|
There's no reason it would be the same
By the definition of "unspent outputs", there's no reason it would not be the same correction: value of unspent outputs is equal to the coins in circulation howeverThe number of unspent outputs can differ from that. It's possible for all unspent outputs to be located at one address or a million.
|
|
|
coincontrol/rawtransactions: good feature, but there's a coin control fork that is likely to be included in 0.9.0. verifyaddress: no point, trying to send to an invalid address will always fail. generate address: no point dumprivkey: i can see how it's useful, but its use is very limited. in the times when it is used, users will want to dump all their keys, not just one transactions report: default qt gui can already filter by address satoshi dice client: why even? importprivkey: same as dumpprivkey: it's useful, but it's rarely used. stats: it's on the start page of the GUI
remote aspect: the only point of a remote client is if you have your bitcoin node hosted on some vps for some reason. and even then, it's only useful if you can't deal with the command line client (bitcoind can communicate with other bitcoind to execute commands). if a person is hosting their bitcoin node on some remote server, chances are they're comfortable with CLI interface. therefore, the audience for this app is small.
|
|
|
bitcoin-qt is a "full node" in terms of network participation. This means it can generate and propigate blocks plus verify and relay transactions. It also has a full history of the blockchain available to it. However, by default, you can not query it for arbitrary data. Only a limited set of data is available using the standard json-rpc API. If you need additional data, you'll need to use a third party API provider, or patch your client. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=724.0
|
|
|
You do realize these "walls" tend to vanish once the the price gets close to them, right?
|
|
|
Implementation of a more flexible block size than the 1MB block hard limit.
friendly reminder: this post is probably bait
|
|
|
Now, your original post was strictly about me personally ,and had nothing to do with what I said, I did not say the transaction fee is not cheap, just that why should they bother to charge it when they can include it for free, and it's you who did not respond with anything of substance or to the point.
Actually, it has everything to do with what you said. You were the one who brought up my tone. You were the one who tried to defend your actions with questionable logic. For the record, I did make a reply to the point. It was in the post you quoted from the beginning. My remark about your tone was merely an add-on to my reply. bonus: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Et_tu_quoqueTheir reward got cut in half. You really anyone would be ok with their revenue halved?
You know the transaction fee is nothing compared to the mining reward, right? 0.5 BTC is about the maximum you will get for a block atm. And at no time was their revenue halved, other than a short period when the fiat price of bitcoin was around $60-the price was only more than $30 for a very short while before Nov.2012 when the reward was halved. Not to say that most of the miners never got the chance to set transaction policy. Their revenue in terms of bitcoins halved. If you were doing something for free, and you did a really good job at it, why on earth would you do it for free? Even satoshi's paper stated that transaction fee would replace the block subsidy as the main source of revenue. According to your logic, miners should never need to rely on transaction fees, seeing how higher market prices can swoop in and save them. Actually, the miners are more generous than you think. They do accept free transactions. My past few transactions all have zero fees attached, but they were confirmed without issue. Often within 5 blocks. I even managed to send an "illegal" transaction with the NFTF patch and it got confirmed the next morning. Clearly, miners aren't as greedy as you think they are. It's just too much people competing for valuable block space.
|
|
|
Well it happened. I tried running pywallet but I didn't get it running. Installed Python 2.7 on Windows with the listed extensions but I got the error SyntaxError: invalid syntax.
are you sure you installed it properly? Python 2.5-2.7, with bsddb package twisted package is necessary if you want to use the web interfaceedit: followed the instructions exactly and it works fine. You should be able to remove these kinds of transactions from the client. Forget about common people with minimal computer literacy adopting Bitcoin else. It will remain the domain of the techsavvy and be labelled "hacker's money" by the media and Joe Sixpack will stay as far away from it as possible. Then again, it might not be such a good idea. Users might randomly stumble upon features like this and screw up their wallet.
|
|
|
protip: most miners rarely bother updating their drivers. those who do rarely update to beta.
|
|
|
This is not a cry for help
then don't post it in the technical support section. Also, 58xx series work fine without dummy plugs. SDK 2.1 through 2.7, catalyst 11.12 through 13.4. Maybe if you don't use beta, it will magically work
|
|
|
your url tags are broken: [url=http://"https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216928.0"] should be: [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=216928.0]
|
|
|
Lie and say you need it for finding prime number. No way they'll get you a test drive to mine bitcoins.
|
|
|
This transaction may never be confirmed. You can use pywallet to remove the transaction from your wallet. Doing this will make your client "forget" about the transaction. Doing so will prevent you client from attempting to use the unconfirmed transaction for future inputs, which should resolve the problem you're experiencing. However, if the transaction magically gets confirmed, your client will receive it, so you're not risking anything.
|
|
|
|