Bitcoin Forum
June 15, 2024, 04:04:51 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 ... 206 »
2281  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What is the single largest transaction of bitcoins on the block chain to date? on: March 31, 2011, 03:27:39 AM
In block 104,889 was a 250,000 BTC output and a 150,000 BTC output (from a 400,000 BTC input).
  http://blockexplorer.com/b/104889


Notice that those 400,000 BTC come from a single transaction in block 104,770:

http://blockexplorer.com/block/0000000000022043f9ea2c298f3381c6ddd86b968271117dd55cb48ac297954c


From that, you conclude whatever you want.
2282  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Post Your Desktop Thread on: March 30, 2011, 05:06:25 PM
Surprised to see some Awesome users.  I just started using it this week on my netbook and I'm loving it.

By the way, for those who don't know it yet, the awesome developpers accept bitcoin donations.  Their address is on their community page:

http://awesome.naquadah.org/community/

It's not on the main awesome page, though Sad
2283  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: pioneer one now accepting bitcoin on: March 30, 2011, 03:19:19 PM

I must say I didn't quite liked this episode #3.  The new character is weird and I disliked the "emotionnal" input they tried to give to the serie.

I'll wait for next episode to see if it's get better, before I make an other donation.
2284  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Post Your Desktop Thread on: March 30, 2011, 03:03:57 PM
When I use X I use awesome too, but in the "full screen" mode, which means that I rarely see my bacground screen.

So my desktop is very boring and I will spare it to you.


PS.  Bah...  here it is, anyway:


2285  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Yet Another Exchange? on: March 30, 2011, 09:53:41 AM
I own Britcoin and our source code is open. If you contact me then I can get you setup for a small fee as I'm doing with CCCMikey. The more people we have using this same software, the easier I can turn it into a safe, secure, easy to install piece of kit for setting up a Bitcoin exchange.

Then we'll have lots of exchanges.

This seem interesting.  I'll give this a try.  By myself first, and if I can't manage I'll contact you.
2286  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BITCOIN IS AVAILABLE ON DEBIAN SID !!!!! on: March 30, 2011, 06:41:30 AM
You can always download the source package, compare the source with the original distributed source, all it takes is a simple diff, and then build your own package out of it.


Last time I tried, I had compilation errors.

I've just tried again, I get:

Code:
$ uname -a
Linux aptosidbox 2.6.38-1.slh.4-aptosid-686 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 26 13:12:20 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
$ make -
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -o obj/nogui/util.o util.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -o obj/nogui/script.o script.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -o obj/nogui/db.o db.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -o obj/nogui/net.o net.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -o obj/nogui/irc.o irc.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -o obj/nogui/main.o main.cpp
g++ -c -O2 -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wformat -g -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__ -DNOPCH -DFOURWAYSSE2 -DUSE_SSL -I"/usr/include/wx-2.9" -I"/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.9" -o obj/nogui/rpc.o rpc.cpp
In file included from /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/context_service.hpp:30:0,
                 from /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/context.hpp:22,
                 from /usr/include/boost/asio/ssl.hpp:19,
                 from rpc.cpp:12:
/usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp: In member function void boost::asio::ssl::detail::openssl_context_service::create(SSL_CTX*&, boost::asio::ssl::context_base::method):
/usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:73:28: error: ::SSLv2_method has not been declared
/usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:76:28: error: ::SSLv2_client_method has not been declared
/usr/include/boost/asio/ssl/detail/openssl_context_service.hpp:79:28: error: ::SSLv2_server_method has not been declared
make: *** [obj/nogui/rpc.o] Erreur 1

I suspect it's because I have too a recent version of openssl:

Code:
$ apt-cache policy openssl libssl-dev
libssl-dev:
  Installé : 1.0.0c-2
  Candidat : 1.0.0c-2
 Table de version :
 *** 1.0.0c-2 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.9.8o-5 0
        500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages
openssl:
  Installé : 1.0.0c-2
  Candidat : 1.0.0c-2
 Table de version :
 *** 1.0.0c-2 0
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.9.8o-5 0
        500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ sid/main i386 Packages

I've just downgraded openssl, and now I get:


make: *** No rule to make target `cryptopp/obj/sha.o', needed by `bitcoind'.  Stop.
2287  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would you support moving to a system with controled inflation? on: March 30, 2011, 03:57:14 AM

...Plutonium, Uranium...

Wink

Some people might find these commodities unacceptable as stores of value as they have built-in inflation imposed by nature due to their half-life.  Grin

I personnally prefer not to store any radioactive element.


There is an article here where a chemist explains why gold beats other elements as a form of money.
2288  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would you support moving to a system with controled inflation? on: March 30, 2011, 03:07:53 AM
For physical money there is nothing but gold.


Silver, copper? 

Try to put a significative amount of wealth with copper or even silver in your pocket.
2289  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Yet Another Exchange? on: March 30, 2011, 03:02:12 AM
The more currency exchanges, the better.
2290  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bounty for Bitcoin Animated Movie [13622.05 BTC ($2520) and growing] on: March 30, 2011, 03:00:43 AM

An idea concerning the next, more technical video:

it should really take some time to explain both public key cryptography and the concept of cryptographic hash-based proof-of-work.
2291  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: BITCOIN IS AVAILABLE ON DEBIAN SID !!!!! on: March 30, 2011, 02:43:41 AM

I confess I am a bit reluctant to use it, though.

After all what exactly prevents it to have a trojan inside?


I guess I'll wait until there are a lot of people who havve tested it and audited the code.
2292  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Would you support moving to a system with controled inflation? on: March 29, 2011, 06:20:03 PM
People deal in the physical, we want to touch, feel, and see objects of worth. However, we also like the private. We like to conduct transactions in private.

So, I see the BitCoin as becoming a transitory monetary system into and out of the physical. We will buy bitcoins to make a transaction, use them, and then get out of the market.

For physical money there is nothing but gold.
2293  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Does WeUseCoins Deserves the Full Bounty? RETAKE on: March 29, 2011, 05:13:25 PM

I understand genjix being kind of angry about that.


This is a no brainer:  the bounty should be paid for this excellent video and it would put a shame on the bitcoin community if it wasn't.   No need to wait until april 5th.
2294  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Does WeUseCoins Deserves the Full Bounty? RETAKE on: March 29, 2011, 05:04:12 PM
Yay, of course.

Sure, the video is not perfect, but it's pretty damn good and come on :  if these guys don't deserve the bounty, who will???
2295  Economy / Marketplace / Re: BiddingPond.com discussion on: March 29, 2011, 04:57:56 PM
Yes maybe I should mention that I too have some minor displaying problems with the new site.

I'm using the Arora web browser under Debian GNU/linux.

Here is a screenshot:


2296  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Best quote from Satoshi on: March 29, 2011, 04:53:15 PM

Quote from: 'satoshi'
The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust thats required to make it
work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of
fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our
money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles
with barely a fraction in reserve. We have to trust them with our privacy, trust them
not to let identity thieves drain our accounts. Their massive overhead costs make
micropayments impossible.
A generation ago, multi-user time-sharing computer systems had a similar problem.
Before strong encryption, users had to rely on password protection to secure their
files, placing trust in the system administrator to keep their information private.
Privacy could always be overridden by the admin based on his judgment call weighing the
principle of privacy against other concerns, or at the behest of his superiors. Then
strong encryption became available to the masses, and trust was no longer required.
Data could be secured in a way that was physically impossible for others to access, no
matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter what.
Its time we had the same thing for money. With e-currency based on cryptographic
proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and
transactions effortless.

I am amazed how Satoshi managed to sum up his idea so well in only three paragraphs.
2297  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The idearamid scheme. on: March 29, 2011, 02:02:16 PM

Smart people would have more money and success than normal people???

That would be unfair!


2298  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Getting the Bitcoin Wikipedia article to the Good or Featured category on: March 29, 2011, 01:28:37 PM
Making a "good" wikipedia article is far from easy.

I doubt the bitcoin article will be rated "good" any time soon.
2299  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Should All Promotions Of Bitcoin "Ponzi" Schemes Be Banned? on: March 29, 2011, 11:58:47 AM
Ponzi schemes are fun, providing nobody is lying to you about what it is.

It's not worse than lottery or gambling, anyway.
2300  Local / Discussions générales et utilisation du Bitcoin / Re: la quadrature du net accepte les dons en bitcoins on: March 29, 2011, 11:05:51 AM

il faudrait peut-être ajouter le lien au wiki, sur la partie "associations acceptant les bitcoins comme donations".
Pages: « 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 ... 206 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!