So simple to understand.

"Blame it all on that youtube video
Vast right-wing conspiracy
No ultra top secret emails on my home made server in the closet..."




Another whore.

When it comes to climate change, I feel like Michael Corleone in Godfather III: Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in. I already noted here earlier my latest rumble with some climatistas in Boulder on Monday, and today I see the news that the temperature “pause” is back on again.

Last fall, conveniently just before the Paris climate summit, the government announced to great fanfare that a re-analysis of the temperature data showed that there had been no pause in global temperature since 1998—that the planet has been getting steadily hotter all along. There was a lot of criticism of potential data manipulation, but as I was busy working on other projects I didn’t look into and left it to John to cover, which he did in several posts.

Earlier this week “a prominent group of researchers,” as Nature magazine describes them, has contested the previous “no pause” finding, and conclude that there was indeed a pause that the climate models can’t account for very well:

    The latest salvo in an ongoing row over global-warming trends claims that warming has indeed slowed down this century.

    An apparent slowing in the rise of global temperatures at the beginning of the twenty-first century, which is not explained by climate models, was referred to as a “hiatus” or a “pause” when first observed several years ago. Climate-change sceptics have used this as evidence that global warming has stopped. But in June last year, a study in Science claimed that the hiatus was just an artefact which vanishes when biases in temperature data are corrected.

    Now a prominent group of researchers is countering that claim, arguing in Nature Climate Change that even after correcting these biases the slowdown was real.

    “There is this mismatch between what the climate models are producing and what the observations are showing,” says lead author John Fyfe, a climate modeller at the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis in Victoria, British Columbia. “We can’t ignore it.”

Amazingly, one of the authors of the new paper is Michael Mann of hockey stick fame. Maybe we should say the “pause” has been “Mann-splained”?

Here’s Scientific American on the story yesterday:

    The disagreement may seem esoteric, but it underpins the biggest climate disagreement of the past decades. Climate models, which are virtual representations of our planet, project that temperatures were much higher in the early 2000s than was the case in reality. Scientists have been trying to understand why.

But remember: everything is settled, shut up, and hand over your car keys. Because we can ignore it, unless you’re the moral equivalent of Holocaust denier.

And from the Global Warming Policy Foundation:

It is pretty amazing to witness such thing: ex mexican presidents, sitting american president, leaders of the dnc, leaders of the gop, el chapo, anonymous, lots and lots of world leaders, the freaking pope... In unisson against TRUMP....

 

Post #56 is a masterpiece of ignorance, a chocolate fountain of liquid brain cells, kept gently at room temperature by a hot plate of bad historical revisionism... no wonder bernie has so many supporter like him/her/it.





 

Amid Trump surge, nearly 20,000 Mass. voters quit Democratic party



Nearly 20,000 Bay State Democrats have fled the party this winter, with thousands doing so to join the Republican ranks, according to the state’s top elections official.

Secretary of State William Galvin said more than 16,300 Democrats have shed their party affiliation and become independent voters since Jan. 1, while nearly 3,500 more shifted to the MassGOP ahead of tomorrow’s “Super Tuesday” presidential primary.

Galvin called both “significant” changes that dwarf similar shifts ahead of other primary votes, including in 2000, when some Democrats flocked from the party in order to cast a vote for Sen. John McCain in the GOP primary.

The primary reason? Galvin said his “guess” is simple: “The Trump phenomenon,” a reference to GOP frontrunner Donald Trump, who polls show enjoying a massive lead over rivals Marco Rubio, Ted Cruz and others among Massachusetts Republican voters.

“The tenor of the Republican campaign has been completely different from what we’ve seen in prior Republican presidential campaigns,” Galvin said. “You have to look no farther than the viewership for some of the televised debates.

“The New York Times referred to the campaign as crude; I suppose that’s fair,” added Galvin, a Democrat. “The fact of the matter is the tenor has been very different this time. And that has an effect. People are interested. It’s exciting.”

Galvin said the state could see as many as 700,000 voting in tomorrow’s Republican primary, a significant number given just 468,000 people are actually registered Republicans. In Massachusetts. unenrolled — otherwise known as independent — voters can cast a ballot in the primary of any party.

If the Democratic vote is close to that of 2008 — when 1.2 million hit the polls — the state could surpass the 1.8 million that voted that year overall, setting what Galvin said he believes would be a record for a presidential primary in Massachusetts.

“The question in my mind is the Democratic turnout,” Galvin said. “The nature of the race is a little different than it was in ’08. ... It’s a fact that Sen. (Bernie) Sanders has a very aggressive campaign here in Massachusetts. He spent both time and money. He has a good ground (game) from what I can see, as does Sen. (Hillary) Clinton. So that’s going to help us. But the chemistry was somewhat different than it was in ‘08.”

Galvin noted the historical context in 2008, when then-Sen. Barack Obama was vying to become the nation’s first black president, and running against Clinton — seeking, as she is again this year, to become the first woman to serve as president.

Turnouts have hit record levels in other primary states this year.

Galvin pointed to the shift in voters from the Democratic party as an “indicator” of turnout in the Bay State.

But while significant, it doesn’t necessary signal a change in the political power structure in Massachusetts, where Democrats have long dominated with heavy majorities in the legislature and across constitutional offices.

The 19,800 who left the Mass Dems represent about 1.3 percent of the 1.49 million enrolled in the party. And though the MassGOP gained several thousand voters, it actually lost more in the same time frame, when 5,911 quit the party to be unenrolled.


http://www.bostonherald.com/news/local_coverage/2016/02/amid_trump_surge_nearly_20000_mass_voters_quit_democratic_party

 

They are purposely dumbing down the children.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/wired-success/201407/anti-intellectualism-and-the-dumbing-down-america

Green parties all over europe always support socialist candidates. Since a lot of europeans already contributed to bernie's American campaign, and are planning to vote for bernie illegally, why not? He cares for global warming.

Is the green party supporting bernie?

This is what I was thinking. Strange move... Unless, behind the curtain, the DOJ is ready to move against clinton. Real estate Billionaire (brick and mortar, humans) vs a democrat billionaire from wall street?

 

And this move should help.. clinton or TRUMP? (let's forget about bernie, he's done)

Sad. Indeed.

I keep telling him/her/it the same thing, the focus should be against harpy clinton now, TRUMP later. I have said the beautiful 24k Gold TRUMP doors will always be open to them, after...

The anti TRUMP / anti harpy rhetoric ratio from the OP is telling. That is why they are losers: they could not see who their real enemy was.

... Because the free bernie college does not provide Sun Tzu studies...

 

Published on Feb 29, 2016

Katrina Pierson was just on msnbc defending trump on the KKK made up comments this video contains a mishap which involves David corn and host Tamron Hall . Tamron cuts to a trump rally for an interview which I'm more than sure she was told was going to be a white KKK person supporting trump. Boy was she burned just look at her reaction after the African American trump supporter has to say


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LltnLzLXs7U


Self imploding...

 

I am a loving human. I love everybody. I understand you could be doing lots of work for bernie sanders right now. Instead, you've decided to help the TRUMP thread.

For this I am thankful.

Banning people is not free speech.

Aren't you for free speech, as in... free healthcare and free education?

I don't even have a banner promoting something, unlike you, making me a little bit less of an hypocrite capitalist than you. Funny.

 

Because bern victims...



 

This thread should be kept open way after bernie sanders WILL quit.