Got no replies, so upped to 1.5 times Deepbit PPS rate.
Also feel free to PM even if you do not meet all the requirements. Am keen to get this going soon so will compromise if I have too.
Thanks
set the title to 180% PPS, this should atract more users  just a little problem, your requirement of winblows. you wont find alot of serious miners (well, if they are really serious miners, u wont find any). |
|
|
|
I don't get it?? In the newbie forum most especially, pools without fees are preferred over those that take back a small fee.
Here's how I see it: Pools with fees are more reliable in the long run because they have some extra funding to keep their services up and running. Ones which do not incur such fees don't seem to have this safety net.
Am I missing something?
thats simple, most humans are selfish as shit, if they have to donate 1-3% they are getting mad and rage about it  |
|
|
|
|
wait, this still isnt flagged as scam? wtf...
|
|
|
|
|
10% fee PPS is unnaceptable, max 5% should be it.
3% fee for Prop is unnaceptable too, 3% DGM would be the max too. But DGM is totally different from Prop!
If i would want a 0% fee pool i continue at EMC and set the donation to 0%, but no my donation isnt at 0%!
|
|
|
|
Mad7Scientist i hope you dont believe this bullshit ur talking, otherwise your really lost! Just a typical person crying for attention, well he got it a bit but in the wrong direction. i dont think he likes what were doing with him |
|
|
|
|
PPS:
#DEFINE rip-off (ACTUALWORK/100)*90
Prop:
#DEFINE rip-off (ACTUALWORK/100)*97
this was fine in the start due to no other pools (expect sluh's) were able to compete with deepbit, but now the situation is different.
its like selling a 10 year old car still for the same prices as you bought it -> rip-off.
so to clarify, nowadays deepbit is a rip-off.
Not even to talk about this from us2sam
"I pay higher fees/contributions at the other pools I use."
all i have to say to that is total retardness, sry if this sound harsh but its a fact.
and for the point, 0 fee pools are rip-off. there are scampools (yes 0 fee pools, 100+% PPS pools, etc) but you setting a fee is forcing ppl. as example take a look at EMC, 0% fee per default but you can donate on your own, most dont but thats because they are selfish. Another example would be ArsBitcoin (which failed due to bad luck and developer having no time to work on his pool), 1% fee per default but you can set it to 0% if you want.
Mining at a hyped pool dosnt mean its worth it. This discussion would lead to marketing and there isnt a good idea to discus. Or are you one of the guys just buying a new iPhone because everyone else has it, or because i has the Apple Logo on it? I bet so...
|
|
|
|
o how the mighty have fallen.
seriously. wtf happened?
they went from over 50% to like 2% of the hash rate.
people finally understood deepbit is a rip-off. hard but true I wouldn't call using the most reliable pool, which one can use unattended with complete confidence, a "rip-off". I pay higher fees/contributions at the other pools I use. And I don't, particularly, have a problem with hoppers. If I did have a problem with hoppers I would hop myself to offset the loss, which anyone can do if they want to put forth the time and effort. 0 fee pools are a rip-off if you ask me. You just can't get something for nothing, no way to get around that fact, learn it, live it, know it! Sam totaly wrong, this is OSS. If you dont understand the basics, just dont even try to argue |
|
|
|
o how the mighty have fallen.
seriously. wtf happened?
they went from over 50% to like 2% of the hash rate.
people finally understood deepbit is a rip-off. hard but true |
|
|
|
I solved 2 blocks today  I'm a lucky bastard  Just found another! Thats 3 in 4 days. Fuck me sideways... I guess a bit late now, but if you use BFGMiner's --coinbase-sig option, you can embed your nick or something in the coinbase of blocks you find good to know, ty |
|
|
|
or is the number a count of ipv4 addresses in this section?
Yes, it shows number of different IP addresses for each list. You can check what exactly each of them is filtering (or allowing) here. well then, sry 4 that are you seeding from home? if so i can understand avoiding the 720 connections |
|
|
|
this fee are so called "lower priority tx's", if you need fast tx confirmation, raise the fee.
I didn't know. Will 0.00050001 BTC (standard + 1 satoshi) give me an advantage in priority? depends on the miners (pools software), altough if you need fast transactions, atleast 0.001 should be fine. 0.01 to be almost 100% sure that it gets included (if you can afford this), this depends on the other transactions in the network. |
|
|
|
Off-topic, sort of: There's incredible amount of Anti-P2P activity lately. By the time I finished downloading file, 724 IP addresses known to be used by organizations and companies openly working against P2P were detected on DHT, and 720 of them tried to connect to my client, LOL! I was downloading and now seed just this file. Really, those people are very fast - and determined - to find out what's new on P2P. Level 1 filters those mentioned above:  yea sure, ipv4 adress spaces higher than 255! lmao EDIT: or is the number a count of ipv4 addresses in this section? even touhg, ipfilter is a fine thing, but not really accurate at all. @jgarzik: need more seeds? |
|
|
|
Oh, God! Waited 97 minutes for the block just to see my Tx wasn't included!
How much did you spend as fee? Standard 0.0005 BTC. Fortunately the tx was included into the next block. this fee is a so called "lower priority tx's", if you need fast tx confirmation, raise the fee. |
|
|
|
The title probably already gave it away but I think we're all thinking this. You know how quite a large number of BTC transactions involve illegal stuff? Don't you wish you could damage those guys' business or basically take their money? Well, most drug-buying, burnout, ass clowns aren't exactly way into following the BTC community. Drug dealers probably can't read so well to begin with so needless to say, most aren't here following every little post So, if someone were to say let's everyone refuse to sell any BTC on any exchange for 1 week starting on XXXX, the price would skyrocket and then everyone dump it after the 1 week and all the money that was collected illegally at the artificially inflated buying price would go straight into our pockets during a big sell off What do you think? Could we get enough people to follow along while keeping enough people in the dark? Or would early sellers, etc ruin it by not exactly following the policy? Would we even have enough people? 1. Drug dealers probably can't read so well to begin with? The drug dealers in question were smart enough to use a computer to set up tor to log on to a site to use encrypted communications to buy and sell goods using a currency most people are just beginning to wrap their heads around. Yeah, you're right. They probably can't read. 2. You want to manipulate the market to capitalize on less educated bitcoin users. Ignoring the moral issue, and the fact that price manipulation is illegal in regulated currencies, the volatility would shake the confidence of anyone on the fence about adopting bitcoin, and hurt the "legitimate" businesses who have begun to adopt bitcoin. 3. I had a three, but I was doing drugs last night and I can't really remember what it was. wuaha, just perfect |
|
|
|
awesome idea, too bad i life in switzerland they look very yummy |
|
|
|
I say we go after Pirate! Let's end this once and for all, no more BS about lawsuits and deadlines. Kill him and brute-force his wallets.
I have so many things to do this week that I don't have time to handle this right now. I've sent couple of emails though.
brute forcing wallet, u know u dont have enough power to do this? |
|
|
|
US2 and US3 will be back up shortly.
I have the new hardware to move US2 to another DC. Just need to get it built and installed.
ty, i love this kind of encouragement i always feel sick when i see like nobody is doing it like u/me (well i dont have a pool, but you know what im talking about ). |
|
|
|
|
69.195.155.226:8337 down again :S
|
|
|
|
ufasoft, any chance to implement Stratum protocol to the miner? cgminer 2.8.0 supports it, so there's already reference implementation in C. I see tons of ufasoft miners on my pool and native stratum support would be benefical for everybody.
Don't hesitate to join #stratum IRC channel and ask to anything, there are always people willing to help you.
just wanna remind you to update your site ( http://mining.bitcoin.cz/stratum-mining), the "compatible miners" section greetings |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
