sometimes people create an account and forget about it and then they start to play on a freshly made account and get banned
nice to see Fortunejack being pretty lenient 
and not enforcing their TOS when a player is not abusing the system
glad that everything has been resolved and they even managed to retain the customer,hope more casinos show flexibility like that

funny how wikipedia considers bitcointalk a spamming site
while it doesn't hesitate to inundate you with donation requests:



never trusted it as a source of information,anyone can edit it and it has been politically biased on so many cases I cannot count

judging by the screenshot,you were asked to choose one of the accounts to keep
a trick question,but you kind of confessed to having two accounts and asked to keep the one you were playing on and to close the second one
so support gladly obliged and closed BOTH quoting breach of their TOS
what happened is probably you were using a public VPN and your IP's matched the other accounts address or you had two accounts from the start and forgot about the first one
you should have told them you have just one account

I think he intended to,the site was undervalued and had (has?) good potential
but seeing Wetsuit spending less and less time with his main project-freebitco.in,my guess would be he has some real life snags
and cannot dedicate taht much time and effort to make things happen,there is indeed almost no action there at least at the moment
but nothing that cannot be changed with a good marketing campaign,promotions etc.

despite the 1% house edge the sites make way more money,usually
it is due to the fact that the vast majority of the gamblers have a very vague idea about bank management or optimal betting strategies
I have seen some atrociously terribad gamblers who are just destined to lose,without a chance to win the way they are playing
there is a variance,of course,one lucky whale could turn the things upside down profitwise
take bustadice and yahoo,for example *winks at Rhavar

I hope there will be an exchanger on the site...one day,will be convenient
the fees and the minimum withdrawal amount is same as with bitcoins
funnily enough,the flame requirements for HR is same as well
you can bet 0.01 ETH and get a flame ,so many are taking advantage to boost their e-peen and are getting this cheap flame,haha
I am sure they will adjust the figures soon,same as wd minimum and wd fees for etherium

yep,you are correct
its a clone of bustabit,same script but for litecoins
the site was offline for some time,I think and now that the new owner is trying to resurrect it....
well lets see,but seeing how Bustabit and Bustadice both cannot boast extraordinary profits,I doubt litecoin.win will be much of a success

you can run games but in a different section- games and rounds:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=71.0
as for your idea of this game-I do not think it is going to make it as it will be the spammiest game ever and the mods will definitely lock the thread sooner or later
come up with a better idea,not the one "hey post to keep me on top of the list and I might share something with you to promote me almost for free"
also yeah,what tokens are we talking about ?

its a very generous offer,indeed
one bitcoin for an anlysis of an altcoin of your choice...
more information would be in order though,tweets have a symbol limit
do you have any limitations as to the size of the post or any other prerequisities? other than it has to be an anlysis you like?
tempted to participate and write up about ADA

it can be denominated in BTC in the games if I remember correct
you can withdraw in bitcoins,I recieved the bonus and managed to win some from it,but not enough to meet the wagering requirements to withdraw in the end
think there was a guy in the topic who managed to withdraw from the nondeposit bonus

egold should have picked a different name,if you heard about egold,you should be aware of this :
https://www.wired.com/2009/06/e-gold/
but of course the new egold has nothing to do with the previous system,but the name
and its capitalisation and trade volumes are not that impressive: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/egold/

I always follow cappers threads and checking the outcomes vs the predictions
it is disappointing in 99% ,either they "cappers" lose interest after a few losing bets
or they plain do not understand the sport they are betting on or have no idea about the bank management
also,try to add a short description,yes I see you have edited your post already
but it would be nice if you set ,say a 1000 unit betting bank and assigned a certain % of it to each bet,depending on how sure you are about the outcome or the coefficient/risk
and keep statistics,this will make your thread look more professional
besides...what is the ultimate goal of your posts here? selling paid prognosis? opening a site with paid tips? anything else?

you MUST like and want to speak much as an owner of a website you are promoting
otherwise go and take some marketing lessons
you can't just drop the link and hey,guys go check it out
as for the site itself-you didn't provide an option to login with email/pass combination
so I could not test the site,but from the looks of it ... well not going to break the profit records IMHO
is it another copy of bitkong?

don't mind the haters, its a cool looking cat and a decent banner
implies that if you do not enter the competition you must be blind,haha
three competitions at once is what makes it look slow,but people are smart,waiting for an opportunity to get as close to +EV as possible,can't blame them for that

many other cryptocurrencies are smart contract friendly
for example:1. EOS asynchronous smart contracts,their declared aim,by the way, is to be able to process hundreds of thousands if not millions of transactions per second
2.Qtum -POS smart contracts,able to run both Eth and BTC applications
mostly large business oriented
3.ADA -the self proclaimed "ETH killer",next generation smart contract platform,potentially issuing their own credit card too
took the market by the storm and keeps gaining momentum and capitalisation

speaking of bitcoin+smart contracts:
particl.io is managing funds in  their trustless escrow ,using smart contracts
https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/yes-bitcoin-can-do-smart-contracts-and-particl-demonstrates-how/
think there are much more examples,but to use bitcoin blockchain for smart contracts is like if you are hammering nails with a screwdriver-technologically possible,but really unneccessary and awkward

challenging the central bank over its decision,pretty much useless
but the move could be the first step on a way to reverting the ruling
India was supposed to be one of the countries that legalised bitcoin,not banned it and it did nothing but bad things to the countrie's economy in the long run
they would have to lift the ban sooner or later and losing time as well as the image of a cryptofriendly country is nothing too positive

such a surprise it is not the first time he is leaving negative comments about bitcoin
would be funny if he suddenly changed his stance ,he also called bitcoin "rat poison squared" so what
for a guy who makes money from investments and central bank shenenigans(like simply making money out of nothing aka printing)
anything that is new and "controversial" opens many opportunities for other players to get rich
but saying something and doing something are two different things:we do not know if he or his affiliated structures are secretly investing billions into bitcoins or not

the giveaways in altcoins were against the forum rules hence they were deleted
the mods even deleted the posts quoting the links to the giveaways
if you want to take advantage of the luckygames giveaways you got to visit their own forum then now

smart guys will do,the rest will be paying 20$ per merit and have,potentially,red trust as a bonus
after all said and done,a guy with alot of merits but crappy posts won't be able to take advantage of his merits for long
sooner or later he will be tagged and lose his account (I say lose since the only reason for him to buy merit is to make money,so red trust=lost account)

at the moment it is not a threat,but it as well could become one
look at Venezuella,for example-its economy in such a bad shape that the goverment had to prohibit the use of bitcoin
it can be righ for many economies that are weak and/or having a lot of grey schemes going on
that can use bitcoins as an alternative form of payment,circumventing the banking and monetary system and taxes
thus the stronger an economy is,the less impact there should be,but China can serve as an example of the opposite,they didn't ban it per se
but limited the operations with crypta for the banks and exchanges