Bitcoin Forum
May 28, 2024, 10:58:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 »
2321  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin Debit Card Free 0.001 BTC at signup! on: May 30, 2015, 03:33:03 PM
OK, there seems to be an issue with the manual entered promo code....I am getting it resolved.

You can use wither the link or the QR coded for now, or just register and provide me the email in a PM and I will have your account credited from them.

sorry for the mix-up.
2322  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin Debit Card Free 0.001 BTC at signup! on: May 30, 2015, 03:24:01 PM
If you already registered and tried that Promo code, and it didn't work, let me know the info, and I will have them credit your account.

thanks!
2323  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin Debit Card Free 0.001 BTC at signup! on: May 30, 2015, 03:22:33 PM
try promo code:

Bitcoin@NYC

I think I might have added the "s" by mistake.

Please let me know if that works.

thanks!
2324  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin Debit Card Free 0.001 BTC at signup! on: May 30, 2015, 07:44:44 AM
I've had nothing but a positive experience with them so far and I've never had an issue using the debit card. Anyone I've spoken to who has the card has only told me about their positive experiences and ease of use as well.




question, is there affiliate system on their site?

Didn't you register like you said?

You can see for yourself. I am not by a computer to check. In bed on phone about to sleep.
2325  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin Debit Card Free 0.001 BTC at signup! on: May 30, 2015, 07:35:24 AM
I've had nothing but a positive experience with them so far and I've never had an issue using the debit card. Anyone I've spoken to who has the card has only told me about their positive experiences and ease of use as well.


2326  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: WTS XFX radeon R9 r290x on: May 30, 2015, 02:55:41 AM
How much are you asking for it?

and how long have you had that card gathering dust and never used?

Thanks!
2327  Economy / Services / Re: Bitcoin Debit Card Free 0.001 BTC at signup! on: May 30, 2015, 02:36:10 AM
I registered and got the .001 in my account. i withdrew it instantly

That's cool, the use of the debit card is the real feature, the extra 0.001BTC is just a promo they are giving out for signing up...enjoy!
2328  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: miners usb only on: May 30, 2015, 02:19:26 AM
I have 2 Antminer U2 USB miners.  what is the going rate for them?
2329  Economy / Services / Bitcoin Debit Card Free 0.001 BTC - Upon completing Registration on: May 30, 2015, 02:15:43 AM
Check out a real working Bitcoin Debit Card.

Works in USA!

Use Promo code bitcoin88 or scan QR code or use link in the signature to get a free 0.001BTC upon registration!



2330  Economy / Reputation / Re: [reputation] buckrogers on: May 16, 2015, 01:20:13 PM
One ray gun coming up.
2331  Economy / Reputation / Re: [reputation] buckrogers on: May 16, 2015, 03:40:22 AM
That's ok everyone is entitled to their opinion.

My intent was never to denigrate anyone, but when being attacked for having and stating my opinion, I will respond with the same tone to which I am addressed.

I was never employed by GAW. I wish I was paid for the effort I attempted to put into trying to defend someone and something I once believed in, but in the end turned out to be something much worse.

If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative.

But from what most everyone says about this topic outside of Bitcointalk regarding the people who post nasty pictures and degrading disgusting graphical remarks towards whomever, they say "don't even bother going there, because you are dealing with irrational people some of which are most likely children with no verbal filter".

After coming here by request from frankenmint to answer some valid questions which was total unrelated to my reaching out to him and the administrators of this site about a separate question all together, I agreed simply because if there were any concerns, I wanted to address them. I could have easily said no, and had whomever believe that I am the "shill" some of the users in this endless thread call me.

So what am I to think? I have been on Bitcointalk long before anything GAW was ever here, and was a member who posted , was friendly, did business with people and so on, and when now I come to try and respond willingly from someone with concerns, and answer truthfully I get responses like the following from you and Paul revere:

"So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it."
"@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking."

Maybe its just better not to engage with irrational people as they say.

I did my best by answering any question thrown my way, only to have the same tone and response as if I was doing something wrong now...its pretty silly that this goes on here or is even allowed to be unmoderated in such a manner. A lot of you should be ashamed for being childish and irrational individuals.

I guess you cant argue with a brick wall.

Long live "whatever"

You are not fooling anyone with this revisionist history. I quoted your own posts, look above if you forgot. You started calling people "idiot #1", "idiot #2", etc for posting something you didn't like. Civil discussion  Roll Eyes. You sound exactly like Garza by demanding respect where you display none yourself.

Even now you're trying to paint yourself as some sort of a victim while a simple glance at your post history tells otherwise. You don't become "friendly" by claiming so. So yes, tough shit. You want to play a tough internet guy you get Newton's third law.

Ironically I mentioned earlier today that despite being a dipshit you probably didn't deserve to be doxed, and this thread is supposed to be about said doxing and your complaints to the mods about that. Well, once again I'm proven to be wrong by yet another narcissistic sociopath on the intertubes, just my luck I guess.

I am not exactly sure what your intentions are here?

My only concern was public doxxing on this forum.

Anything else that followed was a request by someone who asked me to respond to some questions he had.

I am not trying to "fool" anyone.

Honestly I feel that this discussion has been warped into something it was never intended to be.

I feel I have answered any questions that were requested I answer, and I don't need to prove anything.

It wont matter what I say here anyway as I can see, because people will always have their opinions.

I am not here to change anyone's opinions.

I am here to state that public doxxing should not be allowed, especially on this forum, and in general.

I think if anyone has any serious questions unrelated to my previous posts on the GAW related topic, as I have already explained and addressed in detail everything about what I said and why I said it then I would answer it.

I feel that you are taking what I said about civil discussions out of context with your cute smiley face, if you read the post I said "If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative."  which they were not.

I wish you the best,

Have a good day.
2332  Economy / Reputation / Re: [reputation] buckrogers on: May 16, 2015, 01:19:07 AM
Sounds like he's complicit in fraud

Here is an interesting factoid, Buck:


Did Scott Fargo manage to pull some strings with the scumbag Homero for you?

So Daffy and this Buck Rogers asshole are the same person? Interesting.

excuse me? what are you referring to? or are you another one of those guys who just likes to re-post and make random comments?
2333  Economy / Reputation / Re: [reputation] buckrogers on: May 16, 2015, 01:17:02 AM
@suchmoon, we have all made bad judgement calls in our day, and be believing up to point that Josh and GAW were legit, was my error.

Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....

I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.

I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.

Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.

So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.

I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.

If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.

I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.

Thanks,
buck

It's really hard to offend me and you haven't even come close, nor has anyone on the intertubes for that matter.

But I'm not buying this act. There is a huge difference between supporting something/somebody (mistakenly or not) and denigrating anybody who dares to question the thing/person/entity that you're supporting. The only group of posters who did something close to what you were doing were GAW's paid shills (EvilPanda et al). Were you paid too? If not then I guess I'm sorry you were so deluded as to do it for free.

Anyway, back to recent events - nobody forced you to come on Bitcointalk and AGAIN start attacking people for their opinions on btc.com. So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it.


That's ok everyone is entitled to their opinion.

My intent was never to denigrate anyone, but when being attacked for having and stating my opinion, I will respond with the same tone to which I am addressed.

I was never employed by GAW. I wish I was paid for the effort I attempted to put into trying to defend someone and something I once believed in, but in the end turned out to be something much worse.

If this was a civil discussion which it never was here, then any responses would have been polite and informative.

But from what most everyone says about this topic outside of Bitcointalk regarding the people who post nasty pictures and degrading disgusting graphical remarks towards whomever, they say "don't even bother going there, because you are dealing with irrational people some of which are most likely children with no verbal filter".

After coming here by request from frankenmint to answer some valid questions which was total unrelated to my reaching out to him and the administrators of this site about a separate question all together, I agreed simply because if there were any concerns, I wanted to address them. I could have easily said no, and had whomever believe that I am the "shill" some of the users in this endless thread call me.

So what am I to think? I have been on Bitcointalk long before anything GAW was ever here, and was a member who posted , was friendly, did business with people and so on, and when now I come to try and respond willingly from someone with concerns, and answer truthfully I get responses like the following from you and Paul revere:

"So yeah, tough shit, you got called out on it, deal with it."
"@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking."

Maybe its just better not to engage with irrational people as they say.

I did my best by answering any question thrown my way, only to have the same tone and response as if I was doing something wrong now...its pretty silly that this goes on here or is even allowed to be unmoderated in such a manner. A lot of you should be ashamed for being childish and irrational individuals.

I guess you cant argue with a brick wall.

Long live "whatever"
2334  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY btc.com Bitcoinist. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: May 15, 2015, 11:08:48 PM
@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking.

But all he said was "This user is currently ignored."

Huh

enough is enough. this industry makes me sick. period. Cheesy

I don't think its the industry as many people like to think, but instead some of the people behind a lot of what is going on, and the people who post whatever they want for no apparent reason at all. Unless they are trying to be popular on the internet.
2335  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY btc.com Bitcoinist. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: May 15, 2015, 11:05:02 PM
@ Buck : Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks, but thanks for asking.

That's ok Paul, people will just see your true colors, if they haven't already.

There is no need for me or anyone to even try to discredit you.

You are just simply "one of those guys" who spews stuff and doesn't care..and people are aware of that, on various talks and otherwise.

You say vile things across this forum, and stuff like you just said here "Sorry, I don't care about what a worthless douchebag scam shill like you thinks"

So now I'm a scammer, ok, what else am I? a douchbag, ok, great i'm insulted.

I was being polite , but that doesn't get very far with your type, so I will no longer be communicating with you as I believe you have just earned zero credibility if you ever had any to begin with.


thanks for nothing.
2336  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion Paycoin XPY btc.com Bitcoinist. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: May 15, 2015, 10:08:21 PM
As per my PMs w/ Buck Rogers, Here is the publicly facing copy of the PMs that were exchanged yesterday:

Thanks for posting this. It has to be noted that anyone should be really careful with this person. It's one thing to be a "supporter", but what buckrogers was doing on Hashtalk and here goes way beyond that. While that might not deserve doxing don't get fooled by this sudden remorse. Check his posting history. He's a typical intertubes turd flowing with what he considers the most suitable stream of shit at the moment.

Buck was the one who complained that I was "posting without factoids" about him , so I obliged and provided some interesting factoids, like his association with Scott Fargo. The person Buck needs to bitch at is Josh Garza for letting all of this personal information get loose, not me. Instead the idiot is actively pimping Josh's scams for him, it is truly disgusting.




Now he has switched from the other blatant Paycoin scams in his sig to another not yet obvious to everyone Paycoin scam, BTClend. The BTClend business model has no method to create profit, it IS therefore a scam. The purpose of that scam is to keep XPY bagholders' coins locked up and off the market to allow continued dumping of premine and hyperstake, and the depositors are paid "stake" with hyperstaked coins from "rented" Prime Inflators (not enough) or directly from the pre-mine which he has access to through Cmilians partner, Homero Garza.

Paul, if you would like to ask me any questions, please do so, and I will answer them to the best of my ability, in the reputation thread.  Regarding the signature "issue" people have had, I explained that part in the line of questions asked by frankenmint.

Thanks.
2337  Economy / Reputation / Re: [reputation] buckrogers on: May 15, 2015, 09:57:31 PM
@suchmoon, we have all made bad judgement calls in our day, and be believing up to point that Josh and GAW were legit, was my error.

Truthfully I was in belief that they were 100% legit as their first few months of doing business or so seemed to be on the up and up for the most part, and they came through with a lot of their items regarding miners, hosting, make up time for downed miners, etc....

I had no evidence or reason to think or prove otherwise, and was told like everyone else to just "Hold" when they moved the paycoin thing, as we all believed in JG at the time, and he was very good at making people think things were coming SOON.

I'd like to say I'm sorry for saying things in the "attack" quotes you found and posted, and was simply functioning in defense mode for something I thought could actually make a difference here and felt strongly about it. A lesson learned in posting from feelings and beliefs, but at that time that's simply what it was.

Unfortunately like so many other came to find out, I was wrong.

So to be clear, I was wrong in my thinking that Josh and GAW would "change the industry" and do these amazing things.

I apologize to the people I had argued with on this matter, and I have learned a hard lesson here.

If you want to ask me any other questions, please do i'll do my best to answer what I can.

I removed that BTCLend signature as well, as it offended you I guess? I was under the impression that they were a loaning site and not XPY specific, and had BTC and other coins as well.

Thanks,
buck

2338  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion. Paycoin XPY CoinStand Mineral. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: May 13, 2015, 08:56:33 PM
Here is an interesting factoid, Buck:


Did Scott Fargo manage to pull some strings with the scumbag Homero for you?

So Daffy and this Buck Rogers asshole are the same person? Interesting.

No actually it was something totally different, but if you want ill break it down for you as I have nothing to hide: simply I invested too much like everyone else, and had bought some accounts from people selling them in the marketplace, and there was an issue with GAW's 2FA security at the time, so as I didn't have communication with JG, and I knew someone who simply spoke to him, I asked if they could send an email on my behalf.

no harm no foul.

that's it..sorry to burst your bubble.

I never harmed anyone, and never will, unlike yourself you loves to pull stuff into the light, you should probably get all your facts together before making assumptions.
2339  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion. Paycoin XPY CoinStand Mineral. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: May 13, 2015, 08:45:28 PM
Who left the window open? All of a sudden it is real shilly in here.

Wind blew in some trash. Unfortunately I un-ignored the trash for 1 post. Just ignore it and it will slither away soon enough.

I love how all of you speculate without having any real facts, besides what paul brought up earlier which I will address.

Secondly I shill for no one, I was simply a supporter of something I believed in at the time. I was just as hurt financially as the rest of anyone involved, I believed in something that was working for a period of time , then morphed into a nightmare.

That's all I can really say about that. a bad judgement call towards the end like so many others that were hurt.

As far as BTC.com, I have no involvement with them or Bitcoinist except if you call knowing someone IRL an involvement.

But I'm sure the truth will come out as documents are produced that separate Josh or GAWs involvement with BTC.com or Bitcoinist emerge.

I only wish the best for them as they now have to try and remove the taint of what was to what should be.
2340  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: GAW / Josh Garza discussion. Paycoin XPY CoinStand Mineral. ALWAYS MAKE MONEY :) on: May 13, 2015, 08:37:42 PM
Tried visiting BTC.com from a public Wi-Fi network when...



maybe they actually installed Norton , which gave you that message  Smiley

lol
Pages: « 1 ... 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 [117] 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!