I don't know the amount of Bitcoin you have managed to secure but if it is value worth almost to $1k, I will suggest you get a hardware wallet at all cost but if it is less than or within the range of a hundred, you can use Electrum since it can be used offline with any computer that doesn't have anything installed. Create a seed phrase with a passphrase or seed extension and make sure you back it up, send your bitcoin to any of the wallet addresses. Open an Electrum wallet on your android device and create a watched only wallet with that address. You can be viewing your balance on your android but you have to make sure that your seeed phrase is properly secure, if you loose it, keep it safe like you would keep a secret until you need it.

I think the user was trying to passage a message not to try a new casino but the reason wasn't concrete enough to back the statement. If we don't try New casinos, there is no way we will know things that we are missing as most of these new platforms come with great features and since their primary objective is to converge the user base from older to their own, they will have lots of goodies to attract new people, especially the bonus but while doing this, we shouldn't let down the basics things to watch out for incase of any red flag.

I hope you also check their social handles and if they are solvent enough as a new casino to handle big withdrawals. The last time Bitlucy started its business here, lots of promotions and bonuses were given, a signature campaign was also launched and social media engagement was going but didn't end well for the manager and those who deposit their money into the casino, they claimed that the system was abused but deep inside, they were insolvent, they didn't have enough money to open a casino but did and ended up jeopardizing some peoples money and reputation for working with them.

Manipulation is natural, people improvise when it is necessary but I think reputed Casino wouldn't want to indulge in this, not that some Casinos wouldn't do it but it wouldn't be all because playing consistently in a casino without any wins will trigger an alert for players that there is indeed something wrong with where they are playing and if players find out about such corruption, they wouldn't come back.



They are poor, too addicted and don't think of alternatives, some of their betting techniques most of the time is based on assumption and it is too far from reality but they will always play it anyways just to cash out huge bags

This testimony sounds like fiction and well compose, I hope it is true because I'm just thinking about how he went to Casino for the first time if he had not been playing before, it is possible that the dude was already a pro on his game and luckily, he uses that as a medium to get back on his job.
He also made a good ending by not playing again with the $25k, that is the mistake that most gamblers do, as soon as they win big, they are always tempted to play more but I like him that he preserves his greed.



Sometimes in life, we need to appreciate little wins, the small change you see as a little win may be another person's treasure and besides, the money was a catalyst to his business shelf, it is like a big win for him.

Who said personal information obtained from organizations is unimportant? Some months ago, I was so focused on Beginner Board telling them how to prevent everything related to their internet privacy been broken, but many people were interested in my advice. I'm wondering how privates agency will handle stolen people's documents if these ones come from the government.
The hacker will undoubtedly profit from this, I'm confident of it because people on the dark web will be eager to buy it and use it for fraudulent purposes in order to make more money, and also as China been one of the world's most powerful countries, other countries may even disguise themselves in order to obtain information about high-profile people.

Everyone has a way of meriting a post, it could be a post, or a reply, though the manner they do it depends on the individual. A member could merit a post because he likes what the user post or replies and it could be that a person would merit a post for the effort even without learning anything but personally, I can merit a post even if it is from 3 years as so long as I learn something new or important, that is my way of judging a post or reply in term of merit. Exactly the quote you brought to your post, he is a merit source and has focused on the technical aspect of bitcoin, you can't learn all of bitcoin in a day, we all learn every day. About sending a bitcoin as a way of honouring someone's effort, I don't think I'm buoyant enough to that right now,  Maybe in the future.

It generates a recovery phrase and not a bunch of private keys as you say, which must be safely backup and to tighten up the security, you should add a seed extension or passphrase.


A cold storage or hardware wallet and exchange are two different, when you use hardware, you are safe if you properly manage it the way it should be but using an exchange is like giving bitcoin to your trusted friend to keep for you, you give him the custody of your bitcoin, you can't spend it unless you see him and with that, it could end well or go south


Your first paragraph doesn't contradict this statement, Quidax is a centralized exchange, not a software or hardware wallet that you can use to communicate with the bitcoin network.

An account should belong to the rightful owner, I don't think it makes any sense to pass your account to anyone, not that it is a policy but for some reasons such as:
- Reputation: You have built a solid foundation and are well known for the thing you are capable of doing and the things that you cannot, you know your space and limit, you may also be the type that doesn't associate, who doesn't form a clique or any form of friends but as soon as you give out your account to another person, all of these changes.

- The manner of representation: If you are a technical guy, to good about bitcoin underhood and then one day your account changes hand, you may likely get tagged by DT members as people wouldn't want to deal with you, your account may even be a suspected of been bought/sold.

In fact, selling an account on Bitcointalk is prohibited, if your account is found changing hands, just know that it will be damaged by the DT crew.

They are doing this because they are aware that the Premier League is one of the most-watched sports in the world. Come to think, I am unable to think of any specific justification for calling for this to be banned. For example, if we compare the effects of alcohol and casinos that are both promoted during these games, both have significant positive and negative effects. However, since alcohol gives them more sponsorships deal, they prefer to speak out against the latter.

This is going to be a negative impact on the volume that this sponsorship generates for gambling houses, however, since they don't have enough income to persuade them to change this rule, they should redirect their efforts to other leagues such as Laliga and Bundesliga.

This is very possible, the scenario I have seen went from fun to complex life. This guy was playing fun for, it was sports games and he play the little he could afford to lose until he started using many that weren't his, the loss was compiling and decided to play revenge gambling by playing 3 games with 3 teams and wage high amount of money, he thought he could win back at least 1 to recover all the losses, the tickets didn't work out as predicted, it was his family that help him out at long last to settle the debts.


What are you going to say with online Casinos, a gambler can visit a non-gambling environment and still use a VPN or Thor to bypass the restriction and play with confidence and still cash out without any difficulty.

So I dig further and I learnt that genes can be modify and since alcohol is a combination of different chemicals if it is abused with time, it can affect the offspring, so I take back my previous example as a case study with heredity but gambling hereditary says otherwise. Although, it can be transferred from parent to children but the percentage is quite low and again, if the child stays with the addicted parents is likely to happen than when they are taken away from them. Literally, if an addicted gambler gives birth to a child and its been taken care of by another caring parent, the chance of the child becoming a gambler will be very low.

Biologically, gambling is not a trait. Even if I have a deep passion for it, that doesn't mean my children will share it. It would be absurd to argue that drinking is a trait that can be passed down from parent to child, gambling is something you can easily give up, and if you quit before your kid is born, he or she won't know anything about your relationship and gambling. unfortunately, society and environmental factors are the primary problems with underage gambling today.

Children are motivated by money, and they pick up lessons quickly from what they observe. Since gambling often culminates in big wins for players, children may want to go into it if they are not properly supervised.  Every parent has a duty to prevent their kids from gambling until they are old enough to take responsibility for their own decisions and also restrict them, where necessary.

This doesn't change anything, my dear, and if today is not your lucky day, there is nothing special you can do about it. This is gambling, and that is precisely what has happened to you. The best you can do is to see this as an experience and use it to your advantage moving forward. You never know where your own may go, but I understand your anguish as it is quite sad losing your small amounts. I saw on this board on Rollbit where one person posted enormous profits in thousands after losing hundreds, you can do it too but take precautions.
By the way, you should be aware that winnings aren't determined by your bet size; you may lose everything by betting your whole deposit on a single round.

Ineffective? Maybe for Manchester United and this season combined if we are to look at his personal problems like when he lost his child, his last season wasn't bad if you ask me, so you cant tell what he can do for other clubs.



The man who everyone thought would bring United salvation to Champions League has changed his mind, if he wants to live, they should let him and sell him for a good price. I understand that his absence after he left Juventus has had a significant impact on their demotion to relegation, but Manchester United is different, they weren't better or worse when he wasn't there.
Now that Chelsea is interested in him, who knows what has been going on with other clubs all this time. Most clubs, particularly those in the English Premier League, want him to come and play for them, maybe that has given him confidence as a hot cake. They should sell him now rather than wait for a free transfer next year.

He is not the first person that has run his mouth like a tap by discrediting bitcoin performance all this while, we have had many of them from other finances who are afraid of bitcoin becoming the next revolutionary asset as described by Satoshi in his paper. The problem of the current market performance is global, we know that inflation is one of the factors but we all can agree that in every bull market, the bitcoin ecosystem always seems to have new investors that will all want to buy bitcoin while some are not too prepare for it and the moment the market react, they sell to losses. We have also seen 3 bad events like 3 arrow capital, celsius and other insolvent lending protocols that affected the bitcoin price. If he can't see these things, he should focus on his book and allow bitcoin to do its thing.

I think the Author is somehow misleading, if I want to re-use a wallet address multiple times for transactions, it doesn't give me any security harm to my private keys, also we have not seen any computers who have done that currently except for Quantum computers that have been making news but it is still hypothetical, nothing has been done so far. However, address reuse is a big concern when it comes to privacy, you cannot preserve privacy by using a single address for incoming and outgoing transactions every time, the chain surveillance are watching the network, and the moment you do that, you can easily be detected as the owner of the address and the big problem is that you wouldn't be able to combine it with other UTXOs as soon as that address becomes expose to chain analysts.
So, technically, don't use an address more than once.


A node can carry out a transaction Malleabity by changing your transaction ID on the network but they don't have the strength to extract the signature from a transaction, this point is kind of too off.

Why are you going to be angry for something you are well aware that made is for the test, the developers even tried by allowing you to put your skills into the test, gambling doesn't have a test place where you can test your ability and things you have learnt, you have to wager money to know your outcome if it is bad or excellent to make you some winnings. The OP also didn't state the aim was driven at addicted gamblers, I thought gambling was supposed to be fun, what is the after effect of the outcome if you win big, what about the loss? How do you handle it if had been the opposite when you lose a big amount? Just think about it.

Ten Hag appears to be aiming high, but I'm not sure why he has been lagging behind while others are buying more players to strengthen their defence and attack before the start of the pre-season, perhaps Manchester United is trying to get better offers, but with the recent ruckus surrounding the Ronaldo transfer, I doubt if Ten Hag and Ronaldo have this symbiotic relationship. Ronaldo undying love for Manchester United is no longer as strong as it was before he left for Real Madrid, if Manchester United doesn't get a better offer before September, I hope he brings in some trophies to Old Trafford else his journey for football might be coming to retirement, going home at 37 age is not bad at all.

As you have said, it is just a measurement to know your customer and the identity behind the person in your casino. There are rules laid down in every Casino, it is your duty to follow them and if you break them, you will be penalized for it and if you are found doing money laundering, you will be reported to a designated investigation department and probably prosecuted for fraud.


How is KYC now a measure for security, it doesn't come close when it comes to the safety of users rather a way of mandatory privacy showcasing at one will, it is not a compulsory aspect of casino but if they request it, you may have to provide it to enjoy other benefits and it may not be enough sometimes as they may even reject it. If privacy isn't something that you value, you can do it to avoid any problems with large transactions or be suspicious of any event but if you are doing that for security, then it is very wrong.