What game protect is trying to say is that he believes the Curaçao gaming licence has no validity.
I never said the Curaçao gaming licenses 1668/JAZ, 365/JAZ, 5536/JAZ and 8048/JAZ have no validity.
I say the claims of casinos to operate under the 1668/JAZ, 365/JAZ, 5536/JAZ and 8048/JAZ licenses have no legal basis. You might be not able to understand it, but this is a huge difference!
Of course he doesn't say that he is an affiliate,
I surely said it countless times that players can qualify for our online gaming consumer protection service if they register their accounts with any
Qualify free casino.
marketing Curaçao licenced operators.
The only Curaçao licenced operators are the 1668/JAZ, 365/JAZ, 5536/JAZ and 8048/JAZ license holders and Game Protect does not marketing them.
I have talked about this in the past, but to save reader going through numerous posts, let me explain stuff about Curaçao licensing and white label operators.
Different countries have their own licensing regimes.
Curaçao does not have a licensing regime! Even the PPO confirmed this: "Brick and mortar casinos and lotteries are regulated by two dfferent organizations, whereas online games of chance are yet to be regulated in anticipation of legislation."
What relevant information do they give for players playing at Curaçao based casinos?
Where do they explain how the white label construction works?
This is a link to the Antillephone seal status page, right?
How or based on which laws can you claim the information at the seal status page of Antillephone is your
license, while Curacao eGaming itself publicly states that the seal status is not to be accepted as valid license certificate?
I will explain with the example of a driving license what the seal status page is:
1) If authorities issued a driving license to you, they will give you a document / card called driving license with your photo on it.
2) The information that you have a driving license is also in a central register.
3) The seal status page information that oshi.io operates under the 8048/JAZ license is similiar to 2), but it is not 1), it is not your license certificate or your license as you false and misleading claim!
And there is also a huge difference between 2) and 3), because 2) is a register by authorities whereas 3) is a register by an anonymous adventure called Antillephone N.V.
Your license must be a document or contract with the 8048/JAZ license holder, because only the 8048/JAZ license holder holds a license issued by the Government of Curacao and no one else.
To show a valid license for oshi.io, you need to show us a valid authorization from 8048/JAZ license holder to Direx N.V. and then a valid authorization from Direx N.V. to the company that operates osho.io?
And if there is no company that operates oshi.io, then Direx N.V. is the operator of the website oshi.io! Because only companies can have a usage rights contract to operate under the 8048/JAZ license.
And in this case and as I already said, Ivan is your boss because Ivan is the managing director of Direx N.V.!
Show Posts
