PM'ed

Could you please expand more on this?

As far as I know, modern browsers support notifications, so in this regard there is nothing that such apps offer that browsers don't. Further, I'm not sure if in-app advertisements are somehow different from same advertisements presented on a web page (if what I think is what you mean, of course). All in all, we need to find at least one example of some useful feature (i.e. not contrived or invented for the sake of example) at which a mobile-friendly site would suck while a mobile app shine

Then I don't get it at all

I mean why would anyone (i.e. not just casinos) want to have a mobile app if they could just go with website optimization making it mobile-friendly, more responsive, etc? It would be a waste of time and effort if you can get everything from a mobile version of the site that you would get from a standalone app. Or maybe, it is exactly as you and I see it, i.e. it is indeed pointless, apart from obscure marketing purposes and that kind of thing? What's the catch?

The codified law of a country typically reflects the already existing rules of "moral conduct"

If it stops doing that, and the law system is not adapted accordingly and on time, this may lead to a revolution (or a coup). That takes long years since the society doesn't change overnight. Nonetheless, these changes are objective and they are prone to accumulate over time, so they can and do have such grave consequences. But we would still need law enforcement anyway, at least as long as something else doesn't take its place

For example, the term ostracism has its roots in the Athenian democracy of Ancient Greece, where someone breaking the law would be expelled (ostracized) from Athens by the local citizenry. In the same way, if a criminal or wrongdoer could be quickly and effectively isolated from the society (to the extent of the gravity of his crime or delinquency), there would be no need for special law enforcement bodies


I think that technically (or rather, physiologically), we would still remain same human beings as before. It is our environment that we operate within that should change dramatically for us to stop being "human beings" in the most casual sense of the word

They don't need that

If the chips in question are denominated in Bitcoin itself, the problem of volatility is solved automatically (in fact, it doesn't even arise in the first place). That would mean your losses as well as winnings are still denominated in Bitcoin. So no matter how much Bitcoin's dollar price changes, the casino wouldn't be affected by this change. Indeed, their Bitcoin bankroll would have then to be in actual bitcoins (to pay out what's due), but isn't it exactly what online casinos keep their bankrolls in anyway?

That's not the only option (or rather, a direction)

When prices become stagnant (though I wouldn't call the current market that or even stable), first thing many traders do is narrow their trading ranges and likely increase volumes to squeeze same profits from less price action. This is also risky as the longer market stagnates the stronger it is going to move when it finally starts to move. In this manner, these traders get caught in the action by either suffering losses or losing profits, wherever the market goes


Agree

The so-called inflation tax is most harmful to those who receive the new money the last

And since the government printing money has this money before anyone else, they can easily abuse the purchasing power which they essentially receive for free at the expense of the whole society (real, simple people). In fact, that's what all governments do whenever their very existence is threatened (for example, in war or economic collapse)


If taxes can be paid directly, i.e. as a price for services and goods offered, a taxless society would become a reality. Moreover, it would be a better reality due to less corruption and inefficiency caused by the tax system itself (read, we could safely dismantle it altogether)

Well, there can be different views on this issue

Really, BitCasino's clients didn't choose the email service provider as this choice was entirely on the part of the casino, right? If so, why should they get away with it and cannot be held accountable? Think of it this way. For example, if they hired somebody and that person then stole the money from the accounts of casino players or was negligent in doing his job and through this negligence the same story occurred (money got stolen), whom would you start to blame, that person or the casino itself?

In fact, there is law

And it has always been there. The codified law you implicitly refer to in your post is only a subset of a wider system of unwritten laws and traditions existing in society. So it is not the lack of law as such which would be at the root of potential problems that a society without government would likely encounter but rather the lack of law enforcement, which is part of the government (and therefore, part of the problem). In other words, as soon as we are able to solve this little hindrance, we can happily live without any government and don't sink into lawlessness and chaos soon thereafter


We can hope for that, even if it would require a quantum leap of sorts. But at least we don't need evolution for this leap anyway (read, we don't have to wait another few million years)

There is another issue with disposable addresses

While most altcoin transactions get confirmed pretty fast (within minutes), it is not uncommon for a Bitcoin transaction to get stuck (due to a low fee, network congestion, or whatever). Sometimes, and I mean it, you have to wait a couple days till it finally gets through. I don't know what happens at wolf.bet in this particular case (i.e. when your address expires with the TX still not confirmed by the network), but this is definitely not what most users would like to check or experience anyway

And why did it affect Bitcoin?

I mean the regular one, true and only? Besides, the price had been staying below 4k for too long to indiscriminately attribute that dynamic (or rather static, given the lack of price action at and near the bottom for a couple of months) to the hash war between different Bitcoin copycats, which was mostly an isolated event, in both effect and time

On the other hand, Bitcoin had been spiraling down all 2018 since the very beginning of that year and continued to fall well into 2019 (till March, if my memory serves me right). So the hash war was just a small accident and insignificant episode which was unlikely to trigger first the fall of Bitcoin and then its rise

He is not necessarily bluffing

If he is sticking to the safe side of things, he may indeed be winning all the time. I mean at the end of each sequence of losses, obviously, as he is using a martingale setup. Honestly, I don't quite understand why people are so unfriendly and hostile in this case. You could in fact win all the time

The real problem which people don't see with that is the fact that your winnings will be small bordering on outright pathetic, and you can't make them great (again) as in that case you will expose yourself to the risk of irrecoverable losses and thus stop winning all the time

Chaos is what makes crimes take over society

Whenever there is failure of authority and ensuing lack of law enforcement people quickly turn into beasts (Mad Max scenario), so if the reduction of taxes leads to less effective law enforcement, criminals of all sorts will definitely take advantage of this opportunity to get away unscathed with their criminal activities. But overall, it is a complex issue as more law enforcement (read, more taxes) doesn't necessarily lead to more law and order. There should be a balance, middle ground or golden mean of sorts

Could you please rephrase your thought?

You speak in so vague terms that it is hard to get what you are actually trying to say. Anyway, if something is unavoidable, the issue of trust becomes kinda irrelevant as what is unavoidable will inevitably come about in a "natural way", trust or no trust. Regarding a society being as "organized" or even better without an acting "government", that obviously depends on your understanding of "organized"


That's not necessarily so

And we don't need to change a human animal in certain ways (think eugenics here). As I'm inclined to think, we could get there when we have a certain level of integration between people as a whole that would allow to have a form of distributed government but without the typical drawbacks as well as overheads of a regular one (think taxes here). Indeed, some things should remain centralized but more and more could be taken and re-delegated back to "people". And it can also be a natural process (read, more or less inevitable and unavoidable)

Personally, I'm inclined to think along the same lines

But the opponents of this view can be quite vocal and pushy in claiming the opposite view. I can't even recall all their arguments right now (as it was pretty complicated and illogical stuff anyway related to mining costs) but I very well remember how some of them had gone as far as to assert that Bitcoin could never ever drop below 5k. Small wonder, it first dropped below 5k and then 4k shortly thereafter (in November and December 2018, to be exact)

I actually like how well you put that, in a true Orwellian way

I refer to that last piece about "everything the government needs you to do". Needs you to do, huh. In real life, it is more like "do it or otherwise". I leave it to you what kind of punishment you can bring on yourself if you don't


That's another interesting example

Well, if you ask me (since you ask me anyway), I wouldn't call that "fairness" as it is actually a complete reinvention of the term ("we are 35 years late, but we are well on our way"). Fairness assumes somewhat equal conditions (at least, that's how it feels) but the idea of a government pretty much excludes this assumed equality

Seriously, why should I care about being fair to someone who is supposed to be inferior to me by my own definition and volition? Wouldn't it be a sadistic turn to ask for fairness in these very unfair circumstances? Regarding anonymity, I don't think it is so much an anonymity issue when you just want to move your wealth around hassle-free


I can't prevent you from thinking that (but you are on your own here)

Я про Меркурий писал (изменил свой пост, чтобы убрать двусмысленность)

Хотя и на Меркурии будет далеко не айс, ибо если на Венере просто тупо жарко, то на Меркурии сначала жарко, а потом холодно (ну или сначала холодно, а потом жарко). И еще надо посмотреть, что лучше, а что хуже - просто высокая температура (в относительно разумных пределах), или ее зверские перепады от +450 градусов Цельсия (такая же как и на Венере) до почти -200 градусов (почти как на Плутоне). Потому что день длинный, а ночи короткие (зачеркнуто) ночи тоже длинные

That's definitely a nice feature

Especially when you want to build your own betting strategies using tables and need to know exactly how things get calculated with these subunits. But technically, if you don't see lower denominations at other casinos, it doesn't mean that they are not using these subunits internally before rounding up the outcomes to the lowest possible denomination as they then get displayed. I read somewhere that certain exchanges (not casinos but still) actually use 16 digits after the decimal points for their calculations

Туннель - это, как говорится, геморрой (зачеркнуто) overkill

На Меркурии нет атмосферы (сдуло), в отличие от той же Венеры, которая дальше от Солнца, но в целом горячее за счет парникового эффекта. Поэтому за ночь та половина Меркурия, которая находится в тени, успевает охладиться до лютого холода (ибо день там длится чуть меньше местного года), поэтому достаточно просто иметь кабель с одной стороны планеты до другой. Можно еще сделать элемент Пельтье, только наоборот (как он там правильно называется). Хотя элемент Пельтье, наверное, тоже можно сделать


Я не юрист (зачеркнуто) физик, но разве (теоретически) нельзя?

Ликвидность Йоси действительно высока

Но тому есть простое объяснение. Суть в том, что транзакции на этой монете очень быстрые и бесплатные, т.е. ею удобно пользоваться как обеспечением на таких биржах как Феникс. Например, у нас открыта солидная маржинальная позиция на бирже, которую мы обеспечиваем минимумом средств (в целях снижения рисков третьих лиц, т.е. потери средств по вине бирже)

В том случае, когда цена идет не в нашу пользу, с помощью Йоси мы можем быстро добавить необходимое обеспечение. Соответственно, при движении ценника в нашу сторону, мы можем это обеспечение уменьшить за счет бесплатного вывода ликвидности. Наверняка, есть еще какие-то подобные сферы применения, где такие особенности имеют важное значение (арбитраж, например)