All the vanity addresses are like : 1NAMExxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Is there a way that we can generate addresses which end in the desired way ?
For example : 1xxxxxxxxxxxxxNAME
If it is possible then whats the command line for windows?
If you dont use a GPU you can search for regex, the $ symbol means "at the end". Dont use the keys (obviously). >vanitygen64.exe -r NAME$
Pattern: NAME$
Address: 1Lo79wpQy3QVZePzEaL818F1uhXLC2NAME
Privkey: 5JdvX473jNfr2LaYxsETj91E8aC1eiy17xAWkSTZ9g5om1dNLby
anywhere also works (and is obviously easier): >vanitygen64.exe -r NAME
Pattern: NAME
Address: 1EpHNAMEFohF8UF9pmuGSLdNtSyc41CkEn
Privkey: 5J5fDUtVSiAwofjxpRcSKikhZzLjSSWbiE9kcPVyM4Lhhx7HrW6
You can also use more complex patterns. >vanitygen64.exe -r [Aa]{2}1{2}$
Pattern: [Aa]{2}1{2}$
Address: 19VJ8Pmd5MB4EFJ2ovYX8nurgWiDeAA11
Privkey: 5KWwwpWcKhKcJPgePWCzeM6XKr3cZsTDTuRXiPQCM9HR1b6AaY2
Pattern: [Aa]{2}1{2}$
Address: 1QAkUcikHoeAGgzeg21BMFx627mfntAa11
Privkey: 5KiP18jvZotGWnPWRwXda9TJgKyzhQi48evVv7wMgX4144rcnrq
|
|
|
|
here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.
The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times. |
|
|
|
The node I currently have online doesn't know about it either. If it's yours, push the raw transaction here or hereI can't I keep getting error : Unable To find all tx inputs [1eb7da618e2adc0393ef6163ef40d431cdf90834fbb9a20c9fa72390b3ed04b5] in blockchain.info and There was an error pushing your transaction to network! in blockr.io Can anyone push it for me.It has to go either side. Here is the raw transaction : 0100000001b504edb39023a79f0ca2b9fb3408f9cd31d440ef6361ef9303dc2a8e61dab71e010000006a47304402206c815362bcf0e03e043d74ccfde307e6b886f8999ee22804af7b8fd180cd5ac70220312babf11e153340eec4e14ad5e49d3092489133eaaa6c2010b0fca34e4519d201210235c875d53b08e8e07fa5e749d406b9cf33ec8f9b5ae598f4273a9e72ecaf47e9ffffffff0200366e01000000001976a914124e3370a2d92248ccb2af00f370dde8de03ce9688aca2d4df48000000001976a914d54e4bd96435dd80bb5964be406c83c07184c3ad88ac00000000
Looks like the input (essentially the coins) your transaction wants to spend is unconfirmed and mostly forgotten as well. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I want to sell a cracker software (non-malicious).
-snip-
Can you be more specific?
-snip-
i think cracked software would be called illegal
-snip-
Not everything that breaks encryption is illegal everywhere and under all circumstances. I have a ZIP Cracker which uses brute force and dictionary attack to get back the lost passwords of zip, rar, etc compressed files. Oh, i misunderstood... I tought you were talking about cracked software, but it was software used to crack  I think this one will probably be OK, especially if you wrote the software yourself. Offcourse, you'll have a hard time convincing people it's completely clean, but if it is, you have nothing to worry about. Just to clarify, I didn't write the software but i am willing to sell it for Bitcoins. It is a paid software. Well, violation of ToS is considered untrustworthy by some (e.g. Vod marks those selling Microsoft keys). Not sure if this would apply here or if you have rights the resell the software. It is not against forum rules though as theymos explicitly stated that the staff will not enforce ToS. I cant tell if someone would mark you for it. |
|
|
|
sent to CoinPayments.NET for bill payment. Bill is paid tho now, I have not resend it.
Hmm, it might be someone trolling you. The TX can be rebroadcasted by anyone that has it in its a raw format. How long did it take until the TX appeared again? Do you can have coin control enabled in core? Im thinking a double spend on one of the inputs[1] with a high fee might help. [1] e.g. the one received on 1Cckp9QR3C13aUBipyU6YQnUNTHXxqFzU |
|
|
|
-snip-
I want to sell a cracker software (non-malicious).
-snip-
Can you be more specific?
-snip-
i think cracked software would be called illegal
-snip-
Not everything that breaks encryption is illegal everywhere and under all circumstances. |
|
|
|
True, few people use anything less than DT1 because it's default or something.
Default is level 2, and well there are more than 10 levels of DT(in a way) but you can't set your level higher than 4 Can we keep this thread on the topic of MZ please. I get excited there are news every time you bump the thread. |
|
|
|
Hi lutpin i just want to confirm that i am the owner of bitcoinboy12 im not the alt of nickaizoku im just wrong put an address from microguy thread, i mean i copy pasted his post from this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.msg12323195and i forgot to change the address thats why i give possitive feedback in his account because he gave back my bitcoin given by microguy.. Now bitcoinboy12 account sold by my friend last month and i want to remove the negative trust from the account of bitcoin boy.. if you are not satisfied with this answer please give a way how to prove that i am not nickaizoku... You cant, you used the same wallet. It makes no difference whether you are two differen people so close that you share a wallet or one and the same person. If you two share a wallet, how can you "loan" eachother money? Also, why the new account? i made new account because i am fear to give negative trust and remove from signature campaign. crairezx20? -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1160847.msg12530906#msg12530906-> https://archive.is/I8sNk-> https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/12RLH8Lm8ZFbdv3Wz4oRbv57gtpFDyoqef/links-> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1181532.msg12694836#msg12694836-> https://archive.is/Bw6D7I am so sorry about this situation... the other address posted before i can give sign message but the 1 address copy pasted from nickaizoku.
I can't give sign message because im not the owner of that address and i am wrong and i forgot to change the address that i sent it from microguy thread..
You did the same mistake twice? (Jan 22th 2016 and Sept 4th 2015) hello second trade i would like to be part in this campaign please accept me.
Name: bitcoinboy
Post count: 699
Rank: Full member
Bitcoin address: 12RLH8Lm8ZFbdv3Wz4oRbv57gtpFDyoqef
Thanks in advance...
-> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.msg12329754#msg12329754-> https://archive.is/AVEvpi hope you understand.. im not nickaizoku..
I dont actually. the proof that you can see is the feedback from his account..
Well the feedback is the reason there is a negative rating at all. and also the personal message from nickaizoku and from me..
What personal message? before i will wait present owner of bitcoinboy12 right now so that i can give our conversation.. I am so sorry for the present owner of bitcoinboy12.. this is my mistake..
So you sold the account? If so there should be evidence of the sale. TX IDs a thread or other forms of contact/negotiation. Crairezx20 this is my main account.. please remove negative trust in bitcoinboy12 i sold this account 1 month ago and i am not the owner of this and i am not nickaizoku.. i hope you can understand.. Here's the proof that i sold this bitcoinboy12 1 month ago https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1340077.0I hope you guys remove the negative trust of bitcoinboy12.. this is not nickaizoku's account.. sorry not personal message i mean Private message.. about conversation in nickaizoku.. Edit: Hi shorena please remove negative trust in bitcoinboy12 i am not the present owner of this account. i sold this account 1 month ago.. and i want you to remove negative trust.. bitcoinboy12 is not account of nickaizoku.. I just mistaken copy pasted his post in the first page of microguy and i forgot to change address. it was my my fault. to involve present owner of bitcoinboy12.. Im telling the truth.. i hope you can understand. seems plausible, the two identical posts[1,2] with just the different address had me confused. Rating removed. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.msg12327520#msg12327520[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.msg12329754#msg12329754 |
|
|
|
it's pulled it from my wallet and showing today's date as sent?
Status: 0/unconfirmed
Date: 09/03/2016 09:14
To: mphosting 196UHob8ExkDQUm8W9CM5PEuHhRQsf1P3D
Debit: -0.34503200 BTC
Net amount: -0.34503200 BTC
Transaction ID: 4bb769955b2306b7939673ab4121ffca089ecbbf095c7b1121501838425c76f6-000
it both wont confirm or get stopped, what do I do now?
Looks like someone is rebroadcasting it. Did you create or receive it? Could it be the sender resending it in the hopes that it gets confirmed? |
|
|
|
Hi lutpin i just want to confirm that i am the owner of bitcoinboy12 im not the alt of nickaizoku im just wrong put an address from microguy thread, i mean i copy pasted his post from this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.msg12323195and i forgot to change the address thats why i give possitive feedback in his account because he gave back my bitcoin given by microguy.. Now bitcoinboy12 account sold by my friend last month and i want to remove the negative trust from the account of bitcoin boy.. if you are not satisfied with this answer please give a way how to prove that i am not nickaizoku... You cant, you used the same wallet. It makes no difference whether you are two differen people so close that you share a wallet or one and the same person. If you two share a wallet, how can you "loan" eachother money? Also, why the new account? i made new account because i am fear to give negative trust and remove from signature campaign. crairezx20? -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1160847.msg12530906#msg12530906-> https://archive.is/I8sNk-> https://www.blocktrail.com/BTC/address/12RLH8Lm8ZFbdv3Wz4oRbv57gtpFDyoqef/links-> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1181532.msg12694836#msg12694836-> https://archive.is/Bw6D7I am so sorry about this situation... the other address posted before i can give sign message but the 1 address copy pasted from nickaizoku.
I can't give sign message because im not the owner of that address and i am wrong and i forgot to change the address that i sent it from microguy thread..
You did the same mistake twice? (Jan 22th 2016 and Sept 4th 2015) hello second trade i would like to be part in this campaign please accept me.
Name: bitcoinboy
Post count: 699
Rank: Full member
Bitcoin address: 12RLH8Lm8ZFbdv3Wz4oRbv57gtpFDyoqef
Thanks in advance...
-> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.msg12329754#msg12329754-> https://archive.is/AVEvpi hope you understand.. im not nickaizoku..
I dont actually. the proof that you can see is the feedback from his account..
Well the feedback is the reason there is a negative rating at all. and also the personal message from nickaizoku and from me..
What personal message? before i will wait present owner of bitcoinboy12 right now so that i can give our conversation.. I am so sorry for the present owner of bitcoinboy12.. this is my mistake..
So you sold the account? If so there should be evidence of the sale. TX IDs a thread or other forms of contact/negotiation. |
|
|
|
At 44 satoshi per byte fee it should confirm quickly if it would get broadcasted again. Let me see if one of my nodes knows about it. Nope, neither has it. Is it yours? |
|
|
|
Hi lutpin i just want to confirm that i am the owner of bitcoinboy12 im not the alt of nickaizoku im just wrong put an address from microguy thread, i mean i copy pasted his post from this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1169310.msg12323195and i forgot to change the address thats why i give possitive feedback in his account because he gave back my bitcoin given by microguy.. Now bitcoinboy12 account sold by my friend last month and i want to remove the negative trust from the account of bitcoin boy.. if you are not satisfied with this answer please give a way how to prove that i am not nickaizoku... You cant, you used the same wallet. It makes no difference whether you are two differen people so close that you share a wallet or one and the same person. If you two share a wallet, how can you "loan" eachother money? Also, why the new account? |
|
|
|
@eternalgloom But that means that the nodes could actually tie a transaction to the IP address that sent the transaction, right?
Not necessarily. Maybe another node relayed it to the node that relayed it to Blockchain.info. You can't know this. Even if you found the node which first received the transaction, it is not like the node operator would freely give you the information for any reason. Yeah indeed, that sounds pretty logical. I guess one could, in theory, run a huge amount of nodes to de-anonymize part of the transactions, but this would probably not be feasible. If I'm not mistaken it's somewhat comparable to running exit nodes for the Tor network and use them to de-anonymize the traffic. Its even easier, you can just use a Tor browser to connect to one of the services[1] that broadcast transactions for you. I havent tried it over, but at the very least blockchain.info (via their hidden service) will allow it. If you want you can create a new account, post the raw TX in tech support or send me a PM and I (and probably others) will broadcast it for you ASAP. IPs are very easy to detach from transactions.
@SebastianJuWhen it would become a deterministic one, maybe at least as an option, then it would be even more attractive in my eyes. I would not like having to use an old backup only to find that some addresses can't be recovered because the backup doesn't include freshly created bitcoin addresses that might already hold coins.
Backups should be frequent in these cases or you need to properly use coin control and control the input && change address each time. I already control it all the time and do regular backups though the standard wallet is different with its creation of new bitcoin addresses. It might happen that an error slowly comes into a wallet, you make backups and backups and only then realize the error. You try to go back but the last backup that does not contain it is pretty old. Happened with electrum at least once so a deterministic wallet is another form of backup that would protect the basic things in a wallet on top of backups. AFAIK core plans to make the wallet HD in the long run. [1] https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Transaction_broadcasting
|
|
|
|
Hei,
I recently tried to prune my blockchain - it worked great! - but after it, when I switched back to full blockchain, I run into some problems.
One of several possible explanations could be that pruning alters the wallet.dat.
Does anybody know more?
Which problems? AFAIK the only "problem" that is expected is that you have to redownload the blockchain. |
|
|
|
Hallo shorena I see your Personal Text https://keybase.io/verify I've tried to register but do not see further details I just saw this message on the page keybase.io but did not receive confirmation email and other instructions Success
We'll let you know when it's your turn.What should I do next and how long I have to wait. Thank you very much  Thats for PGP signatures and AFAIK you need an invite. If you ask here[1] someone might give you one. I dont think I have any yet. [1] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1159946.0 |
|
|
|
Awesome shorena,
I have done that and it has taken off the transaction in my wallet, I will leave the wallet alone for a few days now.
I am guessing the transaction will fail and disappear from the network? (just worried about it disappearing in the future?)
Since it pays no fee this is the most likely outcome, yes. Thanks for your help, I know it sounds weird coming from someone who was such an early adopter of the coin, but it has never come up before and I wanted to make sure of what was going on lol.
Well the requirements changed over time and it has become very difficult to get a transaction without fee confirmed. |
|
|
|
Well this should be easy to implement, the forum already does this with certain domains such as ones that end in .tk
But as whywefight said, you should request this for the new forum, I think it will be live in two or three months so i dont think we should waste any time implementing anything new here
Really? Interesting... didn't hear of this. I wonder what all the accounts will be worth then that account traders collected on the old forum.  Yeah certain links are replaced by [suspicious link removed] or something similar. Its mainly used for those link shorteners that are against the rules AFAIK. I dont see a problem to add *bitcointaIk* to that list. That's good to hear too though my previous answer was more directed at your second paragraph. I'm sure there are a lot of account traders holding a stash of many bitcointalk accounts. I wonder if they will be worth something anymore in the new forum. Oh, yeah I missed that. I dont think it will change much as all posts and ranks will be migrated to the new forum AFAIK. Besides that, it would be pretty fast to add this link then. Actually I'm surprised that that domain was not snatched before. It is a very old blackhat trick to replace these 2 letters.
It should be, but maybe theymos didnt see this thread yet. |
|
|
|
-snip-
I simply wanted to make a point that in my opinion the client layer isn't the best place for the protection
-snip-
You did. Several times, on several places, you even did so here several times even though according to yourself its not even the topic. Somehow you keep coming back to it with every 2nd[1] post. You also had several developers disagree with your view on this, so i really dont see why there is any further need for a discussion. There can be different views on things, different stances and different philosophies. As gmaxwell explained to you the mailing list moderator probably thought the discussion was wasting time on the mailing list. Maybe here[2] is a better place to discuss your idea. [1] its a guess [2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=6.0 |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
