Kprawn (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
|
|
March 09, 2016, 03:59:26 PM |
|
There have been a lot of discussion lately about the different implementations and the way people think it should be done. Let's find out if people are still happy with the way the Bitcoin Core team are managing things and what their issues is. On a scale from less than 10% to 100% ....stipulate your satisfaction with the current team of people running the show. Let's steer away from specific individuals and just concentrate on the team. If you have suggestions on how to improve their inputs, please add them in your comments. Let's also give credit, if you feel they are doing a good job. Less than 10% is pretty bad, and 100% is perfect ....Enjoy. -
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
March 09, 2016, 04:03:46 PM |
|
You do realise that this forum has no problem with sockpuppet accounts and therefore any "stupid vote" is absolutely not representational beyond the sock puppet ownership?
So you think that your stupid poll has any validity at all?
The only reason to create such a poll is that you already know the outcome because you control the sockies that are going to vote on it.
(so I'd say *don't bother voting because this entire topic is simply rubbish*)
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 09, 2016, 04:05:34 PM |
|
here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
March 09, 2016, 04:06:41 PM |
|
here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.
Be sure to register your vote - as of course you must think it matters. Sorry @OP but I just ruined your vote as it is bullshit (idiots such as the bought account replying to me will post their rubbish but it is clear that this topic is stupid).
|
|
|
|
Kprawn (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
|
|
March 09, 2016, 04:54:10 PM |
|
CIYAM you have a right to your opinion and a right to express it... I have not stated in any way that this poll is indicative of any proof of anything, but rather an attempt at improving the team with constructive criticism. I have no problem with them, other than the long delay in doing something about the Block size increase. I do however appreciate the cautious approach and the reason for these delays, because I acknowledge the risk to the security... if these changes are done in a rush and too quickly. Let's see how this turns out... even if it is sock puppet inflated.
|
|
|
|
unamis76
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
March 09, 2016, 05:14:59 PM |
|
I voted 90%. At the moment I'm pretty satisfied with the Core team: they've realized that Bitcoin as is cannot continue too far in the future and they've presented a solution, a pretty solid roadmap. Let's see if things will work out. Even if they don't, they'll work out in another way.
|
|
|
|
watashi-kokoto
|
|
March 09, 2016, 05:20:24 PM |
|
What about the shills? Will we be able to vote who is our favourite?
They've hired a new poets, and will hire another poets later this year.
|
|
|
|
Patatas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1115
Providing AI/ChatGpt Services - PM!
|
|
March 09, 2016, 05:50:46 PM |
|
Considering they're not officially "paid" for the job (they could be utilizing their programming skills for an MNC and stocking their savings ) which they didn't choose to.I'm quite satisfied with the development ,though there always be the block debates which are unlikely to be settled.
|
|
|
|
SFR10
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 3523
Crypto Swap Exchange
|
|
March 09, 2016, 05:55:10 PM |
|
I voted with 100% as well of majority (until now). I haven't encounter a problem so far in my BTCitcoin experience, although some have (due to their own wrong doings) so I'm quite happy with the outcome so far. Although there isn't a thing as 100%, I'm sure when more complications rises, developers rise to occasions as well and would do their best to overcome it (that's what I've seen so far).
|
|
|
|
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1530
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
|
March 09, 2016, 06:37:00 PM |
|
here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.
The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times.
|
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 09, 2016, 06:44:06 PM |
|
here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.
The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times. the votes are not cryptographically verified? O_o!
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 09, 2016, 06:46:04 PM |
|
HA most vote are either 100% or less than 10%
silly sock puppets you supposed to all vote for the same thing.
|
|
|
|
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1530
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
|
March 09, 2016, 07:23:14 PM |
|
HA most vote are either 100% or less than 10%
silly sock puppets you supposed to all vote for the same thing.
Equal oportunity sock puppeting? here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.
The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times. the votes are not cryptographically verified? O_o! Great, you are aware of the flaw, why defend the poll then? Its not like votes based on signed messages and btc balance are not implemented.
|
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
countryfree
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1047
Your country may be your worst enemy
|
|
March 09, 2016, 07:31:21 PM |
|
I gave them a pretty poor rating. Sorry to their supporters, but the block size and scalability issue has been around for more than 3 quarters. It should have been solved last year already.
About that very unscientific survey, why is the lowest rating below the highest? A linear order would have been better.
|
I used to be a citizen and a taxpayer. Those days are long gone.
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 09, 2016, 07:41:21 PM |
|
HA most vote are either 100% or less than 10%
silly sock puppets you supposed to all vote for the same thing.
Equal oportunity sock puppeting? here we go CIYAM calling everyone stupid all day again.
The vote was called stupid and I agree with CIYAM. There will be nothing learned from the results because we cant know whether a single person voted 10 times. the votes are not cryptographically verified? O_o! Great, you are aware of the flaw, why defend the poll then? Its not like votes based on signed messages and btc balance are not implemented. every time someone makes a poll we get a dumbass saying the poll is meaningless. who cares this is a internet forum, not and election. we'll be fine...
|
|
|
|
helloeverybody
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
March 09, 2016, 07:45:45 PM |
|
To be honest i dont know what to believe any more. I hear so much Fud getting spread about from both sides i no longer know who is acting for the real good of bitcoin. It would be nice if the bitcoin community and devs could put their heads together instead of all this infighting.
|
|
|
|
shorena
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1530
No I dont escrow anymore.
|
|
March 09, 2016, 09:11:20 PM |
|
-snip- we'll be fine...
Was that ever a question? I will be looking forward to the comments.
|
Im not really here, its just your imagination.
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
March 09, 2016, 09:36:00 PM |
|
Less than 10% - 7 (24.1%)
Bitcoin wouldn't be where it is if it wasn't for them. This is the thank you that one gets for doing work for everyone. I gave them a pretty poor rating. Sorry to their supporters, but the block size and scalability issue has been around for more than 3 quarters. It should have been solved last year already.
Such "issues" can't be solved quickly. A 2 MB block size limit does not improve scalability. Equal oportunity sock puppeting?
Looks like it. This is why polls on this forum are very unreliable.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
March 09, 2016, 09:46:19 PM |
|
-snip- we'll be fine...
Was that ever a question? I will be looking forward to the comments. 100% - 6 (20.7%) i count Lauda + 5 sock puppets we'll be fine...
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
March 09, 2016, 09:51:23 PM |
|
i count Lauda + 5 sock puppets
we'll be fine...
Certainly. Please stop with this foolishness. I do not vote in such polls (I have rarely done so in the past).
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
|