--snip--
Lol ban for one copy/paste ? Bitcointalk has so many active members, so they will ban everyone for such things ?
Well, i'm not a mod, i'm not the one who found your ban, i'm not the one that's going to report your account... But yes... You'll probably get banned for one copy/paste... Sure, there are dozens of other people that copy/paste, and the only reason they're not banned is because they weren't caught. |
|
|
|
You do not understand me correctly, these accounts of friends do not concern me in any way. These are strangers who cannot perform bounty assignments because they are blocked on the site. According to them.
Well... It might be that the accounts of your friends do not concern you in any way, however, hilariousandco found a copy/paste post made by your account... So it'll probably be banned within the next couple of hours to... The forum admins are not lenient when it comes to plagiarism... Sure, in some countries plagiarism might be normal, but in other's it's considered a serious offence (you can actually get kicked from your job/education or even go to jail for plagiarism). In general, does Vietnam have any restrictions on the site, on the part of the site, or perhaps by the country?
There are 2 restrictions: 1) Points of evil... If an ip is associated with (for example) spammers, points of evil are attached to the ip(range???). If you want to create a new account from a device with an ip that has units of evil, you'll have to pay a small fee in order to activate your account 2) bitcointalk is using cloudflare... If your ip is flagged by cloudflare, you'll be forced to solve a captcha before entering the forum |
|
|
|
|
Foxpup is right... I gave a bad explanation of the events... It has been a while since i last used the qt wallet so i didn't recognize the icon next to the tranqaction. To make things wose i didn't make the effort to look up the tx on an explorer... Sorry for the confusion op!
|
|
|
|
Could possible be.
Perhaps I made an error at lucky pool setup.
Thats result:
"txid": "b462635eea82b6c93a3b768f348cda70d220e4f85298e60bcbe905f5ff0f4eb3",
"vout": 106,
"address": "39hpjGK9g7UZDDAAd368fET2SBEEZvkeYH",
"account": "Mining",
"redeemScript": "00141ed48789b8aa52c3daeda47af4135d7dfa67dea7",
"scriptPubKey": "a91457e813db3ab783698223b0173189cb29843ed91087",
"amount": 0.00089969,
"confirmations": 962,
"spendable": true,
"solvable": true,
"safe": true
But why the core know that mining is mining ?!
It's just a label... Somebody funded an address generated by your wallet (39hpjGK9g7UZDDAAd368fET2SBEEZvkeYH) with output 106 of transaction b462635eea82b6c93a3b768f348cda70d220e4f85298e60bcbe905f5ff0f4eb3 about 962 blocks ago. Your wallet parsed the block that included this transaction, found an unspent output funding one of the addresses it was monitoring, looked in his database, and found that you attached a label called "mining" to address "39hpjGK9g7UZDDAAd368fET2SBEEZvkeYH". There's nothing more to it  |
|
|
|
https://github.com/gurnec/btcrecover allows you to create a token file, as long as you have a basic idear how your password should look (and it seems you do have a basic idear about this), it should be possible to bruteforce the password within a finite timeframe. If you really have no clue how to setup john the ripper or btcrecover, you can always pay somebody to write a step by step guide (with screenshots) for setting up one of these tools on a clean VPS from a certain VPS service provider, that way you can create a clean VPS with the same provider and follow the step by step guide to setup your own bruteforce server... Good luck!
|
|
|
|
Does full node also get part of TX fees now? You only get rewarded for your work when you "find" a block. So whats that?  That's probably just somebody who funded the address you labeled as "mining". It's just a label. If you would have labelled the mining reward address as "funds from satoshi", it would have shown that label instead after somebody sent you some satoshi's... Go to the debug console and execute "listunspent".... It should probably be visible in the gui to, but i haven't used the gui in a while so i don't know the exact path... |
|
|
|
|
AFAIK, Theymos no longer answers mails sent to banappeals, altough it's the first time i hear an accusation that he would use the emaillist to spam somebody. This accusation seems strange to me, i don't think Theymos would do such a thing... Are you sure you didn't enter your email on some fishy sites?
As for your ban: can you give us a list of banned accounts, it makes things easyer when we try to find out why you were banned.
Last but not least: you are right, it is not forbidden to have multiple accounts... BUT: if even ONE of your accounts is banned, it's you (as a person) who is banned. If you continue using an account that wasn't banned, it's still called ban evasion (which is a bannable offence).
|
|
|
|
I used to use this website way way back : https://www.blockseer.com/But it looks like they cut off the free service and switched to a private paid service :/ "Please email sales@blockseer.com to inquire about an account. Free accounts have been disabled. Thanks." Anyone knows of any tools that are similar to this website that have blockchain/taint analysis tools? It was really good, it could follow inputs/outputs all the way to the block they were generated from, grouped connected addresses together, had tags/names for exchange cold/hot wallets, and custom tags from other users, and so on.. Thanks! has a subset of these features... It's not as extensive as blockseer, but for me, it usually does the trick. |
|
|
|
I don't find it in the spirit of this board to ridicule people banned if they are not consistent of clearly financially motivated copy and pasters. I feel only pitty when I see some of the others begging and grovelling for probably their only means of making some bucks. I certainly don't feel I want to start ridiculing them. The worst offenders will not appeal here they know there is no chance. Tell marboroza and loyce to hurry up it feels wrong with out them here.
Sincerely, I was trying to understand the expected humour in all of this ridicule until I read this post. I agree with you totally. Ridiculing someone because they are plagiarists won't make any impact. Banning them for plagiarism will do. Most plagiarists don't even know how or what it takes to write a post of their own. So, they may not even get the sense of ridicule people are trying to subject them to here. Simple, ban them. Don't laugh at them. Well... This project isn't something that is done instead of banning a plagiariser... This project comes into play after a plariariser was banned, once he creates a new account and starts posting in meta with all kinds of dumb excuses as to why he should be unbanned. In these cases, a ban does not suffice, because they created a new account and started a new thread with this new account. I agree that if somebody is banned for plagiarism, this is enough... Even when they create a new account and creates a thread in meta asking why they are banned, they should not be ridiculed AS LONG as they accept the reason why they were banned and move on. It's only when they start acting out, not accepting their ban even if the rules are clearly quoted and evidence is dug up to confront them with their offence that this tool should come into play. It should make it obvious for them that all excuses to get unbanned have been given before, and they should just accept the fact that they broke one of the few actual hard rules and now they are no longer welcome... Anyways, you're free to have your opinion about banning people, signature campaigns, this tool,... and you're free to express these opinions. This tool isn't an official bitcointalk tool tough, so if you don't like it: ignore it... If you don't like me: ignore me If you don't like people that use this tool: ignore them The "ignore" button is right there, under our names... You don't even have to visit our profiles  |
|
|
|
Wow, this one escalated quickly while i was away from the office... So much has happened that i cannot answer each person individually, so i'll give 5 general answers: - This tool isn't intended for creating plagiarising reports, it's not even intended for plagiarisers that ask why they are banned and right away accept the answers and move on... This tool is generated for plagiarisers that create a thread and act like they did nothing wrong, giving the lamest excuses imaginably. The tool is intended to make these abusers aware of the fact we know all the excuses they're about to give.
- I will add all new excuses into the database...
- @o_e_l_e_o: thanks for the permission, i'll add credits to the correct thread at the bottom of my page. I'd be thrilled to get a better looking layout, the only requirement is that the fields are evenly spaced (i scripted the whole bingo game, the stamps are placed in a fixed pattern, so if the fields aren't evenly spaced things go wrong pretty fast)
- All fields are obligatory, but there is no checking mechanism (offcourse i sanitize my inputs, but any integer will do)... I'd appreciate it if real postid's were entered (since i automatically generate a link based on the postid), but if you don't know the id of the complainer or the abuser, you can make up an id...
- I don't want to get mixed up in the whole discussion here... The only thing i want to say is that I personally don't feel the need to remove my signature because there are bounty spammer plagiarists that also wear one. I drive a car, but i'm not going to give away my car because sometimes somebody else drives drunk... It's the drunk driver that has to go to jail, it's not me who has to stop driving... That's all i want to say about this subject
|
|
|
|
There was a few times also " I bought that Account and it was the Owner before" Bingo Time  LoL Added |
|
|
|
I was gonna yell at you for stealing o_e_l_e_o's intellectual property but this seems to be a serious effort. Great project, good luck dev yeah, to be honest, i don't know who's intellectual property the bingo is... I linked to the thread where i first saw the bingo card appear at the top of my OP AND at the bottom of my webpage in order to give some credit to the inventor, however, hilariousetc didn't include any copyright so the actual inventor might not be credited correctly... If you're certain that o_e_l_e_o is the inventor, i'll shoot him a PM to ask permission |
|
|
|
you need "yes I read the rules" as they proceed to double post.
I'll add it right away  update: it's in the pool, ready to be picked for the next "plagiariser's bingo" |
|
|
|
I was browsing meta and found following thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5083830.0;topicseenhilariousetc posted a plagiariser bingo, and it was quickly picked up by other members... HOWEVER: it was hard for them to keep uploading new images, and there was no way to tally any winner... That's why i took a couple of hours out of my schedule to create.... PLAGIARISER's BINGO: the app How does it work? - You see a plagiariser starting to complain
- Visit https://www.mocacinno.com/bingo/index.php and fill the form... A new url will be created for your unique bingo. At the moment, only 26 excuses are available, out of which 24 will be picked at random
- Hotlink the image from my site AND copy the full url that was generated for you at the bottom of the image... People that want to play need to visit the webpage to claim a new spot
- No need to add the image multiple times... It'll automatically be updated when new spots are claimed (at least, if bitcointalk's imageproxy isn't caching the image;) )
Example for post #100:  Want to play? Visit Mocacinno's plagiariser bingo[url=http://www.mocacinno.com/bingo/index.php?postid=100][img]http://www.mocacinno.com/bingo/image.php?postid=100[/img][/url]
Want to play? Visit [url=http://www.mocacinno.com/bingo/index.php?postid=100]Mocacinno's plagiariser bingo[/url]
Todo: - Calculate when somebody won the running bingo and add their name to the winlist
- Add more excuses
|
|
|
|
What seems fishy about the first 3 posts is the fact that the op is asking about a completely unknown company in the first post, in the second post he posts the name of the owner, and in the thirth post, the owner already posts a smiley... What bothers me is that the owner's name isn't on the website the OP linked to, nor in the whois info... How did the OP find the owner's name, how did the owner find this thread, why did it all happen in the course of a couple of hours? https://web.archive.org/web/20181212063715/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3061180.0;topicseenFrom my point of view, it looks like (no proof) the op is just a shill for this new company, and it looks like the only goal was to post a link to a new company... I'd rather have a company creating an official thread about their service instead of using "alternative" techniques of getting their link out in the open. I don't know if the company is legit or not... The whois info is hidden, but that's not a "real" red flag |
|
|
|
Like OmegaStarScream, i'm unsure about your intentions... If you're trying to monitor an address for transactions funding it, follow OmegaStarScream's advice and use an api, or install bitcoind and use the json-rpc interface (both are quite easy to do using a php script). If you're trying to verify if a transaction is valid, i guess https://github.com/Bit-Wasp/bitcoin-php might be usefull for you. Anyways, before we're able to give you advice tailored to your situation, we need more info... |
|
|
|
 Just want to know the meaning of it, especially to mods and admins if they are around. Am I the one experiencing/seeing it or are there others that have the same issue? Thanks! edit: As of time of posting this thread, I found out that my post counts has been seen I don't know what happen but good thing I snip it as an evidence to show. It means you made exactly 1337 posts... It's an easter egg that has been discussed several times in the past. |
|
|
|
I know about the dangers in online wallets, and how to use a cold - hot wallet.
The question could be formed like this:
If a swept address in an online wallet has 0 coins, and someone sends some coins there (some time later), will the coins be moved to the "web address" ?
the coins will not be moved to the new wallet... If you have privatekey1 whose public key hash (commonly known as the "address") is 1address1, and you sweep privatekey1 into any other wallet, what happens is: 1) the "receiving" wallet will do a scan for any unspent outputs funding address1 AT THAT TIME 2) if it finds unspent outputs, it'll generate a new deposit address (it's possible the receiving wallet has a buffer of unused new deposit addresses). Let's call it 1addressfromnewwallet2 3) the receiving wallet will create a new transaction, spending all unspent outputs from step 1 and funding the new deposit address from step 2 (1addressfromnewwallet2) 4) the transaction from step 3 will be signed with privatekey1 (the key you're sweeping) and broadcasted. 5) since the receiving wallet has the private key whose public key hash is 1addressfromnewwallet2, it'll monitor this address for new unspent outputs, and it'll be able to spend those funds If, after the initial sweep, somebody funds 1address1 again, those unspent outputs won't "magically" move to the address generated by the wallet you swept the coins in... You can, however, repeat the sweeping process as many times as you want... There is a "variant"... If you import privatekey1 instead of sweeping it, both the original wallet as the new wallet start monitoring 1address1, in this case, for the untrained eye, it will look like the new funds magically "move" to the new wallet even after the intial import. However: since both the old and the new wallet have privatekey1, and they're both monitoring 1address1, both wallets are able to spend any unspent outputs funding 1address1. This might be a desirable feature in some usecases, or an undesired feature in other usecases! |
|
|
|
I think greenaddress allows you to sweep private keys: https://greenaddress.it/HOWEVER, is there a reason you're asking for a WEB service? Web wallets are the worst kind of wallets security-wise... If you're not the only one in controll of your private keys, you're not the only one in controll of your funds. Please, switch to a desktop wallet on a clean pc, or if you're holding more than a couple hundred bucks worth of crypto currencie, switch to a hardware wallet or a paper wallet (or a wallet on an airgapped machine). |
|
|
|
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1738960I've never heared about them myself, i'd never use an unknown mixer to mix any coins at all... No idear if this one is a scam, but if it's their io domain you visited, they do have a (seldomly used) newbie account (see above) and there is an email address on the account's profile page. Good luck!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
