Unless there are concrete evidence we have no right to write anything in others trust wall even with neutral feedback. The forum gave too much freedom to the users who are regular (us) just to do what we like wherever we like.

For the record this was mentioned to consider in general. Sorry I failed to point it out so you thought it was meant for this particular case.

I read everything posted in the topic. In fact I read it from the start to finish just half an hour ago on my phone. Now logged in just to make a response. May be after this post I will make few more posts before going back to my usual routine.

PP eventually you fooled a lot of users LOL. It was a smart move to test many more things than just to find the burst posting. But let's leave everything else behind. Let's talk about burst posting.

I was actually looking at your post intervals yesterday before making my first comment but it did not seem to me burst posting even though I saw somewhere like 8 to 10 or 15 minutes (I fucking don't have time to check again LOL) interval between some posts. Since my understanding of burst posting is shit-post one after another in different threads in x amount of time to fulfill signature quota but I did not see the shit-post in your posts so, I really was not sure if you were trying to show your post history.

Honestly speaking I have the same posting habit like you. Just few weeks ago I left one campaign because I was not able to fulfill their weekly quota to post in gambling section. I volunteered to leave the campaign. Both manager and I are happy. Manager expects me to join some other campaign where he will be able to give me more flexibility once it will be available for him. And the few weeks ago one was not the only one that happened with me. I left many campaign where at some point I found it's not going in my way. I even have several long gaps in activity, sometimes it's several months long several times. I take leave from the place when I feel not right.

There are a lot of us who do the same. They do not care about when and what they are posting. They care to post when they feel there are something for them to talk. The earning from signature for them are a bonus just as a side product.

Both you and yahoo62278 are seeing this from two different perspective. As a manager yahoo62278's main concern is to get maximum ROI of the campaigns he is managing. I don't think you both should have hurt feeling towards each others. I can imagine that the PM he left was without having much thought in it.

But it would be nice if yahoo62278 reconsider his view in burst posting. One user above (I am too lazy to find the post and name to bring exact words) said something like:
Don't count the post that you think is burst posting in your terms but again don't consider all posts those have small interval of time even less than five minutes as long as it's on topic and have quality contribution.

After making this post, I may find a topic where I feel like five words are enough to response the conversation. If I do that and if the interval between this post and the next post is 3 minutes then would you say I should unnecessarily make the post longer to make it 300 words and wait half an hour to post it? I am positive that you will not demand it. The best you will do it to ignore the next post from the post counting for the week. But you can not accuse me for making shit post just because it was 5 words long and 3 minutes after the last post.

The Trust page of another user is not a dairy taking place for others. logfiles can easily keep a note for himself using Ninjastic's (TryNinja) users note extension: [Script] BitcoinTalk User Notes

These days I see too many neutral tags which actually can not be considered as neutral but a way to underestimate others. Most of it are given to achieve two agenda:
1. Of course to underestimate the users who they do not like
2. To build up their own reputation proving that they are always active to find wrong doings.

Both are bad since it's all are in personal level.

This post is to reply FatFork.



It's not the first time I confused myself by my own sin 🤣
Most of the forum boards are in my ignore list and when I visit peoples post history page from my account, I miss the posts from the ignore boards. It needs a habit for me to check from another browser before responding to any such discussions LOL

See how it confused me:



It's from the logged in browser.



And this is when I am not logged it LOL

Imagine PP wanted to test user's behavior 🤣

I am sure too. The above post was just to make fun of some users who reacted on the thread not even looking at the post history. No offense guys, sometimes we all are too lazy to go into the deep.

I guess the account is banned now. Look at their post history. It's very possible that all those POA were deleted by the mod however I was primarily thinking mods will not delete the POA.

Anyway, even in 2017 he looked like a spammer.

You must be taking piss off of everyone or have some hidden desire to experiment the reaction of the members. LOL
Like:
Are they reading the topic or just making a response without reading it.
Or you are trying everyone to see the interval of your post history 😂

Surprisingly I saw the ad of this topic on the news section. It's good to see the encouragement from theymos.

I was confused for few seconds to understand if this was photoshopped. The reflation of your picture (guessing it's you) confirmed that it's a raw picture may be lol. But anyway, perfect background, nice framing. I wonder if you are a pro photographer?


PS: Maybe I will bring up something later LOL

I was not aware of this topic existence LOL. Code updated according to your update and it looks good now.

Before


After

I am becoming fan of Benfica. Surely in the next few matches I will have them in my favorite list. Today if this was not PSG at home then I would have them in my winning list. By the way, it's a disaster night for me. I don't even login to superbru. For sure I know from all the matches I was not able to collect any single point.

Didn't I tell you all how good I know these teams 🤣
When I did not see Messi on the ground then I literally checked flashscores and found out he has the injury LOL

@TryNinja, I guess this must be unnoticed by you.



Look at the personal note which I was testing for my account just to check how it shows in my profile.
By the way check the post on my post history: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=662330;sa=showPosts
Search for "Scam by YoYa for $50" on the browser.

So basically it is showing in a quoted message which has trust page linked of another user.

If you are gambling to make money then you are doing the wrong thing there. It's meant to take entertainment. The money part gives you the heat in the adrenaline. Honestly speaking sites are not designed to give you money but to take it away from you. You chose your option how fast you want to lose it.

It's all trading. There are two sides, buyer and seller. You are a buyer here so enjoy it as long as you can.

$600 still is a good amount to stake in a single shot. But imagine your 1 BTC was in a USB stick and you lost the stick before discovering it in your closet last year LOL

Match day again, and this topic deserves at the top of the board!
Kiss my ass two assholes above 😘
Two minutes difference and they post made the post before me. LOL

I don't remember what I got in this match.
My all concern on PSG match since Messi is there LOL.
Will they win against Benfica today? Last week Benfica did very well to hold their not losing streak. it's now 17 unbeaten match. But I think in today's match it will be too hard to take point from PSG.

For the record I don't have any sympathy for OP. Both OP and YoYa was doing unethical ID verification. But this case makes me realize that people are at risk to response Yoya's service thread and he will not pay them later. This deserves a tag with warning which I am going to leave on his wall.

Amazing. If this is what you turned out then why did you even created this thread and seeking help from the forum members. You are not paying me, nor BK8BTC. I am responding to this post from moral obligation. I have not interest to defend BK8BTC or you. My words are coming from what I see was given.

You don't like the people of the forum, move on please.

How is the zero fault?
Anyway, no one is thankful when a casino confiscate winning which is legitimate. When you are caught on shady activity then they have full right to play by their own terms. And most of the casino confiscate everything including deposit. I think this forum is the place where we suggest casinos to return the deposit at least.

Just because the case does not seem going in your way, don't conclude a wrong conclusion. If you are not still happy with the case how it has ended then seek legal action against the casino. No one here is your lawyer.

Even if you give permission, the forum admin will not involve in any such arbitration because the forum does not moderate any scam. This is a place run by community.

Anyway, I received some insider information from source (I would not say complete information but at least it helps to understand the situation) and I believe you are hiding information. You have not answer the question I left to you few post above.

Unfortunately we built a culture that suggest casino to refund their deposit if anything become wrong. But it's also noticeable that many abuser take the chance and hostage a casino to get their deposit back even if they intentionally played wrong. In many cases I had such feeling, I don't know if some of other experience forum users will agree with me or not.

I guess you are saying about financial profit. Not everyone is in bitcoin doing everything for financial gain. Those who are running full node they do not get anything but contributing in the ecosystem without any selfish act.

Mistakes happen and this is clearly a mistake from your side. If they find links with other account no matter how it happen they are going to act according to their terms. Since the mistake is from your side, and you claim that you gave them enough evidence, let's see what they say. If they say they are not satisfied then they have the full right to say it. But if they decides to give you a chance then it's even better.

You may contact their official representative on the forum. Send them a PM pointing this topic and let's see what they response.

Christ! Obviously something that was not right about you and they were suspecting your for it. So instead of freezing everything they at least allowed you to withdraw your deposit. Be happy about it and leave them. It's not that cases like this are coming against them regularly. Which means they are paying legitimate gamblers. Why would they deny you for only few hundred dollars? Something did not add up about you of course.

I would have an argument with them if they would say that they have confiscate everything.