The interface of the desktop version is of secondary importance because the wallet works just fine. The mobile version of Electrum is another can of worms, though. Its looks are outdated ,and it just feel buggy and incomplete. I have never felt comfortable using it.   

In theory, yes, but in practice it's a bit different. Other members already introduced you to the term 'purging'. You can see the data for purging in Mempool.space. The memory pools don't have unlimited capacities. When they run at full capacity, the software removes/deletes/purges transactions that pay the lowest fees to make room for those willing to pay more. If you broadcasted a 2 sat/vByte transaction right now, chances are that mempools would reject making a record of it. It just doesn't pay even nearly as much as it's needed for an onchain confirmation anytime soon. 

They are all fake. All of them registered a Bitcointalk account to post a silly comment or a ask a question and then disappeared. All accounts were registered only to post in your thread. Try harder next time.

I am not interested in your services and will not use it. This will be my last post in this thread to avoid bumbling it and giving it any more attention.   

The table at the bottom is missing, hence making the OP incomplete. All that happened a long time ago which kind of makes it irrelevant in today's time and age. Thread starter abandoned and locked the thread a long time ago so I won't add it.

This thread is already in my collection. Taking a second look, I should maybe remove it. It's locked and the images aren't loading. But since it's already included, I'll leave it be.

Da, mislim da je tako nešto bilo u pitanju. Nije on kao kupac učinio ništa loše. Kupio je USDT od osobe koja mu je prodala ukradeni kripto a možda čak sa hakovane mjenačnice ili novčanika. Kad je to vlasnik tokena primjetio, kontaktirao je koga treba, dokazao (nadam se) da su novci njegovi a Tether kao izdavatelj je tokene blokirao. Šta je dalje bilo, ne znam. Pretpostavljam da će doći do istrage i da će vremenom biti vračeni prvobitnom vlasniku. Naš čovjek je jednostavno kupio nešto što je ukradeno i izgubio novac ako ne nađe osobu kojoj je platio za kupljeni USDT.

Jedna od ideja je bila poboljšati multi-signature transakcije grupisanjem njihovih potpisa kako bi se poboljašala privatnost i smanjio prostor koje te transakcije zauzimaju u blokovima. Postale bi kao obične single-sig transakcije i ne bi mogao po informacijama sa blockchaina razlikovati single-sig od multi-sig transakcije.

Taproot treba posmatrati u kompletu sa Schnorr signatures i Tapscript implementacijama. Schnorr poboljšava sigurnost mreže. Ne pitaj me kako, mogu samo googlati jer nisam nikad ulazio u detalje.

Tačno je da su ovim nadogradnjama omogučili da se na Bitcoin mreži lakše može eksperimentisati sa pametnim ugovorima. Ali Bitcoin nije spreman na tako nešto a to možemo da vidimo po trenutnoj situaciji gdje imamo stotine hiljada nepotvrđenih transakcija i ogromne naknade. Bitcoin je i dalje stari dedo koji se sporo kreće (čitaj sporo potvrđuje transakcije). Sad su tom dedi nabavili veća kolica za kupovinu ali on i dalje sporo hoda i ne može da stigne da obavi sve obaveze.

Ne pratim puno vijesti pa nisam u toku. Jel o tome razmišljaju developeri ili mediji spekulišu? Mineri neće to podržati jer zarađuju više nego ikada. Svaka nadogradnja a pogotovo hard fork zahtjeva ogromnu podršku a dok do toga dođe, čitav ovaj hype će možda bit stvar prošlosti.

He is doing a CPFP, but according to mempool space, his effective fee rate is 25.4 sat/vByte and not 93.3 at/vByte. Transactions in the 90 sat area are getting into the next block right now, and as you can see, OP's is still unconfirmed. The 25 sat zone is still about 14 vMB away. Things are looking a bit better though.

Does Airgap Knox keep the phone permanently in offline mode with no option for the user to bypass it and turn connectivity on again? Or can I simply turn it off with a click of a button and connect my phone to the internet if I please? As I understood, Knox is a device manager, but a closed-source one, which might not suite many people. Has anyone tested and verified the safety and authenticity of the software?

Menadžer Utopia signature kampanje je obavjestio članove da je kampanja završena i da svi mogu da promjene svoje potpise i avatare.
Koliko vidim po changelog-u, @FatFork ti si već izbrisao uvu kampanju iz tablice prošlog tjedna. Nemaš onda nikakvog dodatnog posla poslje ovog posta.

Manji je i broj nepotvrđenih tranksacija. Prije par dana je bilo preko 450.000 a sad smo evo blizu brojke od 300.000. Mempool space pokazuje da mineri i malo brže pronalaze nove blokove. Prosječno vrijeme je bilo 10.6 minuta, pa je spalo na 10.2 zadnji put kad sam gledao i sad je okruglo 10. Nadati se je da će ovi sa Ordinalsima što prije izgubiti novac i odustati.   

Ah, ok. Onda sam pomješao te najave koje dolaze iz Amerije sa spekulacijama koje izlaze u vezi EU tržišta.

Decentralizirane ne možeš kontrolirati a centralizirane možeš. Jasno je onda s kim će sklapati partnerstva i njegovati dobre odnose. Uz odgovarajuću dokumentaciju, USDC, USDT i slični stablecoini mogu biti zaključani na bilo kojoj adresi. Mislim da su nedavno jednom našem trgovcu sa Balkana iz Tethera blokirali adresu sa ogromnom lovom nakon što je kupio veći iznos od nepoznate osobe. Neko je o tome pisao. 

Ako se dobro sjećam kad je o tome bilo riječi u prošlosti, bitcoin nije obuhvaćen novim regulacijama. Odnosno, tu se neće puno toga mijenjati. Vjerujem da će stablecoini biti podložni puno strogijim regulacijama i kontrolama a možda će neke i zabraniti u EU. Jel se ovom regulacijom ili nekom drugom spekuliše da će DAI biti zabranjen? Također se sjećam da fokus neće biti na DeFi sektoru iako je mjesto svakakvih prevara i namjernih i nenamjernih propusta.

Ako ti nije neka velika potreba, ne pomjeraj Bitcoin dok se situacija ne popravi. Najgore je što niko ne može reći kad će to biti. Nejverovatno šta napraviše i kako iskoristiše dugo najavljivani taproot sa ovim Ordinals deblilizmom. Tema ti ne odgovara sadržaju diskusije jel nije ovdje riječ o ovom ili onom novčaniku, niti Wasabi ima išta sa trenutnom situacijom.

Pošto je examplens prešao u Sinbad kampanju, sad ima jedno prazno mjestu u BestChange signature kampanji za jednog Legendary člana.
Ova kampanja traje već preko 3 godine i sigurno je jedna od najdugotrajnijih trenutno na forumu.

It's not only a poverty issue. I have to agree with what LoyceV said. I see no reason to use Bitcoin with the current fee requirements unless I absolutely have to despite living and/or working in a western nation and earning enough money. You are not going to be able to sell that story to someone who asks you to explain the benefits of Bitcoin to them. Saying that it gives you the freedom to do with your money what you want won't be enough. The second question will be how much is all that going to cost me? And when you tell that person it could be $10 or $20 regardless of the amount you spend, they'll laugh and walk away. Bitcoin is useful if it does better than what traditional payment systems can offer. Sadly, that is currently not the case.

Upravo sam to htio predložiti. Iznimna je situacija i ljudi bi trebali da imaju razumjevanja. Ne mijenjate pravila onako što vam je dosadno nego što su naknade podivljale i baca se $100 dolara u bunar. To je veći trošak za svaku kampanju i ako se nešto ne promjeni gazde bi mogle da odluče da počnu prekidati kampanje zbog većih troškova.

Upitajte članove da li bi pristali da se isplate počnu isplačivati svaka dva tjedna, jednom mjesečno ili ako im je svejedno za koju se opciju odlučite. Poslje toga onda znate na čemu ste.

I didn't say that it isn't working as advertised. I am looking at my post again, and I wrote it in a silly way which seems to have confused you. The point is, the network and the miners do what they are supposed to do. They fill the blocks with transactions that pay the biggest fees. I don't like having to pay 300 sat/vByte, especially for multiple input/output transactions, but it is what it is. Bitcoin's bottleneck, which is the 10-min block time and block size is paying the price right now whether we like it or not.   

I would have no problem with the first example, but the second one isn't good enough. People in some countries would be happy if they earned $200 in a full month of work, and paying $20 in fees would be a small fortune for them. Unacceptable, unless the future of Bitcoin is to be used by the rich and those in the Western nations. 

The problem with people is that they will get lazy to do the work themselves if they notice the bot made good predictions several times in a row. They will have the opinion that the bot is reliable and there is no need to doubt its suggestions. And sooner or later, it will drop the bomb on your and suggest that you pay 50 sat/vByte at a time where 5 sat/vByte would have been enough. We have seen ridiculous recommendations by services that suggest bitcoin fees many times in the past.

But you don't have to know what is happening all the time. You should only be concerned about the network status the moment you want to send a transaction. That's when the time comes to take a closer look at the mempool, which only takes a few seconds.

@OP
If you want to be given a chance to join a quality bitcoin signature campaign, you have to change. Over 80% of your posts are in the altcoin bounty section. No one is going to pay you for that. You have posted a little bit in Bitcoin Discussion and Beginners & Help, but there are no other posts from you where you participate in quality discussions. Do what those who are successful on this forum do if you want to be in the same league.    

There are no rules against wearing any signature you like as long as you respect other forum rules. You can wear the BestChange signature if if pleases you. You can create your own signature if you want. You can advertise your own site or put anything else in your signature space you might think is useful.

Not necessarily. Maybe you are miscalculating how much you are actually betting. Imagine that you deposit $100 and start wagering. Most people wouldn't bet the whole amount at once. They would divide it in loads of small bets. Maybe $1 per spin on slots or round of play on another game. If you make 100 bets, you have only reached a 1x wagering requirement. You still have 4x to go. The house edge will destroy you the longer you are wagering. Bet $100 at once or $50, and you are looking to lose your money faster. 

I wouldn't expect much noise from the miners. They are having the time of their life right now. At least those who weren't around during Bitcoin's last great bull run in 2017/2018.
To be completely fair, is the network not working as advertised? Yes, it is.
Do we like the current state of it? No, we don't.
Would it be pro-censorship to censor and restrict what we don't like? Yes, it would.

This is actually a good real-life example that Bitcoin's 1st layer in its current form isn't nearly ready to be a day-to-day payment method. Just imagine if there were no Ordinals and you substitute those transactions for normal BTC transactions of millions of new people who have started using BTC for everyday payments. That's how it would look on the mainnet. Half a million of unconfirmed transactions.