The real worlds definition of evidence and yours are completely different...
This isn't a criminal court buddy. It's blatantly obvious that scotaloo here IS scotaloo on coinchat. |
|
|
|
|
There's plenty of evidence. Don't ignore it
|
|
|
|
lol, my mistake, well it was the next day on my timezone anyways.
Oh look someone totally unconnected to the events would remember that he hacked an account and then made a bitcointalk account / tried to sell it after sleeping. Lol |
|
|
|
There are no posts on this account from that day, and I checked the last active date when I bought the account. devinthedev was hacked on Jun 27100 Economy / Auctions / Re: devinthedev.com on: June 27, 2013, 10:03:15 PM More lies. |
|
|
|
This account scotaloo was not logged in on the day 'devin' was hacked.
Now you have lied. this is a purchased account, thats all i can say right now When you purchase accounts you ask them for every day they logged in from?  |
|
|
|
\ Random people who don't phish do not put "plenty of phish in the sea -pirateat40" and ask for a "GONE PHISHING" sign..
I'd like everyone to read this, this just sums up TF in one line, this is the evidence he's using to come after me after I've caused people to investigate the security of his sites. That's just in addition to you using the same nick. What are the chances of someone using the same nick "scotaloo" on both sites on the same day? OK, the chances of that are still plausible. What are the chances that they both use tor? Still plausible. What are the chances that the forum account is selling a domain name acquired through phishing on a chat account? What are the chances that the forum account makes multiple references to phishing, and is trying to sell vulnerabilities used to compromise an account, and is used to leave trust ratings on me that I'm pirateat40, and mentions that he keeps tabs on all the other phishers, and goes and not what either of us done in the past and goes I keep track of my competition Competition obviously means he competes with them for phishing. This is a case where there isn't one straightforward evidence, but when they are combined they hold weight. |
|
|
|
This is like buying a PMB and complaining that you lost money. It's not really cloudhashing's fault, you made a bad investment.
That's BS. They promised something based on which we invested and if they end up not deliverinf what they promised they owe us. Don't write them off too fast though. Did they? From my convos on skype, they've always said that the date was an estimate given to them by BFL and they will pay when they actually get the hardware. |
|
|
|
Ip addresses don't match, anyways, I would be willing to bet that whoever hacked this 'devin' person probably used a tor node that was used by hundreds of users here that day, and I only use TOR/VPN/compromised SSH servers to browse the internet.
It's not about 100% accuracy because that's impossible to prove. However, when you combine all of the events and facts, it becomes obvious that you've pretty much being trolling as the phisher and now are like "wtf i didn't do that!" trying to not get banned. I would be willing to bet that whoever hacked this 'devin' person probably used a tor node that was used by hundreds of users here that day Read this line again. Random people who don't phish do not put "plenty of phish in the sea -pirateat40" and ask for a "GONE PHISHING" sign. Actually I remember you trying to sell me the bitcointalk.org secret question / answer vulnerability through coinchat that you used to compromise BitcoinOxygen. |
|
|
|
|
Ah, so on the same day a guy called "scotaloo" comes and spreads phishing links on various chat sites, compromises a few accounts including a domain name, tries to sells the mentioned domain name on bitcointalk using the same name "scotaloo", with a signature of 'plenty of phish in the sea -pirateat40', and asks someone to make a 'gone phishing' sign, and you claim you didn't phish? Also check for his sign into devinthedev bitcointalk account. And pretty sure my coinchat IPs match the ones you've signed in from bitcointalk.
This evidence is something that will definitely pass in civil courts.
|
|
|
|
|
This is like buying a PMB and complaining that you lost money. It's not really cloudhashing's fault, you made a bad investment.
|
|
|
|
|
Correction: your account has not posted any phishing links through bitcointalk, but you as a person has posted phishing links - especially you own bitcoin - talk.org
|
|
|
|
Also, During times when no alt-coins are more profitable than Bitcoin, the mining power can easily be moved to mine Bitcoin instead. Yes, because GPU mining Bitcoin is the way to go. |
|
|
|
|
In reality, he probably mixed the coins through a shared wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
Of course, that's assuming ECDSA, SHA256, and RIPEMD-160 aren't broken.
|
|
|
|
On the main betting page, the betting ID's are not one after another but jump ahead.
22716535
22716523
22716492
Does this mean the main betting page is only showing a small section of all the current real-time bets?
Yes. I'm guessing it's a combination of selective sending as well as marking the message as volatile. |
|
|
|
|
You probably should fix this 0.988 % Payouts - should be 98.8% unless you actually mean less than one percent goes back to playeres.
|
|
|
|
Although it must of prime important to make sure that no hacker is able to crack the gambling code to win thousands on bitcoins in a short amount of time.
Even if they were, the hot pocket would be quickly empty |
|
|
|
|
Besides, the more specialized hardware has to be to complete, the harder it will be for an attacker to use off the shelf hardware to attack the network. ASICs are good.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah because Bitcoin surviving or not is determined by fluctuations in BTCUSD. Yeah.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
