Regarding the year, is there any milelage in counting backwards to when no more Bitcoins will be produced? So this year will be 2140-2013 = 127. Or you could express it as 'T-127' Next year T-126, and so on.

It would add a conversation piece, which has real value, as it happens to be a fundamental truth/fact.

Wallet/Security ?

! Stunned into silence 

Something to do with 'this new trading thing'. Meaning, theres many new entrants who have just discovered trading, small and large size alike.
Doing what you describe is exactly what they do.

Nicely done. I like that.

Those were the days, eh?...."yer got a couple ov bob on yer, cock?" !

Speaking of Clarkmoody, is he getting enough tips/donations and recognition, ladies and gentlemen?

Depends what the perception would be when you look at the coin, between 'Phys' or 'Fizz', i guess.

And the more i say it out loud, the more i like it.....
 
"Ere Dave, you gotta couple of Phys, mate?" or "Thank you sir, thats 2 Physcoin change. Have a nice day".


Edit: How about 'Crypts' ?

I actually posted elsewhere that no one would challenge the Casascius brand, anytime soon. Looks like i may have to retract that at some stage!

I like 'Physcoin', and 'Bloccoin'

I would order 10.

The discussion clearly shows the large grey space Bitcoin exists in, within the context of HMRC currently, what ever way you shake it.

Consider their stance for a minute. All of a sudden, they are getting inquires about this new-fangled crypto bit thingamajig somefingorother. They will make initial judgements based on their existing framework, and tables, flow diagrams etc. Without doubt, an invitation to produce whatever result you wish, depending on who you speak to. So what if you tried to escalate your inquiry to the decision makers? Are they going to commit to a defined process concerning the treatment of bitcoin for income/tax/CGT etc? And are they going to do that soon? Cant see it yet, personally.

So, is it not up to businesses that have bitcoin at the core of their trade, to decide how they declare bitcoin on their EOY accounts. Moreover, wouldnt it be logical for HMRC to sit back, wait to see how businesses declare bitcoin, monitor and number crunch its effect and consequence etc etc, and over time, take a defined stance?

Point being, its too soon to specifically define its tax route. How many returns in the last tax year shows a meaningful declaration of £BTC? Hardly any i would have thought?? So for now, its up to us/business to take their choice of the current recognized route i.e. if its 'money', its VAT exempt, but more costs associated with FSA issues, if its a commodity, it attracts VAT, and how income tax, can or cant be off-set, etc etc.
Basically, take your choice. Not ideal i know, but at least you are declaring something, and if and when HMRC want to argue your returns, they are then, setting the precedent.  

  

Are narcissists allowed to go on the joke thread?

Hmmmmm !?

Echo                                                                                                                                  Echo

Not when its derived from an ever changing order book, no.

After that, im looking at $190 as resistance.

Im struck by the amount of support shown on the order book, in the last few days. And for the record, the levels of next support and resistance, i am looking at, are $90 and $190 respectively.

Why will it be frozen?

$50? Tis a shallow world sometimes.

I might agree with that if we are talking £1000s maybe, but risking an accusation of fraudulent claims about your Paypal account for smaller amounts sounds like a stupid thing to risk.

Ive communicated with Paypal regarding Bitcoin. They did not state any ban on bitcoins, they stated that as it is not physical goods, they will not give seller protection. In other words, go ahead, but dont come crying.
At least my way makes them work for their fees!