Just like it's not possible to send ANYTHING of value over a wire from a house, to a car, to land, to a turkey sandwich.  Not being able to be sent over a wire is basically a requirement of something having value.

Trollgoossens, you ready for $500 silver $0 Bitcoin?  If you don't own any, looks like the opportunity to get some is about to close.  Even if you assume 99% of the entire planet is too stupid or broke to buy silver, that leaves only about 30 oz each for the other 1%.

Yea, because building a giant tokamak for billions of dollars and it's billions of dollars of operational costs cost nothing at all.  Positive energy output fusion can be a resounding net negative in this regard, but even this has not happend yet unless the navy, seemingly hoax patents are real.  Even then, it takes a lot more energy to 'create' matter than to tip a domino to release energy from a metastable state.  For physical metals to be redundant, you would need not only positive energy output, but literal free energy with virtually no overhead to the point where it would be a post-scarcity civilization.

Toknormal, your post is utterly nonsensical pretending the "BTC dominance" metric is somehow a tradable variable like the gold to silver ratio.  It's a completely meaningless metric because you can have coins with a supposed billion dollar market cap propped up by only a $1 buy side.  There can be $10 billion market cap JayJuanGee coins that he owns all of them with no buyers whatsoever, and they're everywhere.  

Since Bitcoin is not a real commodity or resource, Bitcoin itself can turn into this at any second with lots of 'hodlers' but absolutely nobody interested in giving up their labor or resources for any imaginary, valueless timestamps.  So, no, BTC dominance is not a relevant or tradable metric for anything.

As with most Toknormal posts, leaving out the real relevant facts.  The only reason BTC requires an altmarket is because mining is designed to centralize through non-commodity hardware.  So the alt market's fleeting pump and dump coins with newer or different proprietary mining systems offer a window into Bitcoin for the outside world.  However, we've already had the Cambrian explosion of altcoins, and they all pretty much centralize too, and the general public is not really interested in them anymore.  So the general public then has no stepping stone to be involved in BTC either and the greater fools dry up.

The chart is a perfect example of you people, seeing as how in the Bitcoin developer channels, there's virtually nobody who believes Bitcoin is too big to fail and when some big price implosion happens, you even see people question if sha256d was broken or something.  So everyone knows it's all built on a shaky ground of bullshit that can implode or be blackswaned to nothing at any second.  

Yes, sha256d is supposedly 'secure' today, but it won't be sometime tomorrow, and if it's required to have a 24/7 on-call Best Buy tech support team to constantly micromanage this nonsense and constantly alter even the bedrock foundations of which it's built on, it's obviously a Keynesian bullshit scam, unlike physical metals.  Metals do not require Best Buy Geek Squad to constantly tamper with them in an attempt to prevent them from imploding.

Day two of Secret Labs Titan $400 chair.

Flat leather with no indented or raised pattern is HOT.  Probably will buy some sort of cloth seat cover in an attempt to avoid this.  If you live in a cold climate, you could just turn down your heater and it wouldn't be an issue.  Also causes back to be hot, but using lumbar support cushion, removes the problem.     As for the other issues of the chair, the seat is a bit softer towards the front and a bit firmer towards the back, so using the lumbar pillow pushes you forward some making the chair more comfortable.

As I stated before, the lumbar pillow on these things are not comfortable, though.  I've isolated the problem being due to the edges on the side of the memory foam pillow curving outwards which causes them to poke into your kidneys.  So as you can see, 99% of the issues with this chair revolve entirely around the lumbar cushion.  I will probably attempt to perform surgery on the foam to make it flat instead of curving outwards to fix these issues.  It's difficult to see in the picture, but those raised edges on the sides stick right into your kidneys:

Have you noticed that every single one of these articles hints that in the future mining will be a highly regulated venture, almost like creating food products (FDA).  So you'll have to pony up tens of thousands of dollars in regulatory certificates, lawyer fees, and all kinds of other nonsense to be 'allowed' to even mine at all?  Then of course, they'll also require you to AML/KYC transactions.  In other words, non-fungible, digital shitcoins were always nothing but a tool to empower the state.

Transaction validators/block producers are already designed to centralize without government involvement.  Then add on enormous regulation to push out any newcomers or small miners, and it turns to total shit monopoly and just a tool for the state to track and control cattle in real-time in a permissioned ledger.

Yep, there was some actual organic movement back then in 2013-2015, but now just about every movement whether up or down is completely artificial like watching Comex gold markets.  Having said that, unlike gold, 90% of the time the manipulation is to the upside, then 10% fast, dramatic implosions.  Bitcoin now trades like absolutely nothing else beyond an artificial pump and dump scam.

Screw imagining what happens to Bitcoin, I'd be more worried that they're saving Brexit as the linchpin to implode the global economy back to the dark ages before the kikes flee to their New Zealand and Paraguay bunkers.

I see it as disturbing.  It's the equivalent of buying McDonalds stock then spending all day creating a bunch of golden arches to place all over your house.  Who does that?  This is how you can tell Bitcoin is a cargo cult of fools.  Bitcoin is WAY WAY fucking past any point of being a political statement now that it's endorsed by the Chinese communist party.  Want to make a political statement?  How about building something NOT endorsed by the Chinese communist party as a method of surveilling and controlling the population?  Or just buy a bar of physical silver since it does not function as a tool to empower the state like every non-fungible, crypto scam token does.

This forum feels like it assigns Lauda to just wander around deleting posts at random even if they're true.  Or are the kikes and Chinese communist party moderating the forum now and don't want their cashless society slavery system they're trying to scam the goyim into using instead of physical metals to go bust?  Virtually nobody actually believes Bitcoin will exist in the year 2090 for fucks sake.  

And only Chinese communist party members actually promote non-fungible, designed to centralize shitcoins, which are impossible to be anything other than a dystopian, permissioned ledger and control grid in the end to empower the state.  If people like Elwar were actually real 'libertardians' he would refuse to even use Bitcoin and attempt to use some half-ass mixed outputs coin instead.  And before some clown mentions it, opt-in mixing with a ghetto rigged Schnorr system is 100% useless because the state will just outlaw it and consider anyone attempting to mix a launderer.  Mixing has to be mandatory, not opt-in.

Hard to claim Bitcoin solves double spend when PoW doesn't solve rough consensus attack, so the thing is designed to be some everbranching bullshit of multiple forks:  Bitcoin 'Core', Bitcoin Cash, etc, and the same phenomenon everywhere else like Ethereum classic.   It also uses false premises like pretending anytime two chains exist with the same algo, one will somehow be terminally attacked and disappear into the void..except they don't.  

Shitcoins obviously have a counterfeiting problem.  If you have a counterfeiting problem, are double spends actually solved?  Not really, because like I said, the excess coins are not governed by longest chain.  Not to mention it being impossible to create a decentralized digital shitcoin in the first place because transaction validators are always designed to centralize.  But it's not really a counterfeiting problem.  Anything based on artificial scarcity is...destined to have no real scarcity since the act can be replicated in some manner.

Why is nobody attempting to fool the goyim into buying cashless society slavery system tokens instead of physical metals??? Where is last of the four cylinders when you need him?  Oh, there he is.

Gonna visit Trollgoossens, Last of the v8, and JayJuanGee's house and sing them all welfare carols for Christmas after silver $150-500 and Bitcoin $0.

I remember her.

Time for hodldreams of silver $150 Bitcoin $0 coming to a town near you:

It's interesting that Elon Musk says David Einhorn went from $15 billion to $5 billion in assets due to losses this year.  If you bought Bitcoin at the very top, JayJuanGee-style, you would only have lost half your money, or if you bought silver at the worst possible time this year you'd only be down 13%, with an eventual good payoff in the future anyways.  

These people dealing with billions of dollars in stocks truly have no greater fools to dump their Wework pump and dump scams on, so their shit just blows the fuck up for catastrophic loses.  But if you see a real rush to the exits in Bitcoin, it will be just as bad or worse.  If Bitcoin is suddenly viewed as a horrific investment with nobody seeing any upside potential anymore, it will be next to impossible to find people to baghold imaginary, valueless timestamps for $10,000.

Supposedly (who can really tell with these Jews), Peter Schiff manages capital for clients and claims to currently have lots of it in foreign stocks, and of course in metals also, but metals don't make up his entire shtick.  So I don't think he actually lives off literally selling gold bars to people.  What % is his 'hedge fund' - if that's what you want to call it - exposed to metals?  No idea.  Not sure if he's even publicly stated the number.  People who are more into stocks and bonds and less pro-metals like Michael Pento I think even claim you should have at least 30% of your money in metals nowadays, so I'd guess Peter Schiff would be somewhere in the 30-50% range.