In 2014 the forum was bragging about how many coins they were going to hodl and there were lots of people with 250 coins or so so I wouldnt say everyone is poor but they might skipping the lambo and getting a GTR or something.

Our young people are tired of getting impaled, dozens of times more often than getting shot, but we're not asking anyone to ban cars or alcohol.

Im not supposed to be a gentlemen. Im supposed to be like a ratchet kid or a fierce warrior. I dont want to wear suits and ties and shit.

Does anyone find that their clothing and demeanor does not yet match their new lifestyle and their confusing the hell out of everyone, security guards, etc.

If I were to just look at this chart without knowing that it was a logarithmic chart of bitcoin, then my first thought would be that it has just made sort of a weak J top and needs to reverse and go into a hard correction, like so:

Are we just drawing random lines on the chart again that dont connect with anything, in linear scale?

In other words is it a glade? Or is it a rally within the bigger glade thatll extend the larger glade and perhaps revisit $8K before the real crash?

Its just roach. Hes been with us the whole year.

Satoshi only has 77 coins and is quite unimaginative.

exactly

Shit how did btctalk know how many coins I had? Must be running some badass analytics.

Wait a minute... JayGuanGee: Politeness: 2280... hahahahahaha

Yes I remember when I bought at like $51 in 2013 right after about 30K of huge walls suddenly popped up at $50. Unfortunately I sold at $60. What a dumb move.

Do we look like realtors to you?

Lately the forum is full of speculators using the word 'pump' as a verb in the incorrect way. The word is often used with Bitcoin itself as the subject of the sentence rather than the predicate.

Example: "Bitcoin will pump past $10,000" (wrong)

In this sentence, Bitcoin is apparently pumping itself, which is impossible. This is not the correct usage of the verb. Nowhere in the dictionary will you find the word used this way.

In financial markets, the verb pump is often used in the context of a 'pump and dump'. In this case, pumping is a fraudulent act performed by a malevolent entity. Is this what you guys mean? Even if so, the way you are using the word is still wrong. You have to specify that subject I.E. WHO is doing the pumping.

Example: "Bulls will pump Bitcoin past $10,000" (correct)

Things don't pump themselves. Something ELSE has to do the pumping.

On that other hand, as I suspect, you may be using the word pump as a synonym for the word 'rise'. These words are not really synonyms. So if your intent is to say that bitcoin will rise, you should simply use the word rise.

Example: "Bitcoin will rise past $10,000" (correct)

The level of bullishness in this thread is bizarre and concerning since I normally factor in a reverse sentiment indicator.

Anyone seen the preview for Pandas?

I dont care what BTC does right now. I just want ETH to die and its following BTC.

All the veteran bulls still playing it cool like..

Do bears get any memes? Bulls have trains and rockets. What do bears have - dump trucks?